Smith Encourages Nebraskans to Submit Comments as USTR Opens Public Consultation on USMCA Review

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Adrian Smith (R-NE)

Washington, D.C. – Today Representative Adrian Smith (R-NE) released the following statement after the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), as directed by Congress, announced the beginning of a 45-day public comment period in advance of the 2026 Joint Review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). 

“As we near the six-year review of USMCA, it is important for Nebraskans to share their perspectives on the agreement’s successes and potential improvements.  When negotiated in 2018, USMCA set a new standard for market access, science-driven standards, and effective enforcement. Feedback from the American people is an essential component to strengthen our shared economic security and ensure the full benefits of the agreement are realized by producers and consumers.” 

The deadline for submitting comments is November 3, 2025. USTR also invites the public to express interest in participating in a public hearing on this topic. To submit a comment or request to participate in the hearing, click here

### 

REPS. BISHOP & KIGGANS INTRODUCE BILL TO IMPROVE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Sanford D Bishop Jr (GA-02)

WASHINGTON – Today, Congressman Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. (GA-02) joined Congresswoman Jen Kiggans (VA-02) to introduce the Military Housing Performance Insight Act. This bipartisan bill would help make Congressional reports publicly available regarding the Military Housing Privatization Initiative, a series of reforms and authorities granted to the Defense Department to privatize military family housing located on military installations.

“Our military families deserve safe, good-quality housing. When deplorable conditions are brought to our attention, Congress must hold those who provide this housing accountable. I introduced this bill so that reports that track the conditions of military family housing are public. Transparency builds public trust in our efforts to address shortcomings and ensures we do our best for those who sacrifice and serve our country,” said Congressman Bishop. “I am proud to lead this bill with Congresswoman Kiggans which helps fulfill the mission of the Congressional Military Family Caucus we lead.”

“Military families are the backbone of our national defense, and they deserve the very best when it comes to their housing and quality of life,” said Congresswoman Kiggans. “This bipartisan bill strengthens transparency and ensures families have confidence in the homes they live in. I’m grateful to partner with Congressman Bishop on this effort to support the men and women who serve our country and their loved ones.”

Congressional reports on the Military Housing Privatization Initiative provide metrics such as:

  • An assessment of the conditions of all on-post family housing projects, including the age of housing units, any backlogs of maintenance, and housing modernization timelines.
  • An assessment of customer satisfaction at each project location, including the results of no-notice inspections and resident surveys conducted.
  • A summary of data relating to the presence of lead-based paint in housing units.
  • Information regarding the financial health of each MHPI project.
  • An assessment of utility costs for housing units compared to utility costs in the surrounding areas.

This bill also adds new reporting requirements, including an overview of data used and collected by the services about the quality of their Military Housing Privatization Initiative projects, an assessment of how the services are using that data to inform housing decisions, and any limitations of existing data.

The full text of the legislation can be found here.

Congressman Bishop and Congresswoman Kiggans are co-chairs of the bipartisan Congressional Military Family Caucus.

They hosted the 2025 Military Family Summit, a forum that brought together service members, their families, veterans, military family and veteran serving organizations, as well as Defense Department and Veterans Affairs Department officials.

The annual summit highlights challenges that military families face and is intended to inspire policy solutions, as well as legislation that can help improve their quality of life, such as the Military Housing Performance Insight Act. This year’s event was held on August 27 at the National Infantry Museum and Soldier Center in Columbus, Georgia.

You can learn more about the Congressional Military Family Caucus at https://bishop.house.gov/CongressionalMilitaryFamilyCaucus.

###

The Truth About Trump’s Tax Bill—and Your Social Security

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative James E (Jim) Clyburn (6th District of South Carolina)

Friends—

You may have seen an email from the Social Security Administration (SSA) claiming that Trump’s new tax and spending bill eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most seniors.

Here are the facts: The bill Republicans recently passed and Trump signed into law does not eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits. Instead, it introduces a temporary, income-based standard deduction for people over 65—regardless of income type.

