Adams, Underwood, Booker Reintroduce the Momnibus to Reduce Maternal Deaths in the United States

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (D-NC-12),Congresswoman Lauren Underwood (D-IL-14), and Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) reintroduced the Momnibus Act. A groundbreaking piece of legislation addressing every factor of maternal mortality, morbidity, and maternal death disparities in the United States.

The Momnibus Act is a transformational package of bills that addresses social determinants of health, expands the perinatal workforce, promotes maternal vaccinations, strengthens data collection for maternal health research, improves care for veterans and incarcerated moms, extends post-partum WIC access, expands access to maternal mental health care— pre- and post-partum, and protects moms from environmental factors that cause adverse pregnancy outcomes. 

“The Momnibus Act is the most comprehensive piece of legislation ever drafted to address the maternal health crisis.” said Congresswoman AdamsCo-Founder and Co-Chair of the Black Maternal Health Caucus. “The maternal mortality rate in the United States is worse today than it was 20 years ago. With all the advances of modern science, that speaks to a serious lack of investment in our research and health care systems that care for our moms. Not only that, the rate of mortality for Black women is disproportionately higher and that gap has not shrunk in decades. This is an unacceptable reality, and we must act urgently and boldly to address this crisis. The Momnibus is the solution. Congress must make the safety and health of our moms a priority and get this bill passed into law.”  

“80% of maternal deaths in America are preventable, and the Momnibus is designed to stop them. I’m proud to introduce this historic legislation with Representative Alma Adams and Senator Cory Booker to build on the progress we have made and secure the investments we need to end this crisis,” said Rep. Lauren Underwood, Co-Founder and Co-Chair of the Black Maternal Health Caucus. “This bill has the tools we need to make America a safer place to give birth, especially for the Black moms who are at the highest risk. The Momnibus will save moms’ lives, and Congress must act urgently to pass it.” 

“Access to high quality health care has always been a top priority for me, and it is unacceptable that the United States has the worst maternal health mortality rates among its peer countries, especially when so many of these deaths are preventable,” said Senator Booker. “I am proud to reintroduce this historic legislation, which will take meaningful steps to address the maternal health crisis and ultimately save lives. Through the Momnibus we are investing in better care, strengthening support for families, and confronting the racial disparities facing Black mothers, who are disproportionately more likely to experience serious health complications or die from pregnancy related causes. Congress must pass this legislation immediately to protect our nation’s mothers and end this crisis.”

A one-page summary of the Momnibus can be found here. A section by section breakdown of the bill is linked here.

A summary of each bill included in the Momnibus can be read below:

  1. Social Determinants for Moms Act
  2. Extending WIC for New Moms Act
  3. Kira Johnson Act
  4. Perinatal Workforce Act
  5. Data to Save Moms Act
  6. Moms Matter Act
  7. Justice for Incarcerated Moms Act
  8. Tech to Save Moms Act
  9. IMPACT to Save Moms Act
  10. Maternal Health for Veterans Act
  11. Protecting Moms and Babies Against Climate Change Act
  12. Maternal Vaccination Act
  13. NIH Improve Act
  14. Maternal Health Pandemic Response Act

Full text of the legislation can be found here.

Congresswoman Alma Adams Urges Black Energy Leaders to “Build Your Personal Pipeline” at NC AABE Conference

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Alma Adams (12th District of North Carolina)

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Today, Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12) served as a featured speaker Friday at the North Carolina Chapter of the American Association of Blacks in Energy’s 2026 Professional Development Conference, where she encouraged attendees to invest in knowledge, relationships, opportunity, and purpose as they build careers that can shape both the energy industry and the future of their communities.

Held at Duke Energy Plaza in Charlotte, the conference brought together energy professionals, emerging leaders, students, and community partners for a full day of professional development focused on skill-building, policy, confidence, leadership growth, and the future of artificial intelligence in the industry.

In remarks tied to the conference theme, “Building Your Personal Pipeline,” Congresswoman Adams reflected on her own journey from modest beginnings to the halls of Congress and challenged attendees to think beyond individual success.

“The most important pipeline is not the one that carries oil or natural gas,” Adams said. “The most important pipeline is the one that carries people like you — from where you are to where you are destined to be.”

Congresswoman Adams thanked the NC Chapter of AABE and its president, MoNiqueka Smith of Duke Energy, for convening a gathering centered on growth, access, and leadership. She praised the organization for creating space not only for professional advancement, but for deeper conversations about equity and influence in one of the nation’s most consequential industries.

“Our people need more than just a seat at the table in the energy sector,” Adams said. “We need, and deserve, a seat at the head of the table.”

