Casten Hosts Roundtable to Highlight Sheldon Peck Homestead Historic Site

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Sean Casten (IL-06)

March 20, 2026

Lombard, IL — U.S. Congressman Sean Casten (IL-06) hosted a roundtable with historians, preservationists, and local leaders to highlight the importance of historic sites and stories that have shaped our nation’s history. The roundtable was co-hosted by Landmarks Illinois and the Lombard Historical Society and took place at the Sheldon Peck Homestead in Lombard.

“The Sheldon Peck Homestead is a notable place in both American and Illinois’ history. Sheldon and Harriet Peck were not only outspoken abolitionists, but they also provided shelter to freedom seekers along the Underground Railroad,” said Rep. Sean Casten. “Now more than ever, as the Trump Administration attempts to erase our nation’s past, it’s important to preserve and honor places like the Peck Homestead. It’s past time the Peck Homestead is recognized on the National Register of Historic Places.”

The Peck Homestead is registered on the National Park Service Network to Freedom as a verified stop on the Underground Railroad. Congressman Casten, along with experts and local leaders, participated in a discussion on the importance of the Peck Homestead, other historic sites in Illinois, and why naming the Peck Homestead to the National Register of Historic Places would benefit the local community.

“The Sheldon and Harriet Peck Homestead in Lombard should be included in the National Register of Historic Places,” said Bonnie McDonald, President & CEO of Landmark Illinois. “The fact that this documented Underground Railroad site, which is included in the Network to Freedom, has been determined ineligible for National-Register listing proves that preservation practices must evolve. Landmarks Illinois has been working hard to do just that. We thank Rep. Casten for joining us in this work and for his commitment to ensuring the Peck Homestead receives the recognition it deserves. The National Register of Historic Places was created to recognize significant places across the nation, its territories, and tribal lands that tell our country’s collective story. The lack of places included in the National Register that tell our full history, like the Peck Homestead, must be rectified.”

“The Sheldon Peck Homestead is one of the most important historic sites in Lombard and an essential part of Illinois history,” said Alison Costanzo, Executive Director of the Lombard Historical Society. “For decades, the Lombard Historical Society and our community have worked to preserve this place and the stories it holds, from Sheldon Peck’s legacy as a nationally recognized folk artist and abolitionist to the story of ‘Old Charley,’ a freedom-seeking man connected to the household. Since the 2012 review, we have undertaken additional research, archaeology, and documentation to address the questions raised during the earlier nomination process. As our nation approaches America 250, this is the right moment to ensure that places like the Peck Homestead — where the ideals of democracy, freedom, and civic courage were lived out — are recognized as part of our national story.”

Other attendees of the event included Jeanne Schultz Angel from the Midwest Underground Railroad Network and Illinois Association of Museums, Sara Faddah and Dario Durham from 77 Flavors of Chicago, Jeffrey Nevins from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, and Sara Phalen from the West Chicago City Museum, Illinois America 250 Commission.

Photos and videos from the roundtable can be found here.

###

MATSUI, BEYER, LIEU, JACOBS, MCCLAIN DELANEY INTRODUCE LEGISLATION TO REPEAL WHITE HOUSE AI MORATORIUM

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Doris Matsui (D-CA)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Doris Matsui (D-CA), Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technologyand Reps. Don Beyer (D-VA), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Sara Jacobs (D-CA), and April McClain Delaney (D-MD) introduced the Guaranteeing and Upholding Americans’ Right to Decide Responsible AI Laws and Standards (GUARDRAILS) Act to repeal President Donald Trump’s executive order entitled “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence,” which is designed to establish a moratorium on state-level artificial intelligence policies. This legislation would prohibit the executive order from taking effect to ensure states can enact commonsense safeguards to protect the American public in the face of rapidly evolving AI technologies. Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) is introducing companion legislation in the Senate.

President Trump’s executive order would kill responsible safety reforms without providing any federal protections or AI governance requirements to replace the state laws it seeks to preempt. This executive order was followed by the White House’s National AI Policy Framework, which reinforces the administration’s commitment to preempting state-level AI laws without the establishment of clear, enforceable guardrails to address the urgent risks posed by AI systems – in addition to attempting to limit Congressional regulatory action. 

“Republicans keep trying to strip states of the ability to enact commonsense AI safeguards—at a time when there are no meaningful federal protections in place,” said Congresswoman Matsui. “President Trump’s executive order is illegal coercion: it threatens states with costly lawsuits and tries to hold hostage the BEAD dollars Congress provided to connect every American to affordable broadband. As Ranking Member of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, I won’t let the Administration weaponize broadband funding to bully states out of enforcing their AI laws. That’s why my colleagues and I are introducing this bill to repeal the order, and I will keep using every tool Congress has to stop this overreach and protect the public.”

