Congressman Moore applauds President Trump’s decision to Designate Nigeria a “Country of Particular Concern,” will lead effort to investigate rampant Christian persecution

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Riley Moore (WV-02)

Washington, D.C. – Congressman Riley M. Moore applauds President Donald Trump’s decision to redesignate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) due to the alarming and ongoing persecution of Christians across the country. President Trump also asked Congressman Moore, alongside House Committee on Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole, to lead an investigation into the slaughtering of Christians in Nigeria.

Earlier this month, Congressman Moore sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio urging the Trump Administration to take “immediate action to address the systematic persecution and slaughter of Christians in Nigeria,” highlighting the nation’s growing reputation as “the deadliest place in the world to be a Christian.”

More than 7,000 Christians have been killed in Nigeria in 2025 alone—an average of 35 per day—with hundreds more kidnapped, tortured, or displaced by extremist groups such as Boko Haram, ISIS West Africa, and the Fulani militants. Reports indicate that between 50,000 and 100,000 Christians have been killed and more than 19,000 Christian churches have been attacked or destroyed since 2009. Data from Open Doors indicate that more Christians are killed every year in Nigeria than the rest of the world combined. 

President Trump previously designated Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern in 2020, but President Biden removed the designation in 2021.

Congressman Moore issued the following statement:

“I want to sincerely thank President Trump for his incredible leadership and decisive action to designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern. Nigeria has become ground zero for Christian martyrdom and I am proud to have been leading the effort in Congress to defend our brothers and sisters in Christ who are being slaughtered since I was first sworn into Congress. Nigeria is, by far, the deadliest country in the world to be a Christian.

I have been calling for this designation since my first floor speech in April, where I highlighted the plight of Christians in Muslim majority countries. I then introduced H.Res. 594 in July to further draw attention to these atrocities against our brothers and sisters in Christ. 

More than 7,000 Christians have been martyred this year alone—an average of 35 every day. This designation is a critical first step in holding the Nigerian government accountable for engaging in and tolerating particularly severe violations of religious freedom, including doing nothing to stop mass killings targeting Christians and upholding its blasphemy laws that disproportionately target Christians.

I am grateful that the President has asked Chairman Tom Cole and me to work through the Appropriations Committee to ensure that Nigeria receives the international attention, pressure, and accountability it urgently needs.

This CPC designation sends a clear message: the United States will not turn a blind eye as Christians are slaughtered, and we stand ready to protect our brothers and sisters in Christ worldwide.”

For more on this issue, see Congressman Moore’s previous work on Nigeria:

·   The Congressman’s first ever floor speech, in which he highlighted the plight of Nigerian Christians;

·   The Congressman’s letter calling for Secretary Marco Rubio to designate Nigeria a Country of Particular Concern;

·   The Congressman’s interview with Laura Ingraham;

·   The Congressman’s interview with Maria Bartiromo;

·   The Congressman’s interview on Fox and Friends;

·   The Congressman’s interview with Stuart Varney;

·   The Congressman’s interview with Kayleigh McEnany;

·   The Congressman’s interview on RSBN;

·   The Congressman’s interview on Varney & Co;

·   The Congressman’s interview with Raymond Arroyo;

·   The Congressman’s interview with Mario Nawfal;

·   The Congressman’s interview on the LOOPcast;

·   The Congressman’s interview with Catholic Frequency;

·   The Congressman’s interview on TimCast

·   The Congressman’s tweet highlighting the killing of a Nigerian pastor and kidnapping of 20 Nigerian Christians

·   The Congressman’s tweet highlighting the Nigerian Army accusing a pastor of stoking division for warning of an impending attack that left a dozen Christians dead;

·   The Congressman’s twitter thread highlighting the state of persecution in Nigeria and announcing his letter calling for Nigeria to be designated as a Country of Particular Concern;

· The Congressman’s tweet highlighting the massacre of Nigerian Christians on Palm Sunday;

·The Congressman’s speech at CPAC’s Ending Christian Persecution Summit.

###

LEADER JEFFRIES STATEMENT ON DONALD TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS ILLEGALLY MAKING AMERICANS GO HUNGRY

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (8th District of New York)

Today, Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries released the following statement:

Donald Trump and his administration are deliberately breaking the law in order to keep food out of the mouths of 42 million Americans. Republicans are willing to starve children, seniors and veterans to pressure Congress into gutting the healthcare of the American people. Cruelty is the point for these extremists. 

I am grateful for the swift and decisive work of Democratic State Attorneys General, Governors and our partners in the legal community. Donald Trump and his Republican sycophants are now being held accountable for their depraved dereliction of duty. Earlier this year, Republicans enacted the largest cut to nutritional assistance in American history in their One Big Ugly Bill and are now using this illegal shutdown stunt to rip SNAP benefits from people who are legally entitled to them at the start of the month. 

The Trump administration needs to follow the law and fix this problem immediately by working closely with states to get nutritional assistance to the millions who rely on it as soon as possible. 