Drawing from her personal story, Adams spoke about the values instilled by her mother, the transformative role of education, and the importance of HBCUs in opening doors for students from low-income and first-generation backgrounds. She connected that lived experience to her long record of public service, including her advocacy for HBCUs, maternal health, affordable housing, food access, and economic opportunity.

She also challenged attendees to see the energy sector in its full context — as a field deeply connected to national security, global economics, agriculture, technological innovation, and everyday life for working families.

During her remarks, Adams pointed to current disruptions in global energy markets as an example of how decisions made far beyond North Carolina can directly affect utility bills, food prices, transportation costs, and the livelihoods of families and farmers here at home. She urged energy professionals to recognize the full weight and reach of their work.

“If you work in energy, you are not just working in a sector,” Adams said. “You are working at the intersection of national security, economic justice, agricultural stability, and global diplomacy.”

Adams also addressed the growing role of artificial intelligence in the energy industry, emphasizing that Black professionals must not be left out of the rooms where emerging technologies are being designed, governed, and deployed.

“The question is no longer whether AI will transform the energy sector — it already has,” Adams said. “The question is whether Black professionals, whether our community, will be at the table designing those systems, training those models, creating those platforms, and setting those policies.”

Throughout the address, Adams urged attendees to treat civic engagement as an essential part of professional life, calling advocacy “the most underused tool in one’s professional toolkit.” She encouraged participants to stay informed, build relationships, mentor others, and bring their expertise into policy discussions at every level of government.

She closed with a direct challenge to those in the room: invest in themselves, invest in others, and invest in the future.

“Your personal pipeline should never stop with you,” Adams said. “It should extend forward to the people who are following behind you.”

Beyer, Norton, Thompson Demand NPS Halt Removal of Critical Commuter Bike Lanes

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Don Beyer (D-VA)

Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA), Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), and Congressional Bike Caucus Co-Chair Mike Thompson (D-CA) led a group of House Democrats in demanding that the National Parks Service (NPS) immediately halt or block any plans to remove the two-way protected bike lane running from the Tidal Basin to Constitution Avenue, a vital commuter route for DC-area residents.

In a letter addressed to NPS Acting Director Jessica Bowron, Members noted that removing the bike lanes will limit transportation options and increase danger for cyclists, pedestrians, and cars alike. Members also stressed the need for immediate action with the National Cherry Blossom Festival and America 250 celebrations approaching, both of which are readily accessible through the bike lanes.

“The bike lanes are part of a broader safe cycling corridor along 15th Street. Those lanes are an essential travel route for commuters from Virginia, D.C., Maryland, and visitors across the country, who rely on them to access jobs, NPS sites along the National Mall, and the Capitol complex,” wrote the Members. “Allowing or actively working to remove these lanes will reverse a decade of improved bike access to those sites and intentionally cut off public access to their elected representatives and public lands.”

The letter is signed by Representatives Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Bill Foster (D-IL), Dave Min (D-CA), Scott Peters (D-CA), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Darren Soto (D-FL), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).

Full text of the letter follows below, and a signed copy is available here.

***


Dear Acting Director Bowron:

We write regarding reports that the National Park Service (NPS) will be participating in, facilitating, or allowing the removal of the two-way protected bike lane on NPS land from the Tidal Basin to Constitution Avenue. That removal cannot proceed.

NPS must immediately reverse course and stop the removal of the bike lane. Failing to do so would indicate that NPS is either refusing to responsibly administer its D.C. lands, or that it is unable to protect those lands against interference from other federal agencies. In either case, NPS must act to protect transportation access to our nation’s capital, recreation access ahead of the National Cherry Blossom Festival, and safety for all road users.

The bike lanes are part of a broader safe cycling corridor along 15th Street. Those lanes are an essential travel route for commuters from Virginia, D.C., Maryland, and visitors across the country, who rely on them to access jobs, NPS sites along the National Mall, and the Capitol complex. Allowing or actively working to remove these lanes will reverse a decade of improved bike access to those sites and intentionally cut off public access to their elected representatives and public lands.

Many of those commuters and visitors would continue to need access to this corridor. By removing the bike lanes, NPS would also force remaining bicyclists to share walkway space with pedestrians or roads with cars, creating danger for pedestrians, bikers, and cars alike. The D.C. Department of Transportation has found that the bike lane corridor reduced bike crashes by 69%, crashes causing injuries by 52%, and all crashes by 46%. Ahead of America 250, removing one of the safest and most convenient ways of accessing historical NPS sites along the National Mall will make the celebrations less accessible and more dangerous for all visitors.

According to posted signage, construction on the Ohio Drive portion could begin as early as today. It is imperative that NPS immediately take action to responsibly steward its own lands and stop the removal of this essential transportation corridor.

