PLASKETT MEETS WITH GOVERNOR BRYAN, VIRGIN ISLANDS LEGISLATURE ON HUD FUNDING FREEZE

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Stacey E. Plaskett (USVI)

PLASKETT MEETS WITH GOVERNOR BRYAN, VIRGIN ISLANDS LEGISLATURE ON HUD FUNDING FREEZE

U.S. Virgin Islands, July 24, 2026

For Immediate Release                             Contact: Tionee Scotland

July 24, 2026                                                    202-808-6129

PRESS RELEASE

PLASKETT MEETS WITH GOVERNOR BRYAN, VIRGIN ISLANDS LEGISLATURE ON HUD FUNDING FREEZE

U.S. Virgin Islands — Congresswoman Stacey E. Plaskett (D-VI) today is meeting with Governor Albert Bryan Jr. and members of the Virgin Islands Legislature regarding the notice from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the freeze of federal funding to the territory. The Congresswoman sent letters to HUD and the Governor’s office regarding the matter this week.

“This morning I will be meeting with Governor Bryan and members of the Virgin Islands Legislature regarding the notice from HUD on the freeze of funding,” said Congresswoman Plaskett. “I’ve shared with the Governor conversations I have had with Republican leadership in Congress regarding this issue that stand ready to support our efforts to create a plan acceptable to HUD.”

“Our office has been in contact with Congressional leadership, and I stand ready to work with the Governor in any way to ensure that we have a plan that creates the accountability and mechanism that will put our federal resources to work for the people,” Plaskett concluded.

###

DelBene on Trump’s Latest Tariff Gambit: Grasping at Straws, Hurting Families

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (1st District of Washington)

Today, Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (WA-01) released the following statement on President Trump’s latest round of tariffs.

“These tariffs are not legitimate or thoughtful trade policy. Yet again, President Trump is going around Congress and raising prices on families and businesses.

“The outcome of these sham investigations was determined before they were ever announced. The White House is grasping at straws to try to find a legal rationale to keep these sweeping tariffs in place. And as usual, Congressional Republicans will find no courage to stand up to the president while their constituents back home suffer the consequences.

“Forced labor is a serious human rights violation that demands real, targeted enforcement. It should never be cheapened into a political excuse for this president’s misguided and damaging trade agenda.

“American families and businesses deserve a predictable, realistic economic plan that lowers costs, not an unchecked president looking for excuses to act like a king.”

Nadler Statement On The Latest Developments In The Trump Takeover Of Penn Station

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jerrold Nadler (10th District of New York)

Washington, D.C. – Today, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (NY-12) released the following statement regarding Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy’s letter to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works regarding an extension of the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act:

“Since the Trump administration began its hostile takeover of the Penn Station renovation project in April 2025, I and other New York elected officials, community advocates, and local residents have called on the Trump administration to provide transparency about the process and funding. The administration has dodged oversight at every turn–refusing to issue a single public correspondence or congressional briefing on the issue. As the Congressman representing Penn Station, I have repeatedly warned that the Trump administration is weaponizing the Surface Transportation Reauthorization to strip local authorities of control over Penn Station at New Yorkers’ expense. Now, after months of misleading the public, Sean Duffy is laying out the Trump administration’s priorities.

“Sean Duffy requested $1 billion in Federal-State Partnership funding for the Intercity Passenger Rail (FSP) Grant Program. This is a woefully insufficient answer to the question the Trump administration has been dodging for months–how will the $8 billion Penn Station renovation be funded and who will pay the bill?

“During the Surface Transportation Reauthorization markup in May, U.S. Representatives Addison McDowell (SC-06) and Seth Moulton (MA-06), neither of whom represent Penn Station or New York City, introduced an amendment as a tool for the Trump administration to steal control and tax revenue of Penn Station from local New York authorities via the McDowell-Moulton Amendment. The amendment that Duffy is championing would hand Amtrak sweeping authority over development around intercity rail stations–allowing Amtrak, a federally controlled entity, to own, lease, and enter into private development agreements, and avoid state and local taxes, building codes, and zoning requirements around Penn Station. This would empower Trump to permanently reshape land use around Penn Station and allow multi-billion-dollar companies to avoid paying full taxes–taxes which would fund local schools, public safety, housing, and basic services. The Trump administration cannot be trusted with this unprecedented level of control over Penn Station, and corporations should not be allowed to skirt public obligations that local communities rely upon.

