Congressman Cohen Announces more than $1 Million in NIH Grants to St. Jude

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Steve Cohen (TN-09)

WASHINGTON – Congressman Steve Cohen (TN-9) today announced that St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital will receive two National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants totaling $1,099,480. One, for $667,480 will go to Dr. Mario Halic for research on the structure and function of chromatin, from the National Institute of General Medical Services. Chromatin is the large complex of DNA and proteins responsible for condensing and packaging DNA into the nucleus of the cell. Dr. Halic’s research will seek to understand how the proteins associated with chromatin regulate transcription – the conversion of DNA into RNA. Prior work has revealed that these chromatin factors are highly mutated in human cancers. His team hopes that this will lead to the development of more specific drugs to treat cancer. The second grant, for $432,000 from the National Cancer Institute, will support pediatric oncology education under the direction of Dr. Suzanne Gronemeyer. Since 1978, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Pediatric Oncology Education program has trained over a thousand students with a long legacy of excellence – 86% of the participants hold a doctorate.

Congressman Cohen made the following statement:

“I am pleased to see these investments in the research and education missions of our premiere children’s research hospital. I commend Drs. Halic and Gronemeyer, and St. Jude, for undertaking this important work.”

# # # 

Video Release: Doggett Introduces “Trade Responsibly for Environmental Emissions Act”

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)

Washington, D.C.— Today, Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Austin), an active member of the House Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee and of the House Sustainable Energy and Environment Coalition (SEEC), released a video introducing the “Trade Responsibly for Environmental Emissions Act,” or “TREE Act.” By prohibiting the import of commodities and products derived from lands affected by deforestation or forest degradation, this bill is designed to position the United States as a leader together with the European Union in the struggle to protect one of our greatest tools to reduce greenhouse emissions: our forests. 

In this new video, Rep. Doggett discusses the importance of the TREE Act with Jennifer Skene, the Global Forest Policy Director at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

WATCH VIDEO HERE.

Each year, over 25 million acres around the world are being deforested, accounting for up to 21% of global greenhouse gas emissions. To incentivize forest protection, a new law, the European Union Deforestation Regulation, requires companies marketing products in the EU to certify that certain commodities—palm oil, rubber, soy, cocoa, cattle, and wood— and products derived from them have not been sourced from areas of deforestation and forest degradation. The TREE Act would establish a similar requirement for U.S. companies importing and selling these commodities and derived products, ensure consistent trade standards and ensure that American companies lead the way in the effort to protect the world’s invaluable forests. Many American companies already responsibly doing just that.

“Our world’s incredible forests, which serve as the lungs of our planet and the habitat for so many diverse plants and animals, are vanishing at an incredible pace,” said Rep. Doggett. “The TREE Act will not only protect our forests from those who seek to profit from their destruction, it will also help American businesses by assuring that they are responsible for compliance with a single, uniform set of sustainability trade rules.”

“Forest loss and degradation do not occur in a vacuum: they are driven by outmoded, irresponsible trade practices. From wood pulp to palm oil, the U.S. marketplace is saturated with products that needlessly come at the expense of forests and the invaluable role they play in sustaining life on earth, “said Jennifer Skene, Global Forest Policy Director at Natural Resources Defense Council. “The TREE Act creates long-overdue guardrails that ensure U.S. purchasers aren’t unwittingly purchasing forest destruction alongside their toilet paper and shampoo. It sets up consistent, common-sense trade standards that make the marketplace—and our future— healthier and more resilient.”

“Addressing deforestation, both global and domestic, is a key solution to the climate crisis,” said Anna Medema, Associate Director of Legislative Affairs for Forests and Public Lands at Sierra Club. “By curbing demand for commodities derived from deforestation and forest degradation, the TREE Act will protect forests for both their carbon sequestration and their biodiversity values, as well as support sustainable sourcing for American businesses. Sierra Club applauds the introduction of this important bill and thanks Rep. Doggett for his leadership in this effort. 

