MIL USHOR-2b Engine

WASHINGTON – Ranking Member Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (VA-03), House Committee on Education and Workforce, and Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education Subcommittee Ranking Member Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), House Committee on Education and Workforce, raised concerns to Department of Agriculture Secretary (USDA) Brooke Rollins regarding the agency’s abrupt announcement to reorganize USDA.  This follows harmful agency relocations under the first Trump Administration. This latest push occurs as families and farmers suffer critical food program disruptions because of failed Trump Administration policies.  

“We are concerned that this abrupt announcement of the reorganization plan comes without full details or substantiation regarding how the reorganization would improve program operations and efficiency,” wrote the Members.  “The process surrounding the reorganization plan has not been transparent, nor has the Department clearly articulated how it is handling input from farmers, community partners, anti-hunger advocates, and state and local officials.”

The last major USDA staff relocation occurred in 2019 when the USDA relocated most staff positions at two of its research agencies from Washington, D.C. to Kansas City, Missouri.  This relocation occurred amidst widespread concern from stakeholders.  Ultimately, the relocation led to the departure of experienced staff, delays in grant processing, and fewer key reports, according to a 2022 government watchdog report. 

 

To read the full letter, click here. 

###

Washington, DC – Today, U.S. Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-25) released the following statement after a Florida judge ruled to effectively shut down the Everglades Immigrant Detention Center:

“The Everglades immigrant internment camp is a testament to cruelty, waste, and corruption. It needs to be closed. Thanks to pressure by fellow Democrats in our Congressional delegation and legal plaintiffs — like the Miccosukee Tribe, Friends of the Everglades, and the Center for Biological Diversity — a judge has agreed that this grotesque political stunt should be shut down.

“Last night’s ruling is a victory for the Everglades, and it blunts the reckless environmental threat this facility poses. We all agree violent criminals must be deported, but the racial and ethnic profiling that triggered this facility’s creation goes on and must be stopped. Until it is, I’ll keep pushing for due process and human rights to be honored and for an end to the cruel conditions at detention facilities like this across our state and nation.”

In Spanish:

“El campo de internamiento de inmigrantes de los Everglades es un testimonio de crueldad, despilfarro y corrupción. Necesita ser cerrado. Gracias a la presión de los compañeros demócratas en nuestra delegación del Congreso y los demandantes legales, como la tribu Miccosukee, Friends of the Everglades y el Centro para la Diversidad Biológica, un juez acordó que este grotesco truco político debe cerrarse.

“El fallo de anoche es una victoria para los Everglades y mitiga la imprudente amenaza ambiental que representa esta instalación. Todos estamos de acuerdo en que los delincuentes violentos deben ser deportados, pero la discriminación racial y étnica que desencadenó la creación de esta instalación continúa y debe detenerse. Hasta que lo sea, seguiré presionando para que se respete el debido proceso y los derechos humanos y para que se ponga fin a las crueles condiciones en centros de detención como este en todo nuestro estado y nación.”

Rep. Wasserman Schultz recently demanded clarity from the Department of Homeland Security on the state of the facility, and leads the No Cages in the Everglades Act which would prevent similar facilities from being constructed in the Everglades in the future.

Downloadable video of Rep. Wasserman Schultz’s reaction to the ruling can be found here.

Downloadable video of the press conference Rep. Wasserman Schultz’s tour of the facility can be found here.

####

Wasserman Schultz, Merkley Lead 63 Lawmakers to Press Trump Admin on Plans for Dangerous, Cruel ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ Facility

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-25) and Oregon’s U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley led 63 members of Congress to raise the alarm and demand immediate answers from the Trump Administration about the immigration detention camp in Florida’s Everglades region known as “Alligator Alcatraz.”

“Brushing aside concerns from human rights watchdogs, environmentalist groups, and Tribal nations, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has greenlit the construction of this expansive detention facility that may violate detained individuals’ human rights, jeopardize public and environmental health, and violate federal law. We ask that DHS promptly provide critical information for the American public to better understand this detention plan,” wrote the lawmakers to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons, FEMA Acting Administrator David Richardson, and DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari.