“After Steven Roth, CEO of Vornado, and James Dolan, billionaire owner of Madison Square Garden, met with Donald Trump at the White House and Roth was announced as a member of Penn Transformation Partners, I raised concerns that there was improper coordination of this project’s bid. Beyond that, it appears the corporations that received the bid, the Trump administration, and members of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee colluded to use the Surface Transportation Reauthorization process to enrich Donald Trump’s billionaire allies at the expense of everyday New Yorkers. Secretary Duffy’s letter confirms that all of these individuals were working towards the same goal: to block local input and ensure that New Yorkers are stuck with the bill for this project.

“This will be one of the most expensive projects in the country, yet the administration has nodded to their intention to rename Penn Station after Donald Trump and has not disclosed how it will be funded or who will pay the bill. New York taxpayers and transit riders must not be forced to pay for a Trump vanity project.”

###

JOINT STATEMENT FROM TRI-CAUCUS, DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP ON MACE RESOLUTION

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (8th District of New York)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Chairs of the Congressional Tri-Caucus—Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) Chair Rep. Yvette Clarke (NY-09), Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) Chair Rep. Grace Meng (NY-06) and Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) Chair Rep. Adriano Espaillat (NY-13)—along with House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Whip Katherine Clark and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar released the following joint statement on Rep. Nancy Mace’s resolution that would effectively abolish the Congressional Tri-Caucus, among other groups:

“Nancy Mace rose to infamy for her cheap political stunts, and this is just the latest distraction from her failed primary and complete inability to deliver for her constituents. Members of Congress have every right to organize around shared policy priorities and the constituencies they serve. There are dozens of bipartisan congressional caucuses dedicated to ethnic communities, geographic regions, industries, veterans, faith traditions and countless other interests. Singling out the Congressional Tri-Caucus—which represents nearly half of all Americans—is racist and a shameless attempt to silence the voices of minorities.

“The Tri-Caucus does not need a lecture about what constitutes federally sanctioned segregation—least of all from a member who has repeatedly made racist and bigoted comments about minority communities over the course of her tenure in Congress.

“The Congressional Tri-Caucus was formed to address the needs and concerns of Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander American communities that are too often ignored in the halls of power. These caucuses existed long before Nancy Mace arrived in Congress, and will remain long after she fades into irrelevancy.”

###

Krishnamoorthi, Warren, Khanna Press Barclays Over Former CEO Jes Staley's Ties to Jeffrey Epstein

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (8th District of Illinois)

WASHINGTON — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), a member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Ranking Member of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, and Congressman Ro Khanna (D-CA), a member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, today sent a letter to Barclays Group Chairman Nigel Higgins seeking answers about Barclays’ handling of former CEO Jes Staley’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the bank’s response after evidence emerged that Staley had misrepresented the nature of that relationship to regulators.

“As has now been extensively reported, however, Staley and Epstein maintained a close professional and personal relationship for nearly two decades, including during his tenure at Barclays. It is deeply unclear how Barclays, in supposedly investigating Staley’s connection to Epstein, failed to uncover this decades-long relationship.”

In October 2019, Barclays informed U.K. financial regulators that Staley had confirmed he “did not have a close relationship” with Epstein. As the lawmakers note, subsequent reporting has shown that Staley and Epstein maintained a close professional and personal relationship spanning nearly two decades, including during Staley’s tenure at Barclays. The letter also details that Staley defended Epstein while serving as a senior executive at JPMorgan, remained in close contact with him after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a child, exchanged more than 1,200 messages with him, visited Epstein’s private island, maintained contact after becoming Barclays’ CEO, and that Epstein reportedly sought to help Staley secure the bank’s top job.

“Barclays’ apparent failure to meaningfully investigate or address Staley’s relationship with Epstein raises significant governance questions regarding the bank’s ability to hold senior executives accountable for wrongdoing.”

Barclays maintains extensive U.S. banking operations, making the firm’s corporate governance and oversight of senior executives matters of significant interest to U.S. regulators and Congress.

The lawmakers are seeking information about Barclays’ due diligence before hiring Staley, its internal investigation into his ties to Epstein, its communications with regulators, the circumstances surrounding Staley’s resignation and compensation, and any contacts with U.S. banking regulators following the release of additional Epstein-related documents. The lawmakers requested responses by August 5, 2026.

The full letter is available here.