“At a time when too many in power are eager to roll back environmental protections in the U.S., we support the lawmakers who are standing up for global forests by introducing the TREE Act,” said Alex Armstrong, Vice President of External Affairs at Mighty Earth. “Products coming into the U.S. like beef, soy, timber, cocoa, rubber, and palm oil are tainted by legal and illegal deforestation that is harming communities and wildlife. People and animals around the world rely on standing forests for their survival, and Americans don’t want to buy goods produced in the ashes of tropical rainforests. This legislation would set a new standard for forest protection in global supply chains. The world lost the equivalent of more than 15 football fields of primary forest every minute last year, so we are encouraged to see an ambitious policy proposal – one that is commensurate with the scale of the challenge of global deforestation.”

This bill is cosponsored by Representatives Yassamin Ansari (AZ-03), Julia Brownley (CA-26), Greg Casar (TX-35), Sean Casten (IL-06), Kathy Castor (FL-14), Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05), Steve Cohen (TN-09), Veronica Escobar (TX-16), Maxwell Frost (FL-10), Adelita Grijalva (AZ-07), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Hank Johnson (GA-04), Summer Lee (PA-12), James McGovern (MA-02), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C. At-large), Mark Pocan (WI-02), Mike Quigley (IL-05), Jamie Raskin (MA-08), Janice Schakowsky (IL-09), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Nikema Williams (GA-05). 

You can watch the video here.

The bill text can be found here and a bill summary can be found here.

### 

Bacon, Raskin and Dexter Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Pension Payments for NOAA Corps, U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Don Bacon (2nd District of Nebraska)

Bacon, Raskin and Dexter Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Pension Payments for NOAA Corps, U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps

Washington, May 12, 2026

Bacon, Raskin and Dexter Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Pension Payments for NOAA Corps, U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps

Legislation would close a loophole that caused retired uniformed service members to miss pension payments during last year’s government shutdown

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Representative Don Bacon (NE-02), alongside his colleagues Representatives Jamie Raskin (MD-08) and Maxine Dexter (OR-03), introduced bipartisan legislation that safeguards the pensions of an estimated 8,000 retired uniformed servicemembers. The Pensions for Retired Uniformed Servicemembers Act would secure parity between retired members of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Commissioned Officer Corps and the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) Commissioned Corps and all other federal retirees, ensuring they continue receiving pension payments during a government shutdown.

“NOAA Corps and U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps officers serve our nation in moments of crisis, from hurricane response and environmental disasters to disease outbreaks at home and overseas,” said Rep. Bacon. “These uniformed officers have answered the call in national emergencies and times of war, and they deserve a retirement structure that recognizes that service. I’m pleased to co-lead the bipartisan Pensions for Uniformed Services Retirees Act with Rep. Raskin to ensure all members of the uniformed services are treated fairly.”

“NOAA Corps officers and USPHS Commissioned Corps officers have made immeasurable sacrifices for the health and safety of our people over decades of public service,” said Rep. Raskin. “Our bipartisan legislation will mean these patriots will get the pensions they earned so they don’t go hungry or struggle to pay their rent or mortgage during a government shutdown.”

“The Commissioned Officers Association is pleased to endorse this important legislation, which would provide a stable and reliable financial foundation for retirement pay for members of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and the NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps,” said CAPT. Jacqueline Rychnovsky, USN (Ret.), Executive Director of the Commissioned Officers Association of the United States Public Health Service. “Transitioning from annual discretionary appropriations to the Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund — which currently supports retirement pay for the other six uniformed services — would help ensure that USPHS and NOAA Corps retirees are never again at risk of missing a paycheck during a government shutdown.”

“All who serve our nation in uniform have earned their benefits, to include consistent and reliable retirement payments,” said Lt. Gen. Brian Kelly, USAF (Ret.), President and CEO of the Military Officers Association of America. “MOAA strongly supports this legislation, which takes an important step toward ensuring parity across all uniformed services by aligning retirement funding for the USPHS and NOAA commissioned officer retirees with the existing Military Retirement Fund.”

Established upon the outbreak of World War I, NOAA Corps Officers command ships and aircraft and support emergency response efforts, including hurricane response and oil spill mitigation. They lead a fleet of vessels and aircraft used for everything from deep ocean research to flying into hurricanes, and they can be brought into the armed services whenever the President requires their expertise.

The U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps was established in 1889 to root out smallpox and yellow fever and is now the largest public health program in the world. Driven by a passion for public service, the Commissioned Corps officers respond to public health crises and national emergencies such as natural disasters, disease outbreaks, and terrorist attacks, both at home and overseas.

