Kaptur, Keating, Wilson, Smith Introduce Legislation Formalizing US-Belarus Strategic Dialogue

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)

Toledo, OH  This week, the bipartisan Co-Chairs of the House Belarus Caucus, Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), Congressman Bill Keating (MA-09), Congressman Joe Wilson (SC-02), and Congressman Chris Smith (NJ-04) introduced legislation to formalize an annual US-Belarus Strategic Dialogue to continue US engagement with the Belarusian democratic opposition, strengthen Belarusian civil society, and ensure accountability for the regime of Alyaksandr Lukashenka. This bill comes at a critical moment as the people of Belarus continue to resist the regime even as it remains complicit in Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and continues to persecute the people Lukashenka purports to represent.

“Today, we are introducing legislation that will formalize a platform for dialogue between the United States and the Belarusian democratic opposition to promote the restoration of democracy in Belarus and support the release of political prisoners held by the Lukashenka regime,” said the Co-Chairs. “The Lukashenka regime continues to silence the voice of the Belarusian people and commit gross human rights abuses. We must stand with the democratic opposition and demand the regime be held accountable for its actions. This legislation sends a clear message that the United States stands firmly with the people of Belarus in their struggle against authoritarian rule, and we will continue to support their pursuit of a free, democratic future.”

# # #

Reps. Hank Johnson and Sydney Kamlager-Dove Introduce Bill To Protect Artists’ 1st Amendment Rights

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Hank Johnson (GA-04)

Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech.” 

 “Freddy Mercury did not confess to having ‘just killed a man’ by putting ‘a gun against his head’ and ‘’pulling the trigger. Bob Marley did not confess to having shot a sheriff. And Johnny Cash did not confess to shooting ‘a man in Reno, just to watch him die’  

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congressman Hank Johnson (GA-04) and Congresswoman Sydney Kamlager-Dove (CA-37)  re-introduced the Restoring Artistic Protection Act (RAP Act) to protect Americans from the wrongful use of their creative or artistic expression against them in criminal and civil proceedings.  

The legislation, H.R. 4678, originally introduced in the 117th Congress, is the first bill of its kind at the federal level. The RAP Act adds a presumption to the Federal Rules of Evidence that would limit the admissibility of evidence of an artist’s creative or artistic expression against that artist in court. 

As of June 2025, researchers have identified more than 820 instances of creative works being used in criminal trials from media reports and the appellate record alone. These cases most often revolve around the presentation of a defendant’s rap lyrics as literal confession, despite the genre’s well-known motifs of exaggeration, braggadocio, and playfulness. In practice, it is a loophole to admit character and propensity evidence, which are explicitly prohibited under Federal Rules of Evidence

“This legislation is long overdue,” said Congressman Johnson. “For too long, artists – particularly young Black artists – have been unfairly targeted by prosecutors who use their lyrics as evidence of guilt, even though there is no evidence that the lyrics are anything more than creative expression. When you allow music and creativity to be silenced, you’re opening the door for other realms of free speech to be curtailed as well. The government should not be able to silence artists simply because they write, draw, sing, or rap about controversial or taboo subjects. The Restoring Artistic Protection Act (RAP Act) would protect artists’ First Amendment rights by limiting the admissibility of their lyrics as evidence in criminal and civil proceedings. I thank my colleague Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove for joining me in co-leading this legislation.” 

“From poetry to plays to music, creative expression should be viewed as just that—not evidence to be held against artists in court,” said Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove. “Far too often, artists’ lyrics are used against them as evidence in court—disproportionately impacting young, Black artists. At a time when the Trump Administration is attempting to curtail free speech and silence dissent, legislation to protect artists’ freedom of expression is more important than ever. I’m proud to co-lead the RAP Act to encourage artists to create freely, without fear of repercussions or retribution.”

“Music has always been an invaluable expression of politics, pain, and social justice,” said Congressman André Carson (IN-07). “Music says what words cannot. Lyrics often move between the real and the surreal and between the literal and the imaginative, and that creative process must be protected. Policing creative expression goes against the First Amendment and tampers the creative expression that brought us the world’s most influential artists in history.”  