###

DESJARLAIS EXPRESSES CONCERN TO USDA & DHS OVER ILLEGAL MIGRANT SNAP BENEFIT USE

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Scott DesJarlais (4th District of Tennessee)

(WASHINGTON, DC) –Congressman Scott DesJarlais (R-TN-04) authored a letter to United States Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and United States Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem expressing concern over illegal migrants potentially using SNAP benefits. 

Rep. DesJarlais expressed his gratitude for the work President Trump, Secretary Rollins, and Secretary Noem have done so far to ensure those who are in the U.S. illegally are unable to take advantage of social programs. He highlighted his concern that progressive state leaders across the country may still be gaming the system due to a lack of reporting requirements. 

“I write to you today to express my concern that the United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is continuing to be utilized by illegal aliens, despite multiple Trump Administration directives, when we have American citizens who are in need. I strongly believe that without strict reporting requirements from states that manage their individual SNAP programs, corruption will occur from progressive governors and state leaders,” said DesJarlais in his letter. 

The Tennessee Congressman placed blame on former President Biden’s failed open border policies for the reason the current SNAP system is being utilized by illegal migrants.

He says in the letter, “President Biden stopped the enforcement of former President Trump’s Public Charge Rule in March of 2021, which denied migrants’ entrance into the U.S. if they possessed the potential to need government welfare assistance. This enticed even more migrants to flood our southern border. We are also aware that under the direction of Biden, many migrants were granted asylum or asylum-seeking status without proper investigation or adjudication into these claims.” 

Rep. DesJarlais requested answers to the following questions: 

Questions for the United States Department of Agriculture: 

  • How many Americans are currently enrolled in SNAP benefits?
  • How many non-American citizens are currently enrolled in SNAP benefits?
    • a) How many non-American citizens enrolled in SNAP benefits are minors? 
    • b) How many non-American citizens enrolled in SNAP benefits are claiming asylum-seeking status? 
    • c) How many non-American citizens began immediately receiving SNAP benefits based on the other nine exceptions listed above? 
  • Are there means of tracking the number of non-American citizens who immediately receive SNAP benefits upon arriving in the United States to ensure there is not widespread fraud and abuse? If no, is this something that can be mandated to states to receive funding for their SNAP programs?            
  • What is the annual cost to the SNAP benefits program for non-citizens who are seeking asylum? 

 
Questions for the United States Department of Homeland Security: 
 
•           How many migrants crossing the southern border are minors?  
•           What percentage of border crossers claim they are seeking asylum?
•           What is the total number of asylum seekers currently awaiting adjudication? 
•           What is the average wait time for adjudication for asylum seekers? 
•           What percentage of those seeking asylum are granted asylum? 

He ended the letter by saying he is grateful for the work the Trump Administration has done so far to remediate the devastating impact Biden’s open border policies have had on Americans. DesJarlais says he hopes to partner with Rollins and Noem to continue this work.  

###

 

Congressman DesJarlais’ full letter to Secretary Rollins and Secretary Noem can be found HERE. 

Rep. Mike Levin Honors Annalise Aitken as October 2025 Constituent of the Month

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Levin (CA-49)

October 31, 2025

Annalise Aitken

San Clemente, CA—Today, Rep. Mike Levin (CA-49) recognized Annalise Aitken, a 17-year-old San Clemente resident, student, and volunteer extraordinaire, as his October 2025 Constituent of the Month.

Over the past three years, Annalise has completed over 900 hours of volunteer work in our community. From delivering meals on wheels to our seniors to supporting a local youth shelter, Annalise has dedicated the time outside of her studies to incredible acts of service. She’s a member of the Laguna Chapter of the National Charity League, which encourages young women to serve their communities, and the President of her school’s choir group, Surf City Singers. Annalise has also played an essential role in organizing an annual Thanksgiving dinner for local Marines and their families for over ten years.

Rep. Levin recognized Annalise for her outstanding record of community service and commitment to making San Clemente a better place for all. She’s an inspiration for young students and her hard work reminds us that our community is stronger when we support one another.

See below for Rep. Levin’s statement recognizing Annalise Aitken in the Congressional Record:

“Mr. Speaker, I am proud to recognize Annalise Aitken as my October 2025 Constituent of the Month.

“Annalise is an example of what it looks like to dedicate ourselves to improving our communities. Serving over 900 hours in various volunteer roles is an extraordinary achievement worthy of recognition. Annalise is committed to serving our local community and working with individuals of all ages who need an extra hand. I’m proud to supporthe work of Annalise and so many others who serve our community. It’s an honor to recognize her success and service thus far.

“Annalise is a great role model and inspiration for San Clemente youth. Her volunteer efforts are a reminder to get involved and support our neighbors with empathy and compassion. I admire her devotion to service and am grateful we have young people like Annalise in our district who are devoted to serving our communities as the future of our great country.”

ABOUT THE CONSTITUENT OF THE MONTH PROGRAM:

Rep. Levin’s Constituent of the Month program recognizes outstanding North County San Diego and South Orange County residents who have gone above and beyond to help their neighbors, give back to their community, and represent the best of our country. Rep Levin’s September 2025 Constituent of the Month was Logan Bailey, an actor who recently starred in his first movie, and his August 2025 Constituent of the Month was Maya Snyder, a California State Parks lifeguard who has completed over 138 water rescues.