Jayapal, Markey Introduce Updated Legislation to Set Strong Guardrails for Private Equity in Healthcare

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (7th District of Washington)

Washington (July 23, 2026) – Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (WA-07) and Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) today reintroduced the Health Over Wealth Act, legislation that would require greater transparency into private equity firms and for-profit companies that own healthcare entities, including hospitals, nursing homes, and mental or behavioral health facilities. The legislation would put safeguards in place to protect workers, patients, and healthcare quality, access, and safety; create stronger accountability measures for corporate greed; and close tax loopholes that benefit real estate investment trusts making money off of healthcare property.

The bill includes a new provision subjecting private equity companies that own suppliers of medical equipment, such as wheelchairs and hospital beds, to transparency requirements. Private equity-owned wheelchair companies are causing dangerously long waits for wheelchair repairs for Massachusetts residents.

“For decades, private equity firms have been aggressively acquiring health care entities. That’s all-around bad news for patients as consolidation in the healthcare industry leads to worse health outcomes, less transparency, and sky-high bills. We have a responsibility to protect patients from greedy corporations that are prioritizing their bottom line over patient care. I’m proud to be leading the Health Over Wealth Act with Senator Markey to crack down on private equity ownership in healthcare, increase transparency, close loopholes, and ensure that we are putting patients over corporate profits,” said Congresswoman Jayapal.

“Corporate greed is running rampant in every industry, but it is especially dangerous in healthcare,” said Senator Markey. “When private equity firms put profit over patients, our loved ones are harmed, health workers suffer, and communities are left to clean up the mess. The Steward Health Care crisis in Massachusetts was just one symptom of a larger infection in our healthcare system that allows corporate wealth to come before the public’s health. We need guardrails against reckless corporate greed—and that is exactly what the Health Over Wealth Act provides. I am thankful to my partners, including Congresswoman Jayapal and my Senate colleagues, for their leadership in putting people before profit.”

The Health Over Wealth Act is cosponsored by Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Tina Smith (D-Minn.), and Representatives Chris Deluzio (PA-17), and Yvette Clarke (NY-09).

Specifically, the Health Over Wealth Act would:

  • Require that private equity-owned healthcare entities—including suppliers of durable medical equipment—publicly report on their debt and executive pay, lobbying and political spending, health care costs for patients and insurance plans, and any reductions in services, wages, or benefits
  • Require that private equity-owned firms set up escrow accounts to cover five years of expenses to ensure continuation of care in the event of a hospital closure or service reduction
  • Authorize the Department of Health and Human Services to revoke investment licenses from private equity firms that price gouge, understaff, or create barriers to care
  • Establish a task force to review the role of private equity and consolidation in healthcare, including how market trends create or exacerbate healthcare disparities
  • Prohibit private equity firms from stripping assets from healthcare entities or undermining quality, safety, or access to healthcare
  • Close tax loopholes for real estate investors to disincentivize healthcare entities from selling their property and then paying exorbitant rents to these investors

The legislation is endorsed by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), AFT: Education, Healthcare, Public Services, Americans for Financial Reform, National Nurses United (NNU), Moral Injury of Healthcare, Private Equity Stakeholder Project, Public Citizen, and United Steelworkers (USW).

Issues:

U.S. Rep. Dina Titus asks Governor Joe Lombardo for Moratorium on Tax Abatements for Data Centers on Federal Land

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Dina Titus (1st District of Nevada)

Congresswoman Dina Titus sent a letter to Governor Joe Lombardo today asking him to halt state tax abatements for data center projects on federal land until the 2027 Nevada Legislature has had an opportunity to review the issue. 

Congresswoman Titus cited the proposed data center on federal land adjacent to Boulder City and concerns raised by residents about its effects on the region’s water supply and other environmental issues when the project was first proposed on city land. The developers of the project then moved it to nearby Bureau of Land Management land where they previously had proposed a solar farm. 

“I am concerned that BLM approved Townsite Solar 2, LLC’s application to amend its ROW grant, without community input or adequate environmental analysis,” Congresswoman Titus said in the letter. “This is despite the fact that when the data center was proposed on an adjacent parcel owned by Boulder City, residents raised significant concerns about the potential impact of the project on our already dwindling water resources, extreme heat, and grid resilience, among other environmental concerns.”

Congresswoman Titus’s letter states: 

Given the community concern and issues raised in this letter, I respectfully request answers to the following questions by August 10, 2026:

  1. Have you or anyone in your Administration had conversations with Townsite Solar 2, LLC about their proposed project in Boulder City qualifying for the State data center tax abatement?
  2. Since the ROW grant has been revised to allow the construction of a data center, is it your position that Townsite Solar, LLC is still eligible for the State renewable tax abatements that your Administration previously approved?
  3. As Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development (GOED), will you commit to refraining from approving data center tax rebates for projects on BLM land until the State Legislature reconvenes and has an opportunity to reconsider this issue, given the community concern around the Boulder City project and the precedent this would set for other public lands?
     