“In today’s lawless, Wild West artificial intelligence environment, states have been leading the charge to implement safeguards addressing serious risks ranging from algorithmic bias to data privacy and consumer protection. But the Trump White House aims to kill state AI laws without setting even minimally acceptable federal guardrails, exposing the American public to the growing risks accompanying completely unchecked artificial intelligence,” saidRep. Don Beyer. “Until federal action ensures safe and responsible AI development, deployment, and use, states must retain the ability to implement policies to protect the American public.”

“Embracing the amazing possibilities of AI can’t come at the cost of leaving Americans vulnerable to its profound risks, which is exactly what President Trump and Republicans are trying to do,” saidSen. Brian Schatz. “Preventing states from enacting common-sense regulation that protects people from the very real harms of AI is dangerous. Congress has a responsibility to get this technology right, but states must be allowed to act in the public interest in the meantime.”

“Congress has the responsibility to establish a national framework for AI and any attempt by Donald Trump to create laws through executive order is a sham. It is Congress’ responsibility to check this overreach of the presidency,” saidRep. Ted Lieu. “Pleased to work with my friend, Congressman Beyer, to make clear that Congress has the responsibility to create AI policy at the national level. Americans deserve a set of AI guardrails that promote responsible innovation, and doing that through Congress ensures the true interests of the American people are honored. I welcome any effort by the Administration to work with, and not around, Congress to establish a federal AI framework.”

“President Trump’s laissez-faire approach to AI regulation and trampling on states’ AI rights is incredibly dangerous for Americans’ rights and safety,” saidRep. Sara Jacobs. “Congress should be proactively creating the rules of the road to protect people while encouraging innovation – instead of taking the back seat to President Trump and his Big Tech donors. But in the meantime, we can’t wait, so I’m proud to co-lead the GUARDRAILS Act to repeal Donald Trump’s AI moratorium. We can’t let Donald Trump’s corruption stand in the way of protecting Americans and people around the world, spurring innovation, and fostering public trust.”

“I’ve built my career advocating for digital protections for our most vulnerable Americans, including children and seniors, from cyber threats like fraud, data breaches, deepfakes, and more. Businesses do better—and strive to do better—when commonsense laws are in place to guide their decisions,” saidRep. April McClain Delaney. “Trump’s Executive Order fails to recognize the important role states play in shaping the policies that drive U.S. competitiveness and innovation. It could not be more clear: the Administration is actively seeking ways to make the internet a more dangerous place.”

The legislation is cosponsored in the House by Representatives Jake Auchincloss (D-MA), Becca Balint (D-VT), Nanette Barragán (D-CA), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Sean Casten (D-IL), Judy Chu (D-CA), Gil Cisneros (D-CA), Angie Craig (D-MN), Maxine Dexter (D-OR), Lizzie Fletcher (D-TX), Bill Foster (D-IL), Valerie Foushee (D-NC), Laura Friedman (D-CA), Ro Khanna (D-CA), John Larson (D-CT), Sarah McBride (D-DE), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Morgan McGarvey (D-KY), Jim McGovern (D-MA), Rob Menendez (D-NJ), Kelly Morrison (D-MN), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Luz Rivas (D-CA), Hillary Scholten (D-MI), Mark Takano (D-CA), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Paul Tonko (D-NY), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), and Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC). 

Text of the Guaranteeing and Upholding Americans’ Right to Decide Responsible AI Laws and Standards (GUARDRAILS) Act is available here

 

# # #

House Foreign Affairs Ranking Member Meeks Calls out Trump Admin for Again Abusing Emergency Authorities to Bypass Congress on Arms Sales

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Gregory W Meeks (5th District of New York)

Washington, D.C. – Representative Gregory W. Meeks, Ranking Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, today criticized the Trump administration for abruptly declaring an emergency and bypassing Congressional review to rush over $20 billion in weapons and equipment to the UAE, Kuwait, and Jordan.    

“The Trump administration’s latest use of emergency authorities to bypass Congressional review for over $20 billion in arms is yet another deeply troubling example of this administration’s flouting and contempt for Congress’s oversight authority. 

“I support our partners’ ability to defend themselves. But that support does not give this administration a blank check to ignore the law or Congress.