The Pensions for Retired Uniformed Servicemembers Act is endorsed by the Military Officers Association of America and the Commissioned Officers Association.

Read the full legislation here.

Scott, McClellan Statement on Congresswoman Jen Kiggans

Source: {United States House of Representatives – Congressman Bobby Scott (3rd District of Virginia)

Headline: Scott, McClellan Statement on Congresswoman Jen Kiggans

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Bobby Scott (VA-03) and Congresswoman Jennifer McClellan (VA-04) issued the following statement:

“In a radio interview, Congresswoman Jen Kiggans enthusiastically agreed with the statement that Leader Hakeem Jeffries should keep his ‘cotton-picking hands off Virginia.’

“She should apologize to Leader Jeffries, all Virginians, and anyone else offended by these comments.”

###

WATCH: In Palm Beach Hearing, Pressley Highlights Economic & Emotional Harms Borne by Epstein Survivors

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)

“There is no amount of compensation that could ever fully account for what was stolen, but every single survivor certainly deserves much more than sympathy, and that is the work that I’m committed to doing alongside of you legislatively.”

PALM BEACH, FL – Today, in a field hearing on the Epstein investigation led by House Oversight Committee Democrats, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07) discussed the long-lasting economic and emotional harms that survivors continue to carry while rarely seeing meaningful accountability. Congresswoman Pressley emphasized that survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse were harmed not only by predators themselves, but also by federal institutions that violated their rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act and denied them accountability.

The field hearing, led by Ranking Member Robert Garcia, was held as part of the Epstein investigation in Palm Beach, Florida, where many of Epstein’s crimes and subsequent failures of accountability took place.  The field hearing included testimony from survivors and important witnesses in the investigation.

As a survivor of sexual abuse herself, Congresswoman Pressley has been a dedicated advocate for survivors’ justice and has led committee Democrats in calling for a full Congressional hearing to ensure survivors’ firsthand accounts are heard.

A transcript of Congresswoman Pressley’s question line during the hearing is available below and the video is available here.

Transcript: Pressley Highlights Economic & Emotional Harm Borne by Epstein Survivors
House Oversight Committee Field Hearing
May 12, 2026

REP. PRESSLEY: Thank you to Congresswoman Lois Frankel, thank you to Ranking Member Garcia, Congresswoman Summer Lee. Your efforts have made today possible. And of course, our courageous survivors.

I’ve been on this Committee since I was a freshman, and Elijah Cummings, the great Elijah Cummings, our chair at the time, would often remind us that the role of the Committee on Oversight, our mandate, is to be in efficient and effective pursuit of the truth.

Now that pursuit is what brings House Democrats here today. Because instead of Epstein’s victims being met with efficiency, they’ve been met with obstruction and delays by law enforcement and by the Department of Justice.

Instead of Epstein’s victims being met with effectiveness, they’ve been met with systemic coverup, and I would add cowardice of those who were intimidated by the power and the privilege of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and their co-conspirators.

So today, we’re here to shine a light. Because sunlight is the best disinfectant. We’re here to shine a light on the corruption, on the failures of this investigation.

But most of all, we’re here to center the survivors. To center the courageous.

Survivors who are grown women before you but who were children. Children whose innocence was corrupted. Whose bodies were violated. Whose dreams were destroyed. Whose lives were irrevocably changed.

Maria, Courtney, Jena-Lisa, Danny, Roza, and Sky and Amanda, here for Virginia, we thank you.

Congress enacted the Crime Victims Rights Act in 2004 to mandate specific obligations for the Department of Justice to ensure that survivors are protected, informed, and able to heal.

Mr. Kuvin, you spent decades representing survivors and fighting for transparency around the federal government’s handling of their cases. Can you speak to how the federal government violated, after their bodies were violated, after their dreams, their dignity, their lives were violated, how were their rights violated?

SPENCER KUVIN: It was our understanding after the release of documents and the bravery of Ms. Wild here at the end in her case that was brought and the final disclosure of all those documents, it showed that the federal government and the state attorney’s office colluded together to not bring an indictment because they knew that if they did, then the Crime Victims Rights Act would then be triggered and they would have to inform the victims of what they were doing.

