Congressman Aderholt Announces DeKalb, Fayette, and Lamar Counties Remote Office Hours

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Robert Aderholt (AL-04)

Congressman Robert Aderholt (AL-04) announced that his office will host remote office hours in DeKalb, Fayette, and Lamar Counties in April. The events will be led by Constituent Services Representatives and are open to all residents needing assistance with federal agencies or services.

Remote office hours provide constituents with a convenient opportunity to meet one-on-one with a representative from Congressman Aderholt’s office to discuss issues such as Social Security, veterans’ benefits, passports, immigration, and other federal matters. Please note, the Congressman cannot help with state government issues.

Event Details:

Fayette County Remote Office Hours
Date: April 1, 2026
Location: Fayette County Courthouse
113 Temple Ave. N
Fayette, AL 35555

Lamar County Remote Office Hours
Date: April 2, 2026
Location: Vernon City Hall
44425 AL-17
Vernon, AL 35592

DeKalb County Remote Office Hours
Date: April 6, 2026
Time: 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Location: Fort Payne City Hall
100 Alabama Ave. NW
Fort Payne, AL 35967

Appointments are encouraged to ensure timely assistance. To schedule a meeting, constituents should call 256-546-0201 (DeKalb) or 202-221-2310 (Fayette and Lamar).

Congressman Aderholt remains committed to making constituent services accessible across Alabama’s Fourth District and encourages residents to take advantage of these remote office hours.

VIDEO: Pressley Demands Consumer Protections in Digital Finance, Condemns Trump Profiteering

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)

“As we innovate, we should not exploit and leave communities behind, and we should not let Trump continue to make money and put our economy at risk by changing or not enforcing the laws created to protect consumers.”

WASHINGTON – Yesterday, in a Financial Services Committee hearing on tokens and digital assets, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07) discussed the need for strong digital finance regulations that protect consumers, not harm them or allow the wealthy and well-connected like Donald Trump to enrich themselves at the expense of everyday working people.

A transcript of the Congresswoman’s exchange with witnesses today is available below, and the video is available here.

Transcript: Pressley Demands Consumer Protections in Digital Finance, Condemns Trump Profiteering

House Financial Services Committee

March 25, 2026

REP. PRESSLEY: We’re talking today about tokens and digital assets and I just want to, for those watching at home, just really center the American public and my constituents of the Massachusetts 7th. 

It seems everything and everyone is being attacked, except for affordability, and people are really struggling. 

They are struggling to pay for their rent, groceries, gas and medical bills. They are exhausted by the constant chaos coming out of this White House and Donald Trump and his co-conspirators are making millions at the expense of everyday working people. 

Trump and Republicans in Congress are continuing to try and weaken the SEC and make it harder for them to protect investors and consumers. 

Mr. Banaei, you worked at the SEC and CFTC, and now you work in digital finance. Previously, you mentioned that you think regulators could have played more of a role in shaping these emerging technologies years ago. Can you just expound and elaborate on how the SEC, the Securities and Exchange Commission, could have exercised oversight of these technologies and protect consumers?

MR. BANAEI: The same decisions that the current SEC is thinking about, you know, could have also been, those authorities could have been exercised under the last administration. A different strategy was undertaken, and we could talk about it sometime. But I think the hardest thing for the SEC to do right now is, for example, looking at the whole myriad rules under reg NMS, including the order protection rule, which was mentioned earlier, and conducting industry outreach and roundtables in order to try to understand how we can bridge the gap between, for example, the public price feed, the securities information processor, the SIP, and on chain-based trading, for example, integrating data both on chain and off chain through connectivity between the SIP and US regulated liquidity pools. These are all issues that can be surmounted, but it requires extensive fact finding, and I would encourage this SEC to engage in that fact finding alongside the other efforts it’s doing. Otherwise it’s going to lead to the same lack of progress. Thank you.

REP. PRESSLEY: Thank you, Mr. Banaei. Mr. Zecca, I’m interested in NASDAQ’s approach to tokenization as a way that empowers shareholders to hold companies accountable. Are you working with consumer groups and advocacy organizations or other stakeholders on that goal, and how can interested parties like myself be involved?

MR. ZECCA: Well, thank you for the question. You know we’re not directly in touch because we’re sort of with the exchange. We’re not with the end customer. I do know that there are intermediaries who do speak to various groups, and we’re happy to demo our technology for anyone.