“The facts here are straightforward: of the dozen weapons cases covered by the administration’s emergency declaration, only one contains defense articles and equipment ready for immediate export. The administration is using the veneer of an emergency declaration to bypass Congressional review on arms sales which have no direct connection to the current conflict or prospect for immediate transfer. That is not an emergency. That is an abuse of authority, and the American people’s elected representatives were deliberately cut out of that decision. 

“For months, I have raised serious concerns about major U.S. arms sales to the UAE while it continues to fuel the brutal civil war in Sudan by arming the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia, an entity the Department of State determined is committing genocide. Those concerns remain unaddressed.  

“As I have said before, this is an emergency of the administration’s own making. This arms transfer reflects a broader pattern: ignoring the law, bypassing Congress, and making major national security decisions without transparency or accountability. It also underscores the administration’s lack of preparation as it drags the American people deeper into Trump’s war of choice.” 

 

###

Representative Thomas Massie to Host 2026 U.S. Service Academy Day

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Thomas Massie (4th District of Kentucky)

For Immediate Release
Contact: massie.press@mail.house.gov
Contact #: 202-225-3465

Crescent Springs, KY- Representative Thomas Massie announces that he will host his annual “Academy Day” event on Saturday, April 18th at the Marriott Cincinnati Airport in Hebron, KY. On “Academy Day” interested students of all ages and their parents have the chance to meet with Service Academy representatives to learn more about the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, the Naval Academy, the Air Force Academy, the Merchant Marine Academy, and the Coast Guard Academy, known collectively as the U.S. Service Academies. More information about the program, including answers to “Frequently Asked Questions,” can be found at this link
 
By attending a U.S. Service Academy, young men and women have the opportunity to serve their country while improving all facets of their character through a rigorous scholastic curriculum and a disciplined moral and physical regimen. Competition for admission to a Service Academy is high, and nominees are chosen based on several factors including character, leadership, academic excellence, physical aptitude, and extracurricular activities.

Any high school student who is interested in learning more about attending a U.S. Service Academy is encouraged to attend “Academy Day” and should RSVP at this link.

 
CONGRESSMAN MASSIE’S ANNUAL U.S. SERVICE ACADEMY DAY

Date:        Saturday, April 18, 2026

Time:       Registration 10:00 AM -11:00 AM
                 Program 11:00 AM -12:30 PM

Where:    Marriott Cincinnati Airport
                2395 Progress Drive
                Hebron, KY 41048
 
For more information, please contact Representative Massie’s Northern Kentucky District Office by calling 859-426-0080.

###

Hoyer: To the Ukrainian People, We Have Been with You, We're with You Now, and We Will Be with You in the Future.

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Steny H Hoyer (MD-05)

WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Steny H. Hoyer (MD-05) delivered remarks after receiving the Star of Ukraine Award at the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation’s Star of Ukraine Awards & Benefit Gala. Below is a transcript of his remarks:

“Look, I know why all of you came. I came to hear the introduction of Marcy Kaptur of me.
Did we record that, hon? (laughter) My wife, Dr. Kamarck is here with me, and we’re so glad to be here with all of you. Madame Ambassador, I could just say I adopt the remarks of the gentlelady from Ukraine and sit down, and some people in here hope I would do that. (laughter) People who know me say, ‘There’s no way I’m going to do that.’

“Marcy Kaptur is Ukraine in the Congress of the United States. (applause) I was talking to Bob McDonald – whom I’ve known for a pretty long time – and Marcy Kaptur of all the Members of the 435 Members, is the Member of the 435 Members who you know is going to be in the room for Ukraine all the time. And it was long before this war started that Marcy Kaptur was there for Ukraine. She’s got courage, she’s obviously articulate, and she’s got passion for freedom and democracy, and particularly that in Ukraine. Mr. Buffett, I don’t know you. (Howard Buffett says, ‘You’re Lucky.’) Thank you Lord. (laughter) But I do know Susan [Buffett] My wife, who died in 1997, Judy, was an early childhood – and I’ve had the great opportunity with Susan of going to the childcare center in Omaha. What a wonderful enterprise. [It] reminds me of how well those children are cared for and how at risk the Ukrainian children are. So, I understand you have given a couple pennies, or maybe a few more for this effort. (laughter) One of the 45 minutes that I spent in your father’s office in Omaha, in that little office about the size of my office, while I was practicing law many, many years ago. He talked to me about what we ought to be doing in the Congress of the United States. It was 45 minutes of absolute joy and seeing this extraordinary father – [that] you had the privilege of being the son of – speak to me about policy in Washington and the people, the working people of America. So, although I don’t know you, I’m sure you’re a chip off the old block and thank you very much for all that you’ve done. (applause)