##

Rep. Titus Spearheads Effort to Prevent the Resumption of Nuclear Testing

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Dina Titus (1st District of Nevada)

Congresswoman Dina Titus (NV-01) today introduced the Renewing Efforts to Suspend Testing and Reinforce Arms Control Initiatives Now (RESTRAIN) Act to prohibit the United States from conducting explosive testing of nuclear weapons after President Trump announced this week that the Department of Defense would resume nuclear testing immediately. 

“Donald Trump has put his own ego and authoritarian ambitions above the health and safety of Nevadans,” said Congresswoman Titus. “His announcement to resume nuclear testing in the United States goes against the arms control and nonproliferation treaties that the U.S. has spearheaded since the end of the Cold War, and will trigger new tests by Russia and China, reigniting an international arms race. It also puts Nevadans back in the crosshairs of toxic radiation and environmental destruction. With just 97 days until the only arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia expires, now should be the time to negotiate further arms-control agreements, not create mushroom clouds in the Nevada desert.” 

The RESTRAIN Act amends U.S. Code to insert a prohibition of explosive nuclear testing while simultaneously preventing any funding from going toward the Trump Administration’s effort to conduct explosive nuclear tests. 

Under the Trump Administration, there has been an unprecedented overhaul of nuclear policy. Project 2025, the Trump Administration’s governing document, calls for the rejection of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. The Trump Administration also has not committed to renewing the NEW START Treaty — the last remaining arms control agreement between the United States and Russia that expires in three months. Meanwhile, the Secretary of Energy announced that he was furloughing much of the DOE direct hires at the National Nuclear Security Administration who work to safeguard our nuclear stockpile. 

“These developments set the stage for nuclear testing here at home and will give the green light to other nuclear powers to do the same,” Congresswoman Titus said.  “The result would put the country on a collision course of catastrophic proportions with Russia and China, undermine the entire arms control regime, allow the proliferation of these weapons to non-nuclear states, and put the health and safety of Nevadans once again in jeopardy.” 

As an expert on the history of nuclear weaponry and author of Bombs in the Backyard, Congresswoman Titus has been a fierce advocate for nuclear nonproliferation. In 2020, when the Trump Administration called for a resumption of nuclear testing in breach of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, Congresswoman Titus led the charge in the FY21 NDAA process to ensure that explosive nuclear testing could not be resurrected in the United States. She has also applauded state and local efforts to prevent testing, including a recently passed resolution in the state legislation urging the federal government to maintain the moratorium on the issue. Rep. Titus’s persistent challenge of nuclear weapons testing reflects the overwhelming opinion of Nevadans, according to Searchlight Research

“The resumption of explosive nuclear testing in the United States would be a costly waste that will only advantage China and Russia,” said Esther Im, Senior Peace and Security Policy Advisor at Foreign Policy for America. “Given our technical superiority, the United States has little to gain from restarting testing, but by breaking the 30-year testing taboo, we’d be opening the door for China and Russia to follow suit and begin to narrow the gap. Why would we spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to cede this advantage?”

“We applaud Rep. Titus for reinforcing what we all know to be true: the United States has no technical or strategic reason to conduct an explosive nuclear weapons test. At a time when the last remaining strategic arms control treaty between the United States and Russia will expire in less than 100 days, resumption of explosive nuclear weapons testing would be detrimental to U.S. national security and send us down a path towards a dangerous and costly nuclear arms race,” said former Congressman John Tierney, Executive Director of Council for a Livable World.

“There is no technical, national security, or political reason for the US to resume nuclear explosive testing.  If Russia, China, India, Pakistan resume nuclear testing because the US is ready to abandon the testing moratorium of the last 30 years, those countries will develop new types of warheads, and close down the scientific and technical advantage the US has always enjoyed in warhead design.  It would be a net detriment to US national security,” said Thomas Countryman, former acting Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security and former Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation. 

“Nuclear explosive testing is a dangerous vestige of the past. There is no technical or military reason to abandon the 33 year-long moratorium on U.S. nuclear testing. By foolishly announcing his intention to resume nuclear explosive testing of some kind simply for the purpose of sending signals to adversaries, Trump will trigger strong international opposition that could unleash a dangerous chain reaction of nuclear testing by U.S. adversaries, and blow apart the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty,” warns Daryl G. Kimball, director of the nonpartisan, nongovernmental Arms Control Association. “The U.S. Congress, at the behest of the American people, led the way in 1991-1992 to halt U.S. nuclear testing and it is critical the Congress rally behind Rep. Dina Titus and Nevadans to block any attempts to resume nuclear explosive testing by the federal government in Nevada, or by any other government anywhere in the world.”

“The President’s recent post is unclear about the nature of testing he’s calling for, but there is no good reason for the United States to resume explosive nuclear testing, and it would actually make everyone in the U.S. less safe. The U.S. has so much to lose and so little to gain from resuming testing. We applaud Rep. Titus for advancing this sensible legislation,” said Tara Drozdenko, Director of the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“Real security does not come from more nuclear explosions, but from preventing the use of nuclear weapons altogether. The U.S. should reaffirm its commitment to the nuclear testing moratorium and pursue diplomatic efforts that prioritize arms control,” said Allen Hester, Legislative Representative for Nuclear Disbarment and Pentagon Spending at the Friends Committee on National Legislation.