So what we learned was they intentionally kept it out of the hands of victims so that the victims co couldn’t object or have any say in the process by secretly doing this deal that they did. And the federal judge, very brave, federal judge Mara found there was a violation of the act here in the Southern District and unfortunately because the way the law was written, there was absolutely no way to get them any justice or remedy as a result.

REP. PRESSLEY: That’s right. So they weren’t notified, they were not consulted, they were not given the opportunity to participate in proceedings that directly affected their lives and their safety. These rights are supposed to be guaranteed by the Crime Victims Rights Act.

Now would any survivor like to speak to any examples to share about how the federal government ignored or neglected your case? I see the clock is ticking here. Would anyone else like to speak to that?

How about this – let me just say this, as a survivor myself, I know that this is not only about your safety that you were robbed of, your innocence and your dreams.

Survivors are forced to carry the financial burden of abuse – lost wages, housing instability, medical expenses, legal fees, security costs, trauma that impacts their daily life.

Can any of you speak to that?

JENA-LISA JONES: We have put ourselves on the front line and spoke out and put our faces to the public when we should have never had to, and that comes with a huge toll. Now every job that we apply for, they Google us. They know our most personal information of things that happened to us as children. That is forever, forever going to follow us. We don’t get that back. We don’t get that luxury. So that is just the one, one of the most important things that comes with the weight of this all because the government couldn’t do their job.

ROZA: Like I heard this before from the survivors. I’m a really cool person if you meet me outside of here, I have life stories, but this release of documents made me something else, and I can’t do tasks, daily tasks, without certain help, and I have a support system, and I’m grateful for it, but if I didn’t, I don’t think I would be here today alive. So it’s really hard. I want to tell the world like it’s hard to be here today. I’m very uncomfortable. I’m trying to look like I’m okay, but I’m not okay.

REP. PRESSLEY: Yes, would anyone else like to speak to the financial burden of abuse, loss of wages, housing instability, medical expenses, legal fees, security costs?

COURTNEY WILD: So I was gonna, when I was younger, when I we met, I met Jeffrey, I experienced a lot of homelessness, so I think I misunderstood your question.

REP. PRESSLEY: No, say whatever you’d like.

MS. WILD: Yes, ma’am, I was just gonna say that, you know, just like you were walking over the bridge, you know, a 14-year-old going to Palm Beach. It was like, as soon as you go over that bridge, you just feel the money and power. And it’s just such a contrast. If you go down Okeechobee to Okeechobee and the Turnpike, there’s a road called Drexel, and it’s a mobile home street. There’s a lot of — that’s where I came, that’s where I was from. So to go from here to there is just, you know, it’s so confusing.

I was homeless. My parents had addiction problems, you know. He preyed, he knew what he was doing. It was all very calculated, you know, and then later on, the fact that he used those things against me. We had the Feds pulling up our MySpaces and treating us like criminals because we were at a party at 16 and 17, drinking, you know, rather than going out — they had so for me, it’s just, it’s so sad that he — he knew who he preyed on. He preyed on young, especially in Palm Beach County, he preyed on us, kids who came from troubled backgrounds and everything else, and they portrayed us as these underage prostitutes, which is that, is that a real charge, like, what was the statute number on his charge that he took?

MR. KUVIN: It was bizarre to us, even at the time, but, you know, it made absolutely no sense. The statutory guidance was very questionable, given that there were minors, but speaking to the representative’s questions specifically and representing survivors over the last 30 years now, you know, it affects not just the survivor.

It affects their family. It affects the way they raise their own children, if they have daughters, it affects their mental stability and ability to maintain employment. Try telling a survivor they’ve got to pay a lawyer for 20 years straight if they want to get justice. It’s impossible, especially with a law that doesn’t provide any remedy. So they’ve got to seek out victims advocates that are willing to do it for free, and there aren’t many of those, especially none that want to do it for 20 plus years to fight. So the financial ramifications of being a victim, especially of somebody with unlimited resources, is dramatic.

DANI HANNAH BENSKY: I think, also, to continue this fight like we’re all here right now, and this isn’t the only thing I’m sure we’re all doing this week, to talk about getting the messaging out. Advocacy is expensive. Therapy and healing is expensive, you know? And we there’s no time to work because, honestly, we got to change it for our kids, because I don’t want to raise my kid in a world like this right now.