“And I’m deeply honored to receive this award from the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation. I was sworn in to the United States House of Representative on June 3rd, 1981. I embarked on my first trip to the Soviet Union 21 days later. Paul Simon, the senator from Illinois, called me up and said, ‘I’m going to the Soviet Union. Would you go?’ I said, ‘I’ve only been here three weeks, it would be a little bit officious to make that –’ okay, [he said] ‘No, no, no. You’re fine. You can go and you can bring Judy with you.’ I said I can’t afford that. I didn’t know about codels at that time. (laughter) The trees are, unfortunately, attacking me. Oh, I don’t know about the rest of you, but these trees are really doing it. (coughs) My wife, Dr. Elaine Kamarck. (applause) Pretty high [ineligible] when you have a Ph.D. from the Brookings Institution to deliver you water. (laughter) We visited Bonn, Moscow, and Kyiv. 1981 was the first time that I had the opportunity to go to Kyiv. I brought with me, Howard, some cigarettes, some candy, and some other stuff that the Jewish community had given me to give to a mother who had a child that was probably in his 20s, in jail in Kyiv. And that, of course, was going to be used to trade with the guards for privileges that he might have received. I remember going – I had to go alone because the embassy said, ‘No, no, we can’t do that.’ So I went alone. I was on their subway there, the Metro. I kept looking around to see if I was being followed. It was a little scary because, of course, it was communist controlled at that point. So that was my first visit, and the KGB guide that we had on the bus said as we drove through Kiev, ‘Do you know–’  because we commented on the trees – ‘Do you know what the ‘tree’d’ community in America is?’ And we said, no. She said, ‘You ought to know because it’s Washington DC.’ (laughter) I believe that the West might make the difference in whether Ukraine achieves the dream that I knew they had of sovereignty.  I have, since that time, supported Ukraine ever since. 

“When I joined the Helsinki Commission in 1985, the Soviet satellite republics received relatively little attention [from] the Washington foreign policy establishment, which primarily focused on Russia itself. We sought to bring attention to the Ukrainians plight. A guy named Orest [Deychakiwsky], it’s longer than that, but some of you may know Orest. (applause) He and I traveled frequently to Europe and behind the Iron Curtain and to Moscow to cast a line in the Soviet oppression against the Ukrainian Catholic Church, which, at the time, was the largest banned religious denomination in the world. We pushed for the release of the Ukrainian Helsinki monitors, who faced the hardest repression of any of the Helsinki chapters. I remember traveling to Moscow in 1987 with the Helsinki Commission and with Speaker Wright, and we met with Gorbachev in Moscow, and he talked about the Soviet Union’s new openness, transparency, and tolerance. After that meeting, we then went again to Kyiv. In Kyiv, we met with, of course, one of the members of the Politburo at that point in time – he was the dictator of Ukraine. That was not his formal title, I’m sure. (laughter) But we also met with dissidents from across the Soviet empire, including Ukraine. Fresh out of the Gulag and hands still calloused from years of forced labor, they told us a different story. One about how the Soviet regime terrorized them, tortured them, jailed them, and in too many instances, killed them. This is in 1987. Their only crime: daring to see the world as it could be, one defined by human rights, by freedom, by democracy, and asking, ‘Why not?’ You know, Bobby Kennedy, when he ran for president, used that line: ‘Some men see things as they are, and ask ‘Why?’ I see things as they are and say, ‘Why not?’

“Ukrainians asked that question in 1987. They asked when they gained their independence in 1991. They asked it [while] clad in orange in 2004, and in 1994 they gave the Soviets what they wanted. They talked about the Budapest, and they promised, in return for the nuclear material, that they would honor the borders of Ukraine. They asked it when they were gunned down in the Maidan to secure their democracy in 2014. Ladies and gentlemen, I believe that 2014 and the theft of Crimea was the mother of this war we confront today. (applause) The tepid reaction of the West – is that the Ambassador?  She’s always going to be my ambassador, with all due respect. (laughter) Oksana [Markarova], good to see you. They continue to ask that question: Why not? Why should Ukraine not be a democratic, sovereign and free? And Russia promised that would be the case. They lied. For decades, a bipartisan majority, the United States, joined in asking that question. Throughout my 45 years in Congress, when I visited Ukraine, when I met Ukrainian dissidents, when I passed legislation supporting Ukraine, I did so along with some Republicans. It was a bipartisan effort, a bipartisan commitment. Tonight, I received the same award that George H.W. Bush received. I sponsored the Americans with Disabilities Act back in 1990, and George H.W. Bush signed that Act. It was a bipartisan commitment to human rights and those with disabilities. Mitch McConnell, who stands as strong as anybody in the Congress of the United States for the NATO alliance and the strength of the West and the defense of democracy and freedom. Rob Portman from Ohio, another Republican. He’s received this award, correctly so. We represent two parties, but we have spoken with one voice, a voice for Ukraine, for America, for the free world, for international law, for rights.