  4. Do you agree that the regulatory approval process for any proposed projects to build data centers on public lands will be transparent and subject to robust public input?

Smith Leads Effort to Address Brazil’s Discriminatory Digital Regulations

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Adrian Smith (R-NE)

Today, Congressman Adrian Smith (R-NE-03), chair of the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade, led a letter with Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH-04) and 18 of their Republican colleagues urging the Trump Administration to address Brazil’s discriminatory actions against American companies.  
 
In their letter to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, lawmakers raised concerns about Brazil’s legislative framework, which would create special designations for digital companies based on thresholds that unfairly target American firms.  
 
The lawmakers emphasized that the proposal could allow regulators to force changes to business models, require companies to forgo revenue, mandate access to proprietary technology, and compel platforms to open their services to third parties—potentially undermining innovation and American competitiveness abroad. 
 
The lawmakers write:In light of these priorities, we are concerned with Brazil’s proposed Fair Competition Act for Digital Markets (Bill No. 4675/2025), which would intentionally replicate the provisions of the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) by targeting successful U.S. digital companies with an onerous new regulatory regime. If passed, this law would empower foreign bureaucrats to dictate changes to the business model of our leading companies, and potentially force them to relinquish valuable intellectual property, resulting in billions in costs and undermining America’s global technological leadership by limiting the ability of U.S. innovators to invest and compete.” 

In addition to Smith and Jordan, the letter was signed by U.S. Representatives Aaron Bean (R-FL-04), Claudia Tenney (R-NY-24), Randy Feenstra (R-IA-04), Vern Buchanan (R-FL-16), Beth Van Duyne (R-TX-24), Michelle Fischbach (R-MN-07), Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI-05), David Schweikert (R-AZ-01), Nathaniel Moran (R-TX-01), Darin LaHood (R-IL-18), Gregory Steube (R-FL-17), Kevin Hern (R-OK-01), Ron Estes (R-KS-04), Rudy Yakym (R-IL-02), Gregory Murphy (R-NC-03), and Lloyd Smucker (R-PA-11). 
 
Read the full letter here or below:  
 
Dear Ambassador Greer: 
 

Thank you for your continued commitment to advancing American technological leadership and defending innovative U.S. firms from discriminatory foreign acts, policies, and practices. This administration’s policies, including the 2025 Memorandum on Defending American Companies and Innovators From Overseas Extortion and Unfair Fines and Penalties, make clear that the United States will stand behind its innovators and ensure they can compete on a level playing field abroad. 
 

In light of these priorities, we are concerned with Brazil’s proposed Fair Competition Act for Digital Markets (Bill No. 4675/2025), which would intentionally replicate the provisions of the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) by targeting successful U.S. digital companies with an onerous new regulatory regime. If passed, this law would empower foreign bureaucrats to dictate changes to the business model of our leading companies, and potentially force them to relinquish valuable intellectual property, resulting in billions in costs and undermining America’s global technological leadership by limiting the ability of U.S. innovators to invest and compete. 
 

USTR’s recently finalized Section 301 investigation into Brazil’s unfair trading practices highlighted several current policies in Brazil that undermine the competitiveness of U.S. companies engaged in digital trade, including fines and suspension orders on digital platforms and unfair market advantages granted to state-owned providers of digital payment services. It is particularly concerning that, at precisely the moment when actions related to this investigation are being finalized, Brazil is looking to expand its discriminatory policies rather than 

consulting with the United States to resolve concerns. Should this measure advance, it would compound existing barriers to U.S. digital businesses operating in Brazil, and continue a disturbing trend in the proliferation of DMA-like measures that are blatantly discriminatory and in direct conflict with U.S. interests. 
 

While this bill is the latest component of Brazil’s broader strategy of digital trade discrimination, we recognize that these issues are a growing threat around the world. We appreciate your efforts to address these global issues through negotiations of Agreements on Reciprocal Trade, the Joint Review of USMCA, and Section 301 investigations. As you continue this work, we urge you to ensure the Fair Competition Act for Digital Markets is addressed in any trade discussions with Brazil. We stand ready to support your Administration in its continued efforts to ensure fair treatment and open markets for American service providers, innovators, and digital creators. 