A federal judge has currently paused further construction at ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ after the Miccosukee Tribe and environmental groups filed a lawsuit on the grounds that the detention facility “threatens environmentally sensitive wetlands that are home to protected plants and animals and would reverse billions of dollars’ worth of environmental restoration.”

“The facility is expected to hold as many as 5,000 people, primarily in a combination of tents and trailers, ‘with no brick-and-mortar construction required.’ Human rights experts have condemned the plan as ‘cruel and inhumane’ by design,” the lawmakers stressed in their letter.

“Construction progressed at ‘turbo speed,’” the lawmakers continued, “and it remains unclear whether the facility has plans to ensure medical care, rapid hurricane evacuation, access to counsel, and sufficient infrastructure for sewage, running water, and temperature controls, despite being located in one of the ‘hottest parts of the state.’ When Florida legislators visited the detention facility, they found temperatures exceeding 83 degrees in the tents without any detainees.”

In addition to Merkley and Wasserman Schultz, the letter was signed by U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Jon Ossoff (D-GA), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Tina Smith (D-MN), and U.S. Representatives Kathy Castor (FL-14), Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (FL-20), Frederica S. Wilson (FL-24), Lois Frankel (FL-22), Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), Hank Johnson (GA-04), Nikema Williams (GA-05), Betty McCollum (MN-04), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Glenn Ivey (MD-04), Dan Goldman (NY-10), Gwen Moore (WI-04), Valerie P. Foushee (NC-04), Lou Correa (CA-46), Jesús “Chuy” García (IL-04), Janelle Bynum (OR-05), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Yvette D. Clarke (NY-09), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC-AL), Juan Vargas (CA-52), Dina Titus (NV-01), Brad Schneider (IL-10), Suzan DelBene (WA-01), Mark Takano (CA-39), Summer Lee (PA-12), Sylvia Garcia (TX-29), Zoe Lofgren (CA-18), Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03), Jahana Hayes (CT-05), Sarah Elfreth (MD-03), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Jasmine Crockett (TX-30), Wesley Bell (MO-01), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Brittany Pettersen (CO-07), Jim McGovern (MA-02), Mike Thompson (CA-04), Sean Casten (IL-06), Sydney Kamlager-Dove (CA-37), Seth Magaziner (RI-02), Danny K. Davis (IL-07), Adam Smith (WA-09), Yassamin Ansari (AZ-03), Shri Thanedar (MI-13), Andrea Salinas (OR-06), Sarah McBride (DE-AL), Seth Moulton (MA-06), Mike Quigley (IL-05), Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05), Jonathan L. Jackson (IL-01), John Garamendi (CA-08), Jim Costa (CA-21), Paul Tonko (NY-20),  Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05), and Veronica Escobar (TX-16).

“Experts worry this novel state-run immigration detention model will allow Florida to create an ‘independent, unaccountable detention system’ that runs parallel to the federal detention system. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis touted that the facility will ‘cut through’ the standard legal process in federal immigration court, and the state will instead deputize the National Guard and ‘other folks in Florida’ as immigration judges within the facility, to facilitate rapid deportations,” the members of Congress cautioned.

They elaborated, “A Florida-run immigration detention system is particularly troubling given that, according to agency records, Florida has been the site of a whopping 40 percent of all deaths in ICE custody nationwide thus far in 2025. It is especially concerning that immigrants’ rights advocates in Florida have filed a lawsuit alleging that people detained at the facility have been denied access to counsel and ‘effectively have no way to contest their detention.’ With that said, this problematic and seemingly unlawful model may grow to expand beyond Florida: Secretary Noem has said, ‘Florida was unique in what they presented to us, and I would ask every other governor to do the exact same thing.’”

The lawmakers reiterated that ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ threatens human rights, due process, Tribal interests, and the environment. Given the clear and immediate risks posed by the facility, they directed DHS to respond to their questions by no later than the 3^rd of September.

Full text of the letter can be found by clicking here and below.

Dear Secretary Noem, Acting Director Lyons, Acting Administrator Richardson, and Inspector General Cuffari:

We write regarding the State of Florida, in partnership with the federal government, building an immigration detention facility in the heart of the Everglades, which has been sarcastically dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz.” Last month, President Trump and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem visited the site. Brushing aside concerns from human rights watchdogs, environmentalist groups, and Tribal nations, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has greenlit the construction of this expansive detention facility that may violate detained individuals’ human rights, jeopardize public and environmental health, and violate federal law. We ask that DHS promptly provide critical information for the American public to better understand this detention plan.