Sincerely,

Gomez Grills Intelligence Chiefs, Exposes Lack of Evidence for War Justification

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jimmy Gomez (CA-34)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As U.S. military operations continue in Iran, Congressman Jimmy Gomez (CA-34) sharply questioned top intelligence officials, exposing glaring inconsistencies, evasions, and a troubling admission: the intelligence community cannot clearly support claims that Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat.

Rep. Gomez repeatedly asked Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard whether she still stands by her prior testimony that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. She declined to give a clear yes-or-no answer. CIA Director John Ratcliffe similarly avoided confirming that earlier assessment.

Rep. Gomez also pointed to President Trump’s public dismissal of intelligence findings, noting that officials would not directly respond when asked whether the President should rely on their assessments.

Key Excerpts from Rep. Gomez’s Questioning:

Intelligence Officials Admit that Trump May Ignore Intelligence in War:
Gomez: “Yesterday, you said the only person who can determine what is an ‘imminent threat’ is the President of the United States. Do you stand by that statement?”

Gabbard: “Yes I do.”

Gomez: “Director Ratcliffe, do you agree with that assessment?”

Ratcliffe: “The President as Commander in Chief gets to make a decision about what’s an imminent threat.”

Gomez: “If the President can determine and ignore what you’re doing, why do you guys even have a job? Why do you even advise him?”

Gomez Questioning Exposes that Basis for Iran War Doesn’t Exist:
Gomez: “Director Gabbard, last year you testified that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. Do you stand by that statement, yes or no?”

Gabbard: “Context matters—”

Gomez: “I reclaim my time. It’s an easy answer, you either stand by what you said last year or not.”

No clear evidence Iran posed an imminent threat:
Gomez: “Were they weeks away from achieving a nuclear weapon, yes or no?”

Gabbard: “This is a serious matter—”

Gomez: “Were they weeks away or not? The American people need to know if this was an imminent threat or not.”

DNI Gabbard Can’t Answer Who Poses Greater Threat: North Korea or Iran:
Gomez: “Director Gabbard, you said that North Korea has intercontinental ballistic missiles that can reach the [United States]. Yet, the Defense Department said that Iran was at least 10 years away from that capability. Which one is the more serious threat? North Korea or Iran?”

Gabbard: “These threats are taken within the context of the total body of intelligence reporting.”

Gomez: “That’s my point. It’s not just about having the capability of building a weapon, it’s if they can actually deliver that weapon, if they have the intention of doing that.”

Gomez: “We haven’t heard that they were weeks away. We haven’t heard that they were months away. That’s what we’re waiting for.”

Gomez: “Imminent to me means they’re mobilizing troops. They’re moving things into position, artillery. They’re getting ready to attack. But everything that we’ve heard is that this is not the case”

Neguse, Bennet Slam FCC for Sidestepping Federal Law to Approve $6.2B Nexstar-Tegna Merger

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Joe Neguse (D-Co 2)

Washington, D.C. — Congressman Joe Neguse and Senator Michael Bennet issued the following statement after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved the $6.2 billion Nexstar Media-Tegna merger. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said the agency would “waive” federal law and the national broadcast ownership cap to give the combined entity coverage of at least 60% of households across the country. 

Currently, federal law, specifically mandated by Congress in 2004, restricts any single company from owning TV stations reaching more than 39% of U.S. households. Violating this rule gives greater power to corporate owners to control programming and the framing of local news coverage. 

“The FCC’s decision is baseless and blatantly political — and will have disastrous consequences for consumers across the country. For Colorado, it will likely result in even greater consolidation of local news coverage, further depriving Coloradans of access to a healthy and competitive news market. That is why we’ve opposed this merger every step of the way,” said Neguse and Bennet. 

“As the appropriations process begins for the next Fiscal Year, it is critical for the Congress to utilize every tool to rein in the lawlessness of this regulatory agency, among others. We intend to do so.” 

###

Casten Hosts Roundtable to Highlight Sheldon Peck Homestead Historic Site

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Sean Casten (IL-06)

March 20, 2026

Lombard, IL — U.S. Congressman Sean Casten (IL-06) hosted a roundtable with historians, preservationists, and local leaders to highlight the importance of historic sites and stories that have shaped our nation’s history. The roundtable was co-hosted by Landmarks Illinois and the Lombard Historical Society and took place at the Sheldon Peck Homestead in Lombard.

“The Sheldon Peck Homestead is a notable place in both American and Illinois’ history. Sheldon and Harriet Peck were not only outspoken abolitionists, but they also provided shelter to freedom seekers along the Underground Railroad,” said Rep. Sean Casten. “Now more than ever, as the Trump Administration attempts to erase our nation’s past, it’s important to preserve and honor places like the Peck Homestead. It’s past time the Peck Homestead is recognized on the National Register of Historic Places.”

