Pocan Votes Against Allowing Americans’ Healthcare Costs to Skyrocket

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Mark Pocan (2nd District of Wisconsin)

WASHINGTON D.C. – Today, U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02)released the following statement after he voted no on funding legislation that fails to extend the Affordable Care Act enhanced premium tax credits.

“Today, I voted no on a bill that fails the American people. This legislation does nothing to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits that keep healthcare affordable for more than 22 million Americans. That means millions will have to pay significantly more for their healthcare in the coming months or lose their insurance entirely. This will also have a ripple effect leading to rate increases for nearly everyone in this country. 

 

And while everyday Americans are left behind, this bill continues to protect Congressional Republicans’ billionaire and corporate donors, keeping in place massive tax cuts paid for by ripping healthcare away from 15 million Americans and gutting food benefits for those who need them most by over $180 billion.

 

On top of that, this legislation allows Senate Republicans, like Ron Johnson, who were investigated for their involvement in the January 6th insurrection to enrich themselves by suing the federal government for $1 million, or possibly more.”

Trump Finally Admits His Tariffs Are Raising Prices

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (1st District of Washington)

Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (WA-01) released the following statement on President Trump’s rollback of some of his food tariffs

“President Trump has finally admitted what we’ve all known for months – his illegal tariffs are making everyday items like coffee, bananas, and meat more expensive. Families have needlessly had to pay more at the grocery store while American farmers have been the target of other countries retaliating against Trump’s trade agenda.

“Right now, families are struggling with higher prices on food, health care, child care, and housing. Trump and Republicans promised to lower prices on Day One, but these sweeping tariffs did the exact opposite.

“This shows why Congress needs to exercise its power over tariffs so families and our economy aren’t hurt by the president’s impulsive decisions.

“The president needs to go further and roll back all of his sweeping tariffs.”

Ranking Member Pingree: Trump Administration Turning NEH Into a Slush Fund

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Chellie Pingree (1st District of Maine)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree (D-Maine), Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, says the Trump Administration’s unprecedented and legally dubious grantmaking practices have called the integrity of the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) into question.

In a letter to Acting NEH Chairman Michael McDonald, Pingree raised serious concerns about the deterioration of the agency following mass layoffs, the cancellation of numerous grant programs, and the awarding of massive grants through questionable non-competitive processes. Pingree also questioned McDonald’s frequent usage of the Chairman awards, including to individuals, which do not require council approval.

“I am deeply concerned by the rapid destruction of NEH,” Pingree wrote. “It is imperative that the damage inflicted on this agency be undone and that the integrity of NEH be rebuilt. Communities across the country are relying on it.”

The problems at NEH began in April, when the Trump Administration implemented sweeping DOGE cuts that terminated previously awarded federal grants and laid off more than 65% of NEH employees. Biden-appointed NEH Chair Shelly Lowe was fired, and Michael McDonald was installed as Acting Chairman.

Since then, the agency’s ability to conduct its core mission has collapsed:

Grant Programs Eliminated Despite Available Funding

According to a federal court decision, only six employees remain in the Office of Grant Management and five in accounting, making it “virtually impossible for NEH to perform its statutorily required role.” The agency has cancelled numerous existing grant programs that have bipartisan Congressional support, citing lack of staff capacity—a self-imposed deficiency caused by the reduction in force.

In one glaring example, on July 8, NEH announced a Humanities Research Centers on Artificial Intelligence competition—in keeping with the administration’s stated focus on AI. The program was abruptly cancelled in September, just weeks before the application deadline, with the agency claiming it didn’t have staff capacity to process applications.

Massive Non-Competitive Grants Raise Red Flags

Rather than conduct NEH’s traditional rigorous competitive grantmaking process, which distributes funding widely across the country, the Trump administration has awarded two of the largest grants in the agency’s 60-year history—both apparently non-competitive.

On August 1, NEH announced a $10 million grant to the University of Virginia. On September 15, the agency announced a $10.4 million grant to Tikvah, a conservative Jewish think tank. Together, these two grants alone represent 10% of NEH’s entire annual appropriation.