The First Amendment guarantees the right to freedom of expression. But freedom of expression is stifled when safeguards are not in place to ensure that an artist’s art is not wrongfully used as evidence against that artist.  

The RAP Act puts those safeguards in place to ensure that First Amendment protection is a reality for all artists in America. 

Cosponsors (20): Kamlager-Dove (colead), Carson (IN), Casten (IL), Chu (CA), Crockett (TX), Frost (FL), Goldman (NY), Jayapal (WA), McIver (NJ), McGovern (MA), Ocasio-Cortez (NY), Pressley (MA), Ramirez (IL), Sewell (AL), Stansbury (NM), Tlaib (MI), Thaneder (MI), Thompson (MS), Williams (GA), Wilson (FL)

Supporting Groups: Congressional Hip Hop Power and Justice Task Force, Artists Rights Alliance, Recording Academy® (the GRAMMY Awards®), Screen Actors Guild – American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), Atlantic Records, Warner Chappell Music, Warner Music Group, Warner Music Latina, Warner Music Nashville, Warner Records, Universal Music Group, Songwriters of North America (SONA), Music Artists Coalition, Black Music Artists Coalition (BMAC), Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), Live Nation Entertainment, Artists at Risk Connection (ARC), PEN America, American for the Arts

To read the bill, click HERE

WHAT THEY ARE SAYING

 119th Congress Endorsers

“Weaponizing lyrics or other creative works in court is a harmful tactic that stifles artistic expression and undermines the voices of not just musicians, but all who create and shape culture. With the reintroduction of the RAP Act, we continue to build momentum for ending this unjust practice. The Recording Academy is grateful to our Congressional partners, Representatives Johnson and Kamlager-Dove, for their leadership on an issue that poses real harm to creators in music and beyond.”– Harvey Mason jr., CEO, Recording Academy

“As a union of artists and performers, SAG-AFTRA is charged with protecting creative expression and creative freedom which are essential to our culture and our country.  Artists should never have to censor themselves for fear that their work will be turned against them in some future criminal proceeding.  We support the Restoring Artist Protections “RAP” Act, and we thank Congressman Johnson for sponsoring this legislation to protect our members’ right to freedom of speech.” –  SAG-AFTRA National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator Duncan Crabtree-Ireland

“The Black Music Action Coalition supports and applauds Representatives Hank Johnson and Sydney Kamlager-Dove for their leadership and commitment to justice through the proposed RAP Act, which challenges the systemic injustice of using lyrics as evidence in criminal trials. Hip-hop was born from resistance. It is raw, real, and often uncomfortable — but discomfort is not evidence. Metaphor is not motive. And art is not a crime. Rap music is a powerful form of expression, rooted in truth and cultural identity. It deserves the same First Amendment protection and freedom of speech guaranteed to all forms of art. Hip-hop is not just the heartbeat of popular music — it is a cornerstone of American culture. We must protect it, not prosecute it.” – Willie “Prophet” Stiggers, President & CEO of the Black Music Action Coalition (BMAC)

“History has taught us that taking an artist’s creative expression out of context is dangerous.  The RAP Act prevents this and prohibits lyrics from being used against all artists in a court of law. The consistent practice by prosecutors of only introducing rap lyrics when artists of color are on trial is discriminatory and must be stopped. MAC applauds Rep. Johnson for his efforts.” – Susan Genco, Board Member, Music Artist Coalition (MAC)

“Musical lyrics of all genres can be alliterative, fantastical, boastful and at times, even hyperbolic. But what they are not intended to be – or marketed as – is ‘truth’. Prosecutorial tactics that use lyrics as ‘evidence’ of guilt without regard to due process and the freedom of expression are deeply disturbing and we commend Ranking Member Johnson for introducing the RAP Act, a commonsense protection against this troubling practice.” – Jeffrey Harleston, General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Business & Legal Affairs, Universal Music Group