REP. PRESSLEY: Okay, alright. Well, I’m gonna take you up on that. Mr. Zecca, on the record, would you commit to working with my office as we move forward in that process? 

And I just really do believe, as we innovate, that we have to have advocates and impacted consumers. They should be at the table. Okay, will you commit to that? 

MR. ZECCA: Yes, happy, to work with you. 

REP. PRESSLEY: Okay, excellent. All right, Mr. Bentsen, as a former member of Congress, I know you understand the importance of the public trust. Do you agree that there should be laws around digital assets so members of Congress or the president, for example, cannot unjustly enrich themselves or abuse their position. My time is short, yes or no?

MR. BENTSEN: Yes, we’re on record saying Congress should write rules around digital assets that are not securities.

REP. PRESSLEY: Okay, alright. For the record, I’m certainly not against innovation. I have introduced legislation to advance financial technology in a way to protect consumers, not harm them, evade the law, or enrich the pockets of the already wealthy and well-connected.

As we innovate, we should not exploit and leave communities behind, and we should not let Trump continue to make money and put our economy at risk by changing or not enforcing the laws created to protect consumers. 

Thank you and I yield back.

Lofgren Introduces Bipartisan Bill to End Corporate Gaming of America's Bankruptcy System

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Ben Cline (R-VA) introduced the Bankruptcy Venue Reform Act, bipartisan legislation which requires that Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings take place where the principal place of business or principal assets of the corporation are located.

“Corporations currently have the ability to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and then potentially choose courts that have issued lenient rulings to hear their cases,” said Rep. Lofgren (CA-18). “Bankruptcies should be adjudicated locally in a court familiar with all the affected stakeholders, not in some court all the way across the country. Our bipartisan Bankruptcy Venue Reform Act is commonsense legislation that will prevent corporations from venue shopping and tipping the scales of justice.”

“Large corporations should not be able to manipulate the bankruptcy system to their advantage while workers, small businesses, and local communities are left behind. Venue shopping erodes trust in the process and shuts out the very people most affected by these decisions. Requiring Chapter 11 cases to be filed where a company is primarily located is a commonsense step to ensure greater transparency, fairness, and accountability for everyone involved,” said Rep. Cline (VA-06).

The text of the Bankruptcy Venue Reform Act can be found here.

The bill has the support of the Commercial Law League of America, the Boston Bar Association, the Maryland-D.C. Creditors Bar Association, the Business Law Section of the Florida State Bar, and the Business Law Section of the California Lawyers Association.

“California is home to more large companies than virtually any other state, yet current bankruptcy venue rules allow those companies to drag their employees, vendors, and small creditors into courtrooms in Delaware or New York,” said Christopher Hughes and Soyeun Choi, Co-Chairs of the Business Law Section of the California Lawyers Association. “California businesses and the workers and communities that depend on them have paid a real price under bankruptcy venue rules that prioritize the preferences of corporate debtors and their counsel over the needs of local stakeholders.  The CLA Business Law Section strongly supports this reform, which would restore meaningful access to justice for the stakeholders who need it most.”

###

Ranking Member Lofgren's Opening Statement at Deep-Sea Mining Hearing

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose)

Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren’s (D-CA) opening statement as prepared for the record is below:

Thank you, Chairman Franklin and Ranking Member Amo for convening this timely discussion on deep-sea mining research and technology. And thank you to our distinguished witnesses for appearing before the Committee today. 

While we live on a blue planet, we have barely scratched the surface of understanding of our oceans. As of last summer, only about 27% of the global seafloor has been mapped according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. And as little as 1% of the seafloor has been explored. We can’t pretend to understand what we have barely begun to even explore.

Furthering our knowledge of the deep ocean is important for national security, natural resource management, economic health, and cultural identity. With the nation’s expansive ocean jurisdiction, we have the responsibility to be a leader in ocean exploration.

While U.S. researchers provide highly impactful peer-reviewed ocean science research with significant influence, unfortunately, the U.S. has already lost the lead in published ocean research output.

Just this week, Reuters reported that the Chinese Government supports more than 40 research vessels that are a part of a broader ocean mapping and monitoring operation conducting climate and maritime research. In comparison, NOAA has 15 research vessels with only one being able to conduct deep-sea research. This imbalance has concerning implications for U.S. national security. The civilian ocean and climate research that the Chinese Government is heavily investing in, according to Reuters and other naval experts, is invaluable for sub-sea military operations and capabilities. 