According to sources, the National Council on the Humanities reviewed the Tikvah application and rejected it. NEH leadership overrode the Council’s decision and awarded the grant anyway—a move that, while not illegal, is unprecedented in both the volume and non-competitive nature of such large awards.

“A non-competitive process for grantmaking suggests that NEH doesn’t have the staff capacity to ensure that the most promising proposals are being elevated,” Pingree wrote. “It is a concerningly irresponsible approach to awarding taxpayer dollars.”

National Council Gutted, Quorum Impossible

At the beginning of October, the White House dismissed most of the members of the National Council on the Humanities members, leaving just four of 26—far short of the 14 required for a quorum.

The Council’s authorizing statute requires that, for grants over $30,000, the NEH Chairperson cannot approve applications without the Council’s recommendation. With no quorum possible, it remains unclear how NEH can legally function in its grantmaking role.

Chairman’s Awards Raise Additional Questions

The NEH Chairman has authority to unilaterally award grants up to $30,000 without Council approval. Pingree expressed concern about McDonald’s use of this authority, including one award entitled “Meritocracy vs. Equity: the Declaration of Independence in Tension with Critical Race Theory and DEI”—despite the fact that, earlier this year, NEH cancelled awards that were “at variance with agency priorities, including but not limited to those on diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

In her letter, Pingree requested a meeting with McDonald and demanded answers to detailed questions about:

  • Current staffing levels and plans to rebuild capacity

  • A complete list of cancelled grant programs

  • Application materials and justification for the large grants to UVA and Tikvah

  • Whether Council members were dismissed in retaliation

  • A list of all Chairman’s Awards and the procedure for selecting recipients

Pingree has given McDonald 30 days to respond.

The full letter is available here and is copied below. Read more about the destruction of the NEH in The New York Times. 

+++

Dear Mr. McDonald:

I have been closely monitoring the developments at the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) since the administration illegally terminated previously awarded federal grants and laid off more than 65% of NEH employees earlier this spring. 

In recent weeks, it has become increasingly apparent that the agency’s ability to conduct grantmaking has been seriously damaged.

First, it is my understanding that dozens of NEH grant lines have been eliminated. In just one example, NEH abruptly cancelled the Humanities Research Centers on Artificial Intelligence competition. The grant application was made available July 8, 2025, in accordance with this administration’s stated focus on AI. Yet, the program was cancelled in September, only weeks before the application deadline. NEH attributed the cancellation to a lack of staff capacity, a self-imposed deficiency caused by the reduction in force.

Second, NEH announced the award of two of the single largest grants in the agency’s history – both seemingly non-competitive. These two grants alone make up 10% of the agency’s annual appropriation. NEH has a long history of maximizing its impact through numerous smaller awards across the country. Departure from this tradition to fund such large awards presumably comes at the expense of numerous smaller grants. Further, a non-competitive process for grantmaking suggests that NEH doesn’t have the staff capacity to ensure that the most promising proposals are being elevated. It is a concerningly irresponsible approach to awarding taxpayer dollars.

Third and finally, at the beginning of October, the National Council on the Humanities (Council) was dismantled when the White House dismissed a significant number of its members. Only four of the 26 members remain on the Council, far short of the 14 required for a quorum.

To help me better understand the situation at NEH and fulfill my responsibility to conduct oversight, I would like to schedule a meeting with you. To aid our conversation, please provide answers to the following questions in advance of that meeting, but no later than 30 days from receipt. 

  • According to information contained in the August 6, 2025, U.S District Court’s decision, “only six employees remain in the Office of Grant Management and five employees in accounting, making it virtually impossible for NEH to perform its statutorily required role rigorously to review more than one hundred million dollars in federal grants and oversee tens of millions of dollars in Federal/State Partnership grants.”

    • Is this figure accurate? 

    • How many FTEs responsible for grantmaking are necessary for NEH to meet its obligations, including ensuring that announced competitions such as the Humanities Research Centers on Artificial Intelligence are actually awarded? 

    • What steps is NEH taking to rebuild its capacity?

    • What is the status of the funds covered by the injunction issued by the U.S. District Court?

    • Please provide a breakdown of FY25 funding by program.