LAUREN HERSH: I’ll just close out with one, one point to Courtney, to your question, about these prostitution charges. We need to eliminate the prostitution charges from the books altogether. We absolutely, absolutely should be holding sex buyers accountable for the harm they cause. But people in prostitution should not be criminalized for being in prostitution, because the vast majority of them are not there by choice. They’re there because of lack of circumstances, poverty, other vulnerabilities, and what we see so often is that traffickers deliberately use that notion, that the women and girls will be arrested for prostitution as a tactic.

It is the number one tactic in order to make sure that survivors, victims are too terrified and too traumatized to talk, so we’ve got a lot of work to do.

REP. PRESSLEY: And I just want to again, thank you all, and thank you for being prescriptive with a number of the legislative responses to address these systemic harms.

I’ll just say that there is no amount of compensation that could ever fully account for what was stolen, but every single survivor certainly deserves much more than sympathy, and that is the work that I’m committed to doing alongside of you legislatively. Thank you.

Palm Beach, Florida is where Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes first came to light, and where prosecutors offered Epstein a sweetheart deal that allowed him to continue his crimes. Palm Beach is also home to Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump’s primary residence and private club. During the many years of friendship between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, multiple women were recruited for Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, including Virginia Guiffre. The Wall Street Journal reports that spa employees from Mar-a-Lago, usually young women, were sent to Epstein’s nearby residence for massages, manicures, and other spa services. Epstein referenced Mar-a-lago in a 2019 email to Michael Wolff, released by Oversight Democrats, when he said, “of course Trump knew about the girls.”

Krishnamoorthi and Cloud Lead Bipartisan Push to Ban Congressional Stock Trading and Prediction Market Trading

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (8th District of Illinois)

Lawmakers urge House leadership to adopt ethics reforms through House rules package to restore public trust and prevent conflicts of interest

WASHINGTON — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) and Congressman Michael Cloud (R-TX) led a bipartisan group of House lawmakers on Monday in calling on Speaker Mike Johnson and Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries to adopt new House rules prohibiting Members of Congress, their families, and congressional staff from trading individual stocks and participating in prediction markets. Additional signers of the letter included Representatives Seth Magaziner (D-RI), Tom Barrett (R-MI), Gabe Vasquez (D-NM), Elijah Crane (R-AZ), Dina Titus (D-NV), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Jen Kiggans (R-VA), Greg Landsman (D-OH), Shri Thanedar (D-MI), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Jason Crow (D-CO), Josh Riley (D-NY), Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ), Chip Roy (R-TX), Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ), Johnny Olszewski (D-MD), and Ritchie Torres (D-NY).

In a letter to House leadership, the Members urged immediate action to strengthen congressional ethics rules and address growing public concerns about lawmakers using privileged information for personal financial gain. The lawmakers argued that Congress should move quickly to adopt clear and enforceable standards through the House rules process.

“We are writing to urge immediate changes to the rules package for the 119th Congress to include a clear, enforceable ban on Members, their families, and staff trading in individual stocks and in prediction markets,” the Members wrote. “If such changes are not adopted in the current Congress, we urge that these provisions be included in the rules package for the 120th Congress.”

The letter points to bipartisan efforts already underway to restrict congressional stock trading and notes that the Senate recently updated its own rules to prohibit Senators and Senate staff from participating in prediction markets. The lawmakers warned that the House should not fall behind in addressing clear ethical concerns and restoring public confidence in Congress.

“Members of Congress are privy to information the average hard-working American is not, so we should end both the appearance and reality of conflicts of interest and special privileges for elected officials,” the lawmakers continued. “The House of Representatives should not lag behind the Senate in closing obvious avenues for conflicts of interest and the appearance of corruption.”

The Members emphasized that the reforms are about protecting the integrity of Congress and ensuring Americans can trust that lawmakers are serving the public interest rather than their own financial portfolios.

“These reforms are not partisan; they are about restoring trust in Congress as an institution,” the lawmakers wrote. “Members from across the political spectrum have heard the same message from our constituents: they want clear rules that prevent lawmakers from personally profiting from nonpublic information or from the outcomes of the very processes we oversee.”

The letter is available here.

