Jayapal, Johnson, Williams, Foushee, Ross Conduct Oversight at Stewart Detention Center

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (7th District of Washington)

Full video of Members’ remarks following their visit can be found HERE

LUMPKIN, G.A. — U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Integrity, Security, and Enforcement, along with Congressmembers Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr. (GA-04), Nikema Williams (GA-05), Valerie Foushee (NC-04), and Deborah Ross (NC-02), today conducted oversight at the Stewart Detention Center.

“We are horrified by the situation here at Stewart,” said Jayapal. “We believe this detention center should be shut down. What we heard from detained people today was that they are not getting the care, the proper food, or the clean water that ICE says they are — to the point that we heard from several people who are simply not drinking water that they haven’t bought bottled from the commissary. Stewart is a failure of the promise of America, and I will continue working to get this facility, and all private, for-profit detention centers, shut down.”

“Stewart Detention Center has a long history of denying basic human dignity and rights to detainees. Since he took office, the Stephen Miller, Steve Bannon, bandwagon that has been rolling throughout the country collecting immigrants and then depositing them into facilities like Stewart Detention Facility, where they languish for months and even years at a time,” said Johnson.

“We conducted an oversight visit to Stewart Detention Center because accountability requires seeing firsthand how people in our nation’s immigration detention system are being treated. Some of the people detained in facilities like this came to this country with their parents at two or three years old—this is the only country they have ever called home. Yet they are being held as if they are hardened criminals. I will continue to do this work because everyone in this country, regardless of where they were born or their documentation status, deserves to be treated with dignity and respect,” said Williams.

“It was heart-wrenching to hear detained people talk about their stories and the family members that they have left. We heard from a gentleman whose wife has end stage renal disease, and she’s not getting the proper care. For people not to be able to have contact and have to constantly be worried about the conditions of their family members back home is another level of cruelty that has been added to the conditions under which they live. We didn’t get a whole lot of answers, but we saw a lot of things,” said Foushee.

“You cannot make money off the backs of immigrants and poor people. It is inhumane. It is unjust. And it is your taxpayer dollars, at least $150 a day to hold people who shouldn’t even be in detention in the first place. This has got to stop now,” said Ross.

Immigration advocates have criticized Stewart as one of the worst detention facilities in the country and many of its problems have persisted throughout Stewart’s history. Federal agencies, independent watchdogs, facility staff, detained people, and advocates have documented abuses including unsanitary conditions, inadequate and inedible food, medical neglect, poor mental health care, inappropriate and overuse of solitary confinement, and use of force.

Stewart has also been consistently overcrowded since Trump came into office. As of the week of July 27, the facility was over capacity by a few hundred. There have also been two suicides at the facility since Trump returned to office.

Members toured the facility and met with detained persons to hear about conditions directly from them. Their full takeaways can be found here.

Issues:

Kelly applauds Trump administration's announcement of $35 million in new rural health care funding for Pennsylvania

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA), a member of the Ways & Means Subcommittee on Health, applauded the Trump administration that $35 million, made possible through the federal Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP), is being put to work to improve health outcomes among rural Pennsylvanians by updating to new, more modern screening technology, buying equipment to bring additional operating rooms online, and expanding transportation options.

This initiative will provide up to $1 million in funding to healthcare providers and hospitals per eligible location, with a total of $35 million available through this funding opportunity.

“Rural providers and hospitals are the backbone of our local health care communities. This funding will help to improve care for both patients and providers alike. I want to thank the Trump Administration for investing in Pennsylvania. This funding is a game changer for patients throughout the Commonwealth,” said Rep. Kelly.

“President Trump understands that every American deserves high-quality healthcare, no matter where they live,” said Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “We are putting resources directly into rural communities to strengthen the health workforce, modernize infrastructure, expand access, and bring care closer to home. We are giving states the flexibility to build solutions around the people they serve, while demanding accountability for results. That is how we strengthen rural health, improve the lives of patients and families, and Make America Healthy Again.”

