Costa Leads California Delegation in Calling for Education Department to Restore Funding for Minority-Serving Institutions

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jim Costa Representing 16th District of California

WASHINGTON – U.S. Representative Jim Costa (CA-21), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (CA-18), Rep. Derek Tran (CA-45), and U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-CA) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) led the California Democratic Congressional Delegation in a letter strongly opposing the Department of Education’s decision to rescind $350 million in funding from Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs). The lawmakers also voiced their disappointment and disagreement with the Department of Justice’s July 25th determination that Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) apply “racial quotas” in a manner that is “unconstitutional,” especially since no court has found the MSI program unconstitutional or instructed the Department of Education to reprogram this funding. The signatories also warn the Department’s actions would disproportionately harm Californian students and weaken California’s—and America’s—long-term competitiveness.“To be clear, diverting resources away from these schools will disproportionately harm California students and students across the nation who depend on MSIs as the most accessible and affordable pathway to a degree,” wrote the lawmakers.“It would also weaken proven engines of upward mobility, deprive our workforce of diverse talent, and undercut the nation’s long-term competitiveness.”
“Rather than reallocate scarce dollars from MSIs to HBCUs and TCCUs, we urge you to allocate funding as intended by Congress to support all MSIs, HBCUs, and TCCUs. … Equitable sustained funding across the spectrum of MSIs, HBCUs, and TCCUs will ensure that more institutions can continue broadening opportunity, reducing inequities, and powering the American economy,” continued the lawmakers.“Our collective goal must be to invest in all students, no matter which institution they attend.” 
BACKGROUND   
There are over 800 federally recognized MSIs, including Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institutions (AANAPISIs), Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions (ANNHSIs), Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs), Native American Serving Non-Tribal Institutions (NASNTIs), and Predominantly Black Institutions (PBIs). MSIs enroll over five million students, many of whom are first-generation college students. These institutions rely on federal funding to provide vital supports and services for students to help them complete their degree. The Trump Administration’s decision to end funding for MSIs could threaten the institutions’ ability to adequately serve all the students they enroll.  
Earlier this year, Tennessee filed a lawsuit against the Department of Education to challenge the eligibility requirements necessary to receive a federal HSI designation. In July, the Department of Justice decided to not defend the constitutionality of the program in the ongoing litigation. Despite no ruling or court instructions, the Department of Education announcedduring HSI week on September 10th that it would end and reprogram $350 million in discretionary grants for HSIs and other MSIs. On October 10, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee allowed the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU) and LatinoJustice Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund (LatinoJustice PRLDEF) to intervene in the litigation, ensuring affected campuses can help defend the programs. 
California has the largest concentration of MSIs in the country. There are 170+ HSIs and 85 eligible AANAPISIs. In addition, MSIs enroll the majority of first-generation and low-income students in California and consistently demonstrate higher rates of economic mobility than non-MSI institutions. The Department of Education’s decision to reprogram funding from the MSI program undermines the ability of these universities to serve communities that have long been underrepresented in higher education. 
The full text of the letter is available HERE.

Costa, Ciscomani Launch Bipartisan Push to Make Crime Prevention a National Priority

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jim Costa Representing 16th District of California

WASHINGTON – U.S. Representatives Jim Costa (CA-21) and Juan Ciscomani (AZ-06), Co-Chairs of the Crime Survivors and Justice Caucus, today introduced a bipartisan resolution to designate October as National Crime Prevention Month, a nationwide effort to put prevention at the forefront of public safety. 
“Crime prevention is not partisan idea – it’s a promise we owe every American,”said Congressman Costa. “Safe communities don’t just happen by accident; they are built when neighbors, law enforcement, and leaders work together to stop crime before it starts. Declaring October as National Crime Prevention Month affirms prevention as the foundation of public safety – keeping kids out of gangs, protecting seniors in their homes, stopping scams and organized crime, and supporting victims. Every American family deserves peace of mind. That’s the future we’re fighting for, and it starts now.”
“Preventing and combatting crime in our communities is something every American deserves,” Congressman Ciscomani said.“This commonsense, bipartisan resolution acknowledges our support for every law enforcement officer, first responders, educators, community leaders and so many more. I’m proud to join my colleagues in honoring National Crime Prevention Month.”
BACKGROUND
The resolution underscores a simple truth: keeping families safe begins with preventing crime before it happens, and ensuring every community has the tools to build safer streets and strong neighborhoods. In short, prevention is action. It means:

Stopping violence before it starts – tackling the roots of crime before it turns deadly.
Keeping kids on the right path – steering young people away from gangs, drugs, and cycles of violence.
Building trust in public safety – strengthening the partnership between police and the communities they serve.
Standing with victims – making sure they have the resources to heal and rebuild their lives.
Fighting modern threats – protecting families from scams, counterfeits, and cybercrime through awareness and education.

