Griffith Announces $883,097 HHS Grant to Virginia Tech

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Morgan Griffith (R-VA)

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has awarded Virginia Tech, based in Blacksburg, Virginia, a $883,097 grant. The funding supports research into drug use and addiction risk. U.S. Congressman Morgan Griffith (R-VA) issued the following statement:

“I support the delivery of knowledge, tools and resources to better inform local communities of the risks of substance use disorder and addiction.  

“This HHS grant for more than $880,000 helps Virginia Tech study risk factors that affect adolescents and provide relevant information for scientists and communities to consider.”

BACKGROUND

Congressman Griffith is chief House sponsor of the HALT Fentanyl Act, which President Trump signed into law in July 2025. This legislation permanently designates lethal fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I drugs.

Congressman Griffith also helped contribute to the SUPPORT Act, which President Trump signed into law in December 2025. Griffith is responsible for crafting Section 103 of the bill to reauthorize the prescription drug monitoring program.

The awarding office of this grant is the HHS National Institute on Drug Abuse.

As a member of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Congressman Griffith serves as the Chairman of the Health Subcommittee. 

###

Larsen Supports Completing Light Rail Spine from Everett to Tacoma

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Rick Larsen (2nd Congressional District Washington)

Yesterday, Representative Rick Larsen (WA-02) sent a letter to Sound Transit’s Board of Directors in support of completing the light rail regional spine from Everett to Tacoma:

“Completing the spine is critical to creating jobs, providing more affordable transportation options, expanding equitable access to transit and promoting regional connectivity,” said Rep. Larsen. “Doing so will help Sound Transit capitalize on the significant federal transit investments already made in our region.”

Rep. Larsen is the top Democrat on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. He helped pass the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law of 2021 (BIL), which invested $341.1 million into Sound Transit’s Lynnwood Link Extension, in addition to other historic investments in local infrastructure across the country. In total, the Lynnwood Link Extension project received $1.3 billion in federal funding, which Rep. Larsen helped secure.

“In the Pacific Northwest, transportation means jobs: workers need reliable ways to get to employment centers, students need access to education and training, families need affordable transportation options, and businesses need confidence that people and goods can move efficiently,” Rep. Larsen continued. “The Everett Link Extension will improve access to one of the region’s most important employment centers and industries.”

Last week, Rep. Larsen’s BUILD America 250 Act passed out of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. The bipartisan, five-year surface transportation reauthorization bill continues the historic investments started by the BIL, including $87.5 billion over five years to expand and improve transit networks across America.

Rep. Larsen’s full letter to the Sound Transit Board of Directors is available here and below.

May 27, 2026

Board of Directors
Sound Transit
401 S. Jackson Street
Seattle, WA, 98104

Dear Board of Directors:

I write in support of completing the light rail regional spine from Everett to Tacoma. Completing the spine is critical to creating jobs, providing more affordable transportation options, expanding equitable access to transit and promoting regional connectivity. Doing so will help Sound Transit capitalize on the significant federal transit investments already made in our region.

Reliable public transit is essential to a strong regional economy. In the Pacific Northwest, transportation means jobs: workers need reliable ways to get to employment centers, students need access to education and training, families need affordable transportation options, and businesses need confidence that people and goods can move efficiently. The Everett Link Extension will improve access to one of the region’s most important employment centers and industries. The SW Industrial Station will connect light rail to Paine Field for the first time, providing better transit access for workers in the aerospace industry. The Boeing Everett Factory alone employs more than 30,000 people, and more than 1,300 other aerospace-related businesses are located in Snohomish County. Light rail is a long-term investment in economic growth and the quality of life for communities across the Puget Sound region.

Completing the spine will help relieve congestion, support transit-oriented housing and job growth, reduce transportation costs for working families and build a cleaner, greener and more accessible transportation network. As the region continues to grow, light rail provides a reliable alternative to increasingly congested transportation corridors and helps connect communities that are underserved by high-capacity transit. Everett has the largest population of any city north of Seattle and is expected to grow significantly in the coming decades. The Puget Sound Regional Council designated Everett as one of five Metropolitan Cities, which together are expected to comprise 36% of the region’s population growth and 44% of its employment growth by 2050.

Bringing light rail to Everett Station will expand transit access for many communities throughout Snohomish County. Everett Station is a major transportation hub, serving more than 20 bus routes as well as regional transportation services. The 2024 opening of Lynnwood Link demonstrated the strong demand for light rail in Snohomish County. The Everett Link extension will build on that success and serve multiple Opportunity Zones along SR 526 and Broadway in Everett, where communities will benefit significantly from expanded light rail service.

Connecting Everett and Tacoma to the light rail network though completion of the spine is critical to the economic success of the region, equitable transit access and the future of a truly connected regional transportation system.

Sincerely,

Rick Larsen
U.S. Representative
Washington State, Second District

###

Evans, Dean Press for Answers, Transparency on Data Centers

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Dwight Evans (2nd District of Pennsylvania)

PHILADELPHIA (May 28, 2026) – U.S. Reps. Dwight Evans (D-PA-3) and Madeleine Dean (D-PA-4) are pressing federal electricity regulators for answers and transparency about data centers.

Today, Evans and Dean sent a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission seeking information on how the agency is overseeing the increased power demand from data centers, especially with respect to reliability of the electrical grid and costs that may be passed on to home consumers. They also requested information on how the Trump-Vance administration’s decision to cancel 223 clean-energy projects could impact transmission planning and delivering electricity to consumers due to changes in energy supply.

“We encourage FERC to continue providing transparency in its decisions on transmission and infrastructure policies as the demand to connect to the grid grows,” the lawmakers said. “As members who are increasingly concerned with affordability and grid reliability, we look forward to receiving your prompt responses.”

Evans and Dean requested responses by June 30.

The full text of the letter follows:

Dear Chairman Swett and Commissioners Rosner, LaCerte, See, and Chang: 

We write this letter expressing interest in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) plans to address domestic grid reliability, affordability, and future planning opportunities. This comes during a time when lawmakers are being asked to address real constraints in American energy markets and grid reliability. We encourage FERC to continue providing transparency in its decisions on transmission and infrastructure policies as the demand to connect to the grid grows.   

There is an increasing presence of data centers, and questions of how, when, and where they will connect to the grid. Our concerns about the future of data centers and their energy demand impacting interstate transmission capacity not only include realistic assessments of load interconnection projects that will be added to the grid but also fluctuating load cycles destabilizing the grid. This is in addition to concerns about the environmental impact, including air quality and water consumption, community input, long-term planning, and the inclusion of distributed energy resources (DERs) in any future buildout.

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) published [1] a Level 3 Essential Action Alert highlighting reliability concerns arising from new computational loads – such as data centers, artificial intelligence compute clusters, and cryptocurrency facilities – interacting with the bulk power system (BPS). The alert highlights 7 advisory actions that transmission planners, owners, coordinators, and operators should consider, and encourages their adoption to support reliability standards and address emerging challenges.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s lawmakers and policy leaders have also acted in recent weeks. Governor Josh Shapiro sent a letter [2] to utility companies describing the criteria his administration will consider justifiable in future rate-making cases. This was in addition to the governor stating that utilities should seek the most cost-effective forms of capital, provide plain and clear language in investment proposals with cost/benefit analyses and transparent data, and offer clear, justifiable equity returns. Separately, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives unanimously passed H.B. 2223 [3], which would require a utility to evaluate and consider integrating advanced transmission technologies (ATTs) before building costly new infrastructure.

Considering these actions, we have included questions that we would like a response to no later than June 30, 2026:

  1. Given that transmission costs can be passed through to customers, are there oversight or implementation issues that FERC has encountered with orders that encourage prior consideration and integration of ATTs and grid-enhancing technologies (GETs) to maximize cost-savings opportunities? Are there any existing FERC regulations that are biased against ATTs or GETs? Has FERC considered how developments in generation technologies, such as DERs and virtual power plants, could improve transmission utilization on the consumer side through improved real-time data sharing or reduce transmission congestion?
  2. Has FERC assessed the implications of NERC’s alert and the need to establish reliability standards to protect from new, large load connections on the BPS? To what extent is FERC considering using its authority to establish processes that would encourage transmission owners and operators to conduct reliability studies and gap assessments, enhance communication coordination to improve operational awareness, integrate technology to model BPS system failure impact depending on the stage/cycle of the computational load, and produce risk mitigation assessments with real-time response monitoring?
  3. The Department of Energy terminated 321 financial awards for 223 energy projects [4]. If transmission planning accounts for new supply plans over a 20-year cycle, and there are uncertainties and risks on the supply side with power plant development, has FERC considered the extent to which transmission planning directives from Order No. 1920 and 1920-A may be challenging? Additionally, there has been a change in commissioners since Order No. 1920 and 1920-A were approved. Given this change in leadership, how do you anticipate that these orders will address affordability concerns?

Thank you for your attention to this matter. As members who are increasingly concerned with affordability and grid reliability, we look forward to receiving your prompt responses.


[1] North American Electric Reliability Corporation. (2026, May 4). NERC issues level 3 alert, reliability guideline focused on large load challenges. https://www.nerc.com/newsroom/nerc-issues-level-3-alert-reliability-guideline-focused-on-large-load-challenges.

[2] Shapiro, J. (2026, April 29). Letter to utility leaders. Latitude Media. https://www.latitudemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2026.4.29-JDS-Utility-CEOs-letter-v2.pdf.

[3] House Bill 2223, 2025-2026 Session (2026). https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/text/PDF/2025/0/HB2223/PN3321.

[4] Department of Energy. (2025, October 1). Energy Department announces termination of 223 projects, saving over $7.5 billion.https://www.energy.gov/articles/energy-department-announces-termination-223-projects-saving-over-75-billion

 

###

Sánchez to DOJ: Are victims of ICE brutality eligible for Trump’s Anti-Weaponization Fund?

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (38th District of CA)

WASHINGTON – Congresswoman Linda T. Sánchez (D-Calif.) today called on acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to explain if victims of the Trump administration’s cruel and inhumane immigration enforcement tactics would be eligible to receive damages from the $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” established by the Department of Justice.

“This slush fund is a plainly illegal diversion of taxpayer funds,” Congresswoman Sánchez wrote. “However, you have stated that the fund exists to compensate ‘victims of lawfare and weaponization.’ The terms ‘lawfare’ and ‘weaponization’ are not defined in any state or federal statute. Instead, they are seemingly defined in the Settlement Agreement as the ‘sustained use of the levers of government power by Democrat elected officials, political and career federal employees, contractors, and agents in order to target individuals, groups, and entities for improper and unlawful political, personal, and/ or ideological reasons.’ That is a sweeping, politically-charged statement. I therefore ask whether the individuals in the following categories — whose grievances are documented, whose harms are real, and who in many cases have already prevailed in federal court — would be eligible to file claims for damages.”

The full text of the letter is available HERE and follows:

May 28, 2026

The Honorable Todd Blanche
Acting Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20520

Dear Mr. Blanche:

I write regarding the so-called “Anti-Weaponization Fund” newly established by the Department of Justice — the $1.776 billion fund created when President Trump dropped his lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service. 

This slush fund is a plainly illegal diversion of taxpayer funds. However, you have stated that the fund exists to compensate “victims of lawfare and weaponization.” The terms “lawfare” and “weaponization” are not defined in any state or federal statute. Instead, they are seemingly defined in the Settlement Agreement as the “sustained use of the levers of government power by Democrat elected officials, political and career federal employees, contractors, and agents in order to target individuals, groups, and entities for improper and unlawful political, personal, and/ or ideological reasons.” That is a sweeping, politically-charged statement. I therefore ask whether the individuals in the following categories — whose grievances are documented, whose harms are real, and who in many cases have already prevailed in federal court — would be eligible to file claims for damages:

Victims of unlawful ICE detention across the country. Federal judges have ruled against ICE detention practices in more than 10,000 cases — roughly 90 percent of all cases filed since the agency mandated universal detention. These are not allegations; they are judicial findings. Are these detainees eligible for damages?

The six people who died in California ICE detention centers. According to a 175-page report released by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, six people died in California immigration detention facilities over the past year, four at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center in San Bernardino County, where families allege the facility failed to provide adequate medical care. May these families apply for damages?

Detainees subjected to chemical agents at Adelanto. The same state report documents an incident in which guards deployed pepper spray in a confined room holding approximately 50 people. Are those 50 people eligible to file claims under the terms of the fund?

Women strip-searched in front of male officers at Otay Mesa, San Diego. State investigators found that the Otay Mesa Detention Center is the only California facility with a policy of strip-searching detainees after every non-lawyer visit. Women described the searches as “humiliating” and “denigrating,” including being searched in front of male officers while menstruating. Some detainees stopped receiving family visits entirely to avoid the practice. May these women file claims?

Detainees denied adequate medical care at California City. At the California City detention center — a former state prison converted to ICE detention center by the Trump administration — state investigators described “crisis-level” medical staffing, with only one physician available for nearly 1,000 detainees. May detainees submit their medical records showing the results of being denied proper medical care as evidence of their entitlement to compensation?

Cary López Alvarado, a nine-months-pregnant U.S. citizen from Hawthorne, California. She was illegally arrested by immigration agents during a raid, detained, and subsequently went into premature labor and was hospitalized. Is she entitled to a claim?

Residents and families of the El Rancho Unified School District, Pico Rivera, California — my own constituents. Last July, surveillance cameras captured ICE and Customs and Border Protection agents trespassing on a school campus in my district, urinating in a parking lot adjacent to a preschool playground, in broad daylight. May these children and their parents file individual claims, or may the school district? 

The administration’s own stated rationale would seem to encompass every one of them. And if the threshold for compensation is “victimhood at the hands of a federal agency,” these individuals — many of them U.S. citizens, many of them Californians, all of them subjected to documented and in some cases lethal, government misconduct — would seem to clear it far more easily than individuals convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers on January 6th.

I respectfully request a written response detailing the eligibility criteria for the Anti-Weaponization Fund, the process by which claims will be evaluated, and whether the categories of harm described above fall within scope.

Sincerely,

Linda T. Sánchez
Member of Congress

###

Congressman Harris Announces $852,366 HHS Award for West Cecil Health Center

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Andy Harris (MD-01)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman Andy Harris, M.D. (MD-01), announced that West Cecil Health Center in Conowingo, Maryland, received $852,366 through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Health Center Program to support patient care for rural communities across Cecil County and neighboring areas.

Statement from Congressman Harris:

“West Cecil Health Center is a critical healthcare provider for rural residents across northeastern Maryland, offering primary care, dental services, optometry, pharmacy services, and laboratory testing close to home. I applaud the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for this funding, which will help West Cecil Health Center keep up with growing demand for appointments and medical services throughout the region.”

For media inquiries, please contact Michella Carter at “>Michella.Carter@mail.house.gov

Congressman Al Green Releases Statement in Response to AIPAC’s X Post

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Al Green (TX-9)

(Houston, TX) — On Thursday, May 28, 2026, Congressman Al Green released the following statement:

“Afraid to come out during the election, AIPAC has finally reared its ugly head. Click here to read its insidious prevarication. I am not anti-Israel; I am anti-sending any more of hardworking American’s tax dollars to Israel. AIPAC, which has not denounced the genocide in Gaza, seems to perceive every person who denounces the slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent Palestinian men, women, and especially children under the leadership of Prime Minister Netanyahu as anti-Israel. Question for AIPAC: Why are so many candidates rejecting your once open and notorious contributions? Answer: You have become persona non grata. Shame on you for what you have condoned. Crawl back into your hole. Sincerely, your unbought, unbossed, unafraid, unelected, liberated Democrat – Al Green, The People’s Congressman.”

Rep. Cleaver Convenes Manufacturing Roundtable to Strengthen Workforce, Supply Chains, and Regional Competitiveness

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Emanuel Cleaver II (5th District Missouri)

(Kansas City, MO) – Today, U.S. Representative Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) joined Kansas City-area business leaders and industry stakeholders for a manufacturing roundtable to discuss the challenges and opportunities facing Missouri companies and identify strategies to strengthen the region’s economic competitiveness. This discussion comes amid continued instability in the nation’s manufacturing sector following the implementation of illegal tariff policies that have increased costs for small businesses, disrupted supply chains, and contributed to the loss of roughly 100,000 manufacturing jobs nationwide over the past year. Ongoing economic uncertainty and dysfunction emanating from the White House has made it increasingly difficult for manufacturers in Missouri and across the country to confidently plan and grow.

Hosted in partnership with Missouri Enterprise, the discussion brought together manufacturing leaders to examine workforce shortages, supply chain resilience, infrastructure investment, utility costs, automation and artificial intelligence adoption, and the long-term future of advanced manufacturing in the Kansas City region.

“Manufacturing built the middle class in communities like Kansas City, and it remains essential to our region’s economic future,” said Congressman Cleaver. “Today’s conversation made clear that if we want American manufacturing to continue growing and competing globally, we must invest in workers, modern infrastructure, workforce pipelines, and domestic supply chains. Those investments don’t just impact factory floors, they directly affect farmers, producers, and surrounding rural communities that rely on strong manufacturing and transportation networks to move products, control costs, and stay competitive. We cannot afford to leave small and mid-sized manufacturers behind as technology and global competition continue to evolve.”

During the discussion, participants highlighted ongoing labor shortages, rising utility and operating costs, and the need for stronger public-private partnerships to support workforce development and industrial growth. Participants also discussed the importance of maintaining reliable infrastructure and ensuring manufacturers already operating in the region are not disadvantaged by growing demands on energy and water resources.

Rep. Cleaver emphasized the importance of continued federal investment in domestic manufacturing, infrastructure modernization, and workforce development programs that create pathways to good-paying jobs without requiring a traditional four-year degree.

“The people building, welding, designing, transporting, and producing goods in our communities deserve policies that match the realities of today’s economy. That means listening directly to employers and workers, supporting innovation, and making sure federal policy helps create opportunity right here at home,” said Congressman Cleaver.

Photos from today’s event can be found here.

Emanuel Cleaver, II is the U.S. Representative for Missouri’s Fifth Congressional District, which includes Kansas City, Independence, Lee’s Summit, Raytown, Grandview, Sugar Creek, Greenwood, Blue Springs, North Kansas City, Gladstone, and Claycomo. He is a member of the exclusive House Financial Services Committee and Ranking Member of the House Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance. 

Stevens, Slotkin to Introduce Legislation to Ban Chinese Connected Vehicles from Driving Over the Border Unchecked

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Haley Stevens (MI-11)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Michigan Congresswoman Haley Stevens and U.S. Senator Elissa Slotkin announced the Protecting America from Chinese Cars Act at the Mackinac Policy Conference on Mackinac Island, MI. The bill prevents Chinese connected vehicles from entering the U.S., including through our neighbors to the north and south. This legislation is a significant step towards protecting our national security and the U.S. auto industry.

The Chinese auto industry is heavily subsidized by the Chinese Communist Party, allowing them to undercut competitors and quickly flood new markets. We’ve seen this process play out rapidly in Europe and South America. In Mexico, Chinese vehicles have quickly gained roughly 15% market share. In January 2026, Canada announced a trade deal with China that will see Canada dramatically reduce tariffs on tens of thousands of Chinese vehicles. The threat of connected vehicles from China is now at both of our backyards, to the North and South.

For years, Stevens has made protecting the United States from the national security and economic threats posed by Chinese connected vehicles a priority. Most recently, introduced the No Chinese Cars Act to protect American automakers and Michigan jobs. This legislation would grant the United States Trade Representative (USTR) the authority to expand existing 301 tariffs on Chinese auto exports to autos arriving in the United States from other countries if those autos: are produced by a firm from a country subject to existing tariffs; and, are produced by a firm from China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea. This legislation drew support from Michauto.

“The Chinese Communist Party should never have access to sensitive information about American drivers, roads, or critical infrastructure. The Protect America from Chinese Cars Act closes dangerous loopholes that currently allow Chinese connected vehicles to enter the United States through Canada and Mexico,” said Representative Stevens. “This bill is about staying laser focused on protecting American national security and standing up for Michigan autoworkers who build the best vehicles in the world.”

“This is an economic security issue and a national security issue, and we must prevent these vehicles from driving over our border and into our communities,” said Senator Slotkin. “They’re surveillance packages on wheels – fully capable of geolocating individual drivers, collecting full-motion video, and mapping sensitive infrastructure sites, including our military. This bill builds on my bipartisan Connected Vehicle Security Act of 2026 and bans fully finished Chinese vehicles from driving over in any capacity, even just for the day.”

The Protecting America from Chinese Cars Act would prevent connected vehicles from China and other adversarial nations from entering the U.S. through the following actions:

  1. Prohibits connected vehicles from China and other adversarial nations from entering the United States. This includes connected vehicles manufactured or designed in China, as well as vehicles manufactured by a Chinese company or an entity in which Chinese companies have a greater than 15% stake.
  2. Establishes a process by which vehicle manufacturers can apply for a specific authorization to allow otherwise prohibited vehicles to enter the U.S. Specific authorizations could only be granted under strict conditions, with both transparency and congressional oversight.
  3. Requires U.S. Customs and Border Protection to develop rules and procedures related to implementing these prohibitions, including a list of prohibited vehicles, within 90 days of the bill’s enactment.

Read the one-pager on the Protecting America from Chinese Cars Act here.

 

###

Pallone and Pou Commend State AGs World Cup Ticket Investigation

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Frank Pallone (6th District of New Jersey)

Earlier this month New Jersey lawmakers demanded answers from FIFA on Event Ticketing

WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ-06), the Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Congresswoman Nellie Pou (D-NJ-09), the Ranking Member of the House Homeland Security Task Force overseeing World Cup security, today commended the investigation into FIFA World Cup ticket sales announced by the Attorneys General of New Jersey and New York.

“Our inquiry to FIFA about event ticketing earlier this month included questions about FIFA’s potentially misleading seat category maps and how holdbacks are shaping demand of World Cup tickets,” said Pallone and Pou. “While we appreciate FIFA’s reply, answers to our questions were either incomplete or unsatisfactory. We support the announcement today by the Attorneys General of New Jersey and New York to ensure that ticket buyers’ allegations of fraud are fully investigated in a timely manner.”

FIFA’s ticket sales process for the World Cup has drawn criticism from fans over rising prices, confusing sales practices, and a lack of transparency. In response, Rep. Pou and Pallone wrote a letter on May 7, 2026, to FIFA demanding answers about World Cup ticket sales and how their policies and process impact prices for local fans.

ICYMI: Davids Warns U.S. Risks Falling Behind China Without Long-Term Infrastructure Investment

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Sharice Davids (KS-3)

Yesterday, Representative Sharice Davids published an opinion piece in the Washington Examiner highlighting the importance of long-term infrastructure investment to strengthen America’s competitiveness against China, support economic growth, and keep Kansas moving forward.

The piece comes after Davids voted last week in the U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee to advance a bipartisan, five-year surface transportation reauthorization bill investing in roads, bridges, transit, rail, and transportation safety programs. While the legislation does not include every Davids-supported provision, it would create good-paying jobs, strengthen supply chains, and improve the safe and efficient movement of people and goods.

Read the full piece in the Washington Examiner or below:

When most people think about infrastructure, they picture orange cones, traffic jams, and potholes. Trust me — I get frustrated by them, too. But as someone who proudly considers herself an infrastructure nerd, I also see something bigger: whether America is serious about competing for the future.

That’s especially true in Kansas.

Our state sits at the crossroads of the American economy. The roads, railways, bridges, broadband networks, and energy systems that run through Kansas help move crops to market, keep supply chains running, power manufacturers, and connect rural communities to opportunity. When those systems fail, the consequences ripple far beyond our state lines.

That’s why, since coming to Congress, I’ve made infrastructure one of my top priorities as a member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. I went to the White House to help negotiate the bipartisan infrastructure law, and I worked alongside colleagues from both parties to help write and pass it because I believed then — and still believe now — that America cannot afford to fall behind.

Make no mistake: we are in a global competition.

China is investing aggressively in transportation, logistics, ports, manufacturing capacity, and energy infrastructure because they understand something simple: economic strength depends on whether goods, people, and information can move quickly, safely, and efficiently.

America must understand that too.

The next surface transportation reauthorization bill is a test of whether Congress is willing to build on the progress we made through the bipartisan infrastructure law or retreat back into the cycle of short-term patches and political dysfunction that left our infrastructure lagging behind for years.

In Kansas, we are already seeing what long-term investment can accomplish.

The bipartisan infrastructure law is helping folks in Olathe replace aging lead pipes so families can trust the water coming from their taps.

It is strengthening the electric grid in central and western Kansas, helping reduce wildfire risks and expand access to affordable energy.

Communities from Wichita to Ottawa and Overland Park are improving road safety and preventing fatal crashes.

And expanded broadband infrastructure is helping connect rural and underserved communities to jobs, education, healthcare, and economic opportunity. 

These projects are not abstract political talking points. They create jobs. They help farmers and manufacturers move products more efficiently. They strengthen supply chains. They lower long-term costs. They provide stability. And they help make sure communities in Kansas can compete economically for decades to come.

That certainty matters.

Businesses do not invest based on two-year political fights. Manufacturers do not hire workers or expand facilities based on congressional chaos. States cannot responsibly plan major transportation projects while wondering whether Washington will pull the rug out from under them every few years.

That’s why the next transportation reauthorization bill matters so much — and why Congress can’t afford to delay it.

And frankly, Kansas understands this better than most places.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Kansan, created the interstate highway system because he understood infrastructure was about more than roads. It was about national strength, economic growth, mobility, security, and preparing America for the future.

That same mindset should guide us now.

And this should not be a partisan issue. The bipartisan infrastructure law proved that when Congress comes together and focuses on solving problems instead of scoring political points, we can still deliver real results for the American people.

Now we have an opportunity to keep building.

America cannot outcompete China with crumbling roads, aging freight systems, and outdated infrastructure. Kansas families, workers, farmers, and businesses deserve better than that. And if Congress is willing to stay focused on the future instead of the politics of the moment, we can get there.