“President Trump made a historic commitment to rural America, and these investments are turning that commitment into better care for patients in communities across Pennsylvania,” said Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz. “This is what rural health transformation should look like: federal investment that is putting patients first, driving lasting improvements and expanding healthcare for the hardworking Americans who call these communities home.”

This investment was made possible through the Working Families Tax Cuts Act— passed by Republicans in Congress and unanimously opposed by Democrats — delivering a historic $50 billion, five-year national investment to help states transform the way healthcare is delivered in America.

Pennsylvania has already committed $42 million to support 66 qualified projects across the state, including projects in Kelly’s district. This is only one part of the larger overall funding amount being awarded to Pennsylvania for fiscal year 2026.

Key investments include:

  • Promoting sustainable access to care by strengthening the integration and delivery of services, leveraging technology, and supporting the rural health workforce.
  • Supporting renovations, structural improvements, equipment purchases, and essential supplies for hospitals, healthcare providers, and other qualified rural health facilities.
  • Strengthening access to critical services and infrastructure, including emergency and non-emergency medical transportation, behavioral and maternal healthcare, medical technology for essential screenings and services, and critical structural repairs.
  • The Trump Administration is delivering on its commitment to strengthen rural America by investing in solutions that modernize technology to promote health and wellbeing for rural communities.

Led by CMS, the RHT Program is partnering with Pennsylvania and states nationwide to move beyond one-size-fits-all approaches and give rural communities the tools to build stronger, more innovative, and more sustainable health systems that deliver better care and better outcomes for the Americans they serve.
 

For more information about the RHT Program, visit: https://www.medicaid.gov/resources-for-states/rural-health.

Davids, House Colleagues Call on Trump Administration to Reverse Decision That Could Raise Medicare Drug Costs for Millions

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Sharice Davids (KS-3)

Recently, Representative Sharice Davids joined 50 House colleagues in calling on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to immediately reverse its planned termination of the Medicare Part D Premium Stabilization Demonstration at the end of this year. 

“Seniors and disabled beneficiaries have seen prices fall over the past three years as a result of [this Medicare program],” wrote the lawmakers. “Lower costs and a rise in covered individuals indicate that the demonstration is working. Despite this fact, CMS has chosen to terminate the program amidst a cost-of-living crisis. Ending this demonstration without a plan to maintain lower costs does not solve these problems, but instead shifts the cost onto beneficiaries least able to afford them.”

The Medicare Part D Premium Stabilization Demonstration has helped keep prescription drug plan costs down for nearly 25 million seniors and people with disabilities. Average monthly premiums fell by $26 in 2025 and another $16 in 2026. But with the program set to be terminated, millions of Americans could be asked to pay more each month just to keep the prescription drug coverage they already have. For seniors living on fixed incomes, even a modest increase can mean a real choice between paying for medicine and paying for groceries, utilities, or other necessities.

This action follows Davids’ meeting with Kansans from across the Third District on the economic impacts of the Trump administration’s policies on working families. In the last month alone, she’s hosted two roundtable discussions with patients and healthcare providers on the impacts of rising healthcare costs, held a press conference on her work to provide economic relief for middle-class families, and met one-on-one with constituents to hear about the financial challenges families are facing. 

Read the full letter here or below:

Dear Administrator Oz,

We write to urge the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to reverse the termination of the Medicare Part D Premium Stabilization Demonstration. The demonstration program has stabilized drug prices for nearly 25 million people and CMS’s decision to end the demonstration puts affordability at risk during a time where seniors continue to face rising costs.

Seniors and disabled beneficiaries have seen prices fall over the past three years as a result of this program. The base beneficiary premium has lowered, which is used to calculate individual plan premiums, and annual increases in monthly premiums have been limited. Since the rollout of the demonstration, enrollment increased from 22.8 million in 2024 to 24.9 million in 2026 and average monthly premiums reduced by $26 in 2025 and $16 in 2026. Lower costs and a rise in covered individuals indicate that the demonstration is working. Despite this fact, CMS has chosen to terminate the program amidst a cost of living crisis.