But more than half of Social Security recipients—low-income retirees, disabled workers, survivors—already pay no federal income tax on their benefits and thus will not benefit from this new deduction.

Additionally, this policy will accelerate the depletion of the Social Security Trust Fund, putting Social Security even further at risk of insolvency for everyone.

But put aside the misleading information.

More importantly, overall, policies in this bill are going to hurt everyday Americans and families.

Just take health care, for instance.

Trump’s bill makes the largest ever cut to Medicaid, and over 17 million people will lose their health care coverage in the coming years, including nearly 300,000 South Carolinians.

Millions more who receive coverage through the Affordable Care Act will see their premiums increase by hundreds.

In addition to health care cuts, this bill cuts some or all SNAP benefits for 22.5 million families, including nearly 300,000 families in South Carolina alone.

And on top of all this, Trump’s bill gives so many tax breaks to the wealthy that it adds an estimated $3.4 trillion to the debt and $700 billion in interest costs over a decade. This will hike interest costs on mortgages and car loans.

Study after study shows that this bill hurts the working class while making the wealthy even richer.

Households making less than $55,000 a year will see their incomes decrease as a result of this legislation. Meanwhile, the richest 1% of Americans will see nearly a trillion dollars in tax cuts, with an average tax break of $309,000.

The right can claim they are lowering costs for everyday Americans all they want.

But the facts are the facts: Trump and Republicans’ “Big Ugly Bill” betrays the American people.

Sincerely,

Jim

Trump Promised Epstein’s Client List. Now His DOJ Says It Doesn’t Exist.

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative James E (Jim) Clyburn (6th District of South Carolina)

Back in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi stated on Fox News that the “client list” was sitting on her desk and being reviewed, and that it was a direct order from President Trump.

But earlier this month, Trump’s Department of Justice said that no client list existed, walking back Bondi’s statements.

Yes, that’s right: Pam Bondi was directed by Trump to review the Epstein files. Now Trump’s Department of Justice says they don’t exist.

Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that the DOJ briefed Trump that his name was among many high-profile figures listed in the Epstein files.

However, President Trump now claims that the DOJ never informed him—and further alleges that his name was planted in the files, even while admitting he and Epstein clashed about one of the victims who had worked at Mar-a-Lago.

The American people deserve to know the truth about Jeffrey Epstein and his inner circle.

Last week, House Democrats forced votes to subpoena the DOJ for the release of the Epstein Files—which may explain the crimes of convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and identify his accomplices.

But House Republicans voted to effectively block a debate on whether or not the Department of Justice should release the files. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson then canceled votes and sent Congress home early.

No one in the government should be trying to keep the facts on these child predators hidden. Congress must pursue the truth.

Sincerely,

Jim

Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” Steals from the Poor, Gives to the Rich

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative James E (Jim) Clyburn (6th District of South Carolina)

Friends—

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO)—the nonpartisan entity that has scored legislation in Congress for both parties for decades—just released a new analysis detailing the impacts of Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” which he signed into law on July 4.

The report concluded: “In general, resources will decrease for households toward the bottom of the income distribution, whereas resources will increase for households in the middle and toward the top.”

Yep, that’s right.

Trump’s bill will make the poor poorer and the rich richer.

But it’s not just the CBO saying this.

Study after study shows that Trump’s bill makes everyday Americans worse off while giving massive tax breaks to the wealthy.

The Institute of Taxation and Economic Policy estimates that in 2026, South Carolina’s wealthiest 1%—those making over $782,500 a year—will receive an average tax cut of $68,260, while the lowest-income residents, earning under $23,200, will face an average tax increase of $30, in addition to steep cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.

And if stealing from the poor and giving to the rich isn’t bad enough, Trump’s bill will add $3.4 trillion to the debt over 10 years and cost taxpayers $700 billion in additional interest payments on that debt over the next decade.