The Peck Homestead is registered on the National Park Service Network to Freedom as a verified stop on the Underground Railroad. Congressman Casten, along with experts and local leaders, participated in a discussion on the importance of the Peck Homestead, other historic sites in Illinois, and why naming the Peck Homestead to the National Register of Historic Places would benefit the local community.

“The Sheldon and Harriet Peck Homestead in Lombard should be included in the National Register of Historic Places,” said Bonnie McDonald, President & CEO of Landmark Illinois. “The fact that this documented Underground Railroad site, which is included in the Network to Freedom, has been determined ineligible for National-Register listing proves that preservation practices must evolve. Landmarks Illinois has been working hard to do just that. We thank Rep. Casten for joining us in this work and for his commitment to ensuring the Peck Homestead receives the recognition it deserves. The National Register of Historic Places was created to recognize significant places across the nation, its territories, and tribal lands that tell our country’s collective story. The lack of places included in the National Register that tell our full history, like the Peck Homestead, must be rectified.”

“The Sheldon Peck Homestead is one of the most important historic sites in Lombard and an essential part of Illinois history,” said Alison Costanzo, Executive Director of the Lombard Historical Society. “For decades, the Lombard Historical Society and our community have worked to preserve this place and the stories it holds, from Sheldon Peck’s legacy as a nationally recognized folk artist and abolitionist to the story of ‘Old Charley,’ a freedom-seeking man connected to the household. Since the 2012 review, we have undertaken additional research, archaeology, and documentation to address the questions raised during the earlier nomination process. As our nation approaches America 250, this is the right moment to ensure that places like the Peck Homestead — where the ideals of democracy, freedom, and civic courage were lived out — are recognized as part of our national story.”

Other attendees of the event included Jeanne Schultz Angel from the Midwest Underground Railroad Network and Illinois Association of Museums, Sara Faddah and Dario Durham from 77 Flavors of Chicago, Jeffrey Nevins from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, and Sara Phalen from the West Chicago City Museum, Illinois America 250 Commission.

Photos and videos from the roundtable can be found here.

###

MATSUI, BEYER, LIEU, JACOBS, MCCLAIN DELANEY INTRODUCE LEGISLATION TO REPEAL WHITE HOUSE AI MORATORIUM

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Doris Matsui (D-CA)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Doris Matsui (D-CA), Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technologyand Reps. Don Beyer (D-VA), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Sara Jacobs (D-CA), and April McClain Delaney (D-MD) introduced the Guaranteeing and Upholding Americans’ Right to Decide Responsible AI Laws and Standards (GUARDRAILS) Act to repeal President Donald Trump’s executive order entitled “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence,” which is designed to establish a moratorium on state-level artificial intelligence policies. This legislation would prohibit the executive order from taking effect to ensure states can enact commonsense safeguards to protect the American public in the face of rapidly evolving AI technologies. Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) is introducing companion legislation in the Senate.

President Trump’s executive order would kill responsible safety reforms without providing any federal protections or AI governance requirements to replace the state laws it seeks to preempt. This executive order was followed by the White House’s National AI Policy Framework, which reinforces the administration’s commitment to preempting state-level AI laws without the establishment of clear, enforceable guardrails to address the urgent risks posed by AI systems – in addition to attempting to limit Congressional regulatory action. 

“Republicans keep trying to strip states of the ability to enact commonsense AI safeguards—at a time when there are no meaningful federal protections in place,” said Congresswoman Matsui. “President Trump’s executive order is illegal coercion: it threatens states with costly lawsuits and tries to hold hostage the BEAD dollars Congress provided to connect every American to affordable broadband. As Ranking Member of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, I won’t let the Administration weaponize broadband funding to bully states out of enforcing their AI laws. That’s why my colleagues and I are introducing this bill to repeal the order, and I will keep using every tool Congress has to stop this overreach and protect the public.”

“In today’s lawless, Wild West artificial intelligence environment, states have been leading the charge to implement safeguards addressing serious risks ranging from algorithmic bias to data privacy and consumer protection. But the Trump White House aims to kill state AI laws without setting even minimally acceptable federal guardrails, exposing the American public to the growing risks accompanying completely unchecked artificial intelligence,” saidRep. Don Beyer. “Until federal action ensures safe and responsible AI development, deployment, and use, states must retain the ability to implement policies to protect the American public.”