“Marcy said I wear this flag every day. I didn’t want you to think I just wore today in appreciation of this award. I wear it every day because I’m old enough. I’m retiring, if you know, people congratulate me [because] I’m retiring. And some say why I return. Well, I’ll be 87 in June. I didn’t think it was a premature retirement. (laughter) But I’m just not sure that at 88 and 89 that I could do the job and I owed it to my constituents, therefore, to step aside. But I’m sad that I’m stepping aside because the country needs people who are committed to standing up for freedom, for rights. (inaudible due to applause) Chamberlain or Churchill time in our country, and we are either going to stand up and fight for what’s right. And we’re going to stand up and fight for freedom and international war, or we’re going to lose, not Ukraine is just going to lose. We are going to lose. The West is going to lose. The values that we share and are committed to will lose. Sadly, and I know this is not a partisan event, but sadly, in the White House and in Congress, some are trying to silence the voices of those who are saying we need to act. Vladimir Putin’s line that somehow Ukraine – who is the victim of this war – somehow started it. That, of course, is, as you know, everybody in this room knows, and the world knows, is baloney. I cleaned that up. (laughter) But ladies and gentlemen, there is still a consensus in the Congress of the United States in support of Ukraine. 

“Since the Russian invasion in 2022, the House has had at least – at least – 12 votes in support of Ukraine. An average of 80% of the Members of the House of Representatives have voted on that bill every time it’s been on the Floor. Over 300 votes, every time it’s been on the Floor. [U.S. Representative] Greg Meeks, the former Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee and now the Ranking Member of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the House of Representatives and I have a bill. It’s called the Ukraine Support Act. Now, I’ve heard a number of you talk about sanctions. I’m for sanctions, but the sanctions bill in the United States Senate doesn’t say a word about Ukraine. Hear me. Read it. It says we want to sanction Russia. I want to sanction Russia. But I also want to send a message to every Ukrainian: We are for you. We will stick by you. (applause) So I want you to help me [with] the Ukraine Support Act. We have approximately 55 [Republicans], we could get more. 214 Democrats. That’s everybody we have. Everybody we have has signed a discharge petition that says bring the Ukrainian Support Act to the Floor. They might bring a bill that says we support Ukraine, we support NATO, we oppose Russia. And yes, it includes sanctions, but it does much more than that. It says to the Ukrainian people: we have been with you, we’re with you now, and we will be with you in the future. We need one Republican. 

“Brian Fitzpatrick, call him up and say thank him. Don Bacon in Nebraska, call him up and thank him. They’re the two Republicans – now remember over 100 Republicans every time, and a majority of Republicans, 11 out of the 12 times, voted to support Ukraine. I have been working, Greg Meeks has been working, Marcy Kaptur has been working, the caucus that she leads has been working to try to get one more signature. And that bill will come to the Floor because those are the rules. The Speaker can’t stop it, the President can’t stop it. It will come to the floor with one more Republican [signature]. That’s your homework. You want to do something? You can give money. That’s great. I heard you buy all the auction items. They are double – the third and four times the price. (laughter) But what I urge you to do, if you know a Republican in the House of Representatives, call them up. Tell them how critically important it is to the Ukrainian people to have the Congress stand up and say we have for you as they’re huddled in cold trenches, heroically stopping the Russian onslaught. Just one more Republican. And there are a lot of Republicans who support Ukraine and say they are, and talk about, and I’ve talked to them, and I’ve said it’s time to stand up for you. 

“And I want to congratulate Putin for getting us Finland and Sweden on board. (laughter, applause) My father was born in Copenhagen, so I’m a Scandinavian, I’m a Viking, and I am so glad to see the Scandinavian countries [with] one voice. Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and how that strengthened NATO. But it is America’s voice that needs to be heard. Yes, we’ve given support. The Ambassador was tenacious in getting us to that objective. Joe Biden didn’t do as much as I would like, but he did a lot.  One more person to speak up for Ukraine, and one more person to show a modicum of courage that Ukrainians are showing every day. One more person to ask, ‘Why not?’ That heartfelt question deserves more than heartless answers of appeasement, apathy, and isolationism. (applause) Those are tough words, I understand that. These are tough times. And we ought not to, in any way, tenderize our language when dealing with an aggressor who wants to not only take Ukraine, but all of that which they add and more.