We want to hold Part D sponsors and drug manufacturers accountable for the prices ultimately paid by beneficiaries, and we welcome the opportunity to work with you to address the underlying drivers of increased costs. Ending this demonstration without a plan to maintain lower costs does not solve these problems, but instead shifts the cost onto beneficiaries least able to afford them. Plan prices are expected to be made available in September and roughly 75% of current enrollees are likely to see their plan costs increase. Ahead of this, we ask that CMS reverse this decision and respond to the following:

  1. CMS claims that insurers no longer need temporary stabilization payments, do you have evidence to support this claim? Has CMS publicly released any analyses, and if not, will it do so?
  1. What analysis has CMS conducted on the impact of premium increases on individuals living on fixed incomes? If no analysis exists, please state so.
  1. If premium increases exceed CMS’s expectations, what corrective actions will you take to help immediately?
  1. What data will be collected to evaluate how the termination of this program is impacting seniors and disabled individuals?
  1. Did CMS consult beneficiary advocates, plan sponsors, or state insurance regulators before deciding to end the demonstration? If so, please identify them and describe what CMS heard.

As health care costs surge, pushing individuals off insurance due to unaffordability, we urge you to reinstate the Medicare Part D Premium Stabilization Demonstration immediately. We must do all that we can to protect lower prescription drug prices for those who need it most. Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Rep. Panetta Announces Nearly $4 Million in Federal Funding for Paso Robles Airport

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif)

Paso Robles, CA – United States Representative Jimmy Panetta (CA-19) announced $3,895,000 in federal funding to rehabilitate Taxiway A at the Paso Robles Municipal Airport. The federal grant, awarded through the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Airport Improvement Program, will support the rehabilitation of 1,900 feet of existing taxiway pavement and minimize foreign object debris that could interfere with safe airport operations. The funding will support the project’s final phase, consisting of construction.

“Paso Robles Municipal Airport is an important transportation hub that supports our local economy, military operations, wildfire suppression and prevention efforts, and regional connectivity,” said Rep. Panetta. “This significant federal investment in northern San Luis Obispo County will help preserve the structural integrity of Taxiway A, reduce the risk of debris, and ensure safer and more reliable airport operations. I’ll continue working in Congress to ensure that the federal government plays its part by bringing our fair share of resources home and investing directly in the infrastructure that serves our communities.”

“Congressman Panetta’s $3.9 million investment strengthens our airport’s infrastructure and safety, supporting regional economic growth, public safety air operations, emergency response, and our future horizontal launch space port opportunities. We greatly appreciate his continued support of our city,” said Paso Robles Mayor John Hamon.

In addition to charter and private use, Paso Robles Municipal Airport serves as an air operations support base for statewide public safety agencies and is the site of a proposed spaceport initiative supported by Rep. Panetta. The City of Paso Robles is making progress toward the FAA Launch Site Operator License, which would allow for spaceport operations to complement the airport operations.

The Airport Improvement Program provides federal grants for airport infrastructure projects, including runways, taxiways, signage, lighting, and markings. These investments strengthen the nation’s aviation infrastructure.

###

Congressman Williams Celebrates Five TX-25 School Districts Named Among North Texas’ Top 10

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Roger Williams (25th District of Texas)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congressman Roger Williams (TX-25), Chairman of the House Committee on Small Business, recognized five outstanding school districts in Texas’ 25th Congressional District for being named among the Top 10 school districts in North Texas based on the latest Texas Education Agency accountability ratings.

The recognized districts are:

Huckabay Independent School District – Erath County
Dublin Independent School District – Erath County
Aledo Independent School District – Parker County
Palo Pinto Independent School District – Palo Pinto County
Graford Independent School District – Palo Pinto County

“I am proud to see Huckabay, Dublin, Aledo, Palo Pinto, and Graford recognized among the top school districts in North Texas,” said Congressman Williams.“What makes these schools special is the opportunities they give students to shape the course of their lives. Through these schools’ commitment to excellence, these districts are helping prepare the next generation to enter the workforce and succeed in every profession.”

Congressman Williams applauded the districts’ commitment to preparing the next generation of students to succeed.

###

Congressman Roger Williams is the Chairman of the House Small Business Committee and a member of the House Financial Services Committee. He proudly represents the 25th Congressional District of Texas.