  • Due to the diminished capacity caused by the reduction in force, I understand that NEH has eliminated numerous existing grant programs, despite there being sufficient appropriations. Many of them have bipartisan Congressional support. The cancellation of these important grants is harmful and unacceptable. 

    • Please provide a list of all previously awarded grant programs have been cancelled in Fiscal Year 2025 due to capacity issues resulting from the reduction in force.

    • Please provide a list of open grant competitions that were cancelled after the funding opportunity was issued.

  • On August 1, NEH announced a $10 million grant to the University of Virginia. On September 15, NEH announced a $10.4 million grant to Tikvah.

    • Please share any application materials associated with these grants.

    • What are the funding sources for these grants?

    • It is my understanding that the Council reviewed the Tikvah application and denied it. What was the justification and authority for overriding the Council’s decision?

    • Did the Council review the University of Virginia grant?

    • Were these larger awards made because of staffing shortages?

    • Is NEH moving toward a model of selecting fewer recipients for larger grant awards?

    • Is NEH in the process of inviting other organizations to apply for large-scale non-competitive grants?

    • How many other grant opportunities were not offered to offset the size of these grants?

  • As noted above, only four out of 26 members remain on the National Council for the Humanities. The Council’s authorizing statute stipulates that for awards over $30,000, “the NEH Chairperson shall not approve or disapprove any such application until the Chairperson has received the recommendation of the Council on such application, unless the Council fails to make a recommendation thereon within a reasonable time.” 

    • Were the councilmembers dismissed in retaliation for raising questions about the Tikvah application or other agency initiatives?

    • What is the timeline for appointing new members to the Council?

    •  In the absence of the Council’s ability to have a quorum, what is the NEH’s procedure for grantmaking? 

    • How is NEH planning to move ahead with the Garden of Heroes funding opportunity without a quorum on the Council?

    • Please provide a list of any grants awarded this year that did not receive a recommendation from the Council.

  • It has come to my attention that you have made liberal use of the authority to make Chairman’s Awards of up to $30,000 to institutions and individuals. 

    • One such award is entitled “Meritocracy vs. Equity: the Declaration of Independence in Tension with Critical Race Theory and DEI.”

      •  Earlier this year, NEH cancelled awards that are, “at variance with agency priorities, including but not limited to those on diversity, equity, and inclusion.” Why is this award that is directly related to DEI different?

      • The recipient for this grant award is listed as unaffiliated independent scholar. Please provide the name of the recipient.

    • Please provide a list of all Chairman’s Awards that have been selected this year.

  • What is the NEH’s procedure for identifying recipients of Chairman’s Awards?

I am deeply concerned by the rapid destruction of NEH, and am committed to ensuring that 

NEH can once again conduct a rigorous process for selecting grantees, as it had previously successfully done since its founding in 1965. It is imperative that the damage inflicted on this agency be undone and that the integrity of NEH be rebuilt. Communities across the country are relying on it.

I look forward to our meeting.

Sincerely,

###

Díaz-Balart Recognizes Naples Student as 2025 Winner of the FL-26 Congressional App Challenge

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart (25th District of FLORIDA)

Naples, FL – The office ofCongressman Mario Díaz-Balart (FL-26), Dean of the Florida Delegation, hosted its 10th annual Congressional App Challenge competition and recognized winner Dallas Szittai from Gulf Coast High School in Naples, Florida.

“My team was proud to recognize Dallas Szittai for winning the 2025 Congressional App Challenge with his innovative weather app, Warn.live. This real-time tool pairs live radar with National Weather Service warnings and advisories, delivering instant alerts to help keep communities safe.

Students in Florida’s 26th District continue to distinguish themselves as leaders in technology and innovation. I encourage students of all skill levels to take the plunge and learn to create their own apps,” said Congressman Díaz-Balart.

When asked about the inspiration behind the app and future developments of it, Szittaisaid, “Warn.live is a real-time severe weather app that pairs live radar with National Weather Service warnings and advisories and delivers instant push notifications whenever new alerts are issued. I created it out of a passion for weather and built it by learning new skills in web development, mapping technologies, and backend architecture. The project, created because of the Congressional App Challenge, taught me not only technical problem-solving but also how to manage time effectively under pressure. I plan to continue developing Warn.live by expanding nationwide notifications and adding more advanced weather features.”