“The Songwriters of North America (SONA) fully supports and endorses the RAP Act, which addresses the troubling and discriminatory practice of using lyrics and other forms of creative expression as evidence in criminal proceedings. This tactic, deeply rooted in systemic racism, has been used primarily to target rap artists—most often young Black men—for simply exercising their right to free speech. The RAP Act represents a critical opportunity to protect artistic freedom, correct injustice, and uphold the constitutional rights of all Americans.” – Dina LaPolt, Co-founder and Board Member, Songwriters of North America (SONA)

“Artists of all mediums, whether that be music, film, or literature, should be free to create without fear that their works will unjustly be used against them. We thank Congressman Johnson and Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove for standing up for Americans’ free speech rights and championing this important piece of legislation.” – Greg Gonzalez, Legislative Counsel, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).

“The Artist Rights Alliance strongly supports the RAP Act and applauds Congressman Hank Johnson for his continued leadership in fighting to protect artistic freedom. The targeted use of rap lyrics in prosecutions undermines our country’s foundational principles of free speech and equal protection under the law. The RAP Act is a vital step toward ending this discriminatory practice and ensuring that all artists can safely enjoy their First Amendment rights without fear that their own work might be weaponized against them in a courtroom.” — Jen Jacobsen, Executive Director, Artist Rights Alliance (ARA)

“Too often, artists—especially those from marginalized communities—have seen their creative work distorted and weaponized in courtrooms. This misuse of artistic expression not only violates fundamental principles of free expression but reinforces systemic inequities in the legal system. ARC welcomes efforts like the Restoring Artistic Protection Act, which reflect a growing awareness that art must be interpreted through its symbolic, cultural, and imaginative dimensions—not as literal confessions of guilt. Ensuring that creative expression is protected in law is essential to safeguarding the right of all artists to create without fear.” – Julie Trébault, Executive Director of ARC – Artists at Risk Connection

“Artistic freedom is a cornerstone of who we are as a nation. No artist should have to create under the fear that their work could be used against them in a court of law. At Americans for the Arts, we stand with artists in defending the right to free expression across all forms of creativity.” — Erin Harkey, CEO of Americans for the Arts

“We applaud the reintroduction of this important legislation that will allow all creators to follow their artistic vision without barriers of prejudice. All too often Rap and Hip-Hop artists have been punished for the same kind of hyperbole and imagery other genres routinely use without consequence. Courts should consider relevance, not assumptions.” — Michele Ballantyne, President & COO, RIAA

“PEN America welcomes the re-introduction of the Restoring Artistic Protection Act (RAP Act) to defend the First Amendment rights of artists against wrongful prosecution based on the biased use of lyrics as evidence. For too long, artists– particularly Black and brown rappers— have been unfairly targeted by prosecutors weaponizing lyrics to advance criminal proceedings when there is no evidence that their lyrics are anything other than creative expression. To weaponize lyrics as though they were evidence of actual wrongdoing undermines the free expression rights of writers, songwriters, rappers and other musicians to express themselves freely without fear of self-incrimination. We urge passage of this bill to ensure that this unjust and discriminatory practice ends.” — Hadar Harris, managing director, Washington, DC, PEN America

### 

Schakowsky, DeGette, Jacobs, 31 House Democrats Demand HHS Enforce HIPAA Privacy Rule, Protect Reproductive Health Care Privacy

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (9th District of Illinois)

Full Text of Letter (PDF)

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Representatives Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), Diana DeGette (CO-01), and Sara Jacobs (CA-51) led 31 House Democrats in a letter to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. demanding the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) uphold protections for private health information related to reproductive care. This action follows the June 2025 decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Purl v. Department of Health and Human Services, vacating most provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule to Support Reproductive Health Care Privacy.

“Emerging threats to reproductive health data privacy raise serious concerns about the safety and confidentiality of patients seeking care,” wrote the lawmakers. “The prospect of a health care provider disclosing a patient’s medical records to investigate and criminalize their reproductive health care decisions threatens patient-provider confidentiality and deters individuals from accessing lifesaving services.

In the year following the Dobbs decision, over 200 women faced criminal charges for conduct related to pregnancy, pregnancy loss, or birth. Of these, 22 women were criminally prosecuted for experiencing a pregnancy loss.