The urgency is clear. According to the FBI, a violent crime is reported every 25.9 seconds in the United States. Experts estimate crime drains $2.6 trillion from families, businesses, and taxpayers each year.
First launched in 1984 by the National Crime Prevention Council, Crime Prevention Month has a proud legacy of mobilizing communities. The bipartisan Costa–Ciscomani resolution renews that mission and challenges the nation to recommit to prevention as the surest path to safer streets, stronger neighborhoods, and peace of mind for every family.
The full text of the resolution is available HERE.

Bacon, Suozzi, Hurd, Gottheimer Release Bipartisan Principles to Temporarily Extend and Reform Affordable Care Act Enhanced Premium Tax Credits

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Don Bacon (2nd District of Nebraska)

Bacon, Suozzi, Hurd, Gottheimer Release Bipartisan Principles to Temporarily Extend and Reform Affordable Care Act Enhanced Premium Tax Credits

Washington – Today, Representatives Don Bacon (R-NE-02), Tom Suozzi (D-NY-03), Jeff Hurd (R-CO-03) and Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ-05) released a statement of principles for lowering health care costs and temporarily extending and reforming the Affordable Care Act (ACA) enhanced premium tax credits (APTCs). The principles focus on a temporary extension with reasonable income caps and reform. 

Bacon, Suozzi, Hurd and Gottheimer released the following quote:

“Congress is gridlocked, and too many Americans have lost faith that we can work together. But here’s the truth: Democrats and Republicans can sit down, listen to one another, and find common ground, especially when it comes to lowering health care costs.

“We may not agree on every ideal outcome, but we’ve identified a fair, reasonable path forward on the future of the Affordable Care Act’s Enhanced Premium Tax Credits. Compromise isn’t rocket science and it shouldn’t be treated like a weakness.

“Our hope is that this shared statement of principles will inspire bipartisan collaboration across Washington and help get Congress back to work for the American people.”

Below, find the statement of principles:

Principles to Temporarily Extend and Reform Affordable Care Act Enhanced Premium Tax Credits

Temporary: A two-year extension of APTCs

Income Cap: An income cap phased out between $200,000 and $400,000.

Reform: Guardrails to prevent improper payments of APTCs

Prevent “Ghost Beneficiaries”: Requirements that ACA marketplaces confirm recipient eligibility with the Death Master File 

Crack Down on Fraud: Establish a “preponderance of evidence” standard of proof to determine when an agent or broker should be allowed to continue operating in the ACA marketplaces. 

Enhance Delivery Clarity: Requirements that marketplaces better notify recipients the value of APTCs they are receiving from the federal government

###

ICYMI: Estes Joins Capitol Report

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Ron Estes (R-Kansas)

U.S. Congressman Ron Estes (R-Kansas) joined NTD’s Capitol Report to discuss China’s restrictions on rare earth exports, President Trump’s meeting with Xi Jinping, and more. Watch the interview on YouTube and Rumble.

On China’s rare earth export restrictions:

“It really was a disruptive thing when China said that several weeks ago … When we look at how critical rare earth minerals are for all the things we want to do going forward, it’s so important that we have … all countries, including China, follow free and fair trade practices. I mean that’s kind of the point that’s made our economic engine in the world  grow and continue to grow and continue to help individuals.” 

On what talks with Xi Jinping should look like:

“… Looking at President Trump’s discussions with President Xi is looking at … how can we help make the economic ties between the United States and China stronger? How can we make sure that China practices and follows those fair trade trade practices that we’ve talked about? And I also would hope that he would look and talk about fentanyl and some of the drug issues that are so devastating for so many of our American citizens.”

On the progress of stopping fentanyl and other drugs from China from coming across our borders:

“I think the biggest improvement that we’ve seen so far is just the enforcement that President Trump’s been putting on the border in terms of making sure that … we don’t have more people crossing the border illegally. And as a result, there’s less fentanyl coming into the country through those means. But the overall practice that China has in providing those precursors and or maybe providing fentanyl itself to actually use in the smuggling trade is not characteristic of what you would expect of a good trading partner.” 

On what Congressman Estes hopes to see come out of a trade deal with the United States and China:

“I am hopeful that as part of these discussions that China is willing to to be engaged and say that it’s important enough to the Chinese economy that they actually act like a fair trading partner so that we can address those issues and make sure that we minimize those negative consequences of things like [drug] smuggling.”