Brownley, Sherman, Schiff, and Padilla Urge FEMA to Release Millions in Federal Funding for Wildfire Emergency Preparedness in Los Angeles County

Source: United States House of Representatives – Julia Brownley (D-CA)

Washington, DC – Today, Congresswoman Julia Brownley (D-CA-26) joined Congressman Brad Sherman (D-CA-32) and U.S. Senators Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla (both D-CA) in urging the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to quickly release more than $4 million in federal funding for the Encinal Canyon Road Emergency Interconnection Project. This project is essential for protecting the flow of fire hydrants and building connections during firefighting operations in the western Malibu community. Malibu was among the cities impacted by the Palisades fire in January 2025.

Los Angeles County was selected for $4,893,885 in FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) award in December 2024 to support construction. However, the project has been significantly delayed due to FEMA’s prolonged processing of the award. The project would provide an urgently needed alternative water source during emergencies, system disruptions, or supply shortages. Any failure to complete this project could jeopardize potable water and fire protection for up to 23,000 residents.

“The issuance of this grant is essential to strengthen critical infrastructure and ensure the community remains resilient in the face of increasing risk of natural disasters” the lawmakers wrote.

The full letter can be found here and below: 


Dear Administrator Hamilton,

We are writing to request your assistance regarding a critical infrastructure project for Los Angeles County Waterworks District 29, the Encinal Canyon Road Emergency Interconnection Project. This project is essential to protecting the reliability of drinking water and needed fire flow for fire hydrants and building connections during firefighting operations in the western Malibu community and was selected for a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) award in December 2024. However, the project has been significantly delayed due to FEMA’s prolonged processing of the award.

The Encinal Interconnection will construct approximately 7,000 feet of new water main and appurtenances to connect District 29 with the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District. This new interconnection will provide an urgently needed alternative water source during emergencies, system disruptions, or supply shortages. The Malibu area currently relies on a single 35‑mile transmission main that traverses steep, landslide‑prone coastal terrain. Any failure along this alignment would jeopardize potable water and fire protection for up to 23,000 residents, and this interconnection will provide vital resiliency for the community.

The County completed the design and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved the project on November 18, 2025. The total project cost is approximately $9 million, and the County had applied for $4,893,885 in HMGP funding to support construction.

The project application (AP1140) was submitted under HMGP DR‑4683 in August 2023 and was selected for award in December 2024. However, more than a year and a half later, FEMA has not issued a Notice of Award. FEMA has cited an ongoing environmental review, despite the project being limited to buried pipeline installation within an existing roadway, and no notable impacts anticipated. The project has already completed environmental reviews consistent with local and state laws. 

We have been informed that the County cannot advertise the construction contract until FEMA issues the grant award, or they risk forfeiting the funding. As a result, the project remains on hold, and the delay poses a threat to public safety and emergency preparedness.

Considering the critical importance of this project, we respectfully request answers to the following questions:

  1. What is the status of FEMA’s review for AP1140?
  2. What is the specific reason for the extended environmental review? 
  3. What is the estimated timeline for issuance of the Notice of Award?

The issuance of this grant is essential to strengthen critical infrastructure and ensure the community remains resilient in the face of increasing risk of natural disasters. We appreciate your expeditious attention to this critical matter.

###

Issues: , ,

Krishnamoorthi Sounds Alarm Over Trump DOJ Deployments to Polling Places and Voter Suppression Risks

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (8th District of Illinois)

WASHINGTON — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL-08), a senior member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, today sent a letter to Attorney General Todd Blanche sounding the alarm over the Trump Administration’s plans to deploy as many as 1,000 Department of Justice election monitors during the 2026 midterms and demanding safeguards against voter intimidation. As President Trump continues to promote unsupported claims about election fraud and foreign manipulation, Krishnamoorthi is seeking assurances that DOJ personnel will be used solely to protect Americans’ right to vote, not to intimidate voters, pressure election officials, or advance unsupported claims about the integrity of American elections. 

