Merkley, Bonamici, Oregon Delegation Slam Trump Education Funding Cuts Harming Schools Across the State

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Suzanne Bonamici (1st District Oregon)

Washington, D.C. – Oregon’s U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley and U.S. Representative Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01) led the Oregon Democratic delegation—Senator Ron Wyden and U.S. Representatives Val Hoyle (OR-04), Andrea Salinas (OR-06), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), and Janelle Bynum (OR-05)—to demand the Trump Administration reverse its abrupt cutoff of more than $73 million in federal education funds for Oregon, harming afterschool programs, specialized literacy programs, educator training, and support for English language learners at schools.

 

“Any withholding of these critical funds will negatively affect the State of Oregon’s efforts to increase academic outcomes for all our students, particularly our multilingual and migrant education students. It will undermine successful initiatives to recruit talented teachers and retain them in our schools, and it will undermine the ability for students to be taught in safe and secure environments. Additionally, withholding funds that support student learning through summer and after-school programs will undermine Oregon’s efforts to help all students thrive in their education,” wrote the lawmakers to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russ Vought and U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon.

 

The Oregon delegation letter follows Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield announcing the state joined a coalition of states to file a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s freezing of these federal education funds. The Administration this week also moved to fire 1,400 Education Department employees, impacting the agency’s ability to perform essential functions such as distributing financial aid and essential federal dollars.

 

“Oregon’s school districts are dedicated and efficient stewards of federal dollars, leveraging funds from [these grant programs] to improve student outcomes and serve Oregon’s student population,” they continued. “For example, Neah-Kah-Nie School District in rural Tillamook County uses ESEA Title II, Part A dollars to fund literacy interventionists in their rural elementary schools so students struggling with reading, writing, and comprehension get targeted support. Without Title II dollars, Portland Public Schools, Oregon’s largest school district serving more than 44,000 students, will lose the ability to provide critical professional development and support for teachers working in low-income schools with challenging student needs.”

 

The lawmakers stressed, “In addition, Hood River Valley School District uses a 21st Century Community Learning Center grant under ESEA Title IV to administer academic support in after-school programs at four Title I schools across this rural region. Similarly, Umatilla School District uses the funds for an after-school program that supports extended learning for roughly half of its K-12 students and provides an opportunity for the students to participate in robotics and a variety of STEAM-focused classes.”

 

Merkley and Wyden also previously joined 30 Senate colleagues to demand OMB Director Vought and Secretary McMahon immediately release nearly $7 billion in frozen funding for K-12 schools and adult literacy programs nationwide.

 

“We respectfully demand that you abide by the law and immediately release this previously appropriated funding. Oregon’s students are counting on you and so are we,” the lawmakers directed.

 

Full text of the Oregon delegation’s letter can be found HERE.

 

###

Bonamici, Bacon Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Bolster Affordable Manufactured Housing

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Suzanne Bonamici (1st District Oregon)

WASHINGTON, DC [7/17/25] –Today Representatives Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) and Don Bacon (R-NE) introduced bipartisan legislation to support manufactured housing communities. 

The Preservation and Reinvestment Initiative for Community Enhancement (PRICE) Act would help preserve and revitalize manufactured housing by making permanent the PRICE grant program, which funds eligible home improvements and neighborhood upgrades.

“We need more affordable housing in every corner of NW Oregon,” said Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici. “Manufactured housing is often the most affordable option, but many of these communities need investments in infrastructure like water and sewer systems to continue providing a quality place to live. The PRICE Act will help increase the supply of affordable manufactured housing and improve existing communities.” 

“Manufactured home communities represent a vital lifeline for countless American families seeking affordable housing options, particularly in areas with limited multi-family housing. The bipartisan Preservation and Reinvestment Initiative for Community Enhancement (PRICE) Act ensures these communities receive the necessary support for infrastructure improvements that will enhance the quality of life for residents,” said. Rep. Bacon. “I am pleased to co-lead this initiative establishing a permanent HUD grant program to preserve manufactured home communities, making them viable and affordable housing options for families across Nebraska and throughout the nation.” 

The legislation is endorsed by ROC USA.

“We are so grateful for the leadership of Congresswoman Bonamici and Congressman Bacon for hearing their constituents and addressing critical needs in manufactured home communities,” said ROC USA President Emily Thaden. “In addition to spurring new housing supply with manufactured homes, the PRICE program will ensure these neighborhoods have resources to maintain resilient and healthy infrastructure just like any other community.”

The full text of the PRICE Act can be found here.

###

Boyle Ranked PA’s “Most Effective” Democratic Member of Congress

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Brendan Boyle (13th District of Pennsylvania)

WASHINGTON, DCThe Center for Effective Lawmaking at the University of Virginia and Vanderbilt University has named Congressman Brendan F. Boyle (PA‑02) the most effective Democratic member of Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation. As the top Democrat on the powerful House Budget Committee, Boyle plays a key role in shaping the nation’s economic priorities, leveraging that position to protect critical programs and deliver real investments for Pennsylvania families.

“My top priority in Congress has always been getting real results for the people I represent, regardless of party,” said Congressman Boyle. “I’m proud of this recognition from the Center for Effective Lawmaking and I’ll keep working every day to deliver for the people of Pennsylvania.”

The Center’s rankings are based on a comprehensive, data-driven analysis of legislative activity, including bill sponsorship, progress through committee, and bills signed into law. Congressman Boyle earned the top effectiveness score among Pennsylvania Democrats in the House—reflecting his leadership, productivity, and commitment to delivering results.

The Center’s full rankings are available here

A high-resolution headshot of Congressman Boyle is available here.

###

Rep. Adams Supports AG Jackson’s Lawsuit to Release $6.2B in Federal Education Funds

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

WASHINGTON, DC— Today, Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), Ranking Member of the House Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development, released a statement supporting North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson’s lawsuit to release $6.2 billion in Congressionally authorized federal education funds, including $12 million for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (CMS), currently being withheld by the Trump Administration.

“I applaud Attorney General Jeff Jackson and Superintendent Mo Green for standing up for North Carolina students, teachers, and schools,” said Congresswoman Adams. “Recklessly withholding these federal education funds has placed CMS in an untenable position: understaff our classrooms or incur millions of dollars in debt. Either option is a disservice to and betrayal of our students. I will continue fighting at the federal level for these funds to be released and am grateful to see AG Jackson use his office to do the same.”

On July 11, Rep. Adams co-led a 150 House Democrat letter to the Department of Education and the Office of Management and Budget calling for information on why these funds have been withheld and when they will be released.

For press inquiries, contact Congresswoman Adams Communications Director Kaleb Harmon by email at kaleb.harmon@mail.house.gov.

NC Democratic Delegation: Senate Rescissions Bill Will Harm Emergency Disaster Response

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

Lawmakers call on Senate leadership to eliminate harmful cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, warning it will impact emergency disaster communications and response.

WASHINGTON, DC— Today, Representatives Alma Adams (NC-12), Deobrah Ross (NC-02), Valerie Foushee (NC-04) , and Don Davis (NC-01) sent a letter calling on Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-ME), and Senate Appropriations Ranking Member Patty Murray (D-WA) to strike cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, including 39 public broadcasting stations in North Carolina, from the Senate rescissions package, citing concerns that cuts to public broadcasting will impact emergency disaster communications and response.

In their letter, the lawmakers wrote, “A federal halt of funding would hurt domestic community TV and radio stations supported by the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and National Public Radio (NPR). Public broadcasting is pivotal to North Carolina, and across the country, especially during hurricane season and other natural disasters.”

They continued by emphasizing the lifesaving service provided by public broadcasting during the 2024 Hurricane Helene disaster, devastating communities in Western North Carolina. “During Hurricane Helene when communities in western North Carolina lost power and the internet, many relied exclusively on public radio for updates, such as when the water was coming back on or what local food resources were available. It also provided a platform for county emergency teams to give multiple updates during the day to ensure people were safe. It truly was a lifeline for many people in North Carolina.”

The lawmakers highlighted the impact public broadcasting has on rural communities who often lack access to high-speed internet and cable services, saying, “Many parts of North Carolina are rural with limited access to high-speed internet or cable. Public broadcasting reaches these communities via radio and TV over the airwaves without internet. Cutting funds reduces coverage quality and programming reach, leaving vulnerable populations less informed.”

They also discussed the importance corporate broadcasting funding has on local stations, drawing attention to the impact local journalists have on disaster communications. “During hurricanes, local stations tailor information specific to affected counties on shelters, road closures, and recovery efforts… This precise, on-the-ground information and knowledge of local areas were indispensable for survival during and after the storm, which national stations would not be able to provide.”

The lawmakers concluded their letter by emphasizing the importance of public broadcasting for emergency disaster communication and response, especially for rural communities. “Cutting funds for public broadcasting in North Carolina, and across the country, undermines trusted, accessible, and crucial communication tools during natural disasters. It puts residents, especially those in rural and vulnerable communities, at greater risk by limiting access to live-saving information and recovery resources.”

Full text of the letter is available here.

Rep. Adams Slams USDA for Cutting Funding for Rural Business Centers Supporting Farmers

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

WASHINGTON, DC— Today, Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), Senior Member of the House Agriculture Committee, released a statement calling for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to reinstate funding for Regional Food Business Centers (RFBCs). The USDA froze funds for the program in January and announced today they were cancelling the program entirely, cutting services to thousands of farms, farmers, and food businesses.

A USDA report from October 2024 found that RFBCs already led to 2,800 individuals receiving technical assistance, 1,500 new partnerships formed by recipients, and 287 businesses reporting increased revenue as a result of the program.

“While cost of living skyrockets and our farmers struggle to make ends meet due to the reckless trade war, the Trump Administration is stripping away a lifeline to our agriculture communities,” said Congresswoman Adams. “Our small, mid-sized, and family farms are the backbone of our economy, but this administration has chosen to abandon them by defunding the Regional Food Business Centers. Investing in our rural communities is always the right thing to do and I demand the USDA reinstate this program so we can offer our farmers and agriculture producers the support they deserve.”

Cuts to the RFCB program add to other program cancellations led by the Trump Administration earlier this year that impact farmers. Specifically, the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement and Local Food for Schools directly supported local farmers by enabling them to sell their products to schools and food banks before its cancellation in March.

Rep. Adams, Colleagues Join Union Workers to Announce Legislation to Protect Workers from Extreme Heat

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

WASHINGTON, DC— Today, as Charlotte and North Carolina face another harsh heat wave, Representative Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12) and House and Senate colleagues joined union workers from United Farm Workers (UFW), American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and United Steelworkers to announce their bipartisan, bicameral legislation to implement federal enforceable workplace heat stress protections.

Rep. Adams was joined by Senators Alex Padilla (D-CA) and Edward J. Markey (D-MA), and Representatives Judy Chu (CA-2) and Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (VA-03), Ranking Member of the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

The Asunción Valdivia Heat Illness, Injury and Fatality Prevention Act would direct OSHA to establish a permanent federal standard to protect workers against excessive heat exposure at work, both in indoor and outdoor environments. The standard would include common-sense precautions, such as ensuring that workers who are in high-heat environments have paid breaks in shaded or climate-controlled spaces, providing cool water for proper hydration, and requiring emergency response and transportation for workers incurring heat-related illness. 

According to OSHA, excessive heat officially caused the deaths of 121 workers on the job between 2017 and 2022 and is likely undercounted with heat-related deaths often misattributed to other causes in the workplace.

The bill is named in honor of Asunción Valdivia, who died from a workplace-related heat stroke in 2004 after picking grapes in California for ten straight hours in 105-degree temperatures. Mr. Valdivia fell unconscious and, instead of calling an ambulance, his employer told his son to drive Mr. Valdivia home. On his way home, he died of a preventable heat stroke at the age of 53. 

“As we face record temperatures, it has never been more important that we protect our workers facing extreme heat in the workplace,” said Congresswoman Adams. “Last year, North Carolina postal worker Wendy Johnson lost her life to heat illness after spending hours in the back of a postal truck on a 95-degree day with no air conditioning. Her death was entirely preventable, and Wendy should still be with us today. I’m proud to introduce this bill so we can honor her memory and ensure every worker has the protections from extreme heat that Wendy deserved.”

“As we continue to experience record-breaking summer heat waves, we’re also seeing a distressing increase in cases of workers collapsing and even losing their lives due to excessive heat. I will never forget people like Asunción Valdivia or Esteban Chavez Jr., who passed away in Pasadena, California in 2022 after a day of delivering packages in 90-degree heat in a truck without air conditioning. Unfortunately, their tragic deaths were entirely preventable,” said Rep. Chu. “Whether on a farm, driving a truck, or working in a warehouse, workers like Asunción and Esteban keep our country running while enduring some of the most difficult conditions—often without access to water or rest. To protect our workforce and save lives, we must pass this bill into law and establish comprehensive and enforceable federal standards addressing heat stress on the job.”

“Asunción Valdivia’s death was completely preventable, yet his story is sadly not unique. As the planet continues to grow hotter, there is still no federally enforceable heat safety standard for workers. That’s not just dangerous for the farm workers and construction workers who work all day outside in the sun — it’s also dangerous for the factory and restaurant workers in boiling warehouses and kitchens,” said Senator Padilla. “Every family deserves to know that even on the hottest day, their loved one will come back home. A national heat safety standard would provide that peace of mind and finally give workers the safety they deserve.”

“This summer, Americans across the country are grappling with some of the hottest temperatures on record. Yet workers in this country still have no legal protection against excessive heat—one of the oldest, most serious, and most common workplace hazards. Heat illness affects workers in our nation’s fields, warehouses, and factories, and climate change is making the problem more severe every year,” said Ranking Member Scott, House Committee on Education and Workforce. “This legislation will require OSHA to issue a heat standard on a much faster track than the normal OSHA regulatory process. I was proud to advance this important bill in 2022, and I urge Chairman Walberg and Committee Republicans to do so again this Congress. Workers deserve nothing less, particularly as heat-related illnesses and deaths rise.”

“Even as heat waves become more frequent, longer-lasting, and more severe, red state politicians are rolling back heat protections and child labor protections across the country. It’s not rocket science—you cannot be pro-worker if you are anti-heat protection,” said Senator Markey. “Our legislation would provide workers with basic, effective protections: access to water, access to shade, time limits on high heat exposure, and procedures for emergency medical response. Every worker deserves to know when they clock in that they will return home safe at the end of their shift.  The thermometer is rising and the clock is ticking. Republicans want to sacrifice working Americans. Let’s save our workers instead.”

“From farmhands to construction workers, America’s essential workforce is doing important work while under extreme heat conditions,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “Temperatures continue to reach record highs in Nevada and across the United States. We must act now to protect our communities’ vital workers.”

The Asunción Valdivia Heat Illness, Injury, and Fatality Prevention Act has the support of a broad coalition of over 250 groups, including: Rural Coalition, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO, UNITE HERE!, Communication Workers of America, Alianza Nacional de Campesinas, Sierra Club, United Farm Workers, Farmworker Justice, Public Citizen, International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Union of Concerned Scientists, United Steelworkers, National Resources Defense Council, American Lung Association, and Health Partnerships.

“Too many workers – including AFSCME members – have lost their lives on the job as a result of blistering heat waves and record-breaking temperatures,” said AFSCME President Lee Saunders. “As the number of heat-related illnesses and fatalities continue to rise, it is well past time we adopt nationwide safeguards to better protect the workers who maintain our infrastructure, keep our streets clean, harvest our food, and keep our economy moving. We at AFSCME thank Senator Padilla and Representative Chu for introducing the Asunción Valdivia Heat Illness, Injury, and Fatality Prevention Act, which will ensure essential workers who brave the heat can do their jobs safely and effectively, and most importantly, make it home alive.”

“Everyone deserves safe working conditions, but powerful corporations have not done enough to protect their workers from hot working environments, exacerbated by the climate crisis,” said Liz Shuler, President of the AFL-CIO. “Extreme heat is increasingly causing indoor and outdoor workers to collapse or even die on the job, and our union family has already lost too many members to preventable, work-related heat illness. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) must issue a strong heat rule, not a weak one, to ensure workers have specific protections they need and to be able to raise unsafe working conditions without fear of retaliation.”

Full text of the bill is available here.

Rep. Adams Blasts Republicans for Reckless Cuts to Public Broadcasting

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

WASHINGTON, DC— Today, Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), Senior Member of the House Agriculture and Education & Workforce Committees, released a statement blasting Republicans for their reckless, partisan vote to cut $1.1 billion in federal public broadcasting funding through the rescissions bill.

“Local public broadcasting was a lifeline to my state during Hurricane Helene. When power, internet, and cell service failed, thousands of North Carolinians received lifesaving updates from public radio including emergency resource information, road closures, and live briefings from county officials,” Congresswoman Adams said. “Without their work, more people would have needlessly lost their lives from this disaster. Republicans’ decision to defund public broadcasting today only serves to abandon communities facing natural disasters in the future, especially rural Americans, and they should be ashamed.”

On Tuesday, Rep. Adams led a letter with Representatives Deobrah Ross (NC-02), Valerie Foushee (NC-04), and Don Davis (NC-01) discussing the importance of public broadcasting for emergency communications, especially in context of the Hurricane Helene disaster in Western North Carolina.

Chairman Guest Opens Hearing on How NGOs Fueled the Border Crisis: “Tax Dollars Were Used to Form the Final Link in Cartels’ Human Smuggling”

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Michael Guest (MS-03)

WASHINGTON, D.C. –– Today, Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS), chairman of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement, delivered the following opening statement in a full committee hearing to examine how non-governmental organizations (NGOs) helped facilitate and benefited from the historic Biden-Harris border crisis, as well as how far-left NGOs are still working to help inadmissible aliens undermine federal immigration law under the Trump administration. 

  

   

Watch Subcommittee Chairman Guest’s full opening statement in a hearing entitled, “An Inside Job: How NGOs Facilitated the Biden Border Crisis.”

 
As prepared for delivery:
 
For four years, the Biden-Harris administration created the worst border crisis in American history. From day one, Biden, Harris, and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas implemented a policy of mass catch-and-release, dismantled effective border-security policies, and gutted interior enforcement. As a result, roughly 13 million inadmissible aliens were either encountered at our borders or entered as gotaways. The consequences have been devastating.   

Thousands of Americans were lost to fentanyl poisonings. Gang members wreaked havoc in local communities. Young women like Laken Riley, Jocelyn Nungaray, and Rachel Morin were raped, abused, and murdered by illegal aliens. 

This committee led the way in impeaching Secretary Mayorkas for his willful and systemic refusal to enforce longstanding immigration laws—laws passed and amended over the years by bipartisan majorities in Congress. The American people also emphatically rejected the open-borders policies at the ballot box last November.  

What is not known by many, and what will be highlighted today at this hearing, is that the Biden-Harris administration could not execute an open borders policy on its own. They needed help, and that help came from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) funded by the federal government.  

These groups that received billions in taxpayer funding would prove instrumental in helping the Biden-Harris administration process and release a historic number of illegal aliens into our communities.  

Under a DHS program called the Emergency Food and Shelter Humanitarian Program (EFSP-H), which later became the Shelter and Services Program, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provided grants to numerous NGOs, many of whom were operating at the Southwest border.  These groups spent billions of taxpayer dollars given to them by the Biden and Harris administration to provide all manner of benefits to illegal aliens “recently released from DHS custody,” according to the department. 

Our taxpayer dollars were spent on purchasing tens of thousands of nights in hotel rooms for illegal aliens, instead of using existing ICE detention facilities to house those detained individuals. The Biden-Harris Administration sent taxpayer dollars to NGOs to put them in hotels at the cost of hundreds of dollars per night, often without any ICE supervision. 

Even worse, our tax dollars were used to form the final link in the cartels’ human smuggling operation, paying to help illegal aliens travel to their preferred destination—Chicago, New York, Miami, Los Angeles, and other destinations of choice.   

Jason Owens, then-chief of the Border Patrol’s Del Rio Sector, told us in an official interview, “ICE would then turn [illegal aliens] over to NGOs for them to travel to wherever they were going to go while they await their hearing.”   

Recent studies have shown that illegal aliens who passed through the doors of these NGOs at the border ended up in effectively every congressional district in this country. Many of the NGOs served as a launching pad for mass illegal immigration.   

The abuse was so widespread that even the Biden-Harris administration and the NGOs couldn’t deny what was happening. In June 2022, one DHS official said the department “will continue to closely coordinate with and support…NGOs to facilitate the movement of any individual encountered at the Southwest border…” John Martin with the Opportunity Center for the Homeless, an NGO in El Paso, said that his organization works with illegal aliens to “facilitate travel to the destination of their choice.”  

These actions appear to constitute a violation of Section 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which prohibits any individual from encouraging or inducing someone to enter the country unlawfully, or helping transport them in the interior. 

Corruption and waste were rampant in the spending by NGOs. Under Biden and Harris, DHS’s top watchdog audited millions of dollars that had gone to local grant recipients over a six-month period in 2021. They found that a lack of proper documentation kept them from determining how more than half of that money had been spent. In some cases, they discovered that funds had been used to pay for benefits for individuals who were legally ineligible to receive them.    

The Biden border crisis proved to be a profitable business model for NGOs. According to the Free Press, three large NGOs involved in handling unaccompanied alien children—Global Refuge who received 85 percent of its revenue from government grants, Endeavors who received 97 percent of its funding from government grants and Southwest Key Programs who received an astonishing 99 percent of its revenue from government funding — these three groups saw “their combined revenue grow to an astonishing $2 billion by 2022.”   
 
They had a vested interest in prolonging the crisis. One NGO, Southwest Key Programs, used the increase in government funding to raise salaries of officers across the board, including an over $675,000 salary increase for their CEO, according to media reporting.  

Many NGOs tried to mislead the public in how these funds were being allocated, as documented by a recent Florida grand jury investigation, “actively obstructed” efforts to determine how they were spending federal dollars. The grand jury also noted that some NGOs received the vast majority of their funding from federal grants—pretty interesting for groups calling themselves “non-governmental organizations.”  

The American people are tired of being told that we should fund the actions of those breaking our laws. They are tired of groups encouraging people to cross the border illegally, and organizations that facilitate the release of illegal aliens into the interior.   

When would-be border crossers know that a host of benefits awaits them immediately after crossing the border, they are more likely to make the deadly journey. That’s exactly what happened on Biden and Harris’s watch as millions of vulnerable people put themselves in the hands of the cartels and smuggling groups.

An untold number perished along the route. Tens of thousands more suffered physical and sexual assault on the way, and many are still trapped paying off their cartel debts through forced labor or working in the sex trade.   

We can and should look for ways to care for the vulnerable and less fortunate. But using taxpayer dollars to undermine our laws and the well-being of Americans and migrants alike is not the way to do it. We cannot let taxpayer dollars be used to facilitate lawbreaking. Shining a light on this disgrace is the first step in accountability. This can never happen again.   

  

###

Pappas Continues to Underscore the Negative Impact of the Big, Ugly Bill on New Hampshire Communities and Seniors

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Chris Pappas (D-NH)

Today Congressman Chris Pappas (NH-01) met with staff and residents of Hillsborough County Nursing Home (HCNH) to discuss how the Republican’s so-called “One Big, Beautiful Bill”, which is now law, makes devastating cuts to Medicaid funding that is essential to New Hampshire nursing homes, their operations, and patient care.

“People deserve to retire with dignity and live peacefully. Nursing homes are key to ensuring our seniors can do so while getting the care they need. Medicaid is the primary payer for about six in ten nursing home residents. The Big, Ugly Bill, which is now law, makes devastating cuts to Medicaid funding that New Hampshire nursing homes rely on to give tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy. Without these resources, their services and care are in real jeopardy,” said Congressman Pappas. “Today I joined staff and residents of Hillsborough County Nursing Home to hear directly from them about these impacts. I fought against the passage of this cruel legislation, and I will continue working to protect health care access and other essential programs for New Hampshire families and seniors.”

“Our nursing homes try our best to provide quality, affordable care to seniors. The cuts to Medicaid threaten our operations, will increase costs for residents, push the burden onto county taxpayers, and ultimately, could lead to loss of care throughout our state,” said David Ross, Administrator of the Hillsborough County Nursing Home. “Ahead of the reconciliation bill’s passage, I reached out to the Congressman’s office about my concerns. I’m grateful for him voting no, for coming to us today to hear from staff and our residents, and for his work to protect and strengthen access to care.”

Background:

Pappas voted against Republicans’ reconciliation bill every timeit came to the floor. Pappas filed two amendments to the Senate-passed Republican reconciliation bill to protect Granite Staters’ access to Medicaid and food assistance and to prevent Congress from passing the burden of cuts to these programs onto the state; neither was adopted.

Now law, this legislation included deep cuts to health care and food programs for working families to cover the cost of $5 trillion in tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy. It will leave an estimated 17 million Americans uninsured, including at least 46,388 Granite Staters; trigger $500 billion in cuts to Medicare; increase monthly out-of-pocket costs for families and leave more Americans with overwhelming medical debt; defund Planned Parenthood, leaving more than 1.1 million women without access to needed care like cancer screenings and birth control; and kick millions of Americans off SNAP, leaving them unable to put food on the table.

In February, Pappas held a roundtable with New Hampshire health care advocates and community leaders to highlight the devastating impact the Republican budget would have on New Hampshire residents’ access to health care and local community health centers’ ability to serve their patients. In April, he held another discussion to highlight the negative impact the legislation would have on people who access care through the Medicaid program and New Hampshire’s Medicaid Expansion. Pappas spoke on the floor several times in opposition to the reconciliation bill and on behalf of his constituents on Medicaid and SNAP.