“The Purl decision effectively eliminates the privacy protections for reproductive health care, including restrictions on protected health information disclosures and attestation requirements,” concluded the lawmakers. “In the absence of these provisions, you have a duty to defend patients and providers, mitigate legal uncertainty, and assert agency authority to protect sensitive health information.”

Last year, under President Joe Biden, the HHS Office for Civil Rights issued a final rule to modify and strengthen the HIPAA Privacy Rule. The Final Rule prohibited a covered health care provider, health plan, or health care clearinghouse from sharing protected health information to investigate or impose liability on an individual for accessing, facilitating, or delivering legal reproductive health care.

In addition to Reps. Schakowsky, DeGette, and Jacobs, the letter was signed by Reps. Donald Beyer, Julia Brownley, Sean Casten, Judy Chu, Yvette Clarke, Steve Cohen, Danny Davis, Suzan DelBene, Mark DeSaulnier, Veronica Escobar, Lizzie Fletcher, Maggie Goodlander, Adam Gray, Julie Johnson, Robin Kelly, Ro Khanna, Doris Matsui, Jennifer McClellan, Betty McCollum, James McGovern, Kelly Morrison, Kevin Mullin, Jerrold Nadler, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Mark Pocan, Emilia Sykes, Shri Thanedar, Paul Tonko, Lauren Underwood, Nydia Velázquez, and Nikema Williams.

###

Boyle, Merkley, Durbin, Kaine Introduce Legislation to Prevent Future Debt Ceiling Hostage Taking

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Brendan Boyle (13th District of Pennsylvania)

For Years, Republicans Have Held the Debt Ceiling Hostage, Continually Putting the United States’ Credit at Risk

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, U.S. Representative Brendan F. Boyle (D-PA-2), Ranking Member of the House Budget Committee, and U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee introduced legislation that would end the political brinkmanship around the debt ceiling and allow for a process to suspend the debt ceiling, subject to a congressional override. In addition to Congressman Boyle and Senator Merkley, U.S. Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Tim Kaine (D-VA) are cosponsoring the legislation. In May, President Donald Trump signaled his support for scrapping the debt ceiling to avoid an “economic catastrophe.”

“We cannot allow Republican debt ceiling brinkmanship to bring our economy to the verge of catastrophe,” said Ranking Member Boyle. “If President Trump is serious about avoiding the devastating consequences of a default, this legislation must represent the bare minimum standard for any agreement. I have spent a decade working to reform the debt ceiling, and I remain ready to work with anyone committed to finally addressing this persistent threat to our economy.”

A debt default has the power to destroy our economy, and that’s exactly why we need to make sure it never happens,” said Ranking Member Merkley. “We have seen Republicans use the debt ceiling as a political hostage time and time again – leading us closer to default than ever before. Continuing on the path we’re on now is all risk and no reward. We can—and must—reform this process in a way that maintains congressional oversight while de-weaponizing the debt ceiling. Doing so is the best and safest path forward for our economy and for the American people.”

“Time and time again, we have come far too close to a catastrophic default crisis, proving that our current debt ceiling process is broken and unsustainable. For the sake of the American people and for the good of our economy, we need legislation to reform the way we address the debt ceiling. The Debt Ceiling Reform Act is responsible, common sense legislation that will give the Treasury the authority to suspend the debt ceiling, absent a resolution of disapproval from Congress,” said Senator Durbin. “President Trump has repeatedly called to abolish the debt ceiling.  If Republicans are truly concerned about the economic well-being of America, they will work with us on this sensible solution.”

“Defaulting on our debt would be catastrophic to our economy, raise mortgage and borrowing costs, and threaten our ability to provide Social Security, Medicare, and veterans benefits,” said Senator Kaine. “We must make reforms to stop the reckless political brinksmanship regarding the debt limit that we’ve seen in recent decades. That’s why I’m joining my colleagues in introducing this commonsense bill to do just that.”