In the letter, Krishnamoorthi writes: 

“If the Administration repeatedly tells the public that certain voting systems, jurisdictions, or categories of voters are vulnerable to fraud or foreign manipulation, and then sends federal personnel into those same communities on Election Day, the presence of those personnel can create an atmosphere of suspicion and intimidation—even if individual monitors follow their formal instructions. The federal government’s presence at a polling place carries authority that ordinary election observers do not, and voters should never be left wondering whether exercising their right to vote has placed them under federal scrutiny.” 

According to recent reporting cited in the letter, DOJ is preparing as many as 1,000 election monitors for the 2026 midterms, compared with plans to monitor 86 jurisdictions across 27 states during the 2024 general election. During the 2025 election cycle, DOJ also deployed federal observers to six counties in California and New Jersey following requests from Republican state parties, raising concerns about deployments in politically consequential jurisdictions following partisan requests. 

The planned deployments come as President Trump continues to cast doubt on the integrity of American elections and DOJ has sued approximately 30 states seeking access to their unredacted voter rolls. As of August 2026, federal district courts had rejected the Department’s efforts in roughly two dozen cases, with no judge having sided with the Administration in those cases. 

 Krishnamoorthi continues: 

“Taken together, these actions create a troubling perception: the federal government is simultaneously seeking expansive access to Americans’ voter information, challenging state election systems, and preparing to place potentially 1,000 federal monitors in communities across the country. At the same time, the President is publicly asserting that American elections are vulnerable to fraud and foreign manipulation, including alleged interference by China.” 

Krishnamoorthi requested responses by August 31, 2026, including answers to the following questions: 

  1. How many federal election monitors does the Department intend to deploy during the 2026 general election, and in how many jurisdictions? 
  2. What objective, nonpartisan criteria is the Department using to determine where monitors will be deployed? 
  3. How many jurisdictions receiving federal monitors were selected following requests from Republican or Democratic political parties, candidates, or elected officials? 
  4. Will the Department commit that political party affiliation, electoral competitiveness, or a jurisdiction’s voting history will play no role in determining whether federal monitors are deployed? 
  5. What written guidance have federal monitors received concerning interactions with voters, poll workers, and election administrators? 
  6. Will monitors be prohibited from questioning, photographing, following, recording, or otherwise interacting with voters unless specifically authorized by federal law? 
  7. What safeguards are in place to prevent the presence of federal monitors from intimidating voters or discouraging lawful participation in the electoral process? 
  8. Will the Department commit that election monitors will not be used to investigate generalized allegations of voter fraud or foreign interference absent specific evidence of a violation of federal law? 

Congressman Krishnamoorthi’s letter is available here.

Doggett Reacts to Abbott’s Refusal to Fulfill His Constitutional Duty to Extradite Accused Felon

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)

Austin, TXToday, Representative Lloyd Doggett, who represents the Texas State Capitol, issued the following statement after the State of Minnesota sued Governor Abbott Tuesday to compel the extradition of an ICE agent charged in a Minneapolis shooting:

“As an excuse for shirking his duty to extradite an accused felon, Governor Abbott has attacked Minnesota, the state where the alleged crime occurred. His claim that he does not trust Governor Tim Walz is belied by the fact that less than a week ago, he forwarded an order to extradite another accused to Minnesota. 

Abbott has approved every Minnesota extradition request for the past five years, including three this summer while leaving this one unsigned. The only difference is that the accused in this case is an ICE agent charged with the type of unnecessary violence that ICE has permitted. Unless Abbott acts, this accused felon could be back on the street next week. Abbott is more interested in burnishing his well-known anti-immigrant credentials than following the law.”

A letter from all Texas Democratic Congressmembers, urging Governor Abbott to proceed with the requested extradition can be found here.

###

Wilson, Hoyer, McCaul, Colleagues Introduce the ‘Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026’

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Joe Wilson (2nd District of South Carolina)

Washington, DC – Representatives Joe Wilson (R-SC), senior member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Steny Hoyer (D-MD), and House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Emeritus Michael McCaul (R-TX), alongside bipartisan colleagues, introduced the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026.