The RESTRAIN Act is endorsed by the Union of Concerned Scientists, Foreign Policy for America, Council for a Livable World, Arms Control Association, and Friends Committee on National Legislation.

Rep. Cline Introduces Bill to Safeguard Second Amendment Rights During Government Shutdowns

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Ben Cline (VA-06)

Today, Congressman Ben Cline (VA-06) introduced the Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act to guarantee that law-abiding Americans can continue to exercise their Second Amendment rights during a government shutdown. The bill requires federal agencies to continue processing firearm applications and licenses even when the government is closed. Senator Jim Risch (R-ID) introduced the companion measure in the U.S. Senate.                                                                                                                            

“Law-abiding Americans shouldn’t lose their Second Amendment rights every time Washington fails to do its job. The Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act ensures that government dysfunction doesn’t stand in the way of lawful firearm purchases or penalize small businesses that follow the law. I’m proud to introduce this commonsense bill alongside Senator Jim Risch to ensure citizens’ rights are protected and lawful commerce continues, shutdown or not,” said Rep. Ben Cline.

“The government shutdown has real impacts on real people, but it certainly should not compromise our constitutional rights. While Democrats pander to their far-Left base, federal agencies have stopped processing firearm applications, unjustly restricting law-abiding Idahoans’ Second Amendment rights,” said Senator Jim Risch. “My Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act ensures our right to lawfully bear arms is not infringed when there is a lapse in appropriations.”

The Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act is supported by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), National Rifle Association (NRA), Gun Owners of America (GOA), American Suppressor Association (ASA), and Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF).

“NSSF applauds Congressman Ben Cline for his leadership on the Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act to ensure the firearm industry can continue to fully serve law-abiding Americans during government shutdowns. Their Second Amendment rights, and the constitutionally protected firearm commerce that makes the exercise of those rights possible, must not be held hostage by Congress’s inability to keep the federal government open,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel.

“While the Trump Administration has made the processing of NFA items an essential function during a government shutdown, there is still no guarantee under federal law. The Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans must not be harmed due to a Democrat lead government shutdown in Washington,” said John Commerford, Executive Director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action. “NRA applauds Representative Cline and Senator Risch for introducing the Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act, which will ensure firearms related processes within the Federal government continue and are deemed essential, regardless of the situation in Washington.” 

“We applaud Congressman Cline and Senator Risch for standing up for millions of law-abiding gun owners and defending Second Amendment rights in the midst of the Democrat-led government shutdown,” said Knox Williams, President and Executive Director of the American Suppressor Association. “The Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act would codify in statute that, while the unconstitutional NFA registry remains in place, government shutdowns cannot be used to punish gunowners. For too long, lawful firearm and suppressor owners have faced unnecessary delays and uncertainty every time Washington fails to do its job. The American Suppressor Association helped lead the fight to get NFA inspectors back to work during the shutdown, and we stand firmly behind this critical legislation to protect and preserve Americans’ Second Amendment rights.” 

Congressman Ben Cline represents the Sixth Congressional District of Virginia. He previously was an attorney in private practice and served both as an assistant prosecutor and a Member of the Virginia House of Delegates. Cline and his wife, Elizabeth, live in Botetourt County with their two children.

Rep. Aguilar Highlights Impact of Republicans’ Harmful Health Care Policies on the Inland Empire

Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Pete Aguilar (31 CD Ca)

If Republicans don’t work with Democrats on an agreement to reopen the government and fix the health care crisis they created, health insurance premiums will skyrocket, making it harder for Californians to afford health care
Rep. Pete Aguilar (CA-33) held a press conference in San Bernardino with Executive Director of Covered California, Jessica Altman, to highlight how Donald Trump and Republicans’ cuts to health care and their refusal to extend the Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits will harm people in the Inland Empire. In California’s 33rd Congressional District, more than 25,000 people covered under the Affordable Care Act will see their premiums go up by an average of $2,160 every year. You can watch the full video of the press conference here.
“After already cutting Medicaid by almost $1 trillion and Medicare by $500 billion, Republicans are now planning to end the Affordable Care Act tax credits that help keep health care affordable for Inland Empire families,” said Rep. Pete Aguilar. “If Republicans allow these tax credits to expire, hardworking families in my district will see their health insurance premiums skyrocket. I’ve heard from residents about how they won’t be able to afford life-saving care—people with cancer who rely on this coverage to pay for their chemotherapy, caregivers who have to take care of their disabled family member full time and small business owners who won’t be able to afford any sort of health insurance. This is unacceptable. It’s time for Donald Trump and Republicans to come to the table and work with Democrats to find a bipartisan agreement that protects health care and reopens the government.”
“Covered California enrollees are hard-working Californians who simply do not have the privilege of working in a way that an employer is offering them health insurance and paying for a large portion of that coverage,” said Jessica Altman, Executive Director of Covered California. “Covered California’s enrollees are sole proprietors. They are agricultural workers and farmers. They are in the gig economy. They are truckers and hairdressers and bartenders, and they deserve access to affordable health care, just like everybody else in our state and in our country. These enhanced tax credits expire at the end of the year, but the decisions that real people have to make about their health care will happen starting on Saturday. It could not be more critical that Congress act and act as quickly as possible to give these households and these families the certainty they deserve and the health care they can afford.”