That means not only more interest on the national debt, but also higher interest rates for car loans and mortgages.

Trump’s claimed you’ll get a historic tax cut from this bill. He’s claimed this bill will “fuel prosperity” for all.

But my fellow South Carolinians, the facts are the facts: This law makes America’s poor poorer, rich richer, and saddles everyone— even our children and grandchildren—with insurmountable debt and a higher cost of living.

Trump’s policies have done nothing but push the American dream further out of reach.

The Republican Party once claimed to be the party of “fiscal responsibility.”

This bill is nothing but fiscal irresponsibility, and we are all going to pay the price—especially Americans who have already been left behind.

All of my Democratic colleagues and I in Congress voted against this cruel bill, and we will do everything in our power to repeal its harmful policies.

Sincerely,

Jim

Government Shutdown Threat. Epstein Cover-Up. We’re Fighting Back.

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative James E (Jim) Clyburn (6th District of South Carolina)

Friends—

Congress is back in session, and I’m back in Washington, D.C.

And once again, House Republicans’ policies are steering us in the wrong direction.

We are less than a month away from a potential government shutdown. Conservatives are doubling down on a funding level that would gut programs everyday Americans rely on. This is on top of the cuts they already rammed through in Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill.”

And now, in an unprecedented move, the White House has announced it will try to unilaterally cut funding for programs that Congress has already approved. The Constitution gives Congress the “power of the purse.” So it’s no surprise that even some Senate Republicans are calling this unconstitutional.

So let’s be clear about what’s going on here: Conservatives want us to vote for a funding bill—one that further slashes funding for health care and education—and then allow them to go back and erase the parts they don’t like?

I don’t think so.

On the Appropriations Committee, I’m fighting to stop these reckless cuts because Trump’s policies are already doing enough damage to our economy.

In just the past month:

How does any of this help working Americans?

Firing civil servants for doing their jobs? Launching trade wars that are raising prices? Who asked for this?

And meanwhile, there’s something else conservatives clearly hope we forget about: the Epstein files.

Well, we haven’t forgotten.

I join my colleagues in Congress in demanding the Trump administration release the full Epstein files.

We know Trump’s Attorney General, Pam Bondi, said there was a client list on her deskthen denied it existed—then briefed Trump that his name was in the files.

Additionally, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released photos of a birthday card provided by Jeffrey Epstein’s estate in which Trump allegedly wrote lewd messages. We also learned that some victims worked at Mar-a-Lago.

And last week, as nearly a dozen victims of Epstein’s heinous crimes stood outside the Capitol Building demanding the White House release the Epstein files, Trump said “It’s really a Democrat hoax, because they’re trying to get people to talk about something that’s totally irrelevant to the success we’ve had as a nation since I’ve been president.”

The release of the Epstein files isn’t about politics. It’s not about Republicans or Democrats.

It’s about the sexual abuse and trafficking of children.

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ran the operation—but their clients, the powerful people who enabled and participated in that abuse, have escaped accountability for decades.

Trump recently said “We’re going in. I didn’t say when, we’re going in” in response to questions about the deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago. A court just found that his deployment of the Guard in California was illegal.

Meanwhile, my Democratic colleagues and I will remain focused on holding perpetrators of all kinds of crimes accountable.

The victims deserve justice, and the American people deserve the truth. They deserve a government dedicated to their interests, not the interests of the president.

Sincerely,

Jim

Quigley Joins IL Democratic Delegation in Support of EPA’s Endangerment Finding

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Quigley (IL-05)

U.S. Congressman Mike Quigley (IL-05) joined Congressman Sean Casten 9il-06) and all Democratic members of the Illinois Congressional delegation in a letter to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin in support of EPA’s Endangerment Finding, which is foundational to EPA regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

“We are writing to express our deep concern over the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (US EPA) proposal to eliminate the Endangerment Finding and what that will mean for the health and safety of our constituents in Illinois,” the lawmakers wrote. “While coastal hurricanes and western wildfires may draw more national attention, climate change is increasing the number and severity of extreme weather events in the Midwest as well. In 2024 alone, Illinois experienced twelve extreme weather events which caused $1 billion or more in damages in Illinois and neighboring states, with a toll of at least 129 lives.”