In this nationwide competition, students compete with peers in Florida’s 26th Congressional District by creating and exhibiting their apps for mobile, tablet, or computer devices on a platform of their choice. Each winning team is invited to showcase their winning app to Congress during the annual  #HouseOfCode festival.

To learn more about participating next year, click here.

###

WATCH: Pressley Rallies with Students to Resist Trump’s Attacks on Higher Education, Urge Colleges to Defend Academic Freedom

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)

“Our colleges and universities have always been fundamental in the struggle for civil rights—a place to be challenged, but also a place to challenge conventional wisdom and ask what could be, instead of settling for what always has been.

“And that is why the current occupant of the White House is obsessed with attacking colleges and universities and restricting academic freedom across the country.”

BOSTON – Yesterday, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07) rallied with student activists from over eleven universities in the Greater Boston area to push back against the Trump administration’s attacks on higher education and urge colleges to stand strong against the White House’s threats to deny students their right to academic and intellectual freedom. Rep. Pressley and the students – a cross-campus coalition known as the Educational Freedom Project – were joined by faculty, community members, state and local elected officials, labor leaders, and coalition partners.

An excerpt of the Congresswoman’s remarks is below and the full video is available here.

Transcript: Pressley Rallies with Students to Resist Trump’s Attacks on Higher Education, Urge Colleges to Defend Academic Freedom
November 15, 2025

Boston, MA

Good afternoon, movement family! And we are one human family.

And you all are here because you recognize that our freedoms and our destinies are tied.

We’re not numbers—we’re neighbors.

So I thank you for the intention with which you arrive here today. You care about your family, you care about your communities, you care about this Commonwealth, you care about our country, you care about our democracy.

Quick digression. I’ve been living with the autoimmune disease alopecia totalis for about five years. It’s a disease which makes it—I can’t grow hair, and I lost all the hair on my head, my face, and my body in a five-week period. And I had the option of wearing a wig, but I chose not to, because I recognize the power of representation.

And so it is with intention that I enter every space demonstrating what it is to be fully, authentically, and unapologetically myself, recognizing that I’m not only here to take up space, but I’m here to create it. 

Every single one of you deserves to show up in the world exactly as you are: fully, authentically, and unapologetically, without fear and without discrimination. 

When I came here—I’ll age myself, because I look good still—in 1992, I walked onto the campus of Boston University. While there, I was President of my Student Government, and I was a Student Ambassador, doing all the things that you all are doing right now—building myself up so that I could build the world up.

Each of you are nation builders, and I’m so grateful for your sweat equity, for your laboring in love. It is truly an honor to be here with you activists, table-shakers, dreamers, and movement builders.

Thank you to the Education Freedom Project for bringing us together and for inviting me to share the stage with leaders from across the city and across our Commonwealth.

This hostile government would like for us to be a people that are ignorant and uniformed. A people that are indifferent to the suffering of our neighbors. A people that are inactive.

So when you are here, and you are engaged and active, when you are compassionate about the suffering of your neighbors, when you are well-informed—you are resisting and rejecting their dark, dystopian view of this country.

History has shown us that the way to beat authoritarianism is not with appeasement. That the only way to beat a dictator is with defiance.

So I thank you for the defiant way in which you show up here today. You are leaders who are bold enough, daring enough to imagine a world guided by justice.

You know, people like to accuse progressives for not being ‘pragmatic’ or ‘realistic,’ ‘too aspirational.’ My goodness, if my forefathers and foremothers had that opinion, I wouldn’t be here today.

The fact of the matter is that because of disruptors of an unjust status quo—the Civil Rights Movement, the progressive movement, which is just a continuation of that—somebody already wrote the blueprint for my survival, for your survival.

And in this moment, it is our responsibility to write the blueprint for someone else’s survival, to send a love letter to future generations, to be unapologetically aspirational.

I’m okay with people thinking I’m radical. My greatest heroes—Angela Y. Davis defines radicalism as getting to the root of the problem.

We’re here to get to the root.