Trahan, McGovern, Dingell Introduce Legislation to Protect Patients from Healthcare Provider Abuse

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA-03)

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congresswoman Lori Trahan (MA-03) partnered with Representatives James P. McGovern (MA-02) and Debbie Dingell (MI-06) to introduce the Protect Patients from Healthcare Abuse Act, legislation that establishes clear, nationwide standards to protect patients during sensitive medical examinations and procedures. The bill follows outreach from survivors of physician sexual misconduct, including recent allegations involving Massachusetts doctor Derrick Todd.

“Patients should never have to fear abuse in the exam room,” said Congresswoman Trahan, a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee. “The women who came forward to expose the sexual abuse they suffered at the hands of their physician showed extraordinary courage and made it impossible to ignore how badly the system failed to protect them. This bill makes clear that abuse will not be excused, institutions will not be allowed to look the other way, and patients will finally have enforceable rights and real safeguards.”

“Our bill will close critical gaps in our healthcare systems that allowed physician abuse to occur,” said Congressman McGovern. “The Protect Patients from Healthcare Abuse Act strengthens the existing patchwork of state and hospital-specific chaperone policies by creating robust federal standards. Every person deserves to feel safe when they’re at the doctor’s office. I’m grateful to Rory McCarthy and all of the other survivors who have trusted us with their stories—their advocacy will help us ensure that no one suffers this kind of abuse again.”

“Patients deserve to feel safe when they see their doctor. Anything less is unacceptable,” said Congresswoman Dingell. “With this legislation, we hope to strengthen trust between patients and their providers, ensure patients better understand what’s appropriate during their medical examinations, and ultimately end this kind of abuse once and for all. We are putting forth this effort to honor the survivors who have bravely come forward to tell their stories, and know deeply what changes need to be made so that no more patients have to go through what happened to them.”

Earlier this month, new details emerged about the case of Dr. Derrick Todd, a Massachusetts-based rheumatologist. Despite multiple complaints over many years, Todd allegedly continued to perform unnecessary and invasive pelvic and breast exams on patients who came to him for unrelated conditions, often without proper informed consent or a chaperone present. More than 200 patients have now accused him of sexual misconduct, and lawsuits and state investigations indicate that institutional failures and poor oversight allowed the abuse to continue unchecked.

Despite existing reporting systems, recent cases like Todd and Oregon physician David Farley have exposed dangerous gaps in patient protections and highlighted the urgent need for clear national standards to prevent similar abuse in the future. Many patients are not clearly informed of their rights, and safeguards like chaperones are often inconsistently offered or not offered at all. The Protect Patients from Healthcare Abuse Act directly addresses these gaps by establishing federal requirements for informed consent and access to trained chaperones during sensitive procedures.

Specifically the bill will require all Medicare-participating providers to comply with the following standards:

Patient Rights Notification: Providers must give adult patients or their lawful surrogates written notice of their rights, including the right to be informed of their health status, to participate in planning their care, to provide informed consent before any service or procedure, and to request a trained chaperone during sensitive procedures.

Informed Consent Standards: The bill defines “informed consent” as the patient’s understanding of the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a service or procedure. Providers must ensure patients are fully informed before care is delivered.

Access to Trained Chaperones: Upon request, providers must make a trained chaperone available during any sensitive procedure.

Chaperone Training Requirements: Providers must train appropriate staff on how to protect patients’ rights leading up to and during sensitive procedures.

Clear Definition of “Sensitive Procedures”: A sensitive procedure includes any exam, surgery, or procedure involving the genitalia, breasts, perianal region, or rectum, as well as any procedure the patient considers sensitive.

A copy of the legislation introduced today can be accessed HERE.

The Protect Patients from Healthcare Abuse Act is supported by survivors of Dr. Derrick Todd, advocates, and independent organizations.

“This chaperone bill is long overdue and critical to protecting patients. Being a patient is one of the most vulnerable positions one can be in. We are told to believe the oath that each doctor takes to do no harm. This oath has been broken on a mass scale. I wish this piece of legislation had been put in place years ago. I believe it would have prevented me and many others from having to carry the burden and shame that comes with being labeled a victim and survivor. The likes of Larry Nasser and Derrick Todd will no longer be able to get away with sexually abusing patients. This bill closes a dangerous loophole that has been exploited by predators. America is a beacon of medical potential – this bill will allow that to continue by setting a new precedent for standards of care,” said Rory McCarthy, Advocate and Survivor.

“I am a survivor of Derrick Todd. The abuse I endured, along with over 250 other people, is something no person should ever have to go through. This bill is essential to ensuring the United States continues to provide some of the best healthcare in the world. If sexual abuse of this scale has been able to happen in various instances, with doctors such as Larry Nassar, Robert Hadden, and now Derrick Todd, legislators need to take action to prevent further abuse. This is common sense legislation, where people won’t have to choose between receiving high quality healthcare and their personal safety. There are systems in place to easily train chaperones, and some hospitals are already taking steps to implement policies. However, this is not enough with federal support. Please be a part of the solution in making sure this doesn’t happen again,” said Sophia Marsden, Advocate and Survivor.