The Everglades site was selected precisely because of its remote location and harsh surroundings, which Florida officials reportedly view as “an ideal location to house and transport migrants.” Touting the remote location, officials have suggested that the facility will need minimal security because the area is naturally surrounded by “alligators and pythons,” and fleeing migrants would have “nowhere to hide.” President Trump recently joked that detained individuals who try to escape will likely be eaten by alligators and shrugged while saying that “this is not a nice business.”

The facility is expected to hold as many as 5,000 people, primarily in a combination of tents and trailers, “with no brick-and-mortar construction required.” Human rights experts have condemned the plan as “cruel and inhumane” by design. Construction progressed at “turbo speed,” and it remains unclear whether the facility has plans to ensure medical care, rapid hurricane evacuation, access to counsel, and sufficient infrastructure for sewage, running water, and temperature controls, despite being located in one of the “hottest parts of the state.” When Florida legislators visited the detention facility, they found temperatures exceeding 83 degrees in the tents without any detainees.

Although the land is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis used emergency powers to take control of the site. Reports suggest that the state of Florida is holding hundreds of people with no criminal record and others with legal immigration status, including Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) holders. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has stated that it will partner with Florida to detain migrants at the site pending deportation, but it is not clear what role ICE is playing in this detention center.

Experts worry this novel state-run immigration detention model will allow Florida to create an “independent, unaccountable detention system” that runs parallel to the federal detention system. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis touted that the facility will “cut through” the standard legal process in federal immigration court, and the state will instead deputize the National Guard and “other folks in Florida” as immigration judges within the facility, to facilitate rapid deportations.

Fundamentally, a state’s ability to participate in immigration enforcement is limited by the federal Supremacy Clause. The Supreme Court also reiterated that states are precluded from regulating conduct in a field that Congress, acting within its proper authority, has determined must be regulated by its exclusive governance. A Florida-run immigration detention system is particularly troubling given that, according to agency records, Florida has been the site of a whopping 40 percent of all deaths in ICE custody nationwide thus far in 2025. It is especially concerning that immigrants’ rights advocates in Florida have filed a lawsuit alleging that people detained at the facility have been denied access to counsel and “effectively have no way to contest their detention.” With that said, this problematic and seemingly unlawful model may grow to expand beyond Florida: Secretary Noem has said, “Florida was unique in what they presented to us, and I would ask every other governor to do the exact same thing.”

Beyond human rights and due process issues, this plan raises serious environmental concerns. The site of the facility, the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, is a little-used airstrip that was initially built to anchor “the world’s largest airport,” but the airport was never built, primarily due to environmental challenges. The location is a highly-sensitive stretch of the Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve. Over the past 35 years, the federal government and Florida have jointly invested more than $10 billion into the Everglades to restore and protect its delicate ecosystem. Environmental experts warn that the increased activity will pose serious environmental risks—not only for the vulnerable wetlands but for the millions of people who rely on the area for access to freshwater. The vast wetlands are a major water source for more than 10 million South Floridians, with 300 million gallons of fresh water pumped out daily.

Furthermore, Tribal leaders have “denounced” plans to place a detention field on their ancestral lands that are home to 15 traditional Miccosukee and Seminole villages and several “ceremonial grounds, burial grounds, and gathering sites.” Not only would the facility harm the “cultural, spiritual and historical identity” of Miccosukee and Florida Seminole people, but tribal leaders have also expressed concerns that disruptions to the environment would negatively impact the ability of nearby tribes to “live, hunt, fish, gather and pray.”