     This legislation — which honors the late Senator Lindsey Graham, who worked on the bill for more than a year and secured the White House’s support — will hold major purchasers of Russian oil and gas accountable for supporting Russia’s war against Ukraine and extend sanctions that restrict funding for Iran’s energy and weapons sectors. 

     “Senator Lindsey Graham and I shared the belief that opposing dictators in defense of freedom and liberty is always the right thing to do. War criminal Putin is losing his invasion of sovereign Ukraine and the threat to humanity posed by the Iranian regime is dire. It is time for Congress to give President Trump the strongest tools available to choke off Russia’s war machine for the good of mankind and cripple the ability of Tehran to continue sowing chaos in the region and beyond. My friend and colleague worked tirelessly in championing these critical initiatives, and I am grateful to help advance them across the finish line in the House,” said Rep. Wilson.

     “Democracy is presently under threat from despotism, and Congress must act to defend democracy and help Ukraine defeat Vladimir Putin’s effort to extinguish its liberty and sovereignty. Our legislation goes after multiple sources of Russian war funding, including its oil and gas sectors, shadow fleet, and financial institutions. I’m encouraged that the Senate passed the companion legislation last week with overwhelming support, and I thank former Chairman McCaul for partnering with me to facilitate action by the House. This action has been delayed too long and will, hopefully, accelerate Ukraine’s success and the ending of this war, one that was initiated illegally by Putin and that has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths of Russians and Ukrainians. I hope that we can secure bipartisan consensus in the House and enact a sanctions package that will stem the flow of money to Russia’s war machine and contribute to a Ukrainian victory,” said Rep. Hoyer.

     “Senator Graham was a national security giant, a statesman of unmatched conviction, and a personal friend and mentor. We shared a fundamental worldview: America is strongest at home when it projects strength abroad. That’s why he fought so hard for this bill, which I promised him months ago I would introduce in the House,” said Rep. McCaul. “As President Zelensky told me last month when I visited Ukraine, he is ready for a ceasefire — ready to negotiate, as he has been for years. Putin, on the other hand, consistently defies President Trump and the international community by refusing to come to the table. I can think of no better way to honor Senator Graham’s life and legacy than by passing these tough sanctions, which will help force Putin into negotiations and bring us closer to securing Lindsey’s vision of enduring peace in two critical regions of the world.”

     Earlier this month, an overwhelming bipartisan majority in the Senate voted to pass companion legislation, by a vote of 86-11, led by Senators Darline Graham (R-SC), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Katie Britt (R-AL), Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee Roger Wicker (R-MS), and Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Jim Risch (R-ID). The text of the House bill is identical to the text that passed the Senate. 

     See bill here.

# # #

 

Northern Virginia Representatives, Democratic Leaders Open Investigation Into ICE Agents Threatening U.S. Citizen With Gun In Northern Virginia

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Don Beyer (D-VA)

Northern Virginia Representatives Don Beyer (D-VA), Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA), and James Walkinshaw (D-VA), along with House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Robert Garcia (D-CA), House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD), and House Homeland Security Committee Ranking Member Bennie Thompson (D-MS), today opened an investigation into an August 10 encounter in Falls Church, Virginia, during which a masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent pointed a gun directly at Carolina Molina, a U.S. citizen and Northern Virginia resident, without justification. The lawmakers sought answers and a full investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and review by the Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, and demanded that the ICE agents involved in the encounter be placed on administrative leave pending the conclusion of the investigation and review.

Video footage recorded by Carolina Molina on August 10 shows unmarked vehicles blocking her car from the front and rear before masked ICE agents approach her. One agent then draws his firearm and points it directly at Ms. Molina. The agent is then heard accusing her of “following” and “recording” the agents before subsequently accusing her of attempting to run them over and threatening her with arrest—an accusation that is not supported by the available footage, which shows no attempt by Ms. Molina to run over or otherwise endanger the agents.

In a letter addressed to Attorney General Todd Blanche, FBI Director Kash Patel, Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin, and Acting ICE Director David Venturella, and copied to DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari, the lawmakers condemned the dangerous and unjustified escalation captured on video and demanded answers about the ICE agents involved, including their use of force and threats against Ms. Molina for exercising her right to record federal officers. The lawmakers also condemned DHS’s subsequent dishonest statements about the incident, including its characterization of Ms. Molina as an “anti-ICE agitator” and allegation that she “attempted to harm officers by weaponizing her vehicle.”