It’s an honor to be here with you. And as I evoke the urgent words of Dr. King, he asked “Where do we go from here? Chaos or Community?”

That is the question. Because we are in a moment of chaos, of cruelty, of callousness, of people who govern with cluelessness about the struggles of everyday people.

So we must choose community. That’s what brings us here today.

We are choosing community.

We are choosing the discipline of hope over the ease of cynicism.

We are choosing to love our neighbors and to put that love into action.

We choose to create space where everyone who calls this community home can show up as their authentic self, free, and without fear.

We choose to organize and mobilize in defense of our shared values and the radical notion that representative democracy should deliver results for the people—all the people.

As I said on the floor of the House before Republicans voted once again to make us hungrier, sicker, less safe, to put healthcare farther out of reach for millions. 

In the United States of America, there is no lack of resource, there is no deficit of resource—only a deficit of empathy, of political will, and courage.

The fact of the matter is at its best, government is meant to be a backstop, a compassionate steward of the public good.

At its best, government catches people when they stumble in a moment of hardship.

At its best, government makes it easier to feed your family, see your doctor, build health and wealth.

And everyone here—no matter where you were born, where you attend class, what you are majoring in, or where you hope to serve after you graduate—we all have a role to play in the movement.

And you must play that role, because this is not about how to weather the next four years—this is about shaping the next one hundred. And our colleges and universities have always been fundamental in the struggle for civil rights.

As my good sister Darlene Lambos laid out—a place to explore new perspectives, expand your horizons, meet chosen family, forge bonds. 

A place to be challenged, but also a place to challenge conventional wisdom and ask what could be, instead of settling for what always has been. 

And that is why the current occupant of the White House—when he’s not working around the clock to deny families their SNAP benefits or tearing families apart for simply being Black and brown in America—is obsessed with attacking colleges and universities and restricting academic freedom across the country.

If only more people were more afraid of a dictator than they are diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.

So to every college and university in the Commonwealth, I say, remember who you are.

Do not shrink in the face of these precise, coordinated attacks on our intellectual freedom.

Root yourselves in your mission, in truth, in the sacred calling to educate a democracy worthy of its name. 

History has shown us that appeasement does not work. The only way to beat a dictator is with defiance. 

You know, their strategy relies on us accepting that their march towards authoritarianism is inevitable. They want us to believe it is inevitable. They need us to fall in the face of the odds. 

But I am here to tell you that the power of the people has always been greater than the people in power. 

You do not need permission to lead in your classrooms, on your campuses, or in your communities, or in this movement. 

Coretta Scott King once said that ‘freedom is never really won. You earn it and win it in every generation.’ 

Thank you for stepping up in this moment to win it for this generation. 

And I’ll close with something I’ve studied and have realized as I’ve studied movements throughout history—that every successful movement requires three things.

Imagination. Before you can do any radical work, you have to have a radical dream. Will you dream with me? Will you keep an imagination that we can one day all be free? You need imagination. 

The second thing you need is strategy. You’ve got to be innovative and nimble in that. 

And the third thing you need, and this is the hardest, is stamina. 

Today, you exemplify all three of these things, daring to dream of a future rooted in justice.

We’ll continue to organize, agitate, mobilize across campuses and across communities.

We’re here because we believe another world is possible. One where higher ed doesn’t mean a lifetime of debt. One where people choose people over profit. 

Young people—Light, truth, courage. Let your light shine bright. Speak your truth even when your voice shakes. And may your courage be contagious. 

Thank you, movement family.

###

McGovern Statement on 36th Anniversary of Jesuit Priest Murders

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jim McGovern (D-MA)

WORCESTER, MA—Congressman James P. McGovern (D-MA), Ranking Member of the House Rules Committee and Co-Chair of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, released the following statement on the 36th anniversary of the murders of six Jesuit priests in El Salvador:

“Today we commemorate the 36th anniversary of the brutal murders of six Jesuits, their housekeeper and her daughter by the Salvadoran military at the University of Central America in San Salvador.

“Fathers Ignacio Ellacuría, Ignacio Martín-Baró, Segundo Montes, Juan Ramón Moreno, Amando López and Joaquín López y López worked tirelessly for peace and justice. Elba Ramos and Celina Ramos supported them in this mission.