“In my final years in Congress, I stand with a besieged Ukraine. A Ukraine that is an example to the whole world of the kind of courage Americans showed in 1776 when they said, ‘We want to tell the whole world that we are going to stand for ourselves and for freedom, for liberty, for justice, for one nation under God, indivisible.’ I want to thank my Ukrainian friends in America who have added so much to our country. But as I said, I’m going to give you homework. You go home tonight, you think of – well, you know, you’re all very active, you’re all very knowledgeable – and I want you to get on the phone. You know how that guy got up and said, ‘I want you to go to the phone, I want you to stand up,’ in that movie? That’s what I want you to do. John Lewis, one of my best friends, who died a little bit ago, said ‘If you see something that’s not right, that’s not fair, that’s not just, you stand up. You need to speak up. You need to speak out. You need to get in trouble. Good trouble.’ I want you to stand up, not worrying about the political ramifications of your standing up with somebody. Stand up because it’s the right thing to do. Stand up because it will make a difference. Stand up because this is America’s fight to accomplish. God bless you, and Godspeed.” (applause)

Read More (Steube, Burchett Introduce The CLEAR Act)

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Greg Steube (FL-17)

March 20, 2026 | Press ReleasesWASHINGTON — Representatives Greg Steube (R-Fla.) and Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) have introduced the Criminalizing Law Enforcement Access Restriction or CLEAR Act, legislation to impose enhanced penalties on rioters who obstruct federal law enforcement vehicles or weaponize civilian vehicles to attack officers. 
“Violent rioters have been allowed to obstruct law enforcement, surround officers, and use vehicles as weapons without facing the full consequences under federal law,” said Rep. Steube. “That ends now. If you go after federal law enforcement, you will be held accountable.”
“Protestors who go out of their way to make law enforcement’s job even harder, and those who put the men and women in uniform’s lives at risk, deserve to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The CLEAR Act solves that. I am proud to stand with my friend Rep. Stuebe in protecting the lives of our federal law enforcement officers.” said Rep. Burchett.
The CLEAR Act amends Section 111 of Title 18 to ensure enhanced penalties of up to 20 years imprisonment apply to individuals who use a vehicle to assault, resist, or interfere with a federal law enforcement officer, or obstruct a federal law enforcement officer operating in a vehicle.
The legislation is supported by Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund. 
“Over the past decade, more than 120 law enforcement officers including 3 federal agents have been killed in the line-of-duty by vehicular assaults and hundreds more seriously injured. Those that seek to kill, maim, or intimidate those that protect and serve our nation and our communities deserve swift and severe justice.” —Jason Johnson, President, Law Enforcement Defense Fund
Background: Across our country, violent riots have increasingly included tactics designed to stop law enforcement from doing their jobs, including surrounding vehicles, blocking access routes, and using vehicles as weapons.
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, tens of thousands of law enforcement officers are assaulted each year. The U.S. Department of Justice has charged hundreds of individuals in recent years for assaulting or impeding federal officers during periods of unrest.
Despite existing federal penalties for assaulting officers, gaps in current law have allowed bad actors to evade consequences when obstructing law enforcement vehicles or using vehicles as weapons. The CLEAR Act closes those loopholes and ensures these actions are met with the full force of federal law.
Read the bill text here.

Speaker Johnson Appoints DeSoto Parish Sheriff Jayson Richardson to the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

WASHINGTON — On Thursday, Speaker Johnson appointed DeSoto Parish Sheriff Jayson Richardson to the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board, which reviews nominations and recommends individuals to receive the Medal of Valor. 

“I am pleased to appoint DeSoto Parish Sheriff Jayson Richardson to the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board,” Speaker Johnson said. “As a dedicated, trusted leader in North Louisiana, Sheriff Richardson is an excellent fit for this role, and I am confident he will be an asset to the Board and its mission of honoring the brave heroes of the public safety community.”

BACKGROUND:

The Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board is an eleven-member board appointed by the President, the Speaker and Minority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Majority and Minority Leaders of the U.S. Senate. The Board, which falls under the Bureau of Justice Assistance within the U.S. Department of Justice, reviews nominations and recommends individuals for recognition of the Medal of Valor issued by the President. For more information on the Board, visit their website: Review Board | Bureau of Justice Assistance.

Sheriff Richardson has served three terms as Sheriff of DeSoto Parish and was elected in 2025 as Vice President of the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association. In 2023, Sheriff Richardson unveiled the “Friends of the Sheriff” program, which alerts first responders if someone inside a vehicle or home has special needs. This initiative has since launched statewide. Sheriff Richardson is also a founding board member of Faith and Fostering, a faith-based organization in Northwest Louisiana aiding homeless young adults in housing and employment opportunities. He now serves as Vice President of the board.

Sheriff Richardson’s appointment to the Board has been entered into the Congressional Record of the United States House of Representatives. Click here to view his appointment. 

###

Rep. Garamendi Statement on Jones Act Waiver

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman John Garamendi – Representing California’s 3rd Congressional District

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman John Garamendi (CA-08) issued the following statement in response to the Trump administration announcing they are granting a Jones Act waiver in a misguided attempt to address the high cost of gasoline amidst Trump’s war in Iran: 

“Let’s be clear: gas prices are sky high because the cost of oil is sky high. The cost has little to nothing to do with domestic shipping costs and has everything to do with Trump’s war of choice in Iran. 

“Today’s announcement of a Jones Act waiver is the opposite of Trump’s “America First” message and his stated policy goals. Trump is selling out American mariners in a desperate ploy to solve a problem he created. Increasing our reliance on foreign vessels will only damage our maritime industrial base and weaken our national defense. 

“This comes just a month after the President publicly committed in his Maritime Action Plan (MAP) to invest in American ships, shipyards, and maritime workers. A Jones Act waiver will create an unequal playing field putting international ships above American vessels. Where American ships must abide by international labor and safety standards, foreign vessels do not. 

“The president is right, we need to lower energy costs for Americans, however, the only way to do that is to end his war with Iran.”

Ranking Member Lofgren Raises Alarm Over Terms of Commerce Department Equity Stake in USA Rare Earth, Condemns Lutnick Conflict of Interest

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose)

WASHINGTON, D.C.– Yesterday, Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) sent a letter to Department of Commerce (DOC) Secretary Howard Lutnick condemning the Department’s proposed equity stake deal with USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR). The terms of the agreement raise serious concerns about the influence DOC will wield over USAR under the deal. These concerns are amplified by the involvement of Cantor Fitzgerald, a financial services firm controlled by Secretary Lutnick’s sons, in a parallel transaction that saw USAR raise private capital at the behest of DOC as a condition of the government’s investment.  

“While DOC has revealed few details about the agreement, what has been publicly disclosed – primarily by the company – is highly concerning and raises alarm bells,” Ranking Member Lofgren wrote in the letter. “The negotiated terms of the deal include conditions that are deeply strange in the context of a government equity stake. Most notably, in its risk factor disclosures to the Securities and Exchange Commission, USAR disclosed that DOC will keep its full equity stake in the company even if the government subsequently backs out of the deal and withdraws its entire investment. Simultaneously, the company disclosed that one of DOC’s conditions to finalize the agreement was the execution of a private placement to raise private capital, which the company separately revealed would be led by Cantor Fitzgerald, the financial services firm formerly controlled by you and now controlled by your sons.”

“Secretary Lutnick, this USAR agreement creates conflicts of interest, blurs the line between your official responsibilities and your family interests, and appears to grant the federal government an extraordinary and even bizarre degree of leverage with which it can wield influence over a private company,” Ranking Member Lofgren continued. “How can such a lopsided power imbalance between government and private sector possibly be justified, wherein a company lies at the mercy of the Secretary of Commerce while simultaneously doing business with his sons? It cannot. DOC must explain itself immediately, and it must not finalize its investment in USA Rare Earth until it does.”

Read the letter here

###

WATCH: Díaz-Balart Delivers Opening Remarks at NSRP Subcommittee Field Hearing on Accountability and Reform at the United Nations

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart (25th District of FLORIDA)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House Appropriations Committee Vice Chair and Chairman of the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Subcommittee (NSRP), Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart, delivered the following opening remarks during the NSRP subcommittee field hearing on accountability and reform at the United Nations headquarters in New York City.

The proceeding, which includes bipartisan appropriations participation and Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations Michael Waltz, will examine the implementation of the FY26 NSRP bill directives aimed at advancing lasting structural reforms and strengthening oversight and effectiveness of the UN system.

The full event is available and livestreamed on the House Appropriations Committee’s YouTube channel.

Chairman Díaz-Balart’s opening remarks as prepared here and below:

“Good morning Ambassador Waltz, Members of the Subcommittee, and others who have joined us today for this critically important field hearing on accountability and reform at the United Nations. We are convened at the United States Mission to the United Nations, overlooking New York City and the UN Headquarters— a fitting vantage point to note that oversight of American tax dollars is non-negotiable.

“Over the last three fiscal years, this Subcommittee has reduced total spending under its purview by 22 percent. This includes the largest cut in the recently enacted FY 2026 NSRP Appropriations Act, which slashed 16 percent by getting rid of inefficient and ineffective programs and refocusing funding on programs that are in the direct national security interest of the United States. Funding for the United Nations was not exempt from this review, which resulted in double digit cuts and stronger requirements that demand accountability and reform on behalf of the American taxpayer.

The hearing today is an opportunity to discuss these measures that go hand in hand with the great work Ambassador Waltz and his team have just begun to undertake with notable results. That’s what this Subcommittee, and taxpayers, will continue to demand. Results.

 “As President Trump said, the United Nations has great potential. But the President also noted the UN has not come remotely close to living up to that potential. Anyone who has followed this Subcommittee in recent years knows I could not agree more. Too often, the UN is directly at odds with America’s interests and makes a mockery of the very things it claims to support. From the Human Rights Council with many of the world’s worst offenders, to the World Health Organization’s pandering to communist China during COVID-19 while shutting out Taiwan, to Iran winning a seat on the Commission on the Status of Women while its regime brutalized women in the streets.

“Luckily President Trump and Secretary Rubio are ushering in a new era of international accountability. One that demonstrates the glaring inadequacies of the UN.

“The central problem is not the Member States but the UN structure itself. It is embedded in the UN bureaucracy, its reporting practices, its discretionary funding pipelines, and its weak culture of oversight. For too long, Administrations have relied on UN self-reporting, vague assurances, and funding without sufficient conditions. That approach has produced a system increasingly comfortable with its own brokenness.

“Let me be clear. That era is over. As long as I’m Chairman of the Subcommittee that provides the U.S. contributions to the UN, the status quo will no longer be tolerated.

“The American people have every right to expect that institutions funded with their tax dollars will support United States security, respect our allies, and operate with transparency and accountability. Too often, that is not what we see.

“The enacted fiscal year 2026 NSRP law begins to change that.

“This Subcommittee worked hard to secure tools that match the scale of the problem.

  • The law cuts funding to unaccountable UN bodies and other international organizations.
  • It strengthens withholdings until entities meet standards on oversight, eliminating anti-Israel bias and antisemitism, aid-diversion reporting, and terrorism vetting.
  • It shifts key accountability triggers away from UN self-reporting and toward determinations by the Secretary of State.
  • It strengthens Inspectors General and GAO oversight access.
  • It bars funding for UNRWA and the Commission of Inquiry against Israel.
  • And it provides additional leverage tied to member-state conduct, including voting patterns at the UN and the treatment of Taiwan.

“In short, Congress has now provided meaningful leverage. And there is no question in my mind that this Administration with this Ambassador before us today will use it to the fullest extent.

“Ambassador, I support an approach that treats United States funding as leverage, not tribute. That means using our contributions, our position, and our voice to press for measurable reform in budget discipline, bureaucracy, political bias, and internal oversight.

“As the landscape of world power is changing under President Trump’s bold leadership, regimes that are hellbent on the destruction of freedom and basic human dignity are on notice. From Tehran to Caracas, Havana, and Moscow, the message is getting through that the old assumptions of impunity no longer hold.

“But sadly, we have not had a UN Secretariat that has been a consistent advocate for freedom and human rights in decades. The current UN leadership, like its predecessors, is not living up to its job description, let alone the promise of the UN Charter to promote peace and security. Its shameful records on Iran and on Gaza make that clear. 

“The UN Charter speaks of peace and security. But institutions do not earn credibility by repeating their mission statements. They earn it through conduct, transparency, neutrality, and demonstrated reform. This is the expectation. It is a huge challenge and will be a difficult undertaking. Luckily, we have one of our nation’s best, brightest, and most tenacious individuals in Ambassador Waltz to get the job done.  

“Ambassador, thank you for your continued service to our country and your willingness to host the Subcommittee here today. I look forward to hearing how you intend to use the leverage this Subcommittee provided as well as other efforts underway to press for accountability and reform and meaningful results at the United Nations.”

###