“Having a chaperone present during sensitive medical examinations is a critical standard of care. Passing this bill will ensure protection and support for both patients and healthcare providers. As a nurse and a survivor of sexual abuse by a healthcare professional, I understand firsthand the importance of safety and trust in medical settings. I wholeheartedly believe this legislation can transform medical practice, creating an environment where patients feel secure and providers are safeguarded. This bill is about protecting people at their most vulnerable—and giving them the support they deserve,” said Bridget Skerry, Advocate and Survivor.

“If we don’t close this loophole, we’ll be choosing inaction in the face of known harm. The next victim shouldn’t depend on our hindsight,” said Karli Nee, Advocate and Survivor.

“This bill is a critical step toward protecting patients from medical abuse and rebuilding the trust that was stolen from so many of us. No one should ever feel abandoned, helpless, or silenced by the very people meant to care for them. As a survivor, I stand in full support of this bill so that what happened to me never happens to anyone else,” said Dylan Dusenberry, Advocate and Survivor.

“Requiring a medical chaperone for sensitive exams is a basic, common-sense protection—one that should have been there for me, and one that can prevent future harm. It also protects ethical providers and gives patients the peace of mind they deserve. No one should have to go through what I did. No one should have to choose between their health and their sense of safety. By passing this legislation, you can help create a system where that choice is no longer necessary. Please vote in favor of this bill—for the countless voices that were never heard, and for those who are still afraid to speak,” said Jane Doe, Advocate and survivor.

“The doctor’s office is a place for care and healing, not exploitation and abuse. This bill, if passed, would affirm this principle. The US hosts some of the best medical institutions in the entire world, and this legislation would raise the caliber of our standards. No patient should be exposed to the possibility of abuse while they’re already in pain and seeking help. As a survivor of sexual abuse and decades long victim advocate, I strongly support this legislation,” said Kate Burgess, Advocate.

“Everyone deserves to feel safe and respected when seeking medical care. This bill moves us closer to making hospitals actually feel like places of healing, places free from abuse and fear. We are so grateful to the survivors who have courageously shared their stories and are leading this advocacy so that every patient can receive care with dignity and trust,” said Nithya Badrinath, Policy Director at Jane Doe Inc., the Massachusetts Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence.

“Having heard accounts from hundreds of patients regarding sexual abuse under the guise of performing sensitive exams, it is clear that a chaperone policy would have made a difference in preventing the abuse from occurring in many instances. This is a monumental moment to learn from the inexcusable abuse of patients which has already occurred, and take immediate action to help protect patients in the future,” said William J. Thompson, Attorney at Lubin & Meyer.

“As a distinguished professor in the history of medicine at Purdue University, and the author of four books on the history of women’s reproductive health, most recently Exposed: The Hidden History of the Pelvic Exam, I fully support the Protect Patients from Health Care Abuse Act. Unfortunately, the United States has a long history of silencing and dismissing a patient’s perspective and experience when it comes to sensitive medical exams, particularly on women. Such procedures have the potential to blur the boundaries between what is a standard medical procedure and what is a sexually exploitative act. This leads to two problems – first, documented examples of abuse, and second, a reluctance on the part of many patients to seek medical treatment in the first place. This Act represents an essential step towards resolving these problems,” said Wendy Kline, Ph.D., Dema G. Seelye Chair in the History of Medicine at Purdue University.

“I am writing in strong support of the proposed Protect Patients from Healthcare Abuse Act. This legislation represents an essential upstream solution to the prevention of medical sexual abuse and its devastating lifelong consequences. The trauma that results from sexual abuse by a medical authority is profound and enduring. Post Traumatic Stress symptomology following such violations is neither minimal nor transient. It often shapes the victim’s ability to trust, seek care, or feel safe within the healthcare system for years to come. These experiences dismantle not only personal safety but also public confidence in medical institutions. By passing this bill, we take a critical step toward rebuilding trust in the healthcare system. It affirms that both women and men deserve safety, dignity, and protection during sensitive medical examinations. This is not only a matter of ethics but of public health, healing, and justice,” said Cheralyn Leeby, PhD, Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist, University of North Florida Adjunct Professor.

###

Health Care, Grocery Costs Skyrocketing Because of Republican Shutdown

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (1st District of Washington)

Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (WA-01) released the following statement on the latest impacts of the Republican shutdown. 

“As I travel the state and the country, the number one issue I hear from folks about is affordability. Yet, beginning tomorrow, families in Washington will be hit with a double whammy. Open enrollment begins for health care coverage through Washington Healthplanfinder, and shoppers will see an average premium increase of 65% next year because Republicans refuse to extend the enhanced ACA tax credits. Meanwhile, President Trump is withholding money from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), meaning that the 900,000 families in Washington that rely on the program could go hungry.

“This pain is a conscious decision made by President Trump and Republicans in Congress. It is time to stop playing games and work to find a bipartisan solution with Democrats. We can reopen the government, make health care more affordable, and prevent families from going hungry.”