“Their work for human rights and justice inspires me to this day. They taught me and many others the importance of putting faith into action, of standing with the oppressed, and of the inherent dignity and worth of every human.

“For their advocacy for the poor and the marginalized, for standing up to power and corruption, they were made martyrs. They were gunned down by security forced supplied with weapons provided by the United States. There has never been genuine accountability for the intellectual authors of these crimes. Many still remain free.

“Today, we are repeating these mistakes. The Trump Administration has send nearly $5 million in American taxpayers’ money to Salvadoran security forces who are engaged in a modern campaign of repression under President Bukele’s state of exception. This is immoral. 

“The Administration has abandoned human rights as a policy priority, and the State Department has closed the office that assesses whether our military aid is used to commit human rights abuses. This is wrong.

“As we reflect on the lives and sacrifices of the martyrs, let us remember their commitment to change—to human rights, democracy, justice, and the rule of law – based on sacred values—rooted deeply in the fabric of their Jesuit values.

“Let us, as Americans, be inspired by their message and their works, and recommit to standing up against authoritarians appeals to brutality and imagine a society where the strong are just and the weak are protected.”

WORCESTER, MA—

WORCESTER, MA—

WORCESTER, MA—

WORCESTER, MA—

Speaker Johnson Joins Fox News Sunday

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

WASHINGTON — This morning, Speaker Johnson joined Shannon Bream on Fox News Sunday to discuss Republican efforts to drive down health care costs and restore regular order to the appropriations process. Speaker Johnson also addressed Democrats’ newfound interest in the Epstein Files and the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. 

Watch Speaker Johnson’s full interview here.

On Republican efforts to drive down health care costs for working families:

We’ve done it just this year, July 4 in the Working Families Tax Cut, the Big Beautiful Bill. The President signed into law some real innovations. We saved the American taxpayers $185 billion according to CBO, by some of the changes there, we brought premiums down. But this is what’s interesting. We had another provision in the House version of the Working Families Tax Cut that went to the Senate that would have brought premiums down on average 12.7% across the country. Senate Democrats fought to take that out of the bill, so it didn’t make it to the President’s desk. We have more ideas like that. There’s a lot of ideas that can bring down the cost of health care, increase quality, increase access to care, and you’ll be seeing that rolled out the next couple of weeks. Remember, we were always planning to do this in October, November, December. Ironically, it’s the Democrats who took all that time off the clock by engaging in their shenanigans for political purposes.

On House Republicans restoring regular order to the appropriations process:

The good news is our appropriators in the House and the Senate, in bipartisan fashion, have been working on appropriations bills the whole year. So, they’re virtually done. There’s a little disagreement between the Senate and House versions of some of the bills. The top line numbers are a little bit different. We got to resolve that, but we can certainly get that done in the amount of time that’s still on the calendar. Just because we don’t have legislative voting days, it doesn’t mean Congress isn’t working. There’s this idea out there that Congress goes on vacation, Shannon, we haven’t. I haven’t had a day off in two years. I mean, we work around the clock on these things. Our appropriators, in particular, have been working very hard and they’re ready to go. So, I’m very optimistic we can get the rest of the appropriations bills done. And this is the key point. We are returning to regular order, the way this is supposed to work. You know, Congress hasn’t done this for many years, and I’m really proud of this achievement, having gotten three bills signed into law on Wednesday night. Three appropriations bills are a big achievement. I know that seems like a low bar, but we’re getting Congress back to the way it’s supposed to work, so that we can be better stewards of the taxpayer dollars.

On Democrats’ newfound interest in the Epstein files:

Remember, the Biden DOJ had every one of these files in their possession for four years, and neither Hakeem Jeffries or Ro Khanna or Thomas Massie or any of them ever said a word about it. They’re doing this to go after President Trump on this theory that he has something to do with it. He does not. The people have already said that. Virginia Giuffre, whose name was redacted by the little leaked email that the Democrats put out – they cherry picked three emails out of 20,000 documents and try to imply that the President was guilty – but they took her name out. Why? She’s the one who came out and said he had nothing to do with it. President Trump has clean hands. He’s not worried about. I talk to him all the time; he has nothing to do with this. He’s frustrated that they’re turning it into a political issue, and it’s not surprising, because the Democrats have nothing else to talk about. What have they accomplished in 10 months? Epstein is their entire game plan.

