Golden, Cline introduces bipartisan Fiscal Contingency Preparedness Act

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02)

WASHINGTON— With the national debt topping $36 trillion and interest payments now exceeding spending on Medicare and national defense, Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02) has signed on as the lead Democratic cosponsor of the Fiscal Contingency Preparedness Act, introduced today by Congressmen Ben Cline (VA-06).

This bipartisan bill would require the federal government to assess and report its ability to respond to major national emergencies like economic downturns, energy crises and national security threats. The bill was also sponsored by Congressman Jack Bergman (MI-01) and Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA-03). 

The legislation directs the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to produce an annual report measuring the government’s fiscal strength and readiness. After this report is released, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) would conduct its own independent review and publish its findings to ensure accuracy and transparency.

“One of the many lessons the Marine Corps taught me was to have a plan for the worst-case scenario,” Golden said. “This bipartisan bill would force Washington to be clear-eyed about our fiscal outlook in potential national emergencies, which is the necessary first step for responsible planning to keep America stable and secure.”

“With our debt piling up and interest payments skyrocketing, we cannot afford to be caught flat-footed when the next emergency hits,” Cline said. “Just like households plan ahead for tough times, the federal government must do the same. Americans deserve a clear picture of how much room we actually have to respond to future crises. Congress must face the facts and make responsible decisions now, before an emergency strikes.”

“We know that when a crisis hits, preparation makes all the difference,” Bergman said. “The Fiscal Contingency Preparedness Act is a commonsense step to ensure we’re ready to respond to whatever comes our way – whether it’s an economic downturn, a natural disaster, or a national security threat. If we’re serious about keeping our Nation strong and secure, we need to start planning ahead and making our decisions based on reality – not scrambling to prepare after the fact.”

“As a small business owner, I know how important it is to plan for a rainy day — and hardworking families in Southwest Washington know it too,” Gluesenkamp Perez said. “Our federal government should hold itself to the same standard and be ready to weather any crisis that comes its way. Our bipartisan legislation would require annual assessments of our national fiscal strength when faced with different crises — so we can better prepare our economy to work for the American people under any circumstances.”

According to the Congressional Budget Office, interest payments on the national debt will permanently exceed defense spending. By 2050, interest costs are expected to double the size of the defense budget. Gross federal debt is projected to hit 123% of GDP by September 2025, surpassing the previous World War II-era high of 119%.

“Our national debt is not just a number,” said the Hon. Joe Manchin, former Senator from West Virginia.It is a real and rising threat to our way of life. It impacts our economy, our national security, and our ability to respond in times of crisis. I am proud to see Representatives Cline and Golden take up the Fiscal Contingency Preparedness Act. This is a commonsense measure. Just like American families must prepare for emergencies, so should our government.” 

“Policymakers and the public need access to the best available analysis on how a severe economic shock may impact the federal government’s finances,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “While our nation’s largest banks are required to undergo regular stress tests to prepare for an unexpected shock, the federal government lacks an equivalent playbook. It is essential that the federal government be prepared for a possible fiscal emergency, and we commend Representatives Cline and Golden for introducing this bipartisan, commonsense proposal to strengthen our fiscal resilience.” 

LaMalfa Applauds EPA Move to Repeal Obama-Era CO₂ Finding and Restore Consumer Choice

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Doug LaMalfa 1st District of California

Washington, D.C.—Congressman Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale) released the following statement praising the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposal to repeal the so-called 2009 Endangerment Finding, a rule established in the first year of the Obama era. This ruling has served as the legal foundation for more than $1 trillion in greenhouse gas emission regulations, including the Biden Administration’s electric vehicle mandates, and many other new regulations on lawn mowers, gas stoves, and more. 

If finalized, the proposal would eliminate EPA’s authority under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide and five other “greenhouse gas” emissions from new motor vehicles and engines—removing sweeping mandates that limited consumer choice, strained supply chains, and raised costs on nearly every product that moves by truck.

“This is long overdue. CO₂ is not a pollutant, it’s a basic building block of life. Plants can’t survive without it, and the 0.04% we are currently at is nowhere near a threat to the planet,” said Rep. LaMalfa. “The Earth has seen far higher CO₂ levels long before the invention of the SUV. The 2009 Endangerment Finding twisted the law to give unelected bureaucrats the power to dictate lifestyles, driving up costs and force working Americans into electric vehicles they don’t want and can’t afford. This repeal puts the brakes on that nonsense and gets us back to real-world thinking. I applaud President Trump and Administrator Zeldin for putting the American people’s choices back in the driver’s seat.”

Background on the 2009 Endangerment Finding

The Endangerment Finding, issued by the Obama EPA in 2009, concluded that carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases “endanger” public health and welfare. That determination ostensibly gave EPA broad authority to regulate vehicle emissions under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, even though the statute was never intended to regulate climate policy.

Since then, the Endangerment Finding has been used to justify seven vehicle and engine emissions rules, including EV mandates and efficiency standards, that have collectively imposed more than $1 trillion in compliance costs on businesses and families. These mandates were enacted without proper evaluation of their real-world economic impact, technical feasibility, or affordability, particularly in rural and working-class areas.

Recent Supreme Court decisions have reinforced that sweeping regulatory actions must originate from Congress, not from executive branch agencies unilaterally reinterpreting the law.

EPA’s new proposal, based on updated scientific and economic data, would roll back greenhouse gas standards for light, medium, and heavy-duty vehicles and engines. The agency estimates this move could save Americans $54 billion annually.

The proposal will be open for public comment.

Congressman Doug LaMalfa is Chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus and a lifelong farmer representing California’s First Congressional District, including Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama and Yuba Counties.

###

California Republican Congressional Delegation Unified Statement on Governor Newsom’s Potential Move to Disenfranchise California Voters and Overturn Independent Redistricting Commission

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Doug LaMalfa 1st District of California

Washington, D.C.—Congressman Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale) released the following statement alongside the entire California Republican Congressional Delegation:

“In 2010, California voters passed the VOTERS FIRST Act by over 20 points, giving the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission the sole authority of drawing California’s congressional districts. Today, Governor Newsom, flanked by Texas Democrats, announced that he stands ready to take power away from the Citizens Commission and place it back into the hands of Sacramento politicians to further his left-wing political agenda. 

The Commission received feedback from tens of thousands of Californians as to their communities of interest which shaped the current set of congressional districts. Districts that represent the local communities that they live in rather than the whims of one political party. A partisan political gerrymander is NOT what the voters of California want as they clearly stated when they passed the VOTERS FIRST Act and participated in the Citizens Redistricting Commission process. As it stands, Republicans only hold nine congressional seats out of 52 despite winning 38% of the vote statewide. 

It’s a shame that Governor Newsom and the radical Left in Sacramento are willing to spend $200 million on a statewide special election, while running a deficit of $20 billion, in order to silence the opposition in our state.

As a Delegation we will fight any attempt to disenfranchise California voters by whatever means necessary to ensure the will of the people continues to be reflected in redistricting and in our elections.”

Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Tom McClintock, Ken Calvert, David Valadao, Vince Fong, Young Kim, Jay Obernolte, Darrell Issa, and Kevin Kiley

Congressman Doug LaMalfa is Chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus and a lifelong farmer representing California’s First Congressional District, including Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama and Yuba Counties.

###

Garamendi Demands Answers on the Recent Death of Palestinian Activist in the West Bank

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman John Garamendi – Representing California’s 3rd Congressional District

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congressman John Garamendi (D-CA-08), a senior California Democrat and member of the House Armed Services Committee, issued the following statement in response to recent reports of violence in the West Bank:

“I am demanding answers about the reported tragic death of Awdah Hathaleen. Awdah, an English teacher and Palestinian activist, was previously denied entry to the United States after being invited to an Interfaith Movement for Human Integrity event to speak about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. According to recent reports, Hathaleen was shot by an Israeli settler in the West Bank village of Umm Al-Khair and later died of his wounds.

“Violence by Israeli settlers against peaceful Palestinians has been all too common and we must demand accountability. Unfortunately, this administration has shown little interest in pushing for peace. On day one of his second term, President Trump repealed sanctions on 30 Israeli settlers and settler organizations accused of engaging in violence in the West Bank. One of those settlers allegedly shot Hathaleen. Lifting sanctions on the very individuals who perpetrate these unacceptable acts only emboldens violent settlers and sends a signal that the United States won’t hold violent actors accountable.

“The West Bank has witnessed intolerable levels of settler violence for decades, and the war in Gaza has only further exacerbated this situation. Settler violence in the West Bank wreaks terror and forces the displacement of Palestinian communities, further destabilizing the Middle East region and putting the prospects for peace and security even further out of reach. This is unacceptable. Israel must rein in settler violence and ensure that Palestinians in the West Bank are able to live in peace, free from the threat of violence.”

###
 

Rep. Garamendi to Host Zoom Townhall

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman John Garamendi – Representing California’s 3rd Congressional District

FAIRFIELD, CA — On Monday, July 28 at 6:00 PM PT /9:00 PM ET, U.S. Representative John Garamendi (CA-08) will host a Zoom town hall to share the latest updates on how he’s fighting back against the impacts of the so-called “Big Ugly Law” on Californians, and how the public can get involved in the fight.

WHO: U.S. Rep. John Garamendi (CA-08)

WHAT: Zoom Townhall  

WHEN: Monday, July 28, at 6:00 PM PT/9:00 PM ET

WHERE: Register to join the Zoom event HERE 

###

Garamendi Statement on the Starvation Crisis in Gaza

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman John Garamendi – Representing California’s 3rd Congressional District

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congressman John Garamendi (D-CA-08), a senior California Democrat and member of the House Armed Services Committee, issued the following statement on the dire, devastating, and deteriorating humanitarian crisis in Gaza:

“It’s impossible to look at the starvation caused by Israel’s dangerous and willful failure to enable humanitarian aid and not see a genocide being committed against the people of Palestine,” said Garamendi. “Gaza has been in a devastating man-made crisis where starvation is widespread among children and adults, where one in three people are going multiple days without eating and many are dying because of malnutrition. This must end.

“Food is readily and immediately available. Earlier this year, it was found that 60,000 metric tons of U.S. food aid, enough for 3.5 million people, or the entire population of Gaza, was sitting in storage, untouched because of Trump’s dissolution of USAID. We know now from Israeli officials that there is little evidence of Hamas routinely stealing aid, a claim that has been used by the Israelis for not distributing aid. Israel has the ability and the means to deliver adequate food to the Palestinians. They also have the obligation under international law to deliver it; it’s the choice of Prime Minister Netanyahu not to feed Gaza.

“I have seen starvation like this. In the Peace Corps, I saw firsthand what starvation does to a child. I have repeatedly called for Israel to stop this war and to address the devastating humanitarian crisis in Gaza. I was one of the only members to vote against military support for Israel, demanding that the U.S. cannot supply more weaponry to a country that is using it recklessly against innocent civilians. I have also joined 94 of my colleagues in demanding the Israeli government immediately resume shipments of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip. I have also voted to block offensive weapons to Israel because I believe that America has an ethical imperative to ensure that humanitarian aid can promptly reach the population in Gaza.

“What Israel is doing is a horribly destructive attack on Gaza’s communities, and America should no longer provide destructive bombs and munitions to Israel. I unequivocally renew my call for Israel to immediately provide necessary humanitarian assistance and stop the purposeful starvation of Gaza.”

### 

Garamendi and Fletcher Lead House Resolution Condemning Donald Trump’s Executive Overreach, Reaffirming Congress’s Constitutional Powers

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman John Garamendi – Representing California’s 3rd Congressional District

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congressman John Garamendi (D-CA-08) and Congresswoman Lizzie Fletcher (D-TX-07) introduced a House resolution reaffirming a foundational principle of the U.S. Constitution: that no one—not even the President—is above the law. The resolution also reasserts Congress’s constitutional authority to declare war, control federal spending, and conduct oversight.

This resolution comes six months into President Donald Trump’s second term, which has been marked by escalating systematic erosion of constitutional norms and executive overreach by his administration.

The resolution is endorsed by more than a dozen public interest and legal advocacy organizations, including the Project on Government Oversight, Campaign Legal Center, and the National Women’s Law Center Action Fund. These organizations stand united in reasserting the essential roles of the legislative and judicial branches, that that every person deserves due process and equal protection under the law, and in declaring unequivocally that no individual – especially the President—is above the law.

“It’s been over six months since President Trump began his second term, and he has repeatedly shown contempt for the Constitution, the courts, and the democratic institutions that safeguard our republic,” said Congressman Garamendi. “This resolution affirms what should be nonpartisan truths: that the separation of powers matters, that Congress controls the public purse, and that the rule of law applies to everyone—especially the President of the United States. In the face of escalating threats to our constitutional order, Congress must not remain silent. This resolution is a declaration of principle and a call to action.”

“Every member of Congress takes an oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States,” said Congresswoman Lizzie Fletcher.  “As Americans become increasingly alarmed by the Trump administration’s abuse of power, executive overreach, and open defiance of the rule of law, it is important that members of Congress are reminded of their duty to support and defend the Constitution.  That is why I am joining Congressman Garamendi in introducing this legislation to reaffirm our commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law. Support for our Constitution is not a partisan or controversial issue, and it is something that every member of Congress should support, regardless of party.”

The resolution highlights numerous constitutional principles that have been undermined by the Trump Administration including the withholding of Congressionally appropriated funding, attacks on judicial independence, and the politicization of the civil service. It also draws on the warnings of the Founders, including James Madison, George Washington, and John Adams, about the dangers of unchecked executive power.

The resolution:

  • Reaffirms Congress’s constitutional authority over federal spending, war powers, and oversight.
  • Condemns the Trump Administration’s repeated violations of court orders and its attacks on judicial independence.
  • Asserts that public funds cannot be withheld or redirected without explicit authorization from Congress.
  • Urges all public officials to reject actions that undermine democratic institutions or disrupt the balance of power.
  • Defends a professional, nonpartisan civil service—protected from political purges—as vital to ensuring the federal government works for the people, not for the President’s personal or political gain.

Original cosponsors include Representative Fletcher (TX-07, co-lead), Representative Carter (LA-07), Representative Costa (CA-21) Representative Doggett (TX-37), Representative Green (TX-09), Representative Jackson (IL-01), Representative McIver (NJ-10), Representative Moulton (MA-06), Representative Mullin (CA-15), Delegate Holmes Norton (D.C.), Representative Salinas (OR-06), Representative Schrier (WA-08), Representative Soto (FL-09), Representative Thanedar (MI-13), and Representative Veasey (TX-33).

Endorsing Organizations: American Governance Institute, American Humanist Association, Campaign Legal Center, Center for Reproductive Rights, Common Cause, Democracy Defenders Action, Equality California, Freedom From Religion Foundation Action Fund, People for the American Way, National Association of Social Workers, National Women’s Law Center Action Fund, NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice, Project on Government Oversight, and the Secure Elections Network.

You can read the full resolution here and below.

Resolution, Reaffirming the principles of the United States Constitution, including separation of powers and the rule of law, and condemning efforts to undermine the same.

Whereas the United States of America is a constitutional republic, and the Constitution has served as the supreme law of the land since its adoption in 1789;  

Whereas the Constitution of the United States created three branches of government, the Legislative, the Executive, and Judicial branch, granting distinct powers to each to avoid consolidation of power in any one branch;

Whereas Congress, as the first branch of government, has the constitutional duty to declare war, regulate commerce, raise revenue, appropriate funds, and conduct investigations and inquiries into the administration of law;

Whereas Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly states that “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law”;

Whereas James Madison, in Federalist No. 58, declared that “this power over the purse may, in fact, be regarded as the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people”;

Whereas the President is not above the law;

Whereas, the President has a duty to refrain from using the vast powers of the Executive branch, including the Department of Justice, to arbitrarily prosecute or intimidate personal or political opponents;

Whereas a professional, nonpartisan civil service protected from political purges and undue influence helps ensure that the federal government functions for the people, not the personal or political interests the President;

Whereas governments that undermine the rule of law experience democratic backsliding, capital flight, and other forms of economic and civil instability;

Whereas article III of the Constitution of the United States vests the “judicial Power of the United States . . . in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish”;

Whereas the Judiciary plays an essential role in ensuring that the Executive faithfully executes the laws and does not exceed its constitutional authority;

Whereas orders issued by Federal judges are binding, and the Constitution of the United States and established precedent require the executive branch to comply with all Federal court rulings;  

Whereas, as recently affirmed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, “for more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision”;

Whereas, as is inscribed on the Department of Justice headquarters, “No free government can survive that is not based on the supremacy of the law. Where law ends, tyranny begins”;

Whereas John Adams, in his Thoughts on Government, declared that “the very definition of a republic is ‘an empire of laws, and not of men’”;

Whereas George Washington, in his Farewell Address, cautioned that “cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government”;

Whereas James Madison, in Federalist No. 47, warned that “the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny”;

Whereas Thomas Jefferson said “An elective despotism was not the government we fought for; but one which should not only be founded on free principles, but in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among several bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits, without being effectually checked and restrained by the others.”

Whereas, in the words of James Madison “ambition must be made to counteract ambition” between the three branches of government; and

Whereas the presidency is a position of service, and Presidents swear an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States: Now, therefore, be it  

Resolved, that the House of Representatives of the United States of America:

  1. reaffirms the principles of the United States Constitution, including the separation of powers, checks and balances, the independence of the judiciary, and the power of Congress to control spending, declare war, and conduct oversight;
  2. reaffirms the protections for individual rights enshrined in the Constitution including due process of law;
  3. condemns any efforts by public officials to undermine congressional authority, violate or ignore court orders or otherwise undermine the judiciary, the independence of executive agencies or the impartial application of the rule of law, or consolidate power in any single branch of government;
  4. declares that appropriations made by Congress are law, not mere recommendations, and condemns any attempt to withhold, misdirect, or spend funds without congressional approval;
  5. urges all public officials, regardless of party, to reject any actions that seek to subvert congressional or judicial authority or otherwise threaten the constitutional order.

###

 

Garamendi Slams Speaker Johnson for Risking Government Shutdown to Bury Epstein Files

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman John Garamendi – Representing California’s 3rd Congressional District

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congressman John Garamendi (D-CA-08) released the following statement in response to Speaker Mike Johnson shutting down the House of Representatives to block a vote on releasing the Epstein files—risking a government shutdown in September:

“House Republicans and Trump are so scared of releasing the Epstein Files that they are shutting down the House of Representatives for more than a month all to avoid a vote that would make this information public,” said Congressman Garamendi.  

“Donald Trump campaigned on conspiracy theories and promised to release these files to the public. Now that the Republican Party has caught the car, they are choosing to protect the elite and their own self-interests above the wishes of their voters.  

“This move is not only desperate and self-serving, but also deeply irresponsible. Six months into the year, House Republicans have failed to pass a single appropriations bill to fund essential government services.

“Mark this date: September 30th. That’s when the U.S. government runs out of money. Instead of doing their jobs and drafting a budget, Republicans chose to waste time and cover up for Donald Trump and his elite friends.

“If they don’t get their act together, air traffic controllers, TSA agents, and law enforcement officers will be forced to work without pay. It means national parks and museums will close. Social Security assistance, passport processing, and other government services we rely on will be closed. And of course it will cost taxpayers billions of dollars.

“Speaker Johnson could have simply released the Epstein files and kept his promise of a transparent government. Instead, he chose to protect Trump and powerful elites rather than serve the American people and sadly this manufactured crisis will likely have real-work impacts for the people we serve.”

### 

RELEASE: REP. KHANNA AND OVERSIGHT RANKING MEMBER GARCIA REQUEST COPY OF “BIRTHDAY BOOK” FROM EPSTEIN’S ESTATE

Source: United States House of Representatives – Rep Ro Khanna (CA-17)

Washington, DC – Today, Representative Ro Khanna (CA-17) and Committee on Oversight and Accountability Ranking Member​​ Robert Garcia (CA-42) sent a letter to lawyers of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein requesting a complete copy of the “birthday book,” compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003 in celebration of Mr. Epstein’s 50th birthday, no later than August 10, 2025 while prioritizing the privacy of the victims.  

“The question is simple. Do you stand with America’s children and survivors of abuse or with the wealthy and powerful who are being protected? I am leading the push for the release of the Epstein files because the public deserves to know the truth and the survivors and their families deserve justice. Congress went home instead of voting for my bipartisan bill to release the files. Our letter today calls for a release of the ‘birthday book,’ which is also relevant to the case. We will continue pushing for the truth,” said Representative Khanna. 

“Today, we are asking the Epstein Estate to immediately turn over a copy of the so-called ‘birthday book.’ The American people deserve the truth about who was a part of Epstein’s closest circle of friends.  Most importantly, the American people deserve to know who was involved in Epstein’s trafficking network and if they are in positions of power in our government. Committee Democrats are continuing the push for the truth, and we will not relent,” said Ranking Member Garcia.

Full text of the letter below

Dear Mr. Ruzumna, Mr. Weiner, and Mr. Moskowitz:

“Recent public reporting indicates that the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein is in possession of a document commonly referred to as “the birthday book,” compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003 in celebration of Mr. Epstein’s 50th birthday, with clear relevance to this case. To assist in bringing transparency and accountability, we request that you provide a complete, unredacted copy of the 2003 “birthday book” no later than August 10, 2025, which may provide information essential to further our constitutionally obligated congressional oversight efforts.

As President Trump continues desperate attempts to quell public interest in the release of files related to his long-time friend, convicted sex offender, and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, we write with deep concern regarding potential public corruption, abuse of power, and failures in the federal law enforcement response to the Epstein case.  Recent public reporting indicates that the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein is in possession of a document commonly referred to as “the birthday book,” compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003 in celebration of Mr. Epstein’s 50th birthday, with clear relevance to this case. To assist in bringing transparency and accountability, we request that you provide a complete, unredacted copy of the 2003 “birthday book” no later than August 10, 2025, which may provide information essential to further our constitutionally obligated congressional oversight efforts.

Public reporting indicates that President Trump submitted a poem and drawing for the “birthday book” and that it contains messages and illustrations from wealthy and powerful friends and associates of Jeffrey Epstein.   The book is relevant for ongoing congressional oversight of the Department of Justice’s handling of the Epstein investigation and prosecution, as well as the Trump Administration’s decision to declassify and release only a handful of documents from the Epstein files while withholding others from the public. In addition, the Committee has issued a subpoena to depose Ms. Maxwell, the book’s alleged creator, and should be permitted to review its contents.   Information gathered from this document may also inform the development of legislative reforms addressing sex trafficking networks, financial regulation, or other critical matters of public policy.

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the principal oversight committee of the U.S. House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.  If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Committee Democratic staff at (202) 225-5051.  Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.  

Sincerely,

Ro Khanna
Member of Congress

Robert Garcia

Ranking Member House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

###

RELEASE: REP. RO KHANNA AND SENATOR ED MARKEY REINTRODUCE THE STATE-BASED UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE ACT

Source: United States House of Representatives – Rep Ro Khanna (CA-17)

Washington, DC –  This week, Representative Ro Khanna (CA-17) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) reintroduced the State-Based Universal Health Care Act. Understanding the growing need in America for quality healthcare and the unique ability of American states to lead the push toward universal healthcare, Rep. Khanna and Senator Markey’s bill provides states with federal funding streams and regulatory flexibility to support affordable, universal health care plans.

Nearly 70% of Americans support a public health insurance option. Washington, Nevada, Colorado, and Minnesota have each passed a version of a public health insurance option. The State-Based Universal Health Care Act creates a waiver granting states the ability to curate and provide state-specific health care plans for residents via access to federal funding streams and flexible regulations. To apply for the waiver, participating states or groups of states must propose plans to provide health care coverage for 95 percent of their residents within five years. 

The State-Based Universal Health Care Act also requires benefits provided under state plans be equal to or greater than what federal beneficiaries receive now. An independent panel of health care experts and officials would evaluate whether a state’s proposal meets the requirements and would then provide a public recommendation of waiver application approval or rejection to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

“State-based universal health care will help fix a broken system that has left far too many Americans subject to the crushing weight of medical debt. By providing coverage to millions of Americans, we can build a stronger path toward Medicare for All and protect health care as a human right. I’m honored to join my colleague Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass) in introducing this legislation that will deliver quality, affordable care to ordinary Americans,” said Representative Ro Khanna (CA-17). 