The idea of having the president increase the debt ceiling, subject to a vote of congressional disapproval, was originally proposed by then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. McConnell’s proposal was incorporated into the Budget Control Act of 2011, which, enacted in August of that year, authorized the president to increase the debt ceiling in three installments. While the broader Budget Control Act had numerous flaws, the mechanism proposed under the McConnell plan was key to avoiding a disastrous debt default.

The Debt Ceiling Reform Act would reform the process of raising the debt ceiling by making the following changes:

  • Allows the Treasury Secretary to initiate a process to suspend, or continue to suspend, the debt limit for up to two years.
  • As early as 60 days prior to reaching the debt limit, the Treasury Secretary could submit a certification to Congress to suspend the debt limit for up to two years. This process must begin at least 46 days before reaching the debt limit or the suspension of the debt limit expires.
  • The debt ceiling suspension would take effect 46 calendar days after Congress receives the certification, unless Congress passes, and the President signs, a joint resolution of disapproval within 45 calendar days of the certification.
  • The joint resolution of disapproval would be a privileged motion qualifying for expedited consideration by Congress.
  • If the Debt Ceiling Reform Act is enacted during a period where the debt limit is not suspended–our current scenario–it would require the Treasury Secretary to submit a certification to Congress to suspend the debt limit for up to two years within 10 days of enactment.

For years, Boyle, Merkley, Durbin, and Kaine have previously introduced similar legislation that would end the political brinkmanship around raising the debt ceiling and allow the executive branch to raise it while maintaining congressional oversight. In 2023, Boyle authored an article in the Harvard Journal on Legislation on the dire need for debt ceiling reform.

The bill text is HERE.  

###

Letter: Rep. Adams Leads Call on House Appropriations Chairs to Demand Release of Education Funding

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

WASHINGTON, DC— Today, Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), Ranking Member of the House Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee,  alongside Representative Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Ranking Member of the House Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education Subcommittee and Representative Lucy McBath (GA-06), led a letter signed by 93 House Democrats calling on House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole and House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Chair Robert Aderholt to join demands that the U.S. Department of Education (ED) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) release the more than $5.5 billion in Congressionally approved education funds currently withheld by the Trump Administration.

This follows a July 10 letter co-led by Rep. Adams and signed by 150 House Democrats, demanding answers from ED and OMB regarding the illegal withholding of these funds. As of today, the bulk of the funds remain unreleased.

In their letter, the lawmakers called on Chairmen Cole and Aderholt to “pressure the Administration to release the [more than $5.5 billion in] funds Congress appropriated as soon as possible.” 

They continued by cautioning continued withholding of the funds will have devastating consequences for local school districts: “Without access to this critical funding, our schools face at least two untenable options, both of which would have severe consequences for students, educators, and the broader community, especially in Republican-controlled school districts.

  1. Understaff classroom support positions and absorb budget shortfalls for already-hired staff. Such measures will directly impact the quality of education and the ability of students to thrive academically.
  2. Many school districts will incur millions in monthly debt, diverting resources from vital education priorities. These funds, once redirected, cannot be recovered for student use, further worsening the challenges faced by our schools.”

The lawmakers concluded saying, “We implore you to join us, just as ten of your Republican Senate colleagues have done, in demanding that OMB and the Department of Education immediately release these Congressionally approved education funds. This request comes not only from us as Members of Congress, but on behalf of millions of students, families, and educators.”

This letter comes amid reports that the Trump Administration is preparing a new rescissions package that may target the remaining 5.5 billion in education funding. 

Full text of the letter is available here.

Trump Administration to Release Remaining Withheld Education Funding Following Pressure from Adams, Colleagues

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

WASHINGTON, DC— After illegally withholding $7 billion in education funding approved by Congress, officials within the Trump Administration have announced they will release the remaining funds. The restored funding comes after pressure led by Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12) and other House Democrats.

“I’m proud to see these Congressionally approved education funds finally released so we can better support our students, schools, and communities,” said Congresswoman Adams. “When it became clear these funds were being illegally withheld by the Trump Administration, House Democrats acted swiftly to ensure our school districts received the resources they were owed. Today, we won that fight but make no mistake, the work isn’t over. We will continue holding this administration accountable because our children’s educational future depends on it.”