So, we’re going to take that weapon out of their hand. This week, they hit the 218 signature threshold. And you know what I did? Offered it on the floor to pass by unanimous consent, the discharge petition. Guess who objected? The Democrats. If they were really for transparency, if this is really about helping victims and all that, they would not have stopped the passage of the discharge petition. So, it will be on the floor again next week. I suspect there’ll be lots of votes and we’ll just get this done and move it on. There’s nothing to hide, and the Oversight Committee is releasing far more information than the discharge petition, their little gambit, ever even anticipated. They never been mentioned in the discharge the Epstein estate files, and that is the treasure trove of documents that’s given us Epstein’s flight logs, his personal records, his financial ventures, his daily calendar. None of that was anticipated. So, the discharge is totally moot. It is a political exercise, and we’re going to dispense with that this week.

###

Rep. Norcross Votes “No” on Partisan Spending Bill that Ignores Rising Healthcare Costs

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Donald Norcross (1st District of New Jersey)

WASHINGTON, DC — Today, Congressman Donald Norcross (NJ-01) voted no on the Senate’s proposed government funding bill, which neglected to include an extension of the Affordable Care Act tax credits.

“For 43 days, America has been held hostage by this Republican shutdown. While it is a great relief that our federal workers will finally receive their hard-earned paycheck, not everyone is celebrating. There are some Americans who may be getting a death sentence as they lose their lifesaving healthcare coverage. I’m voting no on the Senate’s proposed government funding bill because lives are at risk,” said Congressman Donald Norcross. “Raising healthcare costs for hardworking Americans right after Donald Trump and Republicans handed a giant tax cut to billionaires in the Big Ugly Bill is a disgrace. I will not sit by while our neighbors are squeezed to the breaking point. I’m voting no on this bill, and I’ll keep fighting until every American can afford the healthcare they deserve.”

On December 31st, the Affordable Care Act Tax Credits, which have made healthcare more affordable for millions of Americans, will expire. An estimated 22 million Americans who receive this tax credit will see their monthly premium payments more than double on average.

In New Jersey’s First Congressional District, more than 24,000 people are at risk of seeing their premiums increase, and across New Jersey, healthcare premiums will rise by an average of 175 percent.

###

Norcross, Bacon Introduce Bill to Preserve U.S Navy and Coast Guard Ships

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Donald Norcross (1st District of New Jersey)

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Representatives Donald Norcross (D-NJ) and Don Bacon (R-NE) reintroduced the Save Our Ships Act to help preserve historic U.S. Navy and Coast Guard ships and submarines to display in museums and memorials.

Ship museums across the country provide educational programs to over half a million youth and support over 2,000 enlistments, retirements, and commissioning ceremonies every year, all while contributing $1 billion annually to the economy. However, many historic naval ships don’t get the opportunity to be put on display due to the challenges of physical preservation and maintenance.

The Save Our Ships Act addresses this problem by creating the Historic Naval Ship Preservation Grant Program, which would provide funding for physical upkeep and educational programs for these ships and submarines.

“I’m proud to introduce the Save Our Ships Act to make it easier to preserve our historic naval ships and submarines, like the Battleship New Jersey in Camden City,” said Congressman Donald Norcross. “The educational opportunities that come from preserving these historic vessels are priceless. We must ensure students and families can learn about the rich history of our Navy and Coast Guard and inspire the next generation of shipbuilders and servicemembers.”    

“Omaha’s Freedom Park is home to the USS Marlin SST-2 and the USS Hazard AM-240, a minesweeper and submarine, which have both undergone major restoration work over the years due to flooding in 2011, 2015 and 2019,” said Congressman Don Bacon. “But a dedicated group of volunteers work tirelessly to keep these and other items at the park in pristine condition so that visitors can get a taste of living history. I’m thrilled to join Rep. Norcross on this legislation that will create a competitive grant program to help museums that house these treasures perform some of the needed maintenance.”