“Embracing the amazing possibilities of AI can’t come at the cost of leaving Americans vulnerable to its profound risks, which is exactly what President Trump and Republicans are trying to do,” saidSen. Brian Schatz. “Preventing states from enacting common-sense regulation that protects people from the very real harms of AI is dangerous. Congress has a responsibility to get this technology right, but states must be allowed to act in the public interest in the meantime.”

“Congress has the responsibility to establish a national framework for AI and any attempt by Donald Trump to create laws through executive order is a sham. It is Congress’ responsibility to check this overreach of the presidency,” saidRep. Ted Lieu. “Pleased to work with my friend, Congressman Beyer, to make clear that Congress has the responsibility to create AI policy at the national level. Americans deserve a set of AI guardrails that promote responsible innovation, and doing that through Congress ensures the true interests of the American people are honored. I welcome any effort by the Administration to work with, and not around, Congress to establish a federal AI framework.”

“President Trump’s laissez-faire approach to AI regulation and trampling on states’ AI rights is incredibly dangerous for Americans’ rights and safety,” saidRep. Sara Jacobs. “Congress should be proactively creating the rules of the road to protect people while encouraging innovation – instead of taking the back seat to President Trump and his Big Tech donors. But in the meantime, we can’t wait, so I’m proud to co-lead the GUARDRAILS Act to repeal Donald Trump’s AI moratorium. We can’t let Donald Trump’s corruption stand in the way of protecting Americans and people around the world, spurring innovation, and fostering public trust.”

“I’ve built my career advocating for digital protections for our most vulnerable Americans, including children and seniors, from cyber threats like fraud, data breaches, deepfakes, and more. Businesses do better—and strive to do better—when commonsense laws are in place to guide their decisions,” saidRep. April McClain Delaney. “Trump’s Executive Order fails to recognize the important role states play in shaping the policies that drive U.S. competitiveness and innovation. It could not be more clear: the Administration is actively seeking ways to make the internet a more dangerous place.”

The legislation is cosponsored in the House by Representatives Jake Auchincloss (D-MA), Becca Balint (D-VT), Nanette Barragán (D-CA), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Sean Casten (D-IL), Judy Chu (D-CA), Gil Cisneros (D-CA), Angie Craig (D-MN), Maxine Dexter (D-OR), Lizzie Fletcher (D-TX), Bill Foster (D-IL), Valerie Foushee (D-NC), Laura Friedman (D-CA), Ro Khanna (D-CA), John Larson (D-CT), Sarah McBride (D-DE), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Morgan McGarvey (D-KY), Jim McGovern (D-MA), Rob Menendez (D-NJ), Kelly Morrison (D-MN), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Luz Rivas (D-CA), Hillary Scholten (D-MI), Mark Takano (D-CA), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Paul Tonko (D-NY), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), and Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC). 

Text of the Guaranteeing and Upholding Americans’ Right to Decide Responsible AI Laws and Standards (GUARDRAILS) Act is available here

 

# # #

House Foreign Affairs Ranking Member Meeks Calls out Trump Admin for Again Abusing Emergency Authorities to Bypass Congress on Arms Sales

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Gregory W Meeks (5th District of New York)

Washington, D.C. – Representative Gregory W. Meeks, Ranking Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, today criticized the Trump administration for abruptly declaring an emergency and bypassing Congressional review to rush over $20 billion in weapons and equipment to the UAE, Kuwait, and Jordan.    

“The Trump administration’s latest use of emergency authorities to bypass Congressional review for over $20 billion in arms is yet another deeply troubling example of this administration’s flouting and contempt for Congress’s oversight authority. 

“I support our partners’ ability to defend themselves. But that support does not give this administration a blank check to ignore the law or Congress.

“The facts here are straightforward: of the dozen weapons cases covered by the administration’s emergency declaration, only one contains defense articles and equipment ready for immediate export. The administration is using the veneer of an emergency declaration to bypass Congressional review on arms sales which have no direct connection to the current conflict or prospect for immediate transfer. That is not an emergency. That is an abuse of authority, and the American people’s elected representatives were deliberately cut out of that decision. 

“For months, I have raised serious concerns about major U.S. arms sales to the UAE while it continues to fuel the brutal civil war in Sudan by arming the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia, an entity the Department of State determined is committing genocide. Those concerns remain unaddressed.  

“As I have said before, this is an emergency of the administration’s own making. This arms transfer reflects a broader pattern: ignoring the law, bypassing Congress, and making major national security decisions without transparency or accountability. It also underscores the administration’s lack of preparation as it drags the American people deeper into Trump’s war of choice.” 