This release of these funds follows coordinated efforts by House education leaders including Reps. Adams, Lucy McBath (GA-06), Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01) and House Education & Workforce Ranking Member Bobby Scott (VA-03), to release these funds.

“I am deeply relieved that schools and students will finally receive the full funding they are counting on. This money is critical for teachers, classrooms, and the millions of children who rely on these programs to succeed. This is a victory for those who care for and educate future generations,” said Rep. Lucy McBath. “The Trump Administration’s delay put the success of our students in serious jeopardy. Districts were left in limbo, forced to plan without knowing if they’d have the resources to keep staff or offer basic educational services. That is a disservice to the American people. Their children should never be caught up in political games.”

“With less than one day’s notice to grant recipients or to Congress, the Trump Administration inexplicably and unlawfully announced it is withholding billions of dollars in education funding from schools nationwide, including Congressionally appropriated funding for teacher training, after-school programs, classroom technology, English learners, and migratory children and youth. With only a few weeks until the start of the new school year in some jurisdictions, states and districts were having to make difficult decisions about how to move forward without the funding they were guaranteed. Further, the Trump Administration was refusing to obligate funds for adult education and literacy programs, which help adults and legal immigrants learn how to read, write, and enter the workforce,” Ranking Member Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (VA-03), House Committee on Education and Workforce.

On July 10, Rep. Adams co-led a 150 House Democrat letter to the U.S. Department of Education and the Office of Management & Budget calling for the unfreezing of the funding, leading to 10 Republican Senators joining in the demands. On July 24, Rep. Adams led another letter, signed by 93 House Democrats, urging House Appropriations leaders to join these calls.

Norton Introduces Bill Requiring D.C. National Guard Commanding General to Live in D.C.

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (District of Columbia)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) today introduced a bill to require the Commanding General of the District of Columbia National Guard to reside in D.C. It was marked up and passed by the Committee on Oversight and Reform in 2022.

“As we work to resolve all the ways D.C. is treated differently than the states, the lack of residency requirements for federal officials responsible for public safety and law enforcement in the District, as required for other jurisdictions, is surely an important one,” Norton said. “The primary reason residency requirements exist is so that government officials have a connection to the residents they serve and knowledge of the unique challenges faced by residents. Adding a residency requirement for the Commanding General of the D.C. National Guard will help ensure the Commanding General has in-depth knowledge of the issues that D.C. residents face and bring the D.C. National Guard in line with those of the states.”

Governors of the states and territories control their respective National Guards. The bill, the District of Columbia National Guard Commanding General Residency Act, is similar to other bills Norton has introduced requiring certain federal officials to live in D.C., including U.S. District Court and Circuit Court judges for D.C., the U.S. Attorney for D.C., the U.S. Marshal for the D.C. Superior Court, the U.S. Marshal for the U.S. District Court for D.C., and the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for D.C.

Norton’s introductory statement follows.

Statement of CongresswomanEleanor Holmes Norton

on the District of Columbia National Guard Commanding General Residency Act

 

July 29, 2025

Today, I introduce the District of Columbia National Guard Commanding General Residency Act, which would require the Commanding General of the District of Columbia National Guard to reside in D.C.  Two Congresses ago, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform passed this bill. 

The president controls the D.C. National Guard. In contrast, governors of the states and the three territories that have National Guards each control their National Guards.

The Commanding General of the D.C. National Guard is the top official in the D.C. National Guard, is appointed by the president and is a federal employee.  There are residency requirements for government officials in federal law, D.C. law and the laws of jurisdictions throughout the country.  In fact, several states have laws that require the top official in their National Guard to reside in the state, and it is highly likely that every state and territory only appoints residents as the top official in their National Guard.  The primary reason residency requirements exist is so that government officials have a connection to the residents they serve and knowledge of the unique issues and challenges faced by residents.

Congress has justifiably required certain federal officials to reside in the jurisdiction to which they are appointed, including U.S. district court judges, U.S. Marshals and U.S. Attorneys. Similarly, Congress, which controls the local D.C. court system, has justifiably required local D.C. judges and members of the D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission and the D.C. Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure to reside in D.C.