In its landmark 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court ruled that GHGs are air pollutants subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act. The Court further held that the Clean Air Act requires EPA to curb pollutants that it determines endanger public health and welfare by contributing to climate change.

In 2009, EPA conducted a thorough examination of the scientific evidence and found that GHGs endanger the public health and welfare of Americans, basing this finding on the overwhelming scientific consensus reached by decades of peer-reviewed research. The 2009 rule also included the determination that GHG emissions from motor vehicles “contribute” to the dangerous buildup of climate pollution in the atmosphere. The two findings – endangerment and contribution – provided the legal mandate for the EPA to issue GHG emission standards for vehicles in 2010 under the Clean Air Act.

In July 2025, Administrator Zeldin released the agency’s proposal to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding, which would end EPA’s ability to regulate GHG emissions.

In addition to Reps. Quigley and Casten, the letter was signed by U.S. Senators Dick Durbin and Tammy Duckworth and Representatives Nikki Budzinski, Danny Davis, Bill Foster, Jesús “Chuy” García, Jonathan Jackson, Robin Kelly, Raja Krishnamoorthi, Delia Ramirez, Jan Schakowsky, Brad Schneider, Eric Sorensen, and Lauren Underwood.

Text of the letter can be found below. A copy of the letter can be found here.

Dear Administrator Zeldin:

We are writing to express our deep concern over the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (US EPA) proposal to eliminate the Endangerment Finding and what that will mean for the health and safety of our constituents in Illinois.

The Endangerment Finding, promulgated in 2009 under the Clean Air Act, requires the US EPA to protect people from the pollution that causes climate change and its impacts. This administration’s denial of the overwhelming scientific consensus, reached through decades of peer-reviewed research, does not change the facts: pollution from fossil fuels is trapping more of the sun’s energy in the atmosphere, heating our planet, increasing the frequency and intensity of extreme weather disasters, and thereby endangering every American – especially the most vulnerable among us.

While coastal hurricanes and western wildfires may draw more national attention, climate change is increasing the number and severity of extreme weather events in the Midwest as well. In 2024 alone, Illinois experienced twelve extreme weather events which caused $1 billion or more in damages in Illinois and neighboring states, with a toll of at least 129 lives.

Climate change is increasing the number and severity of extreme heat events, with the Chicago area far exceeding the average number of 90-degree days this year. Extreme heat is the number-one weather-related killer, a fact we well know after the 1995 heat wave, which caused 500 deaths in Chicago alone and hundreds more across the Midwest. As we learned then, extreme heat disproportionately harms vulnerable individuals, including children, the elderly, low-income households, those with pre-existing medical conditions, outdoor workers, and communities of color.

Climate change is making Illinois wetter, contributing to extreme rainfall and dangerous flooding. This summer, in both July and August, Chicago and other parts of Illinois experienced flash flooding, which damaged infrastructure, including roads and houses.

Changing temperatures and weather patterns impact agriculture, which is so vital to Illinois’ economy. Heat, water stress, and extreme weather events are greatly damaging to crops; changing temperatures can have negative impacts on weed and pest distribution; and changing precipitation patterns and higher temperatures can have negative impacts on soil health.

Finally, climate change has negative impacts on Lake Michigan, among our most precious natural resources. Warmer temperatures, less ice cover, and extreme weather events are damaging the lake ecosystem, making algal blooms more likely, and worsening erosion, beach loss, and shoreline damage.