 

###

Representative Thomas Massie to Host 2026 U.S. Service Academy Day

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Thomas Massie (4th District of Kentucky)

For Immediate Release
Contact: massie.press@mail.house.gov
Contact #: 202-225-3465

Crescent Springs, KY- Representative Thomas Massie announces that he will host his annual “Academy Day” event on Saturday, April 18th at the Marriott Cincinnati Airport in Hebron, KY. On “Academy Day” interested students of all ages and their parents have the chance to meet with Service Academy representatives to learn more about the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, the Naval Academy, the Air Force Academy, the Merchant Marine Academy, and the Coast Guard Academy, known collectively as the U.S. Service Academies. More information about the program, including answers to “Frequently Asked Questions,” can be found at this link
 
By attending a U.S. Service Academy, young men and women have the opportunity to serve their country while improving all facets of their character through a rigorous scholastic curriculum and a disciplined moral and physical regimen. Competition for admission to a Service Academy is high, and nominees are chosen based on several factors including character, leadership, academic excellence, physical aptitude, and extracurricular activities.

Any high school student who is interested in learning more about attending a U.S. Service Academy is encouraged to attend “Academy Day” and should RSVP at this link.

 
CONGRESSMAN MASSIE’S ANNUAL U.S. SERVICE ACADEMY DAY

Date:        Saturday, April 18, 2026

Time:       Registration 10:00 AM -11:00 AM
                 Program 11:00 AM -12:30 PM

Where:    Marriott Cincinnati Airport
                2395 Progress Drive
                Hebron, KY 41048
 
For more information, please contact Representative Massie’s Northern Kentucky District Office by calling 859-426-0080.

###

Hoyer: To the Ukrainian People, We Have Been with You, We're with You Now, and We Will Be with You in the Future.

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Steny H Hoyer (MD-05)

WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Steny H. Hoyer (MD-05) delivered remarks after receiving the Star of Ukraine Award at the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation’s Star of Ukraine Awards & Benefit Gala. Below is a transcript of his remarks:

“Look, I know why all of you came. I came to hear the introduction of Marcy Kaptur of me.
Did we record that, hon? (laughter) My wife, Dr. Kamarck is here with me, and we’re so glad to be here with all of you. Madame Ambassador, I could just say I adopt the remarks of the gentlelady from Ukraine and sit down, and some people in here hope I would do that. (laughter) People who know me say, ‘There’s no way I’m going to do that.’

“Marcy Kaptur is Ukraine in the Congress of the United States. (applause) I was talking to Bob McDonald – whom I’ve known for a pretty long time – and Marcy Kaptur of all the Members of the 435 Members, is the Member of the 435 Members who you know is going to be in the room for Ukraine all the time. And it was long before this war started that Marcy Kaptur was there for Ukraine. She’s got courage, she’s obviously articulate, and she’s got passion for freedom and democracy, and particularly that in Ukraine. Mr. Buffett, I don’t know you. (Howard Buffett says, ‘You’re Lucky.’) Thank you Lord. (laughter) But I do know Susan [Buffett] My wife, who died in 1997, Judy, was an early childhood – and I’ve had the great opportunity with Susan of going to the childcare center in Omaha. What a wonderful enterprise. [It] reminds me of how well those children are cared for and how at risk the Ukrainian children are. So, I understand you have given a couple pennies, or maybe a few more for this effort. (laughter) One of the 45 minutes that I spent in your father’s office in Omaha, in that little office about the size of my office, while I was practicing law many, many years ago. He talked to me about what we ought to be doing in the Congress of the United States. It was 45 minutes of absolute joy and seeing this extraordinary father – [that] you had the privilege of being the son of – speak to me about policy in Washington and the people, the working people of America. So, although I don’t know you, I’m sure you’re a chip off the old block and thank you very much for all that you’ve done. (applause)

“And I’m deeply honored to receive this award from the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation. I was sworn in to the United States House of Representative on June 3rd, 1981. I embarked on my first trip to the Soviet Union 21 days later. Paul Simon, the senator from Illinois, called me up and said, ‘I’m going to the Soviet Union. Would you go?’ I said, ‘I’ve only been here three weeks, it would be a little bit officious to make that –’ okay, [he said] ‘No, no, no. You’re fine. You can go and you can bring Judy with you.’ I said I can’t afford that. I didn’t know about codels at that time. (laughter) The trees are, unfortunately, attacking me. Oh, I don’t know about the rest of you, but these trees are really doing it. (coughs) My wife, Dr. Elaine Kamarck. (applause) Pretty high [ineligible] when you have a Ph.D. from the Brookings Institution to deliver you water. (laughter) We visited Bonn, Moscow, and Kyiv. 1981 was the first time that I had the opportunity to go to Kyiv. I brought with me, Howard, some cigarettes, some candy, and some other stuff that the Jewish community had given me to give to a mother who had a child that was probably in his 20s, in jail in Kyiv. And that, of course, was going to be used to trade with the guards for privileges that he might have received. I remember going – I had to go alone because the embassy said, ‘No, no, we can’t do that.’ So I went alone. I was on their subway there, the Metro. I kept looking around to see if I was being followed. It was a little scary because, of course, it was communist controlled at that point. So that was my first visit, and the KGB guide that we had on the bus said as we drove through Kiev, ‘Do you know–’  because we commented on the trees – ‘Do you know what the ‘tree’d’ community in America is?’ And we said, no. She said, ‘You ought to know because it’s Washington DC.’ (laughter) I believe that the West might make the difference in whether Ukraine achieves the dream that I knew they had of sovereignty.  I have, since that time, supported Ukraine ever since. 