“The Battleship New Jersey — the most decorated battleship in the 250-year history of the United States Navy — is proud to stand in full support of the bipartisan Save Our Ships Act,” said Marshall Spevak, Chief Executive Officer of the Battleship New Jersey Museum & Memorial on the Camden Waterfront. “No museum ship in America is federally owned; we’re all nonprofit organizations facing the same challenges as other museums — only our work is even more costly. Congressman Norcross, one of our longest and most dedicated advocates, understands that, and we’re deeply grateful to him and the bill’s co-sponsors for their commitment to preserving our nation’s military and maritime history.”

The members were joined by Representatives Troy Carter (D-LA), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), Tim Kennedy (D-NY), Nanette Barragán (D-CA), Brendan Boyle (D-PA), and Bennie Thompson (D-MS) in introducing the bill.

Read the one-pager here.

Read the full bill text here. 

###

Pappas Introduces Bipartisan Legislation to Improve Veterans’ Access to Care

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Chris Pappas (D-NH)

Yesterday Congressman Chris Pappas (NH-01), a member of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, and Congressman Ryan Mackenzie (PA-07) introduced the Improving Veteran Access to Care Act. This bipartisan legislation will improve the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) appointment scheduling process to ensure veterans can more easily schedule and manage their medical care, including primary care, mental health services, and specialty appointments.

Currently, veterans often have to coordinate appointments across multiple VA clinics and services, which can require several phone calls and separate scheduling steps. The Improving Veterans Access to Care Act directs the VA to create a plan to streamline scheduling systems, improve online self-service platforms, and ensure veterans can schedule appointments through a phone call if they choose. The bill also requires VA to report progress and implement system improvements on a clear timeline.

“For veterans trying to make health care appointments at VA, and especially for those in rural areas who have to travel long distances, the current scheduling system is too burdensome and uncoordinated. Creating a one-stop scheduling platform at VA will help veterans make appointments that work for them, saving their time and money and improving access to care,” said Congressman Pappas. “This commonsense, bipartisan legislation will help deliver veterans the quality care that they have earned and deserve.”

“Veterans deserve a clear, straightforward pathway for receiving the care they need,” said Congressman Mackenzie. “As we honor Veterans Day this week, we can ensure that every veteran has access to the care they’ve earned without delay, confusion, or frustration. This bipartisan bill will make it easier for veterans to schedule appointments by streamlining systems and providing clearer, more user-friendly options. Our veterans served our country, now it’s our responsibility to ensure their care is delivered efficiently and effectively.”

This bill is the House companion to the bipartisan Senate bill introduced by Senators Maggie Hassan (D-NH) and John Boozman (R-AR).

Veterans service organizations strongly support this bill: 

“Veterans seeking care at Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities deserve to have the most efficient, streamlined scheduling process available. By requiring a plan to make scheduling appointments easier, the Improving Veteran Access to Care Act aims to do just that. DAV applauds Rep. Pappas for introducing this critical legislation that focuses on timely delivery of care, enhanced access, improved customer experience and greater efficiency, as it will help ensure our veterans receive the high-quality, accessible care they have earned and urgently need,” said Joy Ilem, National Legislative Director, Disabled American Veterans (DAV)

“Creating a single, transparent scheduling system across VA facilities is long overdue. The Improving Veteran Access to Care Act reflects a pragmatic, bipartisan solution to a long-standing access challenge. Veterans should not have to navigate multiple systems just to see a doctor — and this bipartisan bill moves us closer to a modern VA that meets the needs of those it serves”, said Maj. Gen. April Vogel, USAF (Ret), Military Officers Association of America (MOAA) Vice President of Government Relations.

The legislation is also supported by the American Legion, Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA), and Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW).

The bill text is here. 

The bill would:

  • Require VA to create a unified scheduling improvement plan and timeline;

  • Improve both online and phone-based systems for appointment scheduling;

  • Ensure veterans can schedule, cancel, or reschedule appointments more easily;

  • Require regular reporting to Congress to ensure accountability and progress.

  • Ensure improvements are compatible with ongoing Electronic Health Record modernization efforts.