ICYMI: Obama Foundation Announces Naming of Garden Pavilion at Presidential Center for Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi Representing the 12th District of California

Chicago, Ill.The Obama Foundation today announced the Nancy Pelosi Garden Pavilion at the Obama Presidential Center, celebrating Pelosi alongside other icons and everyday heroes who will be honored in named spaces at the Obama Presidential Center, thanks to generous gifts from benefactors. The Nancy Pelosi Garden Pavilion is made possible through a generous donation by philanthropist and business leader Ron Conway.

This naming of the pavilion for Nancy Pelosi, the first woman who served as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, reflects the Foundation’s continued commitment to building a campus that honors the significant contributions of the visionary and courageous individuals “on whose shoulders we stand.” Grounded in the belief that change takes all of us, the Obama Presidential Center brings together culture, community and civic engagement for visitors and neighbors to come together and be inspired to change their world through action. 

Read coverage of the announcement from MS NOW: How the Obama presidential library plans to honor Nancy Pelosi [By Mychael Schnell, 5/12/26]

“President Barack Obama’s mission throughout his entire life in public service has been training leaders for the future — and now he continues that focus at the Obama Presidential Center in an unsurpassed way,” Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi said. “Having a Garden Pavilion with my name on it at the Obama Center is deeply celebratory for me because of the esteem I have always had for President Obama, having seen firsthand his exceptional leadership when I served as Speaker of the House and Democratic Leader during the Obama presidency.”

“Many thanks to Ron and Gayle Conway and their family for their generosity in naming this Garden Pavilion. Their naming a garden makes perfect sense because a garden is a place of growth and renewal, stemming from their values-based roots,” Pelosi continued. “The Conway family are angels and cultivators who have enabled innovators to grow and blossom through their brilliance in sharing ideas and recognition. It is my hope that this Garden Pavilion will inspire future leaders to honor and carry forth those values.”

“For almost four decades, Nancy Pelosi served the American people and worked to make our country better,” said President Obama. “No one was more skilled at bringing people together and getting legislation passed – and I will always be grateful for her support of the Affordable Care Act. That’s why I’m proud to name the Garden Pavilion at the Obama Presidential Center after Nancy. It’s a way to honor her trailblazing leadership, and inspire visitors to follow in her footsteps.” 

“In our nation’s entire history, no President and Speaker of the House got more done for our country working together than President Barack Obama and Speaker Nancy Pelosi,” added Conway. “Gayle and I are deeply honored to support naming the gardens at the Obama Center after Speaker Pelosi. It’s a fitting tribute to her legacy in Congress and to her historic partnership with President Obama.”

“Nancy Pelosi is one of the foremost leaders of our time, blazing a trail for all women in politics, showing people of any party or background the power of increased involvement of women in our democracy,” said Valerie Jarrett, CEO of the Obama Foundation. “As we honor those who make change and inspire others to take action, I can think of no one who has modeled this more than Speaker Emerita Pelosi.”

The Garden Pavilion will anchor the eastern border of the Fruit & Vegetable Garden on the Center’s campus. The structure will include a Garden Classroom, a garden workroom, and public restrooms.

The Obama Presidential Center opens to the public on June 19, 2026. Named spaces will serve as lasting tributes to the “giants” of history, reminding every visitor that they, too, have the power to leave a lasting mark on the world.

Higgins Leads Effort to Initiate Investigation into Foreign Seafood Importers Engaging in Harmful Trade Practices  

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressmen Clay Higgins (R-LA) and Troy Carter (D-LA) penned a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer urging a Section 301 investigation into unfair practices affecting trade in seafood products. Read the full letter here

Foreign seafood importers engaging in unfair trade practices, such as labor abuses and false labeling, have contributed to a significant decline in the domestic seafood industry. A Section 301 investigation offers an important tool for correcting trade imbalances and ensuring fair competition across the seafood sector. 

The Members wrote, “Consistent with the Executive Order and your stated intent, we respectfully request that the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) initiate a broad Section 301 investigation into unfair acts, policies, and practices affecting trade in seafood and seafood products… a Section 301 investigation encompassing a broad spectrum of unfair practices, including false labeling and species designations, the abuse of banned antibiotics and fungicides in aquaculture, export and production subsidies, environmental harm, structural excess capacity, labor abuses, and permissive standards with respect to gear usage, would allow the Administration to effectively leverage access to our market to improve conditions overseas and level the playing field for the American seafood industry within its own domestic market.” 