There is no reason that the Commanding General of the D.C. National Guard, a federal entity that serves D.C. residents and that has both a military and law enforcement role, should not be required to reside in D.C.  A D.C. residency requirement for the Commanding General of the D.C. National Guard will lead to a better relationship between the D.C. National Guard and D.C. residents and is a matter of fairness for D.C. residents.

The D.C. mayor should control the D.C. National Guard. Until then, I urge my colleagues to support this bill.

###

Congressman Krishnamoorthi Visits Franklin Hospital to Highlight Threats Posed by Republican Medicaid Cuts Under Trump Budget

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (8th District of Illinois)

BENTON, IL – Today, Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) toured Franklin Hospital in Benton to spotlight the devastating impact of the Republican-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which slashes more than $1 trillion in federal health care funding, including over $900 billion from Medicaid. Franklin is one of at least nine hospitals in Illinois at immediate risk of closure as a direct result of the law.

Joined by Franklin Hospital CEO Jim Johnson and hospital staff, Congressman Krishnamoorthi warned that the GOP budget, which he has dubbed the “Large Lousy Law,” jeopardizes the health and safety of rural communities while providing massive tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy.

“Franklin Hospital represents the very best of rural America—lifesaving care, dedicated staff, and deep ties to the community—but it’s being pushed to the brink by Republican cuts that gut the very programs keeping hospitals like this afloat,” Congressman Krishnamoorthi said. “You can’t slash a fifth of a hospital’s budget and expect it to keep its doors open. This isn’t about spreadsheets; it’s about babies born safely, elders treated with dignity, and rural communities kept healthy. I’ll keep fighting to reverse these reckless cuts and protect health care access for every Illinoisan.”

Franklin Hospital serves a predominantly rural population that relies heavily on Medicaid. Under the new law, rural hospitals nationwide are projected to lose 21 cents of every Medicaid dollar they currently receive. The legislation also imposes burdensome new work requirements and redetermination rules that will lead to mass disenrollments, particularly in rural and working-class areas.

Key consequences of the “Large Lousy Law” include:

  • $900 billion in Medicaid cuts over 10 years

  • $6.73 billion in projected Medicaid losses for Illinois

  • 1.5 million rural Americans expected to lose Medicaid coverage

  • 400+ rural hospitals at risk of closure nationwide

Background on Franklin Hospital and Rural Health Impact:

  • Serves a Medicaid-dependent population in southern Illinois

  • One of nine at-risk Illinois hospitals due to GOP cuts

  • Faces a 21% reduction in Medicaid reimbursement under current law

  • Provides critical services including emergency care, OB-GYN, and specialty treatment

Reps. Krishnamoorthi, Kelly Bonamici, and Sherrill, Senators Warren and Cassidy, Re-Introduce Bipartisan, Bicameral College Transparency Act to Increase Families’ Access to Available Information in Higher Education Opportunities

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (8th District of Illinois)

WASHINGTON – Today, Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Congressman Mike Kelly (R-PA), Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), and Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ) re-introduced the College Transparency Act (CTA), bipartisan legislation designed to ensure students and families have better access to the data they need to make informed decisions about higher education. A companion bill was re-introduced in the Senate by Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA), chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

“Deciding where to pursue higher education is one of the most important and financially challenging choices a student and their family will face,” Congressman Krishnamoorthi said. “Before making such a major investment, families deserve access to reliable and clear information about cost, success, and outcomes so they can make the best choice. I’m proud to join my colleagues in re-introducing the bipartisan College Transparency Act to ensure students and their families make the best-informed decision for their future.”

Congressman Krishnamoorthi has long championed educational access, and the CTA builds on his ongoing efforts to lower college costs and improve postsecondary outcomes for all Americans.

“Every student deserves access to clear information about colleges and universities so they can choose a school that’s best for them, and that’s exactly what our bill would do. The College Transparency Act would make sure basic information like enrollment, transfer, and graduation rates are available to students and their families so they can make informed decisions about their futures,” Senator Warren said.