The Members wrote:

“This footage and the incident it depicts are deeply concerning. They echo the larger pattern of dishonesty and dangerous, unjustified escalation we have unfortunately seen from DHS agents across the country, which resulted in the tragic deaths of Ruben Ray Martinez, Renee Good, Alex Pretti, Joan Sebastian Durán Guerrero, and Lorenzo Salgado Araujo.”

“What happened to Carolina Molina cannot be dismissed as an ordinary interaction between ICE and a member of the public. We therefore request that the FBI conduct a formal investigation into this incident, and that the DOJ Civil Rights Division evaluates those findings. We also request that DHS immediately preserve all records related to this encounter – including body-worn camera footage, cellphone and vehicle footage, use of force and incident reports, and internal communications.”

Full text of the letter follows below, and a signed copy is available here.

***

Dear Attorney General Blanche, Director Patel, Secretary Mullin, and Acting Director Venturella:

We write to request an immediate Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigation and Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division review into the conduct of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents during an enforcement operation in the Bailey’s Crossroads neighborhood of Falls Church, Virginia, on Monday, August 10, 2026. We urge you to place the agents involved in this incident on leave until the conclusion of the investigation and review of their conduct.

Videos shared with us by Carolina Molina, a U.S. citizen and Northern Virginia resident, depict a disturbing encounter in which masked ICE agents blocked her car with their vehicles, approached her car, and pointed a firearm directly at her without any provocation or threat posed by Ms. Molina to the agents. The videos captured on Ms. Molina’s dashcam and cellphone raise serious concerns about the agents’ unjustified escalation, use of force, blatant dishonesty, and call into serious question the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) subsequent response.

Carolina Molina was visiting immigration law offices in Bailey’s Crossroads on August 10, where she volunteered her services as a licensed professional counselor to immigration clients in need of mental health assessments. After seeing ICE agents operating in the vicinity, Ms. Molina attempted to leave the area. At this point, unmarked vehicles positioned themselves in front of and behind her vehicle, effectively boxing her in. Masked ICE agents then emerged from the vehicles and approached her car. One agent had drawn his firearm and pointed it directly at Ms. Molina.

In the videos recorded by Ms. Molina, an ICE agent with his gun pointed at her shouts at her for “following” them and for “recording” them. Then the ICE agent accuses her of attempting to run the agents over and threatens her with arrest. Another agent says, “I will testify and lock you up.” The claim of a deadly threat is obviously belied by both the video footage and their decision to leave her without detaining or charging her after she told them that she had dashcam footage of the encounter. 

This footage and the incident it depicts are deeply concerning. They echo the larger pattern of dishonesty and dangerous, unjustified escalation we have unfortunately seen from DHS agents across the country, which resulted in the tragic deaths of Ruben Ray Martinez, Renee Good, Alex Pretti, Joan Sebastian Durán Guerrero, and Lorenzo Salgado Araujo. 

ICE’s own policies provide clear standards against which this conduct must be evaluated. Under ICE Directive 19009.3—which governs the use of force and firearms by ICE personnel—officers are strictly prohibited from the use of excessive force. The Directive explicitly states that officers are to “use force only when no reasonably effective, safe, and feasible alternative appears to exist” and may “only use the level of force that is objectively reasonable in light of the totality of facts and circumstances confronting the authorized officer at the time force is applied.” It also states that violations of the policies and procedures outlined in the Directive “may be grounds for disciplinary action or other appropriate action.”

ICE Directive 19010.3 directs ICE agents to activate their body-worn cameras to capture footage at the start of enforcement activities or as soon as safely possible thereafter. The videos published by Ms. Molina show that at least three of the agents involved were equipped with body-worn cameras. Ms. Molina herself also recalls seeing the agent who brandished his gun press a button on his body-worn camera during the encounter. Ms. Molina’s dashcam video also depicts another agent recording the interaction on a cellphone and another taking a photo of her license plate. ICE should therefore have its own contemporaneous record of this encounter. The agency should immediately preserve all body-worn camera footage, cellphone footage, and other records relating to the incident, as required by ICE Directive 19010.3.