“Because of the breadth and complexity of these challenges, we encourage the USTR to pursue a seafood-specific Section 301 investigation that examines all unfair acts, policies, and practices across the full seafood supply chain from countries including, but not limited to: Argentina, Canada, Chile, China, Ecuador, Egypt, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Spain, Thailand, and Vietnam, ” The Members continued.

The letter is supported by several seafood industry associations, including the Louisiana Farm Bureau Federation, the Southern Shrimp Alliance, and the Catfish Farmers of America. 

Richard Fontenot, President of Louisiana Farm Bureau, said, “Time and again I hear from Louisiana Farm Bureau members who have a simple request of their lawmakers: help us do business on a level playing field. Congressmen Carter and Congressman Higgins clearly have heard that plea and are raising their voices for us in a big way. We appreciate them calling on USTR to initiate a Section 301 investigation on seafood and we join them in this request to give our crawfish farmers, shrimpers, and other seafood producers a fighting chance.”

Blake Price, Director of the Southern Shrimp Alliance, said, “The U.S. shrimp industry is grateful to Congressmen Clay Higgins and Troy Carter for spearheading a Congressional request to the United States Trade Representative to launch a Section 301 investigation — one that can comprehensively address the unfair acts, policies, and practices harming American seafood producers. “We ask the Trump Administration to seize this opportunity to address unfair trade practices, eliminate unsafe imports, and level the longstanding unfair playing field for American producers. Under fair market conditions, American shrimpers can sustainably harvest tens of millions of additional pounds of shrimp each year — preserving a way of life for fishing families and boosting coastal economies from Texas to North Carolina.” 

Fleischmann, Hegseth Highlight Need for Nuclear Deterrent in Defense Appropriations Hearing

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN)

Washington, DC – U.S. Representative Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03) on Tuesday discussed the Department of War’s budget with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine during the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee Hearing. Congressman Fleischmann highlighted the importance of modernizing our nation’s nuclear deterrence and his work on the House Energy and Water Appropriations Committee. You can find Congressman Fleischmann’s questions below:

Video Link

Congressman Fleischmann:

To everyone on this panel, thank you for the job well done. Thank you for what you’re doing for our country. This is truly incredible. So let me start with that. As chairman of the energy and water subcommittee, I’m going to take a little bit different approach. I’m deeply involved in the recapitalization and modernization of our nation’s nuclear deterrent, as we are recapitalizing the entire strategic nuclear arsenal. I remain concerned about the lack of options lower on the escalation ladder available to the president in theater. Non-strategic nuclear weapons have remained essential to the credibility of our extended deterrent commitment to NATO. I’ve got a couple of questions to ask, but I’m going to ask General Keane and Secretary Hegseth, what is your assessment of our non-strategic nuclear capability, gaps in the Indo-Pacific and elsewhere? What additional tactical nuclear capabilities beyond SLCM-N, and should we consider that would be most useful for reassuring allies, deterring our adversaries, and providing combatant commands and useful options in the worst-case event of a conflict?

Secretary Hegseth:

We are, as you know, making a $2 billion investment. And you mentioned SLCM-N on FY 26. So, we’re investing in that. But I would say that a lot of that discussion would be classified, given all plans in the Indo-Pacific. But Admiral Paparo, I would say there’s no Cocom commander We have regular feedback with on what dilemmas we might need to create for an adversary. Then admiral Paparo and IndoPacom, to include everything that would deter any level of aggression. So, I think there’s a lot of sensitivity on this topic that doesn’t lend itself to this environment, but very much so. We’re looking at all options.

Congressman Fleischmann:

Thank you. And I would also commend Admiral Paparo. I mean they’re doing incredible work. Yessir, General?

General Caine:

Sir, I was just acknowledging the Secretary’s comment about what forum we’re in here today. You know, all three and I appreciate the congress’s leadership. All three legs of the triad are undergoing modernization, and all require that. And we’re grateful for that assistance from the Congress. It’s a bedrock to deterrence around the world, and one that we want to maintain our focus on. I’ll probably leave it at that and can come back if there’s follow up questions.