“When I joined the Helsinki Commission in 1985, the Soviet satellite republics received relatively little attention [from] the Washington foreign policy establishment, which primarily focused on Russia itself. We sought to bring attention to the Ukrainians plight. A guy named Orest [Deychakiwsky], it’s longer than that, but some of you may know Orest. (applause) He and I traveled frequently to Europe and behind the Iron Curtain and to Moscow to cast a line in the Soviet oppression against the Ukrainian Catholic Church, which, at the time, was the largest banned religious denomination in the world. We pushed for the release of the Ukrainian Helsinki monitors, who faced the hardest repression of any of the Helsinki chapters. I remember traveling to Moscow in 1987 with the Helsinki Commission and with Speaker Wright, and we met with Gorbachev in Moscow, and he talked about the Soviet Union’s new openness, transparency, and tolerance. After that meeting, we then went again to Kyiv. In Kyiv, we met with, of course, one of the members of the Politburo at that point in time – he was the dictator of Ukraine. That was not his formal title, I’m sure. (laughter) But we also met with dissidents from across the Soviet empire, including Ukraine. Fresh out of the Gulag and hands still calloused from years of forced labor, they told us a different story. One about how the Soviet regime terrorized them, tortured them, jailed them, and in too many instances, killed them. This is in 1987. Their only crime: daring to see the world as it could be, one defined by human rights, by freedom, by democracy, and asking, ‘Why not?’ You know, Bobby Kennedy, when he ran for president, used that line: ‘Some men see things as they are, and ask ‘Why?’ I see things as they are and say, ‘Why not?’

“Ukrainians asked that question in 1987. They asked when they gained their independence in 1991. They asked it [while] clad in orange in 2004, and in 1994 they gave the Soviets what they wanted. They talked about the Budapest, and they promised, in return for the nuclear material, that they would honor the borders of Ukraine. They asked it when they were gunned down in the Maidan to secure their democracy in 2014. Ladies and gentlemen, I believe that 2014 and the theft of Crimea was the mother of this war we confront today. (applause) The tepid reaction of the West – is that the Ambassador?  She’s always going to be my ambassador, with all due respect. (laughter) Oksana [Markarova], good to see you. They continue to ask that question: Why not? Why should Ukraine not be a democratic, sovereign and free? And Russia promised that would be the case. They lied. For decades, a bipartisan majority, the United States, joined in asking that question. Throughout my 45 years in Congress, when I visited Ukraine, when I met Ukrainian dissidents, when I passed legislation supporting Ukraine, I did so along with some Republicans. It was a bipartisan effort, a bipartisan commitment. Tonight, I received the same award that George H.W. Bush received. I sponsored the Americans with Disabilities Act back in 1990, and George H.W. Bush signed that Act. It was a bipartisan commitment to human rights and those with disabilities. Mitch McConnell, who stands as strong as anybody in the Congress of the United States for the NATO alliance and the strength of the West and the defense of democracy and freedom. Rob Portman from Ohio, another Republican. He’s received this award, correctly so. We represent two parties, but we have spoken with one voice, a voice for Ukraine, for America, for the free world, for international law, for rights.

“Marcy said I wear this flag every day. I didn’t want you to think I just wore today in appreciation of this award. I wear it every day because I’m old enough. I’m retiring, if you know, people congratulate me [because] I’m retiring. And some say why I return. Well, I’ll be 87 in June. I didn’t think it was a premature retirement. (laughter) But I’m just not sure that at 88 and 89 that I could do the job and I owed it to my constituents, therefore, to step aside. But I’m sad that I’m stepping aside because the country needs people who are committed to standing up for freedom, for rights. (inaudible due to applause) Chamberlain or Churchill time in our country, and we are either going to stand up and fight for what’s right. And we’re going to stand up and fight for freedom and international war, or we’re going to lose, not Ukraine is just going to lose. We are going to lose. The West is going to lose. The values that we share and are committed to will lose. Sadly, and I know this is not a partisan event, but sadly, in the White House and in Congress, some are trying to silence the voices of those who are saying we need to act. Vladimir Putin’s line that somehow Ukraine – who is the victim of this war – somehow started it. That, of course, is, as you know, everybody in this room knows, and the world knows, is baloney. I cleaned that up. (laughter) But ladies and gentlemen, there is still a consensus in the Congress of the United States in support of Ukraine. 