If we fail to invest in marine and climate research, we risk ceding both scientific leadership and strategic advantage on multiple fronts. I believe that my colleagues on both sides of the aisle can agree that strengthening American research and technological capabilities in ocean exploration is necessary.

The specific topic at hand in this hearing is deep-sea mining. And the fact is that right now, we simply do not have the scientific baseline necessary to support commercial deep-sea mining.

Most exploration contracts to date have focused on the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, widely considered the best-studied deep-sea mining region in the world. Yet scientists still lack the data needed to address the scientific uncertainties surrounding deep-sea activities even in this relatively well-studied zone.

The situation is even more concerning in U.S. waters. In areas under consideration for potential leasing, such as offshore American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and multiple areas in the Alaskan outer continental shelf, there is almost no baseline environmental data available. In some cases, only a handful of deep-sea dives have ever been conducted, and none within proposed lease areas. Reviews of publicly available data show major gaps across nearly every category: biological, chemical, physical, ecological, and even basic seafloor mapping.

This illustrates the great deal of scientific uncertainty that remains. We cannot act responsibly without addressing the unresolved scientific questions surrounding deep-sea mining activity, including potential impacts beyond extraction sites. 

From the limited research published on this topic, most studies conducted in prospective mining regions have been funded directly by mining companies. While industry investment in this research is valuable, federal funding is necessary to support independent studies without apparent conflicts of interest.

This is precisely why I have serious reservations about proposals from this Administration to move forward with commercial-scale deep-sea mining. 

If we are committed to the responsible development of deep-sea resources, then we must first commit to the science.

That means investing in long-term, independent research to establish robust environmental baselines, understand ecosystem dynamics, and develop the tools needed to monitor and manage impacts effectively.

I look forward to our discussion and to gaining a clearer understanding of what Congress can do to reinstate American leadership in ocean exploration.

Thank you, and I yield back. 

Beyer, Lawler, Jacobs Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Promote AI Foundation Model Transparency

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Don Beyer (D-VA)

U.S. Representatives Don Beyer (D-VA), Mike Lawler (R-NY), and Sara Jacobs (D-CA) today introduced the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act, landmark bipartisan legislation to establish transparency requirements for how artificial intelligence (AI) foundation models are built, trained, and deployed. 

Foundation models are trained on vast and diverse datasets and power many of our generative AI tools, including chatbots like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Despite the growing influence of these tools, information about what data these models are trained on or how these models have been trained and tested is generally not available to the public. These models can produce inaccurate, imprecise, or biased responses due to limitations/biases in the model’s training data or how the model was trained. This can have adverse real-world impacts when models are used in high-impact areas including health-related AI inferences, loan granting, federal grant approval, housing approval, or law enforcement. 

The AI Foundation Model Transparency Act would direct the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) — in consultation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Secretary of Commerce, and the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) — to set standards for what information high-impact foundation models must provide to the FTC and what information they must make available to the public. Information identified for increased transparency would include a sufficiently detailed summary of training data used, how the model is trained, and whether user data is collected during use. 

The information provided in this bill would both be useful for consumer protection, and for artists and creators who otherwise have very limited insight into training data — addressing widespread concerns about AI from businesses and individuals alike.

“Artificial intelligence foundation models commonly described as a ‘black box’ do not inherently give consumers the tools to understand why a model gives a particular response. Giving users more information about the model—how it was built and what background information it bases its results on—would greatly increase transparency,” said Rep. Don Beyer. “This bill would help users determine if they should trust the model they are using for certain applications, and help identify limitations on data, potential biases, or misleading results. When a model’s bias could lead to harmful results like rejections for housing or loan applications, or faulty medical decisions, the importance of this reform becomes clear and very significant.”

“This is about accountability and getting ahead of a rapidly evolving technology before it outpaces common-sense guardrails,” said Rep. Mike Lawler. “As the general public interacts with AI every day, whether they realize it or not, Americans deserve to know how these systems are built, what data is being used, and where the risks are. Transparency is the foundation for trust, and if we’re going to lead on innovation here in the United States, we also have to lead on protecting consumers, safeguarding our national security, and making sure this technology is used responsibly.”