Congressman Fleischmann:

Thank you. And I would assure you, gentlemen, that in the energy and water bill which funds this, we will certainly address that in a very robust way, as I think the administration has. So, I thank you all. As most of you know, in that bill, I’m probably the nation’s strongest proponent, supporter of nuclear power in Congress. A nuclear propulsion is long provided a great United States Navy with significant operational advantages. There’s been tremendous progress within your department accelerating the adoption of nuclear energy as a means of providing resilient and long duration power generation for military installations and forward operations. I’m excited about the army’s Janus program. And the air force just announced the first two air bases to receive microreactors. 

My question, gentlemen, can you walk us through how the department is thinking about the role of nuclear power across the joint force, including naval propulsion and the use of advanced reactors for base and expeditionary power? What operational advantage did you see these technologies providing, particularly in the Indo-Pacific, and what can we be doing to accelerate and expand these efforts?

Secretary Hegseth:

In both incredibly important capabilities, microreactors and propulsion. Whether you’re looking at survivability, sustainability of, basing and mobility within basing, and the expectation in the homeland or abroad that the lights are on and we can operate even if it’s a contested environment. And then there’s just no doubt, you can’t beat nuclear propulsion, especially as we’ve refined it over time. So, I appreciate your efforts. And I think in this department, you’ll find a friend in ensuring we maximize that.

Congressman Fleischmann:

Thank you, Mr. Secretary. General?

General Caine:

Sir, I’ll just say that the joint staff has collaborated and continues to do so with all the combatant commands, the services, the secretary’s team in office on OSW and the congress to make sure that we’re looking at the range of energy requirements that we’re going to have. And that we move from, frankly, in some cases, a reactive posture, no reaction to your nuclear point, but to a more proactive stance around how we’re going to ensure energy and sustainability in a range of situations that we could face. We appreciate the chance to comment.

Congressman Fleischmann:

Thank you, General. And again, once again, I begin with profound thanks. I will end that way. To all of you. I yield back.”

###

Newhouse/Daines "Build More Hydro" Bill Signed Into Law

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Dan Newhouse (4th District of Washington)

Headline: Newhouse/Daines "Build More Hydro" Bill Signed Into Law

Press Release
For Immediate Release: May 12, 2026
Contact: Juan Ayala, (202) 713-7750

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Rep. Dan Newhouse (WA-04) announced that his “Build More Hydro” bill has been signed into law by President Trump. The bill, S.1020, companion legislation to Newhouse’s H.R. 2072, allows the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to approve six-year extensions for hydropower projects licensed before 2020. 

“Our Nation needs more energy, and I am pleased President Trump has signed into law S.1020, the Senate companion of my “Build More Hydro” bill in the House,” said Rep. Newhouse. “This allows hydroelectric dams with their FERC license additional time to commence construction, eventually adding over 2.5 GW of reliable, clean, baseload power. We need to get every available megawatt of power on the grid to meet our growing energy demand, and this new law gets us one step closer to that goal. I thank Senator Daines for his hard work moving this bill unanimously through Senate and for being a champion of hydroelectric dams.”

“Today is a great day for Montana and the nation,” said Senator Steve Daines (R-MT). “America must meet the rise in energy demand, and the Build More Hydro bill will revive critical hydro projects and increase our domestic energy production. Thank you Senator Fetterman and Representative Newhouse for fighting with me to get this bill to the President’s desk. I’m grateful that President Trump and his administration strongly support Made-In-America energy, and I look forward to seeing the impact this will have across the country.”

Background 

Rep. Newhouse introduced the “Build More Hydro” bill as companion legislation alongside Senator Daines’ S. 1020, in 2025.

On July 9, 2025, S.1020 passed the Senate by unanimous consent.

On April 21, 2026, this legislation passed the House with a vote of 394-14.

The Build More Hydro bill would extend commence construction deadlines for critical hydropower projects nationwide and increase American energy production. 

Since the introduction of S.1020, approximately 100MW of hydropower has been put on hold with an additional 36MW forced into limbo by the end of the year because of congressional inaction. Hydropower supplies baseload electricity to over 30 million homes, provides 96% of utility-scale energy storage, and remains vital to flood control, water storage, irrigation, and grid reliability services. 

The Build More Hydro bill was supported by the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association, Northwest River Partners, Inland Ports and Navigation Group, Port of Lewiston, Tri-City Development Council, Northwest Public Power Association, Washington Association of Wheat Growers, The National Association of Wheat Growers, The National Hydropower Association, Rye Development, and The American Public Power Association. 

Full bill text can be found here.