While this detention facility may prove disastrous for human rights, due process, environmental, and Tribal interests, it is poised to be lucrative for private vendors. Reporting suggests that a “team of vendors” may be partnering with Florida officials to manage the facility, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

Given that DHS is working directly with the Florida state government on a detention facility with alarming implications, DHS should ensure transparency and accountability surrounding the facility’s financing operations. Therefore, we ask that you respond to the following questions by September 3, 2025:

1. Please provide a copy of any memoranda of understanding or other agreements between the state of Florida and DHS (or any of its components) related to the operation of this detention facility.
2. What legal authority allows the state of Florida to construct and operate any migrant detention facilities?
1. Please provide a detailed legal reasoning explaining how the cited legal authority allows the state of Florida to construct and operate a migrant detention facility?
2. Is this detention facility’s construction and operation under the direct control of the Department of Homeland Security as presented in Friends of the Everglades v. Noem (No. 25-22896-CV-WILLIAMS (2025)) or the State of Florda?
3. Is the facility subject to federal standards for the treatment of detainees, such as the 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards and the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) of 2003 (P.L. 108-79)?
1. Have there been any inspections of detention standards at this facility since detainees were transferred in? If so, what were the findings?
2. What is the state licensed and unlicensed staff to detainee ratio? Please disaggregate by license type.
3. How can detainees file a complaint with the DHS Inspector General?
4. How can detainees file a complaint with the DHS Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties?
5. How can detainees file a complaint with the DHS Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman (OIDO)?
6. How can detainees request medical attention?
4. What private vendors are being contracted to participate in operating the detention facility?
1. What oversight mechanisms are being implemented to ensure compliance with federal, state, and international law?
5. What measures are being taken to ensure access to clean drinking water, food, sewage infrastructure, temperature regulation, and medical care for detained migrants?
1. Additionally, what measures are being taken to protect migrants from environmental conditions like floods, pests, dangerous animals, extreme heat, and potential hurricanes?
6. Were any environmental reviews conducted before construction of the facility? If so, what were the findings?
7. Provide a copy of the pre-inspection results and any post-inspection results that are available.
8. How will increased air traffic, development, water runoff, and general human activity affect the surrounding ecosystem?
1. What steps will be taken to prevent contamination of the freshwater source that supplies drinking water to 10 million Floridians?
9. Are minors detained at the facility? If yes, provide the ages of all minors in custody as of the date of this letter.
10. Are women detained at the facility?
11. What criteria is used to segregate detainees?
12. Please describe how the facility upholds due process requirements under the U.S. Constitution and Immigration and Nationality Act.
1. How does the facility facilitate in-person and virtual access to counsel? If so, how many attorney access meetings have occurred as of the date of this letter?
2. How does the facility facilitate access to screenings by asylum officers?
3. How does the facility manage attendance at immigration or state or federal court hearings?
13. What consultations were done with the Miccosukee and Seminole tribes before construction of the detention facility?
14. How is the State of Florida complying with existing federal laws like the National Historic Preservation Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act?
15. What criteria if any did DHS provide for the approval of federal reimbursement?
1. How will the use of FEMA resources for the construction and operation of this facility impact federal and state-level readiness for responding to hurricane season?
2. Are federal Shelter and Services (SSP) grant funds financing this detention facility? If so, how will these funds be used in a manner consistent with federal statute prohibiting the use of SSP funds for custodial detention?
16. What is FEMA’s justification for awarding SSP funds as a sole source award to the State of Florida instead of through a competitive award process?

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

####

Prepared by the Office of Congressman Henry Cuellar
Source: Uniform Crime Report, Federal Bureau of Investigation
The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program defines murder and nonnegligent manslaughter as the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another.

Prepared by the Office of Congressman Henry Cuellar
Source: Uniform Crime Report, Federal Bureau of Investigation
The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program defines murder and nonnegligent manslaughter as the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another.

Prepared by the Office of Congressman Henry Cuellar
Source: Uniform Crime Report, Federal Bureau of Investigation
According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, violent crime is composed of four offenses: Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Violent crimes are defined in the UCR Program as those offenses that involve force or threat of force.

Prepared by the Office of Congressman Henry Cuellar
Source: Uniform Crime Report, Federal Bureau of Investigation
According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, violent crime is composed of four offenses: Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Violent crimes are defined in the UCR Program as those offenses that involve force or threat of force.

PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA
Jueves, 21 de agosto de 2025

Fernanda Nunez-Cazares, Secretaria de Prensa del Distrito
fernanda.nunez-cazares@mail.house.gov
Cell: (619) 209-1834

Matthew Landini, Secretario de Prensa de D.C.
matt@mail.house.gov
Cell: (216) 952-8227

Datos del FBI de 2024 muestran que las comunidades fronterizas de Texas están entre las más seguras del país
De manera constante, las comunidades fronterizas tienen tasas de criminalidad más bajas que las ciudades no fronterizas.