“With the passage of Trump’s Big Ugly Bill, Republicans chose to put corporate wealth over the public’s health. We must fight for a system that cannot be raided by billionaires, that doesn’t charge too much for too little, leave people in debt, burn out health providers, and deny the high quality, unlimited care that people deserve. The State-Based Universal Health Care Act would allow states to pave the way toward a system that is not driven by profit, but by people’s health. It’s time we create a system that protects access to high quality, affordable care and moves us closer to the reality of Medicare for All,” said Senator Ed Markey (D-MA). 

“It is criminal that in the richest country on Earth, Americans die and suffer because they can’t get the health care they need, while private insurance companies rake in billions of dollars. As we continue to build toward Medicare for All at the federal level, the State-Based Universal Health Care Act is a critical step to provide millions more Americans with high quality and affordable care. Thank you to Representative Khanna and Senator Markey for leading this important legislation,” said Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (WA-07). 

“Our job as leaders is to be ready with a new way forward, when the healthcare system collapses in the next few years here. I believe that way is through a universal health care system with a single public payer, be it at the state level or the federal level. We must ensure the freedom for Americans to choose to change jobs without worrying about losing their coverage. The freedom to start a new business! Isn’t that the American way? With Medicare for All, we’ll be able to get more care for less cost and it’ll be easier for the patients, and that’s who we really should be thinking of nonstop,” State Representative Carrie A. Rheingans (Ann Arbor, MI, House District 47).

“I’m proud to stand with my colleagues in D.C. who have introduced a brilliant bill to enable states to establish universal healthcare systems with support from the federal government. I assure my fellow New Yorkers that we could establish a single payer system through the NY Health Act without a federal waiver, but the State-Based Universal Health Care Act would make that process far more seamless and ultimately, make healthcare more accessible and affordable and fix our broken healthcare system,” said New York State Senator Gustavo Rivera.

“To keep our country moving forward we must reimagine the future of health care access. Having one payment system that covers all people just makes sense. It would be more cost effective, cover more people, save businesses and families money and help our providers deliver care by not being tied up with administrative burdens. The SBUHC Act will open up more opportunities for states to start down this road and I’m excited about the future of fixing our broken healthcare payment system with a One Payer system,” said State Representative Karen McCormick (Longmont, CO, House District 11).

“Health insurance monopolies have created a stupidly complex health care system to guarantee exorbitant profits for Wall Street at the expense of the hard-working people who call the USA home.  To meet their shareholders’ profit expectations, those monopolies kick more and more doctors and hospitals out of their networks every year, jack up our premiums and make us all pay money out of our own pockets before they’ll pay a dime – money many families just don’t have – and in many cases, they refuse to pay even a dime for treatments and medications we need. States should be allowed to build a better system for the USA — one that is Universal, Simple and Affordable. This bill would let them do that,” said Wendell Potter, President of the Center for Health and Democracy. 

“Representative Khanna’s and Senator Markey’s reintroduction of the State-Based Universal Health Care Act (SBUHCA) of 2025 provides a golden opportunity for Congress to promote innovative state efforts to establish world-class healthcare programs. Efficient-and-effective, patient-centered, practitioner-friendly, state-based healthcare systems to improve lives, save dollars, and model solutions for other states and the nation. Through the provisioning of waivers for federal healthcare dollars and legal protections for qualifying states, SBUHCA represents the highest tradition in American economic, social, and political reform: state innovation and experimentation as the birthplace of best ideas and practices for the United States,” said Chuck Pennacchio, President of One Payer States.

“The State Based Universal Health Care Act would allow states already poised to lead on this, like Massachusetts, California and New York, to enact cutting edge health care systems that improve access for patients while reducing wasteful spending. This bill would make it easier for every state to take the necessary steps to implement efficient single-payer health care and ensure that everyone in the state can get the care they need when they need it. Such reforms would also mean massive savings on health care costs for both states and cities. At a time that access to healthcare is under attack by greedy corporations and craven politicians, this bill would allow states to implement single-payer health care and show a path to finally achieving guaranteed universal health care in the U.S.,” said Eagan Kemp, Health Care Policy Advocate at Public Citizen.

The full bill can be viewed here

###