Background

  • 80,000 Washingtonians are expected to lose health coverage if ACA tax credits are not extended, making premiums unaffordable.
  • Basic Food, Washington’s SNAP program, covers 900,000 Washingtonians, including 300,000 children.
  • The Trump administration has a contingency fund of $6 billion approved by Congress to fund SNAP in moments like this.

LEADER JEFFRIES: “THERE’S ABSOLUTELY NO JUSTIFICATION FOR DONALD TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS TO WITHHOLD SNAP”

Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (8th District of New York)

Today, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries appeared on MSNBC’s The Briefing with Jen Psaki, where he emphasized that Republicans need to negotiate a bipartisan spending agreement that reopens the government and protects Americans’ healthcare.

JEN PSAKI: Let me start by, I just kind of tried to outline what the impact would be if SNAP benefits are cut off. And we certainly look like we’re heading for that. We’ll see what the judge rules, of course, tonight. I want to start by asking you about the human impact. I showed some video of a long line at a food bank out in Arizona, in Phoenix, Arizona. There are lines like that all across the country. I know you’re hearing from Members or paying attention to districts. What—help people understand what the human impact is right now, what you’re anticipating.

LEADER JEFFRIES: Yeah, it’s extraordinary that Donald Trump and Republicans are threatening to cut off SNAP benefits to 42 million Americans, including 16 million children, 8 million seniors and over a million veterans. And every single one of those individuals represents a real-life impact, people who would otherwise struggle to put food on the table in the absence of these SNAP benefits. And there’s absolutely no justification for Donald Trump and the Republicans to withhold SNAP. They have more than $5 billion in an emergency fund that will allow these benefits to continue through the end of November. They can also find funds for other things just as they’ve repeatedly done, but they can’t do it for SNAP, so that’s extraordinary. It shows where their priorities are. And Mike Johnson actually said the quiet part out loud earlier today when he indicated that we’re willing to starve, meaning Republicans, Republicans are willing to starve children and seniors and women and veterans and American families in order to put pressure on Democrats to continue Republican efforts to gut healthcare of everyday Americans. We’re not going to do it.

JEN PSAKI: We just played that clip, and it’s exactly as you said. He’s basically saying we’re using it as a bargaining chip. We’re using people who will not have enough food next week, potentially, as a bargaining chip. One of the things that struck me is that hunger has never been a partisan issue. I mean, this program has never been shut down before, since it was started in 1939. And now you have the Trump administration making a legal argument that they cannot use funding from other funds, which they can. There’s also $23 billion they could use that they use for WIC, right? That they’re making a legal argument, which feels to me almost kind of immoral. But how do you—how are you digesting that, the legal argument they’re making, given the human impact here?

LEADER JEFFRIES: Well, it’s incredible that they would suggest that there are legal obstacles to doing anything when the Trump administration has been completely and totally out of control. But when it comes to actually meeting the needs of the American people, who might otherwise go hungry, the Trump administration all of a sudden believes that they don’t have the authority to do something that Congress has clearly given them the authority to do. But these are extremists who are willing to actually starve their own folks. One of the five states that would be most impacted if SNAP benefits are cut off is Louisiana, the home state of both Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Leader Steve Scalise, but they could care less. After all, these are individuals who led the effort to pass the One Big Ugly Bill that enacted the largest cut to Medicaid in American history, which is part of the reason why we have this healthcare crisis. But in that bill, they also cut $186 billion from SNAP, the largest cut to nutritional assistance in American history, which is one of the reasons why this hunger issue is not going away. And we’re going to have to grapple with it as part of reversing these Republican policies that are doing great damage to everyday Americans.

JEN PSAKI: We’re waiting for this judge’s ruling, and she seemed to indicate that she thinks their argument is absurd. Do you have a good understanding, if she rules that they have to move forward with it, what the implementation of that could look like? Could that be implemented before November 1, or it wouldn’t be that quick?

LEADER JEFFRIES: Yeah, it absolutely should be implemented by November 1 because the money is available, and it’s just a question of the administration doing what the law requires it to do. In other words, the extraordinary action is Donald Trump and Republicans stopping the benefits from flowing to millions of people all across the country. And so we look forward to the judge’s ruling. She’s correct. The arguments being articulated by the Trump administration are absolutely absurd. But that’s been the case from the very beginning. They cannot defend their position. They cannot defend their refusal to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits, which is going to result in tens of millions of people experiencing dramatically increased healthcare premiums. The Republicans are now claiming, well, that’s actually not the case. But as you pointed out, Jen, the reality is people from across the country are getting notices right now indicating that their premiums may go up by $1,000 or $2,000 per month. These are working-class individuals. They cannot afford these increases. That’s why Democrats are fighting on their behalf.

JEN PSAKI: I wanted to play—I don’t know if you’ve seen this. You probably did. I know you pay attention. But I wanted to play one more thing Mike Johnson said today, because I would just remind people, I mean, he has been on TV a fair amount, but he has not brought his caucus back. You’ve had a brief conversation with him, but you haven’t had negotiations with him. Normally, the Speaker of the House is working around the clock, but let me play this. We’ll talk about it on the other side.

RECORDING OF SPEAKER JOHNSON: People keep commenting to me, you look so tired on TV. I am so tired because we’re not sleeping a lot. We’re working overtime.

JEN PSAKI: I want to know what he’s working on exactly. I understand he’s been on TV. He has not answered questions on a lot of news issues. But what is making him so tired?

LEADER JEFFRIES: That’s a great question. Republicans have actually been on vacation for five consecutive weeks. Mike Johnson and Republicans have canceled votes week after week after week after week after week. They clearly aren’t doing anything. There are no hearings. No legislation is being voted on. Nothing is being debated. And all we see is this parade, this malignant clown show that they keep rolling out day after day, when Mike Johnson and Republicans are appearing before cameras, lying repeatedly to the American people.

JEN PSAKI: Trump is now back from his trip to Asia, claiming victory. Who knows why. But he’s now back. It seems that Mike Johnson and John Thune are not going to do anything unless Trump tells them to do something. Do you think any negotiations can start unless he’s in the room? Does he need to be in the room for them? Or how does this happen from here?

LEADER JEFFRIES: Well, Donald Trump either needs to be in the room or he just needs to give Mike Johnson and John Thune the green light to actually sit down and do their jobs. But until they get, you know, a yes from the puppet master that they can sit and have a conversation with Democrats, unfortunately, nothing is happening. And that’s why Leader Schumer and myself have maintained from the very beginning that Donald Trump needs to get engaged and focus on solving problems for the American people, as opposed to trying to enrich himself, destroying the White House and somehow finding $40 billion to reward his billionaire buddies on Wall Street and bail out this right-wing wannabe dictator in Argentina, but can’t find a dime to make healthcare affordable for the America people or ensure that folks don’t go hungry.

JEN PSAKI: Would you—and we saw what happened last time, and would you and Leader Schumer go back to the White House if he invited you back there to negotiate?

LEADER JEFFRIES: Yeah, I think Leader Schumer and I have to have that conversation, but we’ve said repeatedly we’re willing to sit down with anyone, anytime, anyplace, because we want to reopen the government. We want to enact a bipartisan spending agreement. But it actually has to be an agreement that makes life better for the American people. And we need to decisively address the Republican healthcare crisis. And clearly, the only way for that to happen will be for us to engage with Donald Trump and his administration, because at this point, Senate Republicans and House Republicans are useless.

JEN PSAKI: There was a report today—I mentioned this, too—about polling that was presented in the caucus meeting today. Trump seems like somebody—he’s a lot of things, but somebody who responds to political polling. Do you think that is what this is gonna take for him, to kind of move him? And what do he wish you would know about how the public is digesting this from just even a political standpoint?

LEADER JEFFRIES: Well, you know, Abraham Lincoln once famously said, ‘Public sentiment is everything. With it, nothing can fail. Without it, nothing can succeed.’ And so, public sentiment clearly recognizes that Donald Trump and Republicans are responsible for shutting the government down, refuse to open it back up because they are unwilling to make healthcare affordable for millions of Americans. And now they are threatening to visit hunger on millions more, including children, in rural America, urban America, small town America, the heartland of America and Black and brown communities throughout America. At some point, I think it’s going to become clear. Maybe they’ll wake up on Tuesday when the voters send a message that they don’t like the direction that things are going under complete Republican control of government in America, and that they need to either get with the program or they will be thrown out of office.

JEN PSAKI: Johnson has now set another record for refusing to swear in a Member of Congress. It’s now been 37 days. I’m sure you’re counting and well aware.

LEADER JEFFRIES: Yeah.

JEN PSAKI: How have you thought about the precedent this could set and what kind of trouble he could cause around the midterms or any other special elections?

LEADER JEFFRIES: Yeah, it’s a terrible precedent in this instance, because now I think it’s been five weeks or so that Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva has not been sworn in. It’s clear that Johnson doesn’t want to bring Republicans back because they’ll be at each other’s throats. They have no plan. Marjorie Taylor Greene has asked Johnson, where’s the healthcare plan? Clearly, it’s nowhere to be found. These are extremists who have voted more than 70 times to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and now they’re under pressure to renew the Affordable Care Act tax credits, but they’re unwilling to do so because they are extremists. And of course, Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva would represent the 218th signature on a petition that will force an up-or-down vote on the Epstein files. And Mike Johnson is doing his boss’s bidding, Donald Trump, who clearly wants no part of the American people to see the Epstein files released. And so, we’re going to continue to put the pressure on House Republicans every single day until Representative-elect Grijalva is sworn in as a duly elected Member of Congress, as should have been the case weeks ago. And we’re going to continue to keep the pressure on the Republicans to make sure they actually are serving the American people, and in this instance, that’s going to require lowering the high cost of living, partner with us to do that, and fix our broken healthcare system to address—and by addressing the Republican healthcare crisis.

JEN PSAKI: Sounds like very reasonable things that the majority of the public would like their elected officials to do. Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, thank you so much for joining us.

LEADER JEFFRIES: Thank you.

JEN PSAKI: Hope you get back safely tomorrow.

LEADER JEFFRIES: Thank you.

Full interview can be watched here.

###