“Trust will decide the global AI race – separating the countries and developers that earn it from those that don’t. That’s why I’m proud to co-lead the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act, which will help build trust in AI by requiring clear, upfront information about how foundation models are trained, tested, and operated,” said Rep. Sara Jacobs. “Transparency is the first step toward detecting and addressing potential harms, assigning responsibility, and building confidence in systems that are rapidly shaping our lives as well as our economy and national security.” 

The AI Foundation Model Transparency Act would:

  • Direct the FTC, in consultation with NIST, the Secretary of Commerce, and OSTP, to set transparency requirements for foundation model deployers by asking them to make certain information publicly available to consumers;
  • Direct companies to provide consumers and the FTC with information on the model’s training data sources, model training mechanisms and capabilities, and whether user data is collected in inference; and
  • Protect small deployers and researchers, while seeking responsible transparency practices from our highest-impact foundation models.

The legislation has been endorsed by Americans for Responsible Innovation, SAG-AFTRA, and Mental Health America. 

Text of the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act is available here

Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) serves as co-Chair of the Congressional Artificial Intelligence Caucus. He was one of a handful of members selected to serve on the bipartisan Task Force On Artificial Intelligence, convened by House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Speaker Mike Johnson. He is the author of the GUARDRAILS Act and a lead cosponsor of the CREATE AI Act, the Federal Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Act, and the Artificial Intelligence Environmental Impacts Act.

Beyer previously served for eight years on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and is currently attending George Mason University as a part time student pursuing a master’s degree in machine learning, in part to help inform his work on AI in Congress.

Ranking Member Hoyer: This Ill-Conceived Effort to move the FBI into the Reagan Building is Indicative of the Dysfunction that Exists at GSA

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Steny H Hoyer (MD-05)

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congressman Steny H. Hoyer (MD-05), Ranking Member of the Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) Appropriations Subcommittee, delivered opening remarks at the during the House Committee on Appropriations Oversight Hearing on the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) with Director David Marroni. Below are a video and transcript of his remarks:

Click here to watch a video of his remarks

“Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I want to thank Mr. Marroni for being here and joining us today. We’ve heard much discussion of improving government efficiency and reducing waste this past year. All of us should share that objective. Although I have serious doubts about the Administration’s commitment to those goals, we all ought to agree that those objectives ought to govern how we administer our federal real estate portfolio. We want to make sure we have the right amount of space and the right type of space for our federal employees to do their jobs on behalf of the American people as effectively and as safely as possible. I always say we need to rightsize the government, not increase – decrease, but rightsize for the job that we give them. I recognize that’s no easy task, as I’m sure Director Marroni would agree, but it is also clear that the General Services Administration management of our federal real estate is wanted in some cases. I’d like to quote from [the] Inspector General’s report that was released just this week, and I have that report here and I imagine you brought it with you. I’d like to quote from that: ‘GSA is not consistently addressing deficient security fixtures at the GSA control facility, and as a result, is leaving the public, employees and property at risk from security threats.’ That finding ought to concern every Member of this committee and this House. Much of that report was redacted, but it indicated that – I presume, for security reasons itself – but it is indicated the GSA failure to meet this crucial responsibility was due in part to the immense cost of installing and maintaining security measures. To see the perils of this issue, just look down Pennsylvania Avenue.

“The Trump Administration is trying to move the FBI headquarters from the dilapidated and falling down J. Edgar Hoover building to the Reagan Building just a little way away. Moving the FBI out of one old, exposed, and inadequate building into another old, exposed, and inadequate building is not a solution. When former FBI Director Robert Mueller, who just died, approached me in 2009 about finding a new home for the FBI, he emphasized that the Bureau needed a new, secure, and consolidated facility on a large campus. The Reagan Building fails to meet the FBI security and operational issues. It was not designed as a secure law enforcement facility, rather, emphatically, as an open, accessible office for both public and private tenants. As a matter of fact, I have an article here that reflects that objective. To use the words of Paycom Fred and Partners, the architectural firm that designed the facility, quote, ‘The Reagan Building emphasizes access and permeability. Access and probability are great features of an international trade center, which the Reagan Building was designed to fulfill, but not a law enforcement and intelligence agency.’ An article in Chicago Tribune, published about the building in 1997, noted the very fact. It said, ‘The Reagan Building, quote, will open the standoffish domain of the federal bureaucracy to the city and teach an important lesson to the post Oklahoma City bombing era, when the temptation is to turn all government buildings into impressive fortresses.’ But the FBI headquarters needs to be impregnable.