Rep. Torres Delivers Win for Inland Empire Manufacturers as Trump Administration Finally Moves to Restore $15.6 Million for a California Manufacturing Extension Partnership Center

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Norma Torres (35th District of California)

July 23, 2026

Torres led letter in June demanding that the Department of Commerce take steps to restore MEP access in California

Washington D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Norma Torres, a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee that oversees federal funding, applauded the Department of Commerce’s decision to begin restoring California’s Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) competition after leading a congressional effort demanding that the Trump Administration provide the state with its fair share of federal manufacturing investments. The released Notice of Funding Opportunity, will provide up to $15.6 million to establish a California MEP Center, giving manufacturers across the Inland Empire and the state access to the technical expertise and resources they need to compete, innovate, and grow. Applications are due August 21, 2026.

The announcement comes just weeks after Rep. Torres led California Appropriators in pressing Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to immediately restore California’s MEP Center, arguing that the nation’s largest manufacturing state should not be left without one after the previous center closed in October 2025. California was one of only two states to not have a MEP center in the country. Manufacturing employment has fallen by 75,000 jobs since President Trump took office. In the letter, the Members emphasized that California is home to more than 35,000 manufacturers that contribute over $391 billion to the U.S. economy and urged the Department to quickly execute a new funding competition, consistent with congressional direction.

“California is the manufacturing powerhouse of America, and our workers and small manufacturers deserve the same federal support as every other state,” said Congresswoman Norma Torres. “When California’s MEP Center was allowed to lapse, I immediately called on the Department of Commerce to restore this critical program because our manufacturers cannot afford to fall behind. Today’s announcement is a victory for California businesses, for the Inland Empire, and for the thousands of workers whose livelihoods depend on a strong manufacturing economy.”

“This is exactly why we fought for California to receive its fair share,” Torres continued. “The Inland Empire is helping build America’s future. Restoring an MEP Center in California will help manufacturers innovate, expand production, strengthen our supply chains, and create more good-paying jobs right here in our communities. I encourage eligible applicants in the Inland Empire to apply.”

CA-35 is one of California’s leading manufacturing hubs, with thousands of businesses producing everything from advanced technologies and aerospace components to food products, logistics equipment, and medical devices. Small and medium-sized manufacturers are the backbone of the region’s economy, creating good-paying jobs and strengthening domestic supply chains.

Applications for the California MEP Center are due on August 21, 2026. If selected, the new center will join the nationwide Manufacturing Extension Partnership Network, providing manufacturers across California with technical assistance, workforce development, and advanced manufacturing expertise.

###

Tonko, Fitzpatrick Introduce Bipartisan Disability Community Act

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Paul Tonko (Capital Region New York)

WASHINGTON, DC — Representatives Paul D. Tonko (NY-20) and Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-1) today introduced the Disability Community Act, legislation that would bolster workers who support individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD). The bipartisan legislation would propose a Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) increase for states over three years to support providers who rely on Medicaid funding and strengthen care for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD).

“Despite delivering compassionate, essential care to those with disabilities, our community-based providers have long been left without proper federal support, forced to shoulder continuously rising costs themselves,” Congressman Tonko said. “Our bipartisan legislation would right this wrong, bolstering these workers by covering costs and wages so that Medicaid-funded providers are able to deliver the best possible care. I urge my colleagues to join us in advancing this bill that will ensure our disability community and those who care for them receive the vital support they need.”

“Community-based care gives individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities the freedom to live more independently, remain connected to their communities, and pursue greater opportunity — and protecting that care must be a governing priority, not an afterthought,” Congressman Fitzpatrick said. “I have consistently worked with families, providers, and direct-support professionals to strengthen the system they rely on. The bipartisan Disability Community Act brings balance and accountability to that effort — supporting workers, equipping providers to meet new federal requirements, and ensuring that progress does not come at the expense of the individuals and families they serve.”

“ANCOR is immensely thankful to Representatives Tonko and Fitzpatrick for their continued leadership in supporting people with disabilities and community-based providers by reintroducing the Disability Community Act,” said Barbara Merrill, CEO of the American Network of Community Options and Resources (ANCOR). “Providers shouldn’t have to go it alone, and this bill will give states a way to ensure they don’t have to. We’re proud to support the Disability Community Act to make sure providers have the resources they need to deliver the quality services people deserve.”

The Disability Community Act amends Title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act to temporarily establish a higher federal matching rate with respect to Medicaid expenditures for certain services furnished to individuals with developmental disabilities if such expenditures are attributable to compliance with specified regulations.

Full bill text for the legislation can be found HERE.

###