Rescinding the Endangerment Finding is part of the administration’s politically-driven scheme to undermine clean car and truck programs and roll back standards for global warming pollution from power plants, oil and gas operations, and more. It means giving polluters a free pass to pollute at the expense of families across the country. It means our constituents will face more climate chaos and, especially in communities already overburdened by pollution, greater health risks and higher medical costs. It even means that our constituents will pay more for energy, given the cheaper clean energy alternatives to fossil fuels that are currently available

We urge you to maintain the Endangerment Finding and, in general, do your job of protecting the health and welfare of Illinoisans and Americans all across the country.

Sincerely,

Congressman Harris Announces Millions in Federal Aviation Administration Grants for Eastern Shore Airports

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Andy Harris (MD-01)

Washington, D.C. – Today, Congressman Andy Harris, M.D. (MD-01) announced two Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grants to support safety and infrastructure upgrades at airports in Maryland’s First Congressional District.

Easton/Newnam Field will receive $8,713,751 to continue a multi-year project that expands the safety zone at the end of its main runway, improving safety for takeoffs and landings. Ocean City Municipal Airport will receive $7,969,413 to replace worn pavement on Taxiway A, which is the main taxiway connecting planes to the runway. This grant is the next step in a larger project to fully reconstruct the 3,850-foot taxiway.

Statement from Congressman Harris: 

“These grants for Easton/Newnam Field and Ocean City Municipal Airport will create construction jobs and improve transportation for employers and constituents across the district. I applaud the FAA for their continued investment in our local airports.”

For media inquiries, please contact Anna Adamian at Anna.A@mail.house.gov

Congressman Harris Applauds Historic $50 Billion Rural Health Transformation Program

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Andy Harris (MD-01)

Washington, D.C. – Today, Congressman Andy Harris, M.D. (MD-01) applauded the launch of the new $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program, created under the Working Families Tax Cuts. This marks a historic step to invest in America’s rural communities.

The Rural Health Transformation Program invites all 50 states to apply for funding to address each state’s specific rural health challenges. The $50 billion program funding will be allocated to approved states over five years, with $10 billion available each year beginning in federal fiscal year 2026.

The Program has five strategic goals, grounded in the statutorily approved uses of funds:

  • Make rural America healthy again: Support rural health innovations and new access points to promote preventative health and address root causes of diseases.
  • Sustainable access: Help rural providers become long-term access points for care by improving efficiency and sustainability.
  • Workforce development: Attract and retain a highly skilled health care workforce by strengthening recruitment and retention of health care providers in rural communities.
  • Innovative care: Spark the growth of innovative care models to improve health outcomes, coordinate care, and promote flexible care arrangements.
  • Tech innovation: Foster use of innovative technologies that promote efficient care delivery, data security, and access to digital health tools by rural facilities, providers, and patients.

States must submit applications by November 5, 2025.

For more information, please visit a dedicated webpage here: Rural Health Transformation (RHT) Program | CMS

Statement from Congressman Harris: 

“Thanks to the Working Families Tax Cuts, we are delivering an unprecedented investment in rural health care. As a physician, I know how vital rural hospitals and clinics are to my constituents in Maryland’s First District. This program will foster innovation, expand the health care workforce, and ensure quality care is available close to home.”

McGovern, Malliotakis Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Address Link Between Diet and Chronic Disease

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jim McGovern (D-MA)

WASHINGTON—Today, a bipartisan, bicameral group of lawmakers led in the House by Ranking Member of the Rules Committee James P. McGovern (D-MA) and Representative Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), introduced the Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Demonstration Pilot Act, legislation that would help people overcome chronic illnesses through the power of nutritious food. A companion bill in the Senate was introduced by Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Roger Marshall (R-KS).

**Full Bill Text Here (PDF)**

The nationwide pilot program created by the bill would allow Medicare to help seniors with diet-impacted diseases get food that’s specifically tailored to healthier outcomes. Additional original cosponsors include Representatives Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Dwight Evans (D-PA) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Senators Tina Smith (D-MN) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA).

“Democrats and Republicans can agree on this simple truth: food is medicine,” said Representative McGovern. “No senior should have to face chronic illness without the basic nutrition they need. Investing in medically tailored meals will reduce hospital readmissions, improve health outcomes, and save taxpayers money. By connecting health care and nutrition, we can improve lives, strengthen communities, and build a fairer, healthier future for all.”

“The large majority of seniors 60 years of age and up are living with one or more chronic health conditions that can limit their ability to shop or cook for themselves,” said Representative Malliotakis. “By establishing a Medicare-covered pilot program to deliver nutritious and medically tailored meals to homes, we can provide our vulnerable seniors with peace of mind, improve their overall health and lower their healthcare costs by reducing their hospital readmission rates.”

“Nutritious food is foundational to good health, and medically tailored meals have consistently proven to reduce hospitalizations, improve outcomes, and lower health care costs. With more than half of older Americans living with one or more chronic conditions, Medicare must meet patients where they are by supporting interventions that work,” said Representative Pingree. “Delivering meals designed for specific medical needs is a commonsense, compassionate approach that strengthens Medicare while giving patients the tools to live healthier, more independent lives. As cofounder of the bipartisan Food is Medicine Working Group, I’m proud to cosponsor this legislation with Reps. McGovern and Malliotakis to demonstrate the transformative impact of food as medicine.”

“Food is medicine, and for many seniors, medically tailored meals are the difference between recovery and relapse,” said Representative Fitzpatrick. “This bipartisan legislation brings together community expertise, federal support, and decades of evidence to do something transformative—improve health outcomes, reduce costly hospital readmissions, and strengthen the safety net for our most vulnerable neighbors. By partnering Medicare with local providers to deliver these meals, we are proving compassion and fiscal responsibility can work hand-in-hand to build a stronger, more resilient health care system for our seniors.”

“I have long said that food is medicine, and this bill would use that principle to help fill a serious gap for many vulnerable seniors,” said Representative Evans.

“As longtime advocates for policy initiatives that address the connection between nutrition and health, FIMC is deeply appreciative of Representatives McGovern, Malliotakis, Pingree, Fitzpatrick and Evans and Senators Booker, Marshall, Cassidy and Smith for their introduction of the Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Pilot Act. This program will not only address the gap in access to medically tailored meals for older Americans and people with disabilities, but it will provide the data we need to make our health care system more efficient and patient-centered. We look forward to working with these bipartisan champions, the Administration, and legislators on both sides of the aisle to advance this important bill,” said Alissa Wassung, Executive Director of the Food is Medicine Coalition.

How Would Medically Tailored Meals Save Taxpayer Money?

About 93% of seniors have at least one chronic condition and nearly 80% have two or more chronic conditions. A growing body of research suggests that MTMs are a patient-centered and cost-effective way to provide care to our seniors. A recent study from the Food is Medicine Institute at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, for example, found that expanding the use of MTMs could save approximately $23.7 billion in health care costs each year – as well as improve health outcomes by preventing 2.6 million hospitalizations yearly.

What Does The Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Demonstration Pilot Act Do?

The bill creates a 6-year nationwide Medicare pilot to provide Medically Tailored Meals (MTMs) to seniors with diet-related diseases like heart disease, diabetes, or COPD. Forty hospitals will participate, with priority for rural and underserved areas. Each must partner with a community MTM organization to deliver two meals a day for at least 12 weeks. MTMs are designed by Registered Dietitians to meet the specific medical needs of each patient. The program will test different payment and delivery models—especially in rural areas—and will be evaluated for its impact on hospital readmissions, costs, and health outcomes.

How Are Medically Tailored Meals different From Meals On Wheels?

Unlike Meals on Wheels, MTMs are prescribed by a healthcare professional, created by registered dietitians, and customized to the patient’s medical needs. Seniors receiving MTMs also get ongoing nutrition counseling, education, and, if needed, medical nutrition therapy throughout the program.