On China’s human rights abuses:

“China has a long history of human rights abuses, whether it’s related to Christians, whether it’s to the Falun Gong, or whether it’s to the Uyghurs. But also just from a standpoint of slave trade practices and using that in their economy … In the past … a lot of leadership, whether it’s the United States or in other countries around the world,  have backed away because China objected to bringing up commentary about their human rights abuses. President Trump hasn’t done that. 

“He’s been willing to stand up and say, ‘We need to make sure that good practices are followed’ and [he’s] been willing to push forward some of his tariffs and some of his other leading points on trade to actually make sure that some of these unfair practices are addressed.” 

On potential outcomes of President Trump’s meeting with Xi Jinping:

“I look forward to having some good dialogue when they meet and, ultimately, I do think it’ll take a long time because some of these things, I think, are built into the Chinese economy and they may have to figure out that in their own self-best interest is to agree,  to head in a right direction, and act the same way that we would expect our trade partners to react if we want to have trade partners that are considered most favored nation status.”

On what may transpire after President Trump’s meeting with Xi Jinping:

“President Trump’s knows there’s going to be heat, I mean just like other presidents knew there were going to be heat, but they didn’t address it, whereas President Trump’s been willing … to take the slings and arrows, if you would, in terms of the criticisms that would come at him, but he was willing to address and and focus on what’s what’s the right thing to do.”

ICYMI: Estes Joins Voice of Reason with Andy Hooser

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Ron Estes (R-Kansas)

U.S. Congressman Ron Estes (R-Kansas) joined The Voice of Reason with Andy Hooser to discuss the ongoing Schumer Shutdown, how Democrats are using the government shutdown as “leverage,” and their out-of-touch demands to reopen the government. Watch the interview on YouTube and Rumble.

On the ongoing Schumer Shutdown: 

“It’s just another Schumer Shutdown that basically [the Democrats] don’t want to talk about funding the government. And the bad part about it is, that this particular funding bill was something that they’ve already voted on, basically, 13 times when we were under President Biden when he was in office. 

“As recently as this last spring, they voted for the basic, same funding levels. So, the whole purpose there is that they’re focusing on … trying to make it a story about healthcare and a distraction from really what their responsibility is: to fund the government. All of these Democrats that are voting to not fund the government [are] causing real pain for real people. And now, at least the Democrats are saying that they recognize it’s causing pain for people, but they’re using it as a political leverage point. And that’s a sad way for people being in a leadership role, an American leadership role, to treat American citizens.”

On Democrats playing leverage games instead of working to fund the government:

“It is just a political game that they’re playing instead of trying to focus on doing their job, doing their responsibility, which is funding the government. And yeah, there’s going to be differences and debate about how much our total appropriations should be for 2026 [and] going forward. But let’s keep the government open while we’re having that discussion and finalizing that. 

“And that’s why we created this CR, this continuing resolution, until November 21st. When we voted on it back in September, it was to actually be able to have some time for the appropriations committees to sit through and come up with … How much are we going to spend on Health and Human Services? How much are we going to spend on defense? How much are we going to spend for the Agriculture department? And with the shutdown, those discussions aren’t happening.”

On reopening the government and how to fund it into next year:

“The bill that the Republicans passed out of the House of Representatives sets November 21st as the deadline for the continuing resolution to move forward. The Democrats in the Senate are filibustering it and have voted it down, voted to keep the government closed. So, obviously, if it was going to take six or seven weeks for the appropriations folks to work through the process, then that date would have to be changed to some degree. 

“The Democrats are going to have to come to the table and stop the filibuster, and vote to open the government, whether it’s on November 21st, or whether it moves it to a date in January or something, that actually provides enough time for these discussions to be happening.”

On the negative impacts of the Schumer Shutdown on Americans and the economy:

“Well, if you look at the number of workers that are operating under the federal government, there’s a little over two million civilian workers, and roughly the same number if you add up the military and the postal service. The reason I break those out is just because of the way they’re funded. 

“So we’re talking about the salaries for those four million people. Now, there’s 100 million other people that are working in the economy and actually going about their daily business, doing their jobs … It has a little bit of an impact … But the bigger issue is going to be that starting last week, there’s no paycheck at all for any of those workers.

“That’s going to become particularly burdensome … for those individuals. Whether they’re trying to pay their mortgage or pay their car payment or go to the grocery store or the drugstore to get medicine for their kids. And that’s a piece that’s going to be very painful for these individuals that are involved in this. It’s really sad that the Democrats are continuing to filibuster and use this as a political leverage point.”

On working to achieve a balanced budget:

“Well, we’ve slowly made some progress. We’ve got so much more to do. I mean, the problem is, one out of [every] five dollars that the federal government spends is being borrowed, which means we’ve got a big problem we’ve got to work on and address and sort through.

“… You start to get complaints from the government workers who actually run a program, you get complaints from the advocates who cheer on a particular program, and then you get complaints from the people that get paid through a particular program. So you have a lot of folks that are complaining that they want to keep their program. It’s a delicate balance as we go through this. 

“A lot of things, some things you can stop right away, but a lot of things you kind of need to phase down through that process. And unfortunately, as Ronald Reagan said, a federal government program is the closest thing to eternal life because it just wants to keep going.”

On enforcing work requirements to be eligible for government programs:

“It’s one of the things we highlighted in the Big Beautiful Bill, that we worked on for the Working Families Tax Cuts Act this summer … American people are generous people, and we’re going to continue to be generous to help folks that need a hand up. But there’s also some expectations that if you’re an able-bodied adult and you’re receiving, say, Medicaid, which is what we talked about with the One Big Beautiful Bill, was that you’re able-bodied, you don’t have children, you ought to be working.”

“Even if it’s twenty hours a week, or if not working, then go working on [an] education or doing volunteer work in order to get this free healthcare that American taxpayers are paying for you.”

On Democrats attempting to justify their ongoing government shutdown:

“They’re just making up different stories as they walk along, trying to find something to justify what they’re doing. It’s just a political game that they want to play, which is kind of sad because it, I mean, even now they’re starting to admit it’s hurting everyday people. 

“When we talk about the folks in the district … whether they’re needing support from a food stamp program or whether they’re … trying to buy a house, and if it’s in a flood zone, they can’t get flood insurance because that was part of the CR that was going to be extended, the flood insurance program. And … it’s a sad way to treat your fellow American citizens, [which] is what they’re doing.”

On Democrats’ demands in the government funding bill and hypocrisy on the expiring Obamacare enhanced tax credits:

“The demands they’re making are that they take $50 billion away from rural hospitals and that they go out and make sure that the illegal aliens keep their free Medicaid and health care. 

“I think a lot of this is built around the whole concept that Obamacare is failing, and they’re seeing it. They covered it up with the COVID bailout and now the COVID bailout’s ending the way they structured it. 

“It was the Democrats that chose to end this on December of 2025 because they thought that was enough for them to cover it. And it’s getting worse and worse. Premiums are going up, taxpayers are paying more, and this goes back to the basic Obamacare that’s going to be struggling without the COVID bailout.”

On when the government will open:

“I don’t have a good solid crystal ball. I think they’re going to play around with this until after the elections next week because they don’t want to disrupt the . . .Virginia and New Jersey governor elections. I just don’t think it’s going to work out well for them, and it’s American people who are suffering because of what the Democrats are doing.”

Wall Street Journal: Travel Industry Sounds Alarm Over Government Shutdown

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

WASHINGTON — Read “Travel Industry Sounds Alarm Over Government Shutdown,” in today’s Wall Street Journal:

Hundreds of travel businesses, including casinos, hotels and convention bureaus, are asking Congress to end the monthlong government shutdown by immediately passing a straightforward spending bill, citing worries about the holiday travel season.

The letter signed by nearly 500 companies and groups adds to the pressure on Democrats to give up their drive for a broader deal before voting to reopen the government. Since the shutdown started Oct. 1, government workers including air-traffic controllers and passenger screeners have gone without pay, leading to delays and safety concerns.

Americans “expect and deserve a fully functioning federal government during the peak holiday travel season,” the travel entities wrote in a letter led by the U.S. Travel Association and sent to the Republican and Democratic leaders of the House and Senate. “Congress must act without delay to pass a clean continuing resolution to reopen the government immediately and ensure full federal operations are restored in advance of the Thanksgiving travel period.”

Senate Democrats since September have blocked a GOP measure funding the government through Nov. 21, attempting to force Republicans to extend certain subsidies that help 22 million people pay for health insurance. Senate Republicans have said that they will discuss the subsidies only after Democrats agree to reopen the government. The subsidies would add an estimated $350 billion to the federal deficit over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

The travel-industry letter was signed mostly by small businesses and groups that promote travel. But it was also signed by giants including MGM Resorts International, Hilton, Omni Hotels and Resorts, Delaware North and the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority.

The busiest air-travel day last year was the Sunday after Thanksgiving, with more than three million travelers in the skies, according to data from the Transportation Security Administration. Travel plans are typically locked in far in advance, causing anxiety about whether travelers will be willing to make plans with the uncertainty of the shutdown in the background.

“A continued shutdown is likely to significantly suppress travel demand and spending, creating a real threat to American workers, businesses, and the overall economy,” the letter said.

Last week, airline chief executives met at the White House with Vice President JD Vance and called on the Senate to pass a so-called continuing resolution that passed the House on Sept. 19.

“It is time to pass a clean CR, use that as the opportunity to get into a room behind closed doors and negotiate hard,” United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby said.

Before that, the nation’s largest federal labor union went public with a call for Congress to pass the same bill.

Conversations about ending the government shutdown continued among senators over the weekend, according to one aide, and senators have been growing more optimistic about finding a way out of the shutdown. But the optimism that swept through the Senate last week still hasn’t resulted in a deal.

###

Wasserman Schultz Sounds Alarm on Hunger Crisis as Trump Delays Food Help to Millions of Floridians

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-23)

“America faces a dire Republican healthcare crisis, and now – despite having the power to avoid it – President Trump has plunged America into a potential hunger crisis,” said Wasserman Schultz. “Rather than sit down with Democrats to negotiate a plan to get us out of this mess, Trump is intentionally making it as painful as possible.”

Sunrise, FL – Today, U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-25) joined nutrition assistance leaders and SNAP recipients to sound the alarm on how the Trump Administration’s heartless, unlawful withholding of emergency SNAP funds amid a Republican shutdown needlessly harms millions of Floridians.

Watch the full press conference here.

Instead of sitting down with Democrats and negotiating to reopen the federal government and lower health care costs, President Trump has weaponized hunger and delayed SNAP benefits to 3 million Floridians, including children, seniors, and veterans – all despite Congressionally authorized contingency funds being specifically set aside and available to provide this assistance. Forty-two million Americans nationwide count on these food benefits.

“America faces a dire Republican healthcare crisis, and now – despite having the power to avoid it – President Trump has plunged America into a potential hunger crisis,” said Wasserman Schultz. “Rather than sit down with Democrats to negotiate a plan to get us out of this mess, Trump is intentionally making it as painful as possible.”

“A large number of the people we serve are people who are working full-time jobs, but whose wages are out of balance with the cost of living in Broward County,” said Denise Brown, CEO of LifeNet4Families. “Recent reports suggest that 50% of Broward County’s residents live paycheck to paycheck. This means that these families constantly live on the verge of financial collapse.”

The LifeNet4Families CEO also announced that the Children Services Council, the Jim Moran Foundation, United Way of Broward County, Community Foundation, Feeding South Florida, and HANDY Inc. will partner with LifeNet4Families to keep their food pantry open six days a week to SNAP recipients and furloughed government workers, staying open from 7:30AM to 6:30PM Monday through Friday and 7:30AM until noon on Saturdays.

“With the holidays coming up, you know that food costs go up, and food becomes more important for families,” said Flordaliza Jimenez, a Broward County resident and SNAP recipient. “I really want Republicans to sit down with Democrats and work this out. There’s a lot of high costs right now, and there’s a lot going up, not coming down. Rent, utilities, medical costs, it’s all going up, and it’s cutting into my food budget month-to-month.”

“It’s really a sad day that we have to be here to talk about eating and basic things that we sometimes normally take for granted,” said Annete Chang, a Broward County resident and SNAP recipient. “When I was approved for $100 – you know, it doesn’t sound like a lot, but it really made a difference in my life. And I know that this pause will create a deficit in my ability to manage sustainably…You know we live in the richest country in the world, why are we weaponizing hunger?”

“I thought it was a joke, to be honest. I thought they were going to release the funds. They can’t let us go without having the funds. But when I woke up on the first and checked, it wasn’t there,” said Sheba McKinon, a Broward County resident, SNAP recipient, and LifeNet4Families employee. “My rent was due on the first, but I have until the fifth to pay it, so I took partial payment from that to go to the grocery store and make sure me and the kids are okay.”

Two federal courts ruled the Trump Administration is required to spend funding appropriated by Congress to sustain nutritional assistance benefits, yet it’s still not clear how quickly the president will comply. The intentional delay leaves struggling families in doubt and further overwhelms food pantries who will now face even more demand. Withholding these funds comes after Congressional Republicans passed the largest ever cut to SNAP in the Big Ugly Law, slashing more than $186 billion in funding. Here’s a list of local SNAP impacts around the state and nation, broken down by congressional districts.  

####

Speaker Johnson on Day 34 of the Democrat Shutdown: Despite 14 Consecutive Votes to Keep Government Closed, Democrats Continue Gaslighting the American People

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

WASHINGTON — On Day 34 of the Democrat Shutdown, Speaker Johnson hosted a press conference alongside House GOP Leadership to dismantle Congressional Democrats’ most flagrant lies about their government shutdown. Speaker Johnson also addressed Democrats fear of the Far-Left radicals in their own party.

“What is outrageous to us is that they have gone onto the Senate floor and they have voted no. They have voted to close the government,” Speaker Johnson said. “And then they have gone out to the hall, to the nearest camera they can find, and they look into the lens and say, ‘Republicans are shutting down the government…’ It’s the most extreme example of gaslighting in the history of American politics.”

Watch Speaker Johnson’s full remarks here.

On Democrats lying about their votes to shut down the government:

The obviously false claim from the Democrats is that Republicans have closed the government. I’ve heard them say this myself. You’ve all seen it in interviews. They’re blaming the shutdown on the Republicans, and it is patently absurd. The next slide will show you the simple fact, the obvious fact that everyone can see, it is Republicans who have voted to open the government 14 times. Now, remember how this came about. Back on September 19, in the House, Republicans voted to open the government, to pass the clean continuing resolution to keep everything in operation. Every Democrat, except one, in the House voted to close the government, but we still passed it because we have the majority. And so we sent that bill over to the Senate. And on 13 different occasions, 13 times, the Democrats have voted to close the government. Republicans voted yes every time to open it. Republicans and the Senate and the House voted to keep the lights on, to pay service members and our troops who are in harm’s way, Border Patrol agents, TSA, air traffic controllers, all federal workers.

They voted to ensure that women, infants, and children nutrition programs continue and that SNAP benefits continue to go to the American families who are in need. But by contrast, the Democrats have voted no every single time. And what is outrageous to us is that they have gone onto the Senate floor and they have voted no. They have voted to close the government. And then they have gone out to the hall, to the nearest camera they can find, and they look into the lens and say, “Republicans are shutting down the government.” It makes no sense. It’s the most extreme example of gaslighting in the history of American politics. And many in the media have allowed them to get away with that.

On the false claim that Democrats are “fighting for health care”:

False claim number three, Democrats are fighting for health care. You’ve heard this over and over and over. Let me say something very simply about this false claim. It is the Democrats who created Obamacare. It is the Democrats who did that without any Republican votes. It’s the Democrats who, by extension, have cost the American taxpayers and people who have health insurance have made their costs skyrocket. It is their policies that made that happen. And so instead of reforming it, the Democrats don’t reform Obamacare, they want to subsidize it. They want to spend more taxpayer dollars. That, by the way, goes mostly to insurance companies, which makes the cost rise further. That’s the Democrats plan. When they passed Obamacare in 2010, they called it the Affordable Care Act. We know the truth is exactly the opposite.

By some estimates, premiums have risen 60% in many categories since they passed that bill into law. Now, the fact is, the opposite. Republicans are the ones fighting to save health care. Why? It’s not just talking points to us. We do this, we have ideas and we have already implemented ideas and measures to reduce costs, increase access and quality, and eliminate fraud, waste and abuse. Now, why do we say it’s not just a talking point? Why do we say the Republican Party is the only one advancing commonsense reform solutions? Because we’ve proven it. We did that in the big beautiful bill, the Working Families Tax Cut. We took a look at Medicaid, and we took on that challenge. We took action to reduce fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicaid. We got able-bodied young men without dependents off the program. We got illegal aliens off the program, and we saved $185 billion, just to start. We got millions of ineligible enrollees off the program, and it preserved it, it strengthened Medicaid for the people who rely upon it, which is the elderly, disabled, and young pregnant women. No, it’s not about health care. That is a false claim, and everybody knows it. Everyone in America, and certainly everybody in this room understands that this is about something else. That what this is about is about fear. The Schumer Shutdown was never about health care. That’s a distraction. It’s a red herring, as we say in debate club. Okay? This is about fear and what is the fear, the resolution on the COVID-era Obamacare subsidy issue was always going to be slated for debate in October, November, and December. Everybody knows that, and every Democrat knows that it’s an issue that’s too complex to be solved on a short-term funding measure like a CR.

On Democrats running scared from their Far-Left base:

This is about fear. Everybody in the country is watching the elections that’ll happen tomorrow. You got big elections in New Jersey and Virginia, the governor’s races and attorney general’s races, et cetera. But all that, the attention is focused primarily on New York City. Why? Because the fear that Mamdani and all that he represents will be risen to power, that he’ll be elected the mayor of America’s largest city, the, the once cradle of capitalism, that we’re going have a Marxist, a communist, running the largest city now. This terrifies the establishment old guard Democrats in Washington, and the leaders of both chambers are among those most terrified. They’re both from New York. Leader Hakeem Jeffries is the Democrat in the House and Leader Schumer in the Senate. They’re both from New York and they’re terrified. You’ve watched their actions carefully. Many of you have not reported on it enough.

Hakeem Jeffries had to ultimately, finally, he was forced to endorse Mamdani, and he’s terrified that he now owns the results of that. Chuck Schumer has been dancing around the issue, but he knows he’s darned if he does, darned if he doesn’t, they’re both terrified. And so that is the fear. This is a fact, and you should print it this way. Schumer and Jeffries and their colleagues fear political retribution from the Far-Left activists in their party more than they fear the consequences of keeping the government closed for weeks on end. They fear that personally for their own political future, and they care more about that than they care about SNAP benefits flowing to hungry families, about air traffic controllers being paid so they can keep the sky safe, Border Patrol, troops, and all the rest. It pales in comparison, and this is a simple summary that is a simple fact. It is extremism on the Left that is the direct cause of American suffering right now.

###

Speaker Johnson: While Democrats Continue Using “Leverage,” Real People are Suffering

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

WASHINGTON — On Day 33 of the Democrat Shutdown, Speaker Johnson joined Shannon Bream on Fox News Sunday to discuss how, despite the real pain they have caused for working families around the country, Democrats shamefully continue to treat the government shutdown as “leverage.”

“This is not about winning a political contest here. Real people are losing; the American people are hurting,” Speaker Johnson said. “Democrats have voted 14 times now to keep the government closed. 14 times.”

Watch Speaker Johnson’s full interview here.

On Democrats treating the suffering of American families as “leverage”:

Just 24 hours before that [poll] came out, CNN of all places had a big story about how Republicans are winning the shutdown battle. But we reject all of this. This is not about winning a political contest here. Real people are losing; the American people are hurting. Democrats have voted 14 times now to keep the government closed. 14 times. They had the opportunity to have SNAP benefits flow, to let air traffic controllers be paid, to take care of all these problems and pay the troops. And they said no. And it is a fact that no one can dispute. They shut the government down over restoring free healthcare to illegal aliens as part of their $1.5 trillion wild partisan wish list. They’re playing games and real people are suffering because of it.

You have all the unions now coming out against them. You have the major airlines in the country; you have every segment of the population and hardworking Americans who will be going without. You have 42 million recipients of SNAP that are in jeopardy right now. You have the women, infants, and children nutrition program that President Trump and the White House have heroically funded thus far is running out of money. And of course, the troops, I mean, we’ve gotten them paid now for two cycles, but that money is not inexhaustible and it’s running out. And so increasingly the American people will be feeling the pain. And after we pass that threshold of the first of this month, it gets very real for more and more people.

On Democrats refusing to fund SNAP then blaming Republicans for the consequences:

It’s absolutely absurd. They are accusing the Republicans and the President of doing exactly what they are doing. Remember, don’t get lost in the facts, Republicans have voted 14 times to open the government. Democrats have voted 14 times to close it. Who’s playing games here? We have a clean, simple continuing resolution, no partisan gimmicks or tricks at all. It’s 24 pages in length. It would keep everything going. The President is bending over backwards to take care of the American people, and it’s the Democrats who are quite literally using the people as leverage. 

I can quote you Senator, after House Member on the Democrat side in the last two weeks who have said the quiet parts out loud, from Whitehouse, to Coons to Katherine Clark, the number two Democrat in the House. Bernie Sanders, they’ve all said this is their leverage, their leverage for what? So, they can show that they’re fighting President Trump to the Far Left because they’re worried about the Marxists rising Democrat Party. We see it in New York City and elsewhere. And because they actually want, and they’ve argued and they put on paper, they want illegal aliens to receive taxpayer-funded benefits. Again, that is a fact. They’ve never changed it. They’ve never pulled back from that. Everybody can see the stark contrast between two parties right now, and only one is fighting for the people. And that’s a Republican party.

On the Trump Administration’s actions to protect the homeland from narco-terrorists:

We had a gang of eight briefing with the Secretary of State himself about a week and a half ago. You had Republicans and Democrats there, the top leaders on both sides in intelligence and in elected leadership. We have exquisite intelligence about these strikes, and I can’t get into the classified parts, but that information is well known. It is very reliable. And what the President and the Administration are doing is protecting the homeland. That’s one of his number one responsibilities. 