LAREDO, TX — Hoy, el congresista Henry Cuellar, Ph.D. (TX-28), publicó las estadísticas de criminalidad del FBI correspondientes al año 2024, las cuales, a lo largo de los años, han demostrado consistentemente lo que los residentes a lo largo de la frontera sur ya saben: estas comunidades son más seguras que muchas ciudades no fronterizas en Estados Unidos.

“Cuando nuestras comunidades están seguras, todo lo demás se vuelve posible,” dijo el Dr. Cuellar. “Crecen los empleos. Las escuelas tienen éxito. Las familias prosperan. Para mí, la seguridad no es solo una cifra en un informe. Se trata de si los padres se sienten seguros al enviar a sus hijos a la escuela por la mañana, si un trabajador puede ir a su lugar de empleo, o si una madre puede conducir al supermercado sabiendo que su comunidad la respalda. Se trata de si las familias pueden entrar a la iglesia el domingo con tranquilidad. Año tras año, los datos del FBI demuestran que nuestras comunidades fronterizas están entre las más seguras del país, y eso es algo de lo que todos debemos sentirnos orgullosos. Por eso seguiré luchando en Washington para asegurar que nuestros agentes del orden público tengan los recursos que necesitan y que nuestras familias cuenten con la tranquilidad que merecen. Quiero agradecer a las agencias del orden a nivel local, estatal y federal, así como a los líderes comunitarios a lo largo de la frontera sur, por sus incansables esfuerzos para mantener nuestras comunidades seguras.”

Según el Informe Uniforme de Criminalidad de 2024 del FBI, Detroit, Michigan, tuvo una tasa de homicidios de 31.17 por cada 100,000 habitantes y una tasa de delitos violentos de 1781.3 por cada 100,000 personas. Además, Baltimore, Maryland, registró una tasa de homicidios de 34.8 por cada 100,000 residentes y una tasa de delitos violentos de 1606.16 por cada 100,000 personas. A nivel nacional, la tasa de homicidios fue de 5 por cada 100,000 habitantes y la tasa de delitos violentos fue de 359.1 por cada 100,000 personas.

Sin embargo, a lo largo de la frontera, estas tasas son significativamente más bajas. Laredo, Texas, registró una tasa de homicidios de 2.32 y una tasa de delitos violentos de 365.84 por cada 100,000 residentes, mientras que Rio Grande City, Texas, tuvo una tasa de homicidios de 0 y una tasa de delitos violentos de solo 184.3 por cada 100,000 residentes.

A continuación se presentan gráficos de barras que muestran las tasas de homicidios y delitos violentos entre ciudades fronterizas de Texas y ciertas ciudades de Estados Unidos, así como entre ciudades fronterizas de Texas y los promedios nacionales.

Preparado por la Oficina del Congresista Henry Cuellar
Fuente: Informe Uniforme de Criminalidad, Oficina Federal de Investigaciones (FBI)
El Programa de Estadísticas Uniformes de Criminalidad (UCR) del FBI define el homicidio y el homicidio no culposo como la muerte intencional (no culposa) de un ser humano a manos de otro.

Preparado por la Oficina del Congresista Henry Cuellar
Fuente: Informe Uniforme de Criminalidad, Oficina Federal de Investigaciones (FBI)
Según el Programa de Estadísticas Uniformes de Criminalidad (UCR) del FBI, los delitos violentos comprenden cuatro delitos: homicidio y homicidio no culposo, violación, robo y asalto agravado. El Programa UCR define los delitos violentos como aquellos que implican el uso de la fuerza o la amenaza de fuerza.

Preparado por la Oficina del Congresista Henry Cuellar
Fuente: Informe Uniforme de Criminalidad, Oficina Federal de Investigaciones (FBI)
Según el Programa de Estadísticas Uniformes de Criminalidad (UCR) del FBI, los delitos violentos se componen de cuatro delitos: homicidio y homicidio no culposo, violación, robo y asalto agravado. El Programa UCR define los delitos violentos como aquellos que implican el uso de la fuerza o la amenaza de fuerza.

###