“Pursuing higher education is a major investment for New Jersey families, and can open doors to the middle class and good-paying jobs,” Congresswoman Sherrill said. “In order to make the critical decision of where to study, families should have access to transparent, student-level data. I’m glad to join my colleagues in reintroducing this legislation to ensure that students and parents are empowered to make an informed choice on which school is right for them.”

Choosing the right college is a consequential decision for students and families,” Congresswoman Bonamici said. “Unfortunately, institutions of higher education have limited student-level data that families can consider as they make these decisions. This lack of data also impedes the ability of lawmakers to craft policies that improve our system of higher education. I’m glad to join Rep. Krishnamoorthi in introducing the bipartisan College Transparency Act to modernize postsecondary data systems while protecting student privacy and data security.”

“The One Big Beautiful Bill made historic reforms to our broken higher education system, lowering college costs and increasing Americans’ access to quality education options,” Dr. Cassidy said. “The College Transparency Act builds on that success by empowering students and families with information to make the best college decision so they can succeed.”

“College is one of the biggest investments a person will make in their lifetime. The College Transparency Act gives parents and students the tools they need to succeed,” Congressman Kelly said. “This legislation empowers families to make the decision that is best for them, and it further sheds light on critical information families seek before beginning college.”

The legislation modernizes the college reporting system by providing accurate, privacy-protected data on student outcomes including enrollment, graduation, transfer, and post-college earnings across institutions and fields of study. This transparency will allow students to better assess their return on investment and help policymakers, educators, and employers understand how to improve postsecondary education and workforce alignment.

The CTA has a broad, bipartisan coalition of supporters in both chambers. In the Senate, the bill is co-sponsored by Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Katie Britt (R-AL), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), John Cornyn (R-TX), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-KS), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Tina Smith (D-MN), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Raphael Warnock (D-GA).

The CTA is supported by a wide range of educational, policy, and industry groups, including AccessLex Institute, Advance CTE, Advance Illinois, the American Association of Community Colleges, the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and many others.

“CCA is grateful for the bi-partisan reintroduction of the College Transparency Act. This critical policy lever will enable students to make more informed decisions about their path to a college degree or credential of value. This tool will also provide policymakers with the information they need to bolster accountability across higher education institutions and systems,” Yolanda Watson Spiva, Ph.D., President, Complete College America, said.

“We thank the bipartisan sponsors in the House and Senate for their leadership working to bolster transparency of higher education outcomes,” Waded Cruzado, President, Association of Public and Land-grant Universities said. “Where to attend college is a critically important decision for millions of students and families each year, and they should have robust data on labor market outcomes to inform their decision. The College Transparency Act would enable exactly this kind of transparency while also helping institutions and policymakers better understand how populations of students, such as student veterans, are succeeding to ensure the promise of higher education delivers.”

“The U.S. Chamber of Commerce strongly supports the introduction of the College Transparency Act. This legislation will make postsecondary data available to students and employers, empowering students to make informed decisions about their education and career paths while equipping employers with the data necessary to connect with skilled talent. The College Transparency Act will strengthen our education system, enhance workforce competitiveness, and drive economic growth,” Rodney Davis, Head of Government Affairs, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said.

A full copy of the bill is available here.

Krishnamoorthi Responds to Federal Court Ruling Blocking Trump Administration’s Retaliatory Cuts to Planned Parenthood

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (8th District of Illinois)

WASHINGTON – Following a federal judge’s decision to block the Trump administration from enforcing retaliatory Medicaid funding cuts to Planned Parenthood, Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi issued the following statement:

“I applaud the federal court’s decision to block President Trump’s cruel and unconstitutional attempt to defund Planned Parenthood. Just last month, I stood with Planned Parenthood of Illinois to warn that these attacks on reproductive health care are not only wrong—they’re dangerous. This ruling is a victory for the thousands of Illinoisans and millions of Americans who rely on Planned Parenthood for cancer screenings, STI testing, birth control, and more. I’ll continue fighting to protect access to care and stop these politically motivated assaults on women’s health.”