I like what Secretary Hegseth said at the opening, “Narco-terrorists will be treated like Al-Qaeda.” We have to do that. They’re bringing in huge amounts, tons of illegal narcotics into the country, and it is killing Americans. Remember, fentanyl alone was a leading cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 49 in the four years of the Biden Administration. We finally have a President who is strong enough to stop that and to protect the people. And one of these boats, Shannon, could kill potentially tens of thousands of Americans. This is serious business. They’re taking it seriously and Congress will continue to have oversight. We’ll have more of these hearings, but thus far, the intelligence that we have is very reliable.

###

Congressman Raul Ruiz and Inland Empire Lawmakers Call on DOJ to Respect California’s Secure Elections and Protect Voters from Intimidation

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Raul Ruiz (36th District of California)

RIVERSIDE, CA – Inland Empire Representatives Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25), Pete Aguilar (CA-33), Mark Takano (CA-39), and Norma Torres (CA-35) call out the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for actions that intimidate voters and undermine confidence in California’s free and fair elections. The DOJ recently announced plans to send federal election monitors to polling sites in five California counties ahead of the November 4, 2025, Statewide Special Election, a move the lawmakers say is unnecessary and unjustified.

The Inland Empire Representatives joined 41 California Democrats urging the DOJ to respect the state’s election system and refrain from actions that intimidate voters or suppress participation. In a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, the lawmakers stressed the importance of protecting California’s transparent and secure voting process, noting that the DOJ has provided no evidence of federal law violations in the state’s elections.

“California’s elections are secure, transparent, and fair. Any attempt to intimidate, harass, or mislead voters is unacceptable. Every Californian has the right to cast their ballot freely, privately, and without fear, and they can be confident their vote will count. False claims meant to sow doubt are a threat to democracy, and we will continue to protect the integrity of our elections.” — Congressman Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25)

 “In an effort to intimidate voters and undermine confidence in California’s Statewide Special Election on November 4th, Donald Trump is directing his Department of Justice to unnecessarily send federal monitors to the state. Let’s be clear: California elections are free and fair, and voters should feel safe going to the polls or mailing in their ballots. I’m confident Californians will make their voices loud and clear in just a few days.” — Congressman Pete Aguilar (CA-33)

“California knows how to run elections. We have one of the most transparent and secure systems in the country, and millions of Californians vote safely every year. I welcome fair observation from the Department of Justice, but not interference or intimidation. Donald Trump and his cronies are just looking for an excuse to suppress turnout, but I’m confident Californians will make their voices heard in this upcoming special election for Prop 50.” — Congressman Mark Takano (CA-39)

“There is no justification for the DOJ to intimidate Inland Empire voters with unnecessary federal monitors. California’s elections are safe, secure, and fair. Donald Trump and the Republican Party continue spreading lies to undermine trust, both here and across the nation. We saw the deadly consequences of those lies on January 6, when a President refused to accept the results of a fair election. Their goal is clear: to sow distrust, suppress votes, and silence Californians, especially Latino communities in Los Angeles County and the Inland Empire. DOJ’s actions are an attack on our democracy, and I will not stand by while Californians’ right to vote is threatened.” — Congresswoman Norma Torres (CA-35)

California operates one of the most transparent and secure election systems in the nation. Every registered voter automatically receives a mail-in ballot, and each ballot includes a voter-verifiable paper trail, allowing voters to confirm that their vote has been received and counted. Voting machines are thoroughly tested and audited to ensure accuracy and security. In the November 2024 election, more than 16.1 million Californians voted, representing over 71 percent of registered voters, far above the national average.

The Inland Empire delegation emphasized that Californians should feel safe and confident voting by mail, at drop boxes, or in person on Election Day. They encouraged voters to make a plan and to use official resources to track their ballots and find polling places: https://WheresMyBallot.sos.ca.gov.

Voters in California have the right to cast their ballots free from intimidation, coercion, or interference under both state and federal law. No one can threaten, harass, or obstruct a voter to influence their choice or prevent them from voting. Every eligible voter is entitled to a private, secure voting experience, with access to assistance if needed, without fear of discrimination or suppression. Protections under laws like the Voting Rights Act ensure that all Californians, regardless of race, ethnicity, language, or disability, can participate safely and confidently in the electoral process.

The four Inland Empire members reaffirmed their support for California’s election officials and encouraged residents to vote early, by mail, or in person on Election Day.