Just as concerning as the incident itself is DHS’s response to the incident. On August 11, DHS issued an unattributed statement referring to Ms. Molina as an “anti-ICE agitator” and claiming that she “attempted to harm officers by weaponizing her vehicle against them.” DHS further stated that Ms. Molina “could face criminal prosecution.” These are serious allegations, none of which are corroborated by the video footage publicly posted by Ms. Molina. The Department’s accusation that she was “weaponizing her vehicle” is particularly concerning, as it is identical to previous claims made to justify the use of deadly force elsewhere that later collapsed after the production of video evidence, just as this one has. The similarities suggest that Department personnel are intentionally, nefariously, and systematically engaging in illegal intimidation and violence against American citizens under cover of false claims of danger. 

Ms. Molina’s dashcam footage shows the lead-up to the encounter, while her cellphone video captures the confrontation after ICE agents approached and surrounded her vehicle. Neither video shows any attempt by Ms. Molina to run over or otherwise endanger the ICE agents. The footage does, however, depict the ICE agents dangerously escalating the encounter by surrounding her vehicle and confronting her with a drawn firearm. The footage also captures ICE agents using intimidation rather than lawful enforcement to control members of the public who observe, criticize, or record their activities. Whatever the agents’ views of her conduct, criticism, and recording of federal agents in public do not justify federal officers escalating that encounter or threatening a civilian with a firearm.

What happened to Carolina Molina cannot be dismissed as an ordinary interaction between ICE and a member of the public. We therefore request that the FBI conduct a formal investigation into this incident, and that the DOJ Civil Rights Division evaluates those findings. We also request that DHS immediately preserve all records related to this encounter – including body-worn camera footage, cellphone and vehicle footage, use of force and incident reports, and internal communications. We also request answers to the following questions: 

For DOJ and FBI:

  1. Please confirm when we can expect the FBI and Civil Rights Division to start an investigation.

For DHS:

  1. Who are the ICE agents depicted in the videos recorded by Carolina Molina? Please provide the names, titles, positions, and functions of each agent involved in the encounter.
  2. Did the ICE agents involved in the incident with Ms. Molina receive training on safely stopping and approaching vehicles? If so, what specific training did they receive, and did their actions comply with ICE policies and procedures?
  3. Please state whether these agents have faced any disciplinary actions for violating ICE’s use of force policies, improperly displaying a firearm, or otherwise endangering Ms. Molina and members of the public. If yes, who has faced discipline and on what grounds? If no disciplinary action has been initiated, why not?
  4. Are these agents currently authorized and deployed to conduct immigration enforcement operations in public spaces?
  5. Has any DHS supervisor, field office, or other oversight body opened an investigation into this incident? If so, which office was designated to review the incident? What is the status of that investigation and what are they investigating?
  6. Was a use of force report or other incident report created as a result of the agent drawing and pointing his firearm at Ms. Molina? If so, was such a report completed? Provide a copy to our offices.
  7. Has ICE determined whether the agent who drew and pointed his firearm directly at Ms. Molina complied with Directive 19009.3? If so, please identify the specific provisions supporting that determination. 
  8. ICE should have its own record of this encounter. Please provide our offices with all complete and unedited body-worn camera footage, cellphone and vehicle footage, and any other records relating to the incident.
    1. If the body-worn camera did not record the encounter, please explain why not and whether the agent complied with all applicable requirements under ICE Directive 19010.3 governing body-worn cameras.
  9. When ICE agents menaced Ms. Molina for the “offense” of “recording us,” was this violation of her First Amendment rights consistent with their training from the Department? Given the recurring pattern of ICE and other DHS agents menacing citizens for legally and constitutionally protected activities, what corrective actions will your agencies take to prevent systematic violations of Americans’ constitutional rights from continuing?

Please provide a response no later than Monday, August 31, 2026.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. We look forward to your response.