“Since the Russian invasion in 2022, the House has had at least – at least – 12 votes in support of Ukraine. An average of 80% of the Members of the House of Representatives have voted on that bill every time it’s been on the Floor. Over 300 votes, every time it’s been on the Floor. [U.S. Representative] Greg Meeks, the former Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee and now the Ranking Member of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the House of Representatives and I have a bill. It’s called the Ukraine Support Act. Now, I’ve heard a number of you talk about sanctions. I’m for sanctions, but the sanctions bill in the United States Senate doesn’t say a word about Ukraine. Hear me. Read it. It says we want to sanction Russia. I want to sanction Russia. But I also want to send a message to every Ukrainian: We are for you. We will stick by you. (applause) So I want you to help me [with] the Ukraine Support Act. We have approximately 55 [Republicans], we could get more. 214 Democrats. That’s everybody we have. Everybody we have has signed a discharge petition that says bring the Ukrainian Support Act to the Floor. They might bring a bill that says we support Ukraine, we support NATO, we oppose Russia. And yes, it includes sanctions, but it does much more than that. It says to the Ukrainian people: we have been with you, we’re with you now, and we will be with you in the future. We need one Republican. 

“Brian Fitzpatrick, call him up and say thank him. Don Bacon in Nebraska, call him up and thank him. They’re the two Republicans – now remember over 100 Republicans every time, and a majority of Republicans, 11 out of the 12 times, voted to support Ukraine. I have been working, Greg Meeks has been working, Marcy Kaptur has been working, the caucus that she leads has been working to try to get one more signature. And that bill will come to the Floor because those are the rules. The Speaker can’t stop it, the President can’t stop it. It will come to the floor with one more Republican [signature]. That’s your homework. You want to do something? You can give money. That’s great. I heard you buy all the auction items. They are double – the third and four times the price. (laughter) But what I urge you to do, if you know a Republican in the House of Representatives, call them up. Tell them how critically important it is to the Ukrainian people to have the Congress stand up and say we have for you as they’re huddled in cold trenches, heroically stopping the Russian onslaught. Just one more Republican. And there are a lot of Republicans who support Ukraine and say they are, and talk about, and I’ve talked to them, and I’ve said it’s time to stand up for you. 

“And I want to congratulate Putin for getting us Finland and Sweden on board. (laughter, applause) My father was born in Copenhagen, so I’m a Scandinavian, I’m a Viking, and I am so glad to see the Scandinavian countries [with] one voice. Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and how that strengthened NATO. But it is America’s voice that needs to be heard. Yes, we’ve given support. The Ambassador was tenacious in getting us to that objective. Joe Biden didn’t do as much as I would like, but he did a lot.  One more person to speak up for Ukraine, and one more person to show a modicum of courage that Ukrainians are showing every day. One more person to ask, ‘Why not?’ That heartfelt question deserves more than heartless answers of appeasement, apathy, and isolationism. (applause) Those are tough words, I understand that. These are tough times. And we ought not to, in any way, tenderize our language when dealing with an aggressor who wants to not only take Ukraine, but all of that which they add and more.

“In my final years in Congress, I stand with a besieged Ukraine. A Ukraine that is an example to the whole world of the kind of courage Americans showed in 1776 when they said, ‘We want to tell the whole world that we are going to stand for ourselves and for freedom, for liberty, for justice, for one nation under God, indivisible.’ I want to thank my Ukrainian friends in America who have added so much to our country. But as I said, I’m going to give you homework. You go home tonight, you think of – well, you know, you’re all very active, you’re all very knowledgeable – and I want you to get on the phone. You know how that guy got up and said, ‘I want you to go to the phone, I want you to stand up,’ in that movie? That’s what I want you to do. John Lewis, one of my best friends, who died a little bit ago, said ‘If you see something that’s not right, that’s not fair, that’s not just, you stand up. You need to speak up. You need to speak out. You need to get in trouble. Good trouble.’ I want you to stand up, not worrying about the political ramifications of your standing up with somebody. Stand up because it’s the right thing to do. Stand up because it will make a difference. Stand up because this is America’s fight to accomplish. God bless you, and Godspeed.” (applause)