“Even if the Reagan Building were not located between two major thoroughfares, 14th Street and Pennsylvania, it still would not meet Inter-Agency Security Committee facilities security level standards. The GSA says it will take at least $1.5 billion to retrofit the building. But anyone familiar with the GSA knows that project. These always cost much more, and the Architect of the Capitol said it would be cheaper to build a fourth building for the House than to locate Members while repairs are being made to Rayburn into the Madison Building. This ill-conceived effort to move the FBI into the Reagan Building is indicative of the dysfunction that exists at GSA. Director Marroni, I’m going to be asking you some questions as I told you I would. And I imagine you share some of these concerns which are reflected in this report as issues contributed to the mismanagement of our federal real estate. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have 13 seconds and I’ll yield back.”

Doggett Condemns Trump Lifting Sanctions on Russian Oil Giants Responsible for Child Trafficking

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)

Washington, D.C.—Today, U.S. Representative Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), an active member of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus and Helsinki Commission, denounced the Trump regime’s shocking complicity in the trafficking of Ukrainian children and retaliation against researchers who revealed this latest outrage. A newly released report by the Humanitarian Research Lab at Yale University revealed the direct involvement of Russian oil companies Rosneft and Gazprom in the trafficking of Ukrainian children—two companies that Trump recently lifted sanctions on. According to the report, 2,000 Ukrainian children were taken to Russian reeducation camps owned by Rosneft and Gazprom subsidiaries. In response to the report, the Trump regime withheld Congressionally-approved funding for the Humanitarian Research Lab’s efforts tracking kidnapped children—funds that were secured under the leadership of Rep. Doggett. 

“Trump is helping the kidnappers, not the kidnapped. As he lifts sanctions on companies trafficking Ukrainian children, he retaliates against the people trying to find them,” said Rep. Doggett. “When the State Department learned of Yale’s report, they ceased all contact with the program. Yale was supposed to receive $5 million of the $15 million Congress appropriated for these efforts — money that is now in jeopardy. Meanwhile, Rosneft and Gazprom can bank billions for the Kremlin war machine with no consequence for their role in child trafficking. Yale told the truth about what Trump’s policies mean for trafficked children. Like so many others, it is being punished for it.”

Rep. Doggett continued: “Researchers have done painstaking, courageous work to document these crimes and to keep the world’s attention on the children that Putin has stolen. They deserve a government that support their work instead of sabotaging it. 35,000 children are waiting.”

The Geneva Convention defines the forced transfer of children from an occupied territory to the occupying state as a war crime. By lifting sanctions on these companies and moving to suppress the reports of their crimes, Trump continues to appease the war criminal behind them all – once again putting Putin over American values and interests. 

Watch the Congressman’s remarks here.

###

Pallone Helps Drive Bipartisan BEACH Act Through House to Protect Jersey Shore, Public Health

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Frank Pallone (6th District of New Jersey)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06) helped lead passage of bipartisan legislation to reauthorize and strengthen the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act, which protects beachgoers and coastal economies by ensuring water is safe for swimming and recreation.

The legislation passed the House by a sweeping bipartisan vote of 378–32 and now heads to the Senate. It reauthorizes key EPA water quality programs through 2031, including the BEACH Act, which funds testing and public notification systems for contamination at coastal and Great Lakes beaches.

“New Jersey’s beaches are a cornerstone of our economy and our identity,” said Pallone. “Our bill makes sure residents know when the water is safe and, just as importantly, gives states the tools to go upstream and stop pollution at its source. That’s how you protect public health and keep our shore open for business.”

First enacted in 2000 by Congressman Pallone, the BEACH Act requires the EPA to set national standards for water testing and provide grants for state and local monitoring programs. The updated legislation expands testing to include shallow waters where children and seniors are more likely to swim. The updated law also expands how states can use funding — not just to detect contamination, but to trace it back to its source, helping stop pollution before it reaches the shoreline.

Recent data from Environment America underscores the urgency: in 2025, more than 60 percent of U.S. beaches experienced at least one day of potentially unsafe contamination levels, often driven by sewage overflows and stormwater runoff.

With House passage secured, the bill now moves to the Senate.

###

Scalise: Democrats are Siding with Illegal Immigrants Over the American People

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Steve Scalise (1st District of Louisiana)

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) joined Newsmax’s Wake Up America to discuss TSA agents struggling to make ends meet as Democrats vote to withhold their paychecks and keep the Department of Homeland Security shut down to appease their radical base.

Click here or the image above to view Leader Scalise’s full interview. 
Highlights from Leader Scalise’s interview:On the radical direction of the Democrat party:“You’re seeing Democrats that just want chaos to appease the radical base, the Mamdani wing of their party. That’s who’s driving the Democratic Party today. It’s not your father’s Democrat Party where you can just reason and, you know, Tip O’Neill and Ronald Reagan working things out. They hate Donald Trump and they want chaos. They don’t care if it affects people adversely. You see it. They know that families are waiting 4 hours at airports, missing flights, you know, not being able to make vacations or funerals or weddings. They don’t care. And we’re going to have a vote today on the House floor. You’re going to see the vote. And look, it’s a very straightforward vote. Do you want to fund the Department of Homeland Security, TSA, Coast Guard, all of that, yes or no? It’s two buttons, yes or no. And you’ll see Republicans voting yes. And you’re going to see Democrats voting no to make people go to work. 100,000 of these agents having to go to work without getting paid because Democrats are voting no.”On Democrats voting for chaos and lawlessness:“You know, we’re going to continue to give more opportunities. The vote you’re going to see today is going to be the eighth time that Congress will be voting to fund this department. And eight times Democrats keep voting no. When will they take yes for an answer? I mean, look at all the changes President Trump has made to the Department of Homeland Security. We have a new secretary now, Markwayne Mullin, who’s going to do a great job. He’s over there. Tom Homan’s come in, made major reforms. You know, you’re seeing lots of changes in how enforcement’s working.“But oh, by the way, the murderers are still out there, as we saw in Chicago, another horrible death, young, beautiful girl shot down by an illegal who Joe Biden and Democrats let in. And Democrats are voting to keep those borders open and let more murderers into our country. This is a major fight that America needs to understand. You know, Republicans are fighting for law and order. Democrats want to defund the police. They want lawlessness. They want open borders. And they’re defending the criminals who come here illegally and harm Americans. It’s insane. I can’t explain it. I don’t know if you can. It makes no sense. But these people are crazy, as Donald Trump said at the State of the Union.”On TSA agents struggling to make ends meet because of Democrats’ political games:“[The TSA Deputy Administrator] also testified that TSA agents are sleeping in their cars because they can’t pay rent. So imagine, you know, you talked about all the checks that they’ve missed… they’ve gone 49% of this fiscal year without a paycheck because Democrats cruelly voting to deny them pay while they’re doing this important job to keep our country safe. Whose side are these Democrats on, by the way, when they would rather side with violent criminal illegals over Americans who want to be safe and TSA agents who are just doing a job to let you go to an airport and get on a plane and not have to worry that a terrorist was going to get on that plane with some kind of bomb-making device. I mean, this is a pre-September 11th mentality that Democrats have right now. And it’s the votes, you can see it’s a very transparent vote. You can go look at it. Call my office if you want to see the vote today and get a list of who voted yes and who voted no to keep defunding the police and defunding our TSA agents, who are barely making it. They’ve got rent due, they’ve got to try to eat. I mean, there’s food shelters, setting up food shelters for TSA agents at airports. Democrats should be ashamed of themselves for voting no today.”

Jayapal, Warren, Boyle, 45+ Lawmakers Renew Push for Wealth Tax on Ultra-Millionaires and Billionaires

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (7th District of Washington)

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Representative Brendan F. Boyle (D-Pa.), led over 45 lawmakers in reintroducing the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act, legislation that would apply a wealth tax to fortunes above $50 million. According to a new analysis, the bill would generate $6.2 trillion in revenue over the next decade, more than double the score of the bill when it was first introduced five years ago and enough money to pay for investments like universal child care, free community college, Medicare expansion, and more — without raising taxes on 99.85% of American households.

“As millions of families are struggling under the weight of inflation, tariffs, and rising gas prices, the richest billionaires continue to see their net worth grow. We live in the richest country in the world, but that wealth is incredibly concentrated in a tiny group of people. It’s time to tax the rich and level the playing field to ensure that every American has a chance to succeed,” said Representative Jayapal. “The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act is a major step toward making sure the wealthy finally pay their fair share. With this legislation, we can narrow the racial wealth gap and invest trillions of dollars in health care, schools, clean energy, housing, and more to improve lives in communities across America.”

“While multi-millionaires and billionaires are getting richer and richer, families are getting squeezed by a rigged economy. My bill is about basic fairness and making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share. It’s time for the government to stop listening to the richest of the rich and start working for working people,” said Senator Warren.

“A secretary shouldn’t pay a higher tax rate than the CEO. The current tax code is rigged against working people and the middle class. Our proposal finally changes this and makes billionaires pay their fair share,” said Representative Brendan F. Boyle.

While millions of families are struggling, billionaires have watched their fortunes skyrocket. According to an analysis from economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, the richest 0.1% of Americans hold nearly as much wealth as the bottom 90% of families combined. Instead of tackling this inequality, the Trump administration has turbocharged the crisis, slashing health care coverage for millions of families to deliver over $1 trillion in tax cuts to the top 1%.

The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would level the playing field and narrow the racial wealth gap by asking the wealthiest 260,000 households in America, or the top 0.15%, to pay their fair share. The bill would establish a 2% annual tax on the net worth of households and trusts valued at over $50 million and an additional 1% annual surtax (3% total annual tax) on the net worth of households and trusts above $1 billion. The bill also includes robust anti-evasion and avoidance measures, including $100 million in new funding for the IRS and a 40% “exit tax” on the wealth of ultra-millionaires and billionaires who renounce their citizenship to avoid the tax.

10 Senators co-sponsored the bill, the largest coalition of Senate cosponsors supporting the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act to date: Senators Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).

Additionally, 39 Representatives co-sponsored the bill, the largest coalition of House supporters to date: Representatives Greg Casar (D-Texas), Judy Chu (D-Calif.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Danny K. Davis (D-Ill.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Donald Beyer Jr. (D-Va.), Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Jesús “Chuy” García (D-Ill.), Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Summer Lee (D-Pa.), Robin Kelly (D-Ill.), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), Lateefah Simon (D-Calif.), Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.), Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), Jill Tokuda (D-Hawaii), Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), Valerie Foushee (D-N.C.), Linda Sánchez (D-Calif.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Glenn Ivey (D-Md.), Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.), Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.), Laura Friedman (D-Calif.), Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), Mark Takano (D-Calif.), Jonathan Jackson (D-Ill.), Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.), Nydia Velázquez (D-N.Y.), Adam Smith (D-Wash.), Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.), and Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.).

With the $6.2 trillion in revenue the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would generate, the federal government could make serious investments in lowering costs for families. The revenue could pay for all the following policies combined — with money left to spare:

  • Provide universal, affordable childcare
  • Lower rents by building millions of new homes
  • Slash child poverty by expanding the Child Tax Credit
  • Lower the Medicare eligibility age to 55
  • Offer universal paid family leave
  • Establish tuition-free community college

The bill is endorsed by nearly 40 unions, advocacy groups, and national organizations, including: Service Employees International Union (SEIU), American Federation of Teachers (AFT), American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), UNITE HERE, National Domestic Workers Alliance, Communications Workers of America, National Education Association, United Steelworkers, Americans for Tax Fairness, Public Citizen, Americans for Financial Reform, Main Street Alliance, Patriotic Millionaires, P Street, National Women’s Law Center Action Fund, Groundwork Collaborative, Oxfam America, People’s Action Institute, the Sunrise Movement, MomsRising, Center for Law and Social Policy, Take on Wall Street, Health Care For America Now, Indivisible, Jobs With Justice, NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice, Responsible Wealth, United for a Fair Economy, Liberation in a Generation, Voices for Progress, Coalition for Human Needs, Liberation in a Generation, Climate Hawks Vote, Organized Power in Numbers, Tax the Greedy Billionaires, and Campaign for America’s Future.

“It’s time the super-rich start paying their fair share. By asking the ultra-wealthy to contribute just a small percentage of their extreme fortunes, we can generate trillions in revenue to invest directly in the needs of everyday Americans—lowering costs, expanding opportunity, and strengthening the middle class. The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act will help ensure that prosperity is shared by all who create it, not concentrated in the hands of a few,” said Jody Calemine, AFL-CIO Director of Advocacy.

“Anti-worker extremists in Congress and their billionaire backers are slashing safety net programs and rigging the tax code to make the ultra-wealthy richer as working families are pushed closer to the brink. The working people who keep this country running shouldn’t be the ones carrying a heavier tax burden than the richest 0.1%. It’s past time billionaires paid their fair share, so we can invest in the public services that working people need — from child care to health care to food support. Congress must pass Senator Warren and Rep. Jayapal’s Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act now,” said Lee Saunders, President of AFSCME.

“Working Americans understand that in order to ensure a strong future for our communities, we must raise revenue to invest in critical infrastructure and other shared resources. Yet the ultra-rich continue to hoard wealth, skirting the tax code to avoid paying their fair share. Our union applauds Sen. Warren’s efforts to hold these freeloaders accountable so that they too contribute to our nation’s enduring success,” said Roxanne Brown, President of USW International.

“Our tax system is unjust. It is littered with loopholes that benefit the ultrawealthy, allowing them to game the system while working people pay higher rates than Wall Street’s billionaires and multi-millionaires. The Ultra-Millionaire Tax is a key policy needed to make the superrich pay their fair share of taxes and build an economy that works better for the rest of us,” Ericka Taylor, Co-executive Director of Americans for Financial Reform.

“To whom much is given, much is expected: That is not simply what many of us believe spiritually; it is the foundation of a progressive income and wealth tax code. Billionaires and ultra-millionaires have reaped the benefits of globalization and other economic trends that enabled their wealth to soar. The tax code should not insulate this windfall; it must be fairer,” said Randi Weingarten, President of AFT. “Unlike what the current administration has done to create more of a windfall, the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would level the playing field for working families and ask the 250,000 wealthiest households to finally begin paying their fair share. Working families deserve an economy that gives them a shot at a better life and a tax code that doesn’t bend over backward to reward wealth over work.”

“We have long treated care as a private burden rather than a public responsibility, shifting the burden onto families and expecting underpaid, undervalued workers to carry the weight. By asking the wealthiest households to finally pay their fair share, the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act is our opportunity to make meaningful investments in our care infrastructure and ensure that families across the country can afford childcare and have paid leave care workers earn family-sustaining wages, and older Americans age and disabled loved ones live with dignity. This legislation is a transformative step toward an economy that values dignity for the many, not just wealth for the few.” said Haeyoung Yoon, Vice President of Policy and Advocacy for the National Domestic Workers Alliance.

“The American public is rightly infuriated by the very wealthy being able to avoid paying their fair share in taxes, especially when everyday people are having such a hard time making ends meet as costs continue to rise,” said Susan Harley, managing director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would not only begin to rebalance the gross inequities in our tax code but it would also generate trillions of dollars in new revenues that can be reinvested in programs that make life more affordable for everyone.” 

“Across the country, American families are struggling while the ultrarich drive up costs, lay off workers, and hoard their wealth. This consolidation of wealth threatens our democracy and our economy. The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act from Senator Warren and Congresswoman Jayapal is more than just a tax proposal; it’s a vision for rebuilding our economy around the everyday people who power it, instead of the billionaires at the top,” said Emma Lydon, Managing Director of P Street.

“For far too long, the wealth of ultra-millionaires and billionaires has continued to rise while investment in basic services has stagnated or been cut altogether. Under Republicans and President Trump, Congress is spending trillions of dollars on tax cuts that only benefit the ultra wealthy while everyday Americans feel the pressure of an increasingly unaffordable cost of living,” said David Kass, Americans For Tax Fairness’s Executive Director. “The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act asks the wealthiest 0.15% of households to pay a 2% tax on wealth over $50 million—3% above $1 billion—generating $6.2 trillion over 10 years. This would help raise the revenue necessary to enact policies that would help lower costs for working families, including funding universal childcare, affordable housing, an expanded Child Tax Credit, Medicare at 55, paid family leave, and tuition-free community college. If we want an economy that works for all Americans and not just the wealthy few, we need legislation like this to rebalance the scales towards workers and families.”

“The United States is capable of sustaining the rich, stable and free economy and country the vast majority of Americans—regardless of political party—actually want. The only way to ensure we get there, though, is by building a tax system that puts a check on the extreme inequality that threatens our economy and our democracy,” said Morris Pearl, Chair of Patriotic Millionaires. “Millionaires like me want less inequality because we and our families will be better off in a society with less economic disparity. And it’s not because I’m good or altruistic. I am not any more altruistic than the next person, I’m just greedy for a different kind of country than some other rich people in America. I’m willing to pay more in taxes if it means helping us become the kind of country I know we can be. The Patriotic Millionaires are proud to support the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act, and we urge Congress to act